The analyses were based on 1272 participants who met the inclusion criteria from a total of 2245 participants. During 7-year follow-up, 45 (3.5%) newly patients reported experienced CHD. The prevalence of slow walking was likely to be higher in the CHD group. The prevalence of coronary heart disease was more likely to be higher in men with the 70-year-old group (Table 1). The characteristics of the participants according to the status of walking speed and grip strength at the baseline are presented in Table 2 for all participants and Additional file 1 Table S1 for sex stratifications. The highest prevalence of slow walking speed and weak grip strength was in the 80-year-old group in all participants and both sexes. Individuals with slow walking speed were more likely to be HT, weak grip strength, lower serum albumin, and higher IMT on considering all participants and sex stratifications. Individuals with weak grip strength were more likely to be those who had slow walking speed, lower serum albumin, lower TCHO, lower BMI, and higher IMT on considering all participants and sex stratifications. The prevalence of physical function status stratified by age and sex are presented in Additional file 2 figure S1. Those with weak grip strength were more likely to be women in the 70 and 80-year-old groups. Whereas, those with a slow walking speed were more likely to be women in the 70-year-old group.
Table1. Individual characteristics at the baseline according to CHD over 7-year follow-up (N=1272)
Characteristics
|
CHD onset over 7-year follow-up
|
Without CHD
|
With CHD
|
Sex
|
Men
|
553 (45.1)
|
25 (55.6)
|
Women
|
674 (54.9)
|
20 (44.4)
|
Age group
|
70 y.
|
560 (45.6)
|
19 (42.2)
|
80 y.
|
586 (47.8)
|
23 (51.1)
|
90 y.
|
81 (6.6)
|
3 (6.7)
|
DM yes, (%)
|
|
193 (15.7)
|
8(17.8)
|
HT yes, (%)
|
|
883 (72)
|
36 (80)
|
DLP yes, (%)
|
|
729 (59.4)
|
31 (68.9)
|
Ever-smoker
|
|
443 (36.1)
|
18 (40.0)
|
BMI (kg/m2), M (SD)
|
|
22.6 (3.2)
|
22.9 (3.5)
|
Slow walking, n (%)
|
|
767 (62.5)
|
36 (80) *
|
Weak grip strength, n (%)
|
|
506 (41.2)
|
20 (44.4)
|
70 y.
|
Men
|
244 (43.6)
|
14 (73.7) **
|
Women
|
316 (56.4)
|
5 (26.3)
|
80 y.
|
Men
|
274 (46.8)
|
11 (47.8)
|
Women
|
312 (53.2)
|
12 (52.2)
|
90 y.
|
Men
|
35 (43.2)
|
0 (0)
|
Women
|
46 (56.8)
|
3 (100)
|
Years of follow-up
|
3
|
357 (29.1)
|
21 (46.7)
|
4
|
24 (2)
|
0 (0)
|
6
|
757 (61.7)
|
24 (53.3)
|
7
|
89 (7.3)
|
0 (0)
|
CHD indicates coronary heart disease; DM, Diabetes mellitus; HT, Hypertension; DLP, Dyslipidemia, BMI, Body mass index; SD, Standard deviation. * significant with p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01 on chi-square analysis, †See text on physical function of methods for details on how the status was defined.
Table 2. The characteristics of all participants according to physical function status (N=1272)
Characteristics
|
Walking speed status
|
Grip strength status
|
Normal
|
Slow
|
p
|
Normal
|
Weak
|
p
|
Women, n (%)
|
265 (56.5)
|
429 (53.4)
|
0.287
|
340 (45.6)
|
354 (67.3)
|
<0.001
|
Age group, n (%), 70 y.
|
267 (56.9)
|
312 (38.9)
|
|
421 (56.4)
|
158 (30.0)
|
|
80 y.
|
196 (41.8)
|
413 (51.4)
|
<0.001
|
305 (40.9)
|
304 (57.8)
|
<0.001
|
90 y.
