Baseline characteristics between two groups
Between January, 2015 and July, 2017, 514 AECOPD cases were collected in the two hospitals. After excluding those without the records of acute CVEs in hospitalization, we included 496 cases into analysis. (Figure 1) A total of 30 cases (6.05%) had concomitant acute CVEs (ACS, n=2; arrhythmia, n=19; LVD, n=13), and 4 cases died in hospital. At the timepoint of 1 month after discharge, 11 patients were lost to follow up.
As the Table 1 showed, acute CVEs group was older than non-CVEs group (P=0.027). Interestingly, females were more susceptible to acute CVEs in the AECOPD period (P=0.037, OR=2.35, 95% CI=1.03-5.33). As for severity of COPD, two group did not significantly differ in the spirometric grade, symptom scores and numbers of previous 1-year AE.
Other coexisted respiratory diseases were not associated with acute CVEs. Whereas, prior cardiovascular diseases were strong predictors of acute CVEs in AECOPD, such as coronary heart disease (P=0.016, OR=2.82, 95% CI=1.18-6.75) and left heart insufficiency (P<0.001, OR=6.42, 95% CI=2.50-16.48). When defined as total cholesterol >5.2mmol/l, hyperlipidemia was not associated with increased risk of acute CVEs. Regular usage of inhaled agents for treating COPD in the stable period was a protective factor, especially for the combination of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta agonist (LABA) (P=0.027, OR=0.34, 95% CI=0.12-0.92).
Acute CVEs were associated with poor outcomes in AECOPD patients
In comparison with non-CVEs group, increased death risk in hospital was observed in the acute CVEs group, with the constituent ratio of 13.3% versus 2.6% (P=0.001, OR=5.81, 95% CI=1.75-19.26). (Table 2) Moreover, patients with acute CVEs had longer hospital stay and much more frequent re-exacerbation of COPD within 3 months.
Risk factors of acute CVEs identified by the univariate analysis
As Table 3 showed, common respiratory symptoms were not indicators of acute CVEs, such as cough, expectoration, hemoptysis, shortness of breath and chest pain. Fever, chill and cyanosis were also not related to acute CVEs. Abnormal escalation of heart rate and new or worsening edema of both lower limbs indicated the subsequent cardiac deterioration.
Elevated neutrophils and C-reactive protein, suggesting aggravated inflammation, had a weak association with acute CVEs. Procalcitonin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were excluded for analysis, because they were not routinely tested for patients with AECOPD. Indices of myocardial damage and heart failure, like lactic dehydrogenase and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), significantly up-regulated in the acute CVEs group. As a promising variable in COPD management, either absolute counts or binary classification (150/µl) of eosinophils had no statistical association with acute CVEs. Additionally, patients in the acute CVEs groups had more complications in the AE period, including pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism and electrolyte disturbance. Whereas, pneumonia and respiratory failure were not associated with acute CVEs.
As Figure 2 showed, usage of inhaled beta receptor agonists and muscarinic agonists in the AE period did not promote the occurrence of acute CVEs but had slightly protective effects. Interestingly, commercial inhaled glucocorticoid had a tendency of preventing acute CVEs (P=0.066, OR=0.49, 95% CI=0.22-1.02), compared with aerosol inhalation of venous agents (P=0.22). Among 496 cases, 490 cases received antibiotics, of which nearly 1/5 received combined antibiotic therapy. Although fluoroquinolone was a cardiovascular risk factor of QTc prolongation in the previous study, [15] it was not statistically associated with acute CVEs in our cohort. In addition, only 3 cases had macrolides and 6 cases had anti-fungal agents, so they were not included into statistical analysis.
Preventive anticoagulation and nutrition support were predictors of acute CVEs, which might be attributed to poor baseline status of patients. (Figure 2) Nine of 23 patients using digitalis had acute CVEs in the AE period, with 3 treated for LVD and another 6 for controlling ventricular rate.
Increased heart rate, electrolyte disturbance and use of diuretics were independent risk factors
After removing 90 cases with missing data, 406 cases (20 CVEs and 386 non-CVEs) were included into the multivariate analysis. In Table 4, a total of eight variables with P <0.001 in the univariate analysis were included into the binary logistic regression equation. Previous LVD, 20% increase in heart rate (HR), electrolyte disturbance and diuretics use were independent predictors of acute CVEs in the AE period. In addition, approximately 1/3 of the patients receiving diuretics had electrolyte disturbance at admission.