We compiled the elevational patterns of precipitation and species richness from the literature. Temperature shows a decreasing elevational pattern, whereas precipitation regimes differ across elevational gradients, which means that the species richness elevational patterns correspond to different precipitation patterns. Decreasing-increasing (D-I) and decreasing-hump-shaped (D-H) elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation accounted for 60.6% and 27.3%, respectively, of 33 examined cases, whereas decreasing-decreasing (D-D) and decreasing-U-shaped (D-U) elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation accounted for only a small proportion (6.1%) (Fig. S1, Table S1). In total, 36.4% of the cases exhibited nonsignificant elevational patterns in all temperature-precipitation combinations, followed by decreasing (21.2%) and hump-shaped (18.2%) elevational patterns (Figs. S1, S2). Microbial richness showed hump-shaped elevational patterns in association with D-D elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation. In 30.0%, 25.0%, 20.0% and 20.0% of cases, microbial richness exhibited decreasing, nonsignificant, hump-shaped and U-shaped elevational patterns, respectively, in association with D-I elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation. Microbial richness exhibited nonsignificant elevational patterns in association with D-U elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation. In 55.6%, 11.1% and 11.1% of cases, microbial richness exhibited nonsignificant, hump-shaped and U-shaped elevational patterns, respectively, in association with D-H pattern elevational patterns of temperature-precipitation. Thus, there were no general elevational patterns of richness in association with different temperature and precipitation combinations. We further reviewed the main drivers shaping richness elevational patterns. In 54.5% of cases, local environmental variables were shown to be the most important drivers of species richness, followed by climate (30.3%) and energy (6.1%) variables (Table S1).
3.2. Biodiversity patterns of microbial community
Generally, alpha and beta diversity showed U-shaped and hump-shaped elevational patterns, respectively, at approximately 4,700-4,900 m. For species richness, the whole archaea and the phylum Crenarchaeota exhibited a significant (P < 0.01) decreasing pattern, while bacteria showed nonsignificant pattern (Figs. 2a, S8). Most bacterial phyla exhibited significant elevational patterns in richness (12 out of 14 phyla), among which approximately 36%, 29% and 14% were U-shaped, hump-shaped and decreasing patterns (P < 0.05), respectively (Fig. S8). For species evenness, archaea and bacteria showed significant (P < 0.05) decreasing and U-shaped patterns with R2 values of 0.18 and 0.35, respectively (Figs. 2b, S9). Approximately 64% of phyla showed significant (P < 0.05) elevational patterns in evenness, among which approximately 29%, 29% and 7% were U-shaped, hump-shaped and decreasing patterns, respectively (Fig. S9). For instance, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria exhibited significant U-shaped patterns; Gemmatimonadetes showed a significant hump-shaped pattern; and Crenarchaeota exhibited a significant decreasing elevational pattern (Fig. S9).
We observed consistent significant U-shaped LCBD-elevation relationships for archaeal (R2 = 0.18, P < 0.01) and bacterial (R2 = 0.38, P < 0.01) communities (Fig. 2c). U-shaped patterns were also found for most bacterial phyla (12/14), such as Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (P < 0.05) (Fig. S10). Interestingly, the lowest LCBD values for the whole microbial communities and their phyla occurred at approximately 4,700-4,900 m. The microbial community composition was mainly differentiated by elevation (Adonis statistic: R2 > 0.11, P = 0.001; Figs. 2d, e).
3.3. Underlying drivers of elevational biodiversity
Typical alpine steppe and meadow ecosystems were distributed below and above 4,850 m, which was consistent with the two main constraints of MAT and MAP (Fig. 1a). The climate and vegetation ecotone also occurred at approximately 4,800-4,900 m in conceptual Whittaker biome plot (Fig. 1b). Climate, local and energy variables varied substantially along elevational gradients. For instance, MAT (− 1.9–2.84 ℃), MAP (313–552 mm) and PSCV (134–141) showed significant (P༜0.05) decreasing, hump-shaped and U-shaped elevational patterns, respectively (Figs. S3, S5). Energy variables, such as the vegetation Shannon index (1.28–1.92), showed increasing and hump-shaped elevational patterns (P༜0.05), while the local variable of soil pH showed a significant (P༜0.05) U-shaped elevational pattern (Fig. S3).
Soil pH was the most important explanatory variable, explaining 20.1%, 55.8% and 21.4% of the variation in archaeal richness, evenness and LCBD, respectively (Figs. 3a, b, c). Vegetation richness, TN and the K/Al ratio had the strongest effects on bacterial richness, evenness and LCBD, with relative importance values of 16.1%, 12.5% and 11.6%, respectively (Figs. 3e, f, g). The moisture index (GSP/AccT ratio) was the most important explanatory factor, explaining over 17.6% variation of microbial community composition represented by the first axis of PCoA (PCoA1), followed by MAT and MAP (Figs. 3d, h). Microbial richness, evenness and LCBD at the phylum level were driven by different variables. For richness, Tmin, PMD, pH, vegetation richness and TP were the most important predictors, explaining 15.7%, 27.3%, 18.1%, 32.6% and 45.3% of the variation in Acidobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria, respectively (Fig. S16). For evenness, Tmin, pH and slope were the primary drivers, explaining 21.5%, 48.7% and 56.8% of the variation in Deltaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Crenarchaeota, respectively (Fig. S17). For LCBD, MTCM and slope had the strongest effects on Actinobacteria and Crenarchaeota, with relative importance values of 14.3% and 25.8%, respectively (Fig. S18).
Temperature and precipitation exerted considerable indirect effects on microbial richness and evenness through local and energy variables, whereas temperature directly influenced microbial LCBD and PCoA1. The total effects of temperature were larger than those of precipitation in explaining the variations in microbial evenness, LCBD and PCoA1 (Figs. 4, S19). Local and energy variables had direct effects on microbial alpha and beta diversity (R > 0.22) (Fig. 4). For archaea, the final SEMs explained 20.9%, 29.1%, 37.8% and 65.1% of the variation in richness, evenness, LCBD and PCoA1 (Figs. 4a-d), respectively. Temperature had a larger indirect influence on microbial evenness, LCBD and PCoA1 than precipitation, with R values over 0.22 and 0.07 (Table S6). Temperature had direct effects on archaeal LCBD and PCoA1, with R values of 0.24 and 0.37 (P༜0.05), respectively (Figs. 4c, d). For bacteria, the final SEMs explained 15.1%, 54.7%, 67% and 78.5% of the variation in richness, evenness, LCBD and PCoA1 (Figs. 4e-h), respectively. Temperature had a larger indirect influence on microbial alpha and beta diversity than precipitation, with R values over 0.2 and 0.07 (Table S6), respectively. Temperature had significant (P༜0.05) direct effects on bacterial LCBD and PCoA1, with R values over 0.39.
Such effects of climate, energy and local variables were further statistically supported by linear or quadratic regression analysis (Fig. S13), Mantel’s test (Fig. S14) and variation partitioning analysis (Fig. S15). For instance, DON, MAT, TP and PMD were the most important drivers of archaeal richness, evenness, LCBD and PCoA1 (P༜0.05), with R2 values of 0.12, 0.18, 0.26 and 0.42, respectively. PSCV, the first PCA axis of metal variables (metal.pc1), MTCM and TP were the most important drivers of bacterial richness, evenness, LCBD and PCoA1, with R2 values of 0.05, 0.30, 0.51 and 0.70 (P༜0.05), respectively (Fig. S13). The microbial communities were most significantly correlated with the GSP/AccT ratio (R > 0.37, P < 0.01) (Fig. S14). Variation partitioning analyses showed that the combined effects of climate, energy and local variables explained over 18% of the variation in microbial LCBD and PCoA1, whereas the effects of these three groups of variables explained only slightly over 3% of the variation in microbial richness and evenness. Climate variables showed pure effects larger than local and energy variables in explaining microbial LCBD and PCoA1 (Fig. S15).