|
6 (1.3)
|
78 (9.7)
|
|
20 (2.7)
|
64 (12.2)
|
|
DM yes, (%)
|
67 (14.3)
|
134 (16.7)
|
0.257
|
108 (14.5)
|
93 (17.7)
|
0.123
|
HT yes, (%)
|
304 (64.8)
|
615 (76.6)
|
<0.001
|
533 (71.4)
|
386 (73.4)
|
0.448
|
DLP yes, (%)
|
290 (61.8)
|
470 (58.5)
|
0.246
|
458 (61.4)
|
302 (57.4)
|
0.154
|
Smoking status, Never, (yes), n (%)
|
314 (67)
|
497 (61.9)
|
0.070
|
431 (57.8)
|
380 (72.2)
|
<0.001
|
Ever, (yes), n (%)
|
155 (33.0)
|
306 (38.1)
|
|
315 (42.2)
|
146 (27.8)
|
|
Slow walking speed*, yes, (%)
|
|
|
|
429 (57.5)
|
374 (71.1)
|
<0.001
|
Weak grip strength*, yes, (%)
|
152 (32.4)
|
374 (46.6)
|
<0.001
|
|
|
|
SBP, mmHg, M (SD)
|
144 (48.7)
|
146 (28.7)
|
0.668
|
146 (43.4)
|
145 (26.4)
|
0.715
|
DBP, mmHg, M (SD)
|
83 (49.0)
|
79 (25.5)
|
0.133
|
82 (42.9)
|
78 (22.7)
|
0.031
|
LDL-C (mg/dL), M (SD)
|
122.4 (29.4)
|
119.8 (29.1)
|
0.131
|
121.9 (29.4)
|
119.2 (28.9)
|
0.103
|
HDL-C (mg/dL), M (SD)
|
62.0 (16.7)
|
59.6 (15.1)
|
0.011
|
60.4 (15.9)
|
60.7 (15.4)
|
0.687
|
TCHO (mg/dL), M (SD)
|
211.9 (34.7)
|
205.8 (34.1)
|
0.002
|
209.8 (34.0)
|
205.5 (34.9)
|
0.030
|
Albumin (g/dL), M (SD)
|
4.41 (0.27)
|
4.33 (0.27)
|
<0.001
|
4.39 (0.26)
|
4.32 (0.29)
|
<0.001
|
HbA1c (mg/dl), M (SD)
|
5.5 (0.6)
|
5.6 (0.7)
|
0.253
|
5.5 (0.6)
|
5.6 (0.6)
|
0.102
|
BMI (kg/m2), M (SD)
|
22.3 (2.8)
|
22.7 (3.1)
|
0.069
|
22.9 (2.9)
|
22.1 (3.0)
|
<0.001
|
Mean IMT (mm), M (SD)
|
0.81 (0.17)
|
0.85 (0.16)
|
<0.001
|
0.80 (0.16)
|
0.85 (0.18)
|
<0.001
|
*See text on physical function of methods for details on how the status was defined.
DM indicates Diabetes mellitus; HT, Hypertension; DLP, Dyslipidemia; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TCHO, Total cholesterol; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; BMI, Body mass index; Mean IMT, Mean Intima-media thickness; p, p-value; M, Mean; SD, Standard deviation.
The association and hazard ratios between walking speed, grip strength, and CHD are presented in Table 3. In all participants, a slow walking speed at the baseline was significantly correlated with CHD after all confounder adjustment (HR=2.53, 95%CI, 1.20-5.33, p=0.015). Grip strength was not significantly correlated with CHD across all models. On sex stratification, a slow walking speed was associated with CHD after full adjustment (HR=4.78, 95%CI, 1.07-21.35, p=0.040) in women only. Weak grip strength at baseline was associated with CHD after age adjustment (HR=2.45, 95%CI, 1.03-5.81, p=0.043) in men only. However, after additional multivariate adjustment, the associations were weaker.
Table 3. Hazard Ratios for the association between walking speed, grip strength, and coronary heart disease
|
Model 1
HR (95%CI)
|
p
|
Model 2
HR (95%CI)
|
p
|
Model 3
HR (95%CI)
|
p
|
Model 4
HR (95%CI)
|
p
|
All participants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow walking
|
2.53 (1.21-5.31)
|
0.014
|
2.51 (1.19-5.28)
|
0.015
|
2.52 (1.99-5.30)
|
0.015
|
2.53 (1.20-5.33)
|
0.015
|
Weak grip strength
|
1.27 (0.67-2.41)
|
0.455
|
1.31 (0.69-2.48)
|
0.406
|
1.29 (0.68-2.45)
|
0.434
|
1.31 (0.69-2.48)
|
0.410
|
Men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow walking
|
1.67 (0.69-4.01)
|
0.253
|
1.63 (0.70-3.95)
|
0.283
|
1.71 (0.71-4.11)
|
0.233
|
1.68 (0.69-4.08)
|
0.253
|
Weak grip strength
|
2.45 (1.03-5.81)
|
0.043
|
2.34 (0.97-5.59)
|
0.056
|
2.39 (1.00-5.69)
|
0.050
|
2.23 (0.93-5.35)
|
0.074
|
Women
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slow walking
|
5.22 (1.18-23.21)
|
0.030
|
5.07 (1.14-22.55)
|
0.033
|
4.90 (1.10-21.91)
|
0.038
|
4.78 (1.07-21.35)
|
0.040
|
Weak grip strength
|
0.73 (0.30-1.81)
|
0.499
|
0.84 (0.34-2.09)
|
0.700
|
0.76 (0.30-1.90)
|
0.557
|
0.89 (0.35-2.24)
|
0.799
|
Model 1 includes adjustment for age and sex; Model 2 includes adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and Model 1; Model 3 includes adjustment for smoking status, body mass index, and Model 1; Model 4 includes adjustment for full covariate factors; 95%CI, 95% Confidence Interval; p, p-value.