See the published version of this preprint at BMC Oral Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Orapin Komin
Chulalongkorn University Faculty Of Dentistry
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-9382
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
BACKGROUND. Complete tooth losses are still being major problems which resulted in lesser quality of life especially for elderly patients. However, there are still lack of questionnaire to evaluate the treatment outcome from the patient’s aspect. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient’s Denture Assessment-Thai version (PDA-T), then use this questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with complete denture treatment.
METHODS. The subjects comprised 120 edentulous adult patients (49 men/71 women; average age 70 years-old) from the Prosthodontic and the Geriatric Dentistry and Special Patients Care Clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University during 2019 March‒2020 March. The patients were divided into two groups: The group experienced (Exper) (n=54) with wearing complete dentures, and the non-experienced (NonExper) group (n=66). The patients used the validated PDA-T to self-assess their treatment at different times. The Exper group completed the questionnaire at t 0 (during treatment), t 0.5 (2‒8-weeks after t 0 ), and t 1 (final follow-up). The NonExper group completed the questionnaire only at t 1 .
RESULTS. In the Exper group, Cronbach’s α and average inter-item correlation was 0.95 (range 0.76‒0.95) and 0.47 (range 0.57‒0.83), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (n = 18, 95% confidence interval) were 0.98 overall. The paired t-test (p < 0.05) between t 0 and t 1 indicated a significant difference between t 0 and t 1 in every PDA-T topic, and the effect size was 1.71. In the NonExper group, the Pearson correlation analysis indicated no significant correlation between the patients' demographics and masticatory function.
CONCLUSIONS. The reliability and validity of the PDA-T indicate it is a valuable tool for evaluating complete denture treatment. Treatment success affected the patients' satisfaction, but was not associated with the patients’ prior denture experience, sex, or educational level.
Keywords
PDA-T, Complete denture, Reliability and validity, self-assessment, satisfaction
Figure 1
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
Version (no preprint)
Posted 13 Jan, 2021
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 13 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 11 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 09 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 03 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 03 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 03 Jan, 2021
This version was not preprinted
Version 1
Posted 17 Sep, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 26 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 25 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 14 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Sep, 2020
First submitted
On 26 Aug, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 Aug, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Oral Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Orapin Komin
Chulalongkorn University Faculty Of Dentistry
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-9382
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
Version (no preprint)
Posted 13 Jan, 2021
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 13 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 11 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 09 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 07 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 03 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 03 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 03 Jan, 2021
This version was not preprinted
Version 1
Posted 17 Sep, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 26 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 25 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 14 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Sep, 2020
First submitted
On 26 Aug, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 Aug, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
BACKGROUND. Complete tooth losses are still being major problems which resulted in lesser quality of life especially for elderly patients. However, there are still lack of questionnaire to evaluate the treatment outcome from the patient’s aspect. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient’s Denture Assessment-Thai version (PDA-T), then use this questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with complete denture treatment.
METHODS. The subjects comprised 120 edentulous adult patients (49 men/71 women; average age 70 years-old) from the Prosthodontic and the Geriatric Dentistry and Special Patients Care Clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University during 2019 March‒2020 March. The patients were divided into two groups: The group experienced (Exper) (n=54) with wearing complete dentures, and the non-experienced (NonExper) group (n=66). The patients used the validated PDA-T to self-assess their treatment at different times. The Exper group completed the questionnaire at t 0 (during treatment), t 0.5 (2‒8-weeks after t 0 ), and t 1 (final follow-up). The NonExper group completed the questionnaire only at t 1 .
RESULTS. In the Exper group, Cronbach’s α and average inter-item correlation was 0.95 (range 0.76‒0.95) and 0.47 (range 0.57‒0.83), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (n = 18, 95% confidence interval) were 0.98 overall. The paired t-test (p < 0.05) between t 0 and t 1 indicated a significant difference between t 0 and t 1 in every PDA-T topic, and the effect size was 1.71. In the NonExper group, the Pearson correlation analysis indicated no significant correlation between the patients' demographics and masticatory function.
CONCLUSIONS. The reliability and validity of the PDA-T indicate it is a valuable tool for evaluating complete denture treatment. Treatment success affected the patients' satisfaction, but was not associated with the patients’ prior denture experience, sex, or educational level.
Figure 1
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...