Animals used
Male and female Wistar rats having 8 to 12 weeks old and weighing between 100 and 150 g were used. These animals came from the Applied Biomedical Sciences Institute of University of Abomey-Calavi. These animals were acclimatized to the conditions of the animal house for a week before experiments.
Plants used
The whole plants of Euphorbia hirta (E. hirta) and Heterotis rotundifolia (H. rotundifolia) and the leaves of Citrus aurantifolia (C. aurantifolia) were used. They were harvested and confirmed at the national herbarium of University of Abomey-Calavi. These plants were dried and powdered in laboratory. The powders were used to make ethanolic extracts.
Ethanolic extracts preparation
The ethanolic extracts are obtained by maceration of 50 g of powder of each plant in 500 ml of 96% ethanol for 48 h with continuous stirring. The mixture was then filtered twice on hydrophilic cotton and once on No1 Whatman paper before being concentrated in rotavapor at 50°C. The concentrates were deposited in an oven at 50°C until obtained a dry mass which constitutes the ethanolic extract [14].
In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of extracts
The method used here has been inspired by that of Sy et al. [15] with some modifications. Thus, 5 groups of 6 rats each were formed and fasted 15 hours before experimentation. The treatment was done orally as follows :
- The first animals group were used as controls and they received only physiological water at 1 ml/100 g body weight (b.w.) ;
- The second animals group were used as a reference and they received diclofenac at 50 mg/kg b.w ;
- The other three animal’s groups received ethanolic extracts of hirta (EE-Eh), C. aurantifolia (EE-Ca) and H. rotundifolia (EE-Hr) at 200 mg/kg b.w. respectively.
One hour after treatments, 0.1 ml of 2% formalin solution was injected into each rat under foot pad of the right hind paw. The paw diameter at the arch was measured every hour until fifth hour. Edema increase (EAP) and inhibition (EIP) percentages were calculated from the following formulas:

Where Dt: Mean diameter of the right hind paw at time t; Do: M ean diameter of the right hind paw at time 0 (before treatment).

Analgesic activity of extracts
Writhing test
The method proposed by Koster et al. [16] and taken over by Sy et al. [15] was used. Thus, 5 groups of 6 rats each were formed and treated in the same way as before. But the reference animals group used here received acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at 200 mg/kg b.w. Thirty minutes after treatments, 0.1 ml of 3% acetic acid solution was injected intraperitoneally to all rats and the twisting for each rat was counted over 30 minutes. Cramping inhibition percentage (CIP) was calculated according formula :

Where TCc : Mean of twisting count of control group ; TCt : Mean of twisting count of treated groups
Tail immersion method
To evaluate analgesic effect of extracts by this approach, the method described by Gbenou et al. [17] was used with some modifications. The rats were arranged and treated as in the writhing test. Thirty minutes after treatments, the tail of each animal was immersed in hot water at 50°C and the reaction time was recorded.
Antipyretic effect of extracts
Pyrexia was induced in 5 groups of 6 rats each with a 20% beer yeast suspension. 24 hours after this induction, rats that showed an increase in temperature were treated with extracts and ASA as described above. The anal temperature of each rat was recorded every hour for 4 hours [18]. Pyrexia inhibition percentage (PIP) was calculeted ccording formula :
Where T°o : Temperature before pyrexia induction ; T°t : Temperature after pyrexia induction and treatment at time t
Euthanasia
At the end of the experiments, all rats were euthanized in a specially designed enclosure. Euthanasia by inhalation of CO2 with progressive filling (80%) of the enclