1. Tsutsui S, Ashizawa K, Minami K, Tagawa T, Nagayasu T, Hayashi T, et al. Multiple focal pure ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT images: Clinical significance in patients with lung cancer. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2010;195:W131-8. doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3828.
2. Miller A, Markowitz S, Manowitz A, Miller JA. Lung cancer screening using low-dose high-resolution CT scanning in a high-risk workforce: 3500 nuclear fuel workers in three US states. Chest. 2004;125:152s-3s.
3. Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology. 2009;253:606-22. doi:10.1148/radiol.2533090179.
4. Jiang L, Situ D, Lin Y, Su X, Zheng Y, Zhang Y, et al. Clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of malignancy in patients with pulmonary focal Ground-glass Opacity. Thoracic cancer. 2013;4:380-4. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12032.
5. Chan EY, Gaur P, Ge Y, Kopas L, Santacruz JF, Gupta N, et al. Management of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2017;141:927-31. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0307-RA.
6. Edey AJ, Hansell DM. Incidentally detected small pulmonary nodules on CT. Clinical radiology. 2009;64:872-84. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.03.006.
7. Truong MT, Ko JP, Rossi SE, Rossi I, Viswanathan C, Bruzzi JF, et al. Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2014;34:1658-79. doi:10.1148/rg.346130092.
8. Nasim F, Ost DE. Management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. 2019;25:344-53. doi:10.1097/mcp.0000000000000586.
9. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017;284:228-43. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659.
10. Dai J, Yu G, Yu J. Can CT imaging features of ground-glass opacity predict invasiveness? A meta-analysis. Thoracic cancer. 2018;9:452-8. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12604.
11. Yang W, Sun Y, Fang W, Qian F, Ye J, Chen Q, et al. High-resolution Computed Tomography Features Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions Manifesting as Persistent Solitary Subsolid Nodules. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19:e75-e83. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.023.
12. Bianconi F, Palumbo I, Spanu A, Nuvoli S, Fravolini ML, Palumbo B. PET/CT Radiomics in Lung Cancer: An Overview. Applied Sciences. 2020;10:1718.
13. Kaseda K. Recent and Current Advances in FDG-PET Imaging within the Field of Clinical Oncology in NSCLC: A Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;10. doi:10.3390/diagnostics10080561.
14. Vallières M, Zwanenburg A, Badic B, Cheze Le Rest C, Visvikis D, Hatt M. Responsible Radiomics Research for Faster Clinical Translation. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2018;59:189-93. doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.200501.
15. Wilson R, Devaraj A. Radiomics of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer. Translational lung cancer research. 2017;6:86-91. doi:10.21037/tlcr.2017.01.04.
16. Cook GJR, Goh V. A Role for FDG PET Radiomics in Personalized Medicine? Seminars in nuclear medicine. 2020;50:532-40. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.05.002.
17. Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, Häggström I, Szczypiński P, Gibbs P, et al. Introduction to Radiomics. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2020;61:488-95. doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.222893.
18. Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Antonorsi N, Tixier F, Tankyevych O, Jaouen V, et al. Radiomics in PET/CT: Current Status and Future AI-Based Evolutions. Seminars in nuclear medicine: Elsevier; 2020.
19. Palumbo B, Bianconi F. Value of Shape and Texture Features from (18)F-FDG PET/CT to Discriminate between Benign and Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: An Experimental Evaluation. 2020;10. doi:10.3390/diagnostics10090696.
20. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436-44. doi:10.1038/nature14539.
21. Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K. Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights into imaging. 2018;9:611-29. doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9.
22. Fazal MI, Patel ME, Tye J, Gupta Y. The past, present and future role of artificial intelligence in imaging. European journal of radiology. 2018;105:246-50. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.020.
23. Suzuki K. Overview of deep learning in medical imaging. Radiological physics and technology. 2017;10:257-73. doi:10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5.
24. Sollini M, Antunovic L. Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics. 2019;46:2656-72. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04372-x.
25. Tau N, Stundzia A, Yasufuku K, Hussey D, Metser U. Convolutional Neural Networks in Predicting Nodal and Distant Metastatic Potential of Newly Diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on FDG PET Images. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2020;215:192-7. doi:10.2214/ajr.19.22346.
26. Sibille L, Seifert R. (18)F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Classification in Lymphoma and Lung Cancer by Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. 2020;294:445-52. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019191114.
27. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S. Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv preprint arXiv:161207003. 2016.
28. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2015;42:328-54.
29. Beichel RR, Van Tol M, Ulrich EJ, Bauer C, Chang T, Plichta KA, et al. Semiautomated segmentation of head and neck cancers in 18F-FDG PET scans: A just-enough-interaction approach. Medical physics. 2016;43:2948-64. doi:10.1118/1.4948679.
30. Uzunova H, Wilms M, Handels H, Ehrhardt J. Training CNNs for image registration from few samples with model-based data augmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: Springer; 2017. p. 223-31.
31. Perez L, Wang J. The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:171204621. 2017.
32. Zhou B, Khosla A, Lapedriza A, Oliva A, Torralba A. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2016. p. 2921-9.
33. Ling CX, Huang J, Zhang H. AUC: a better measure than accuracy in comparing learning algorithms. Conference of the canadian society for computational studies of intelligence: Springer; 2003. p. 329-41.
34. Patino CM, Ferreira JC. Propensity scores: a tool to help quantify treatment effects in observational studies. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. 2017;43:86. doi:10.1590/s1806-37562017000000099.
35. Baldwin DR. Management of pulmonary nodules according to the 2015 British Thoracic Society guidelines. Key messages for clinical practice. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016;126:262-74. doi:10.20452/pamw.3379.
36. Wu G, Woodruff HC. Diagnosis of Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Chest CT Radiomic Features of Part-Solid Pulmonary Nodules: A Multicenter Study. 2020;297:451-8. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192431.
37. Gong J, Liu J, Hao W, Nie S, Wang S, Peng W. Computer-aided diagnosis of ground-glass opacity pulmonary nodules using radiomic features analysis. Physics in medicine and biology. 2019;64:135015. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab2757.
38. Hubner KF, Buonocore E, Singh SK, Gould HR, Cotten DW. Characterization of chest masses by FDG positron emission tomography. Clinical nuclear medicine. 1995;20:293-8. doi:10.1097/00003072-199504000-00001.
39. Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K. Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2004;45:19-27. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.009.
40. Taralli S, Scolozzi V, Foti M, Ricciardi S, Forcione AR, Cardillo G, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT diagnostic performance in solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules detected in patients with previous cancer history: reports of 182 nodules. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2019;46:429-36. doi:10.1007/s00259-018-4226-6.
41. Miwa K, Inubushi M, Wagatsuma K, Nagao M, Murata T, Koyama M, et al. FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. European journal of radiology. 2014;83:715-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.020.
42. Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Lowe VJ. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2006;187:1361-7. doi:10.2214/ajr.05.1166.
43. Vicente AMG, Pérez-García VM, Castrejón ÁS. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules: can we do better? Journal of thoracic disease. 2015;7:E215.
44. Schillaci O, Calabria FF. Comments on characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules with 18F-FDG PET/CT relative activity distribution analysis. Journal of thoracic disease. 2015;7:1708-12. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.61.