1McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Annals of Surgery 2007; 246: 246–53.
2Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117–27.
3Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality in the Modern Era. Annals of Surgery 2014; 260: 244–51.
4Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2128–37.
5Topal B, Van de Sande S, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1377–81.
6Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V. Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 357–62.
7de Wilde RF, Besselink MGH, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 404–10.
8van der Geest LGM, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. MHPB 2016; 18: 317–24.
9Nathan H, Cameron JL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM. The Volume-Outcomes Effect in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Hospital Versus Surgeon Contributions and Specificity of the Relationship. ACS 2009; 208: 528–38.
10Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM. Evaluating Trends in the Volume-Outcomes Relationship Following Liver Surgery: Does Regionalization Benefit All Patients the Same? J Gastrointest Surg 2016;: 1–9.
11Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade. Annals of Surgery 2009; 250: 472–83.
12Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA, Upchurch GR Jr, Knol JA, Colletti LM. National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection1 1No competing interests declared. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 31–8.
13Pal N, Axisa B, Yusof S, et al. Volume and outcome for major upper GI surgery in England. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 353–7.
14Krautz C, Nimptsch U, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grützmann R. Effect of Hospital Volume on In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany. Annals of Surgery 2017;: 1–7.
15Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016184–19.
16Nimptsch U, Haist T, Krautz C, Grützmann R, Mansky T, Lorenz D. Hospital volume, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue in esophageal surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018;: 1–14.
17Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Finlayson EVA, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital Volume, Length of Stay, and Readmission Rates in High-Risk Surgery. Annals of Surgery 2003; 238: 161–7.
18Research data centres of the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the Länder. Data supply | Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (DRG Statistics). http://www.forschungsdatenzentrum.de/en/database/drg/index.asp (last accessed in November 2016).
19Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12: e1001885–22.
20Swart E, Gothe H, Geyer S, et al. [Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations]. Gesundheitswesen. 2015; 77: 120–6.
21Croner RS, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W, Brunner M. Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016;: 1–8.
22Birgin E, Tesfazgi W, Knoth M, Wilhelm TJ, Post S, Rückert F. Evaluation of the New ISGLS Definitions of Typical Posthepatectomy Complications. Scand J Surg 2018; 108: 130–6.
23Andreou A, Struecker B, Raschzok N, et al. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma_ Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis. Surg Oncol 2018; 27: 751–8.
24Heinrich S, Tripke V, Huber T, Mittler J, Lang H. A Match-Pair Analysis of Open Versus Laparoscopic Liver Surgery. JSLS 2017; 21: e2017.00061–9.
25MD KH, MSc UH, MD CS, et al. Risk assessment for liver resection. Surgery 2018; 164: 998–1005.
26Nimptsch U, Krautz C, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grützmann R. Nationwide In-hospital Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany is Higher than Anticipated. Annals of Surgery 2016; 264: 1082–90.
27Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Hyder O, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 836–46.
28Buettner S, Gani F, Amini N, et al. The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer. Surgery 2016; 159: 1004–12.
29Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care 2011; 49: 1076–81.
30Busweiler LA, Henneman D, Dikken JL, et al. Failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43: 1962–9.
31Nimptsch U, Haist T, Gockel I, Mansky T, Lorenz D. Complex gastric surgery in Germany—is centralization beneficial? Observational study using national hospital discharge data. 2018;: 1–9.
32Peschke D, Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Achieving minimum caseload requirements—an analysis of hospital discharge data from 2005–2011. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 556–63.
33Nimptsch U, Wengler A, Mansky T. [Continuity of hospital identifiers in hospital discharge data - Analysis of the nationwide German DRG Statistics from 2005 to 2013]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016; 117: 38–44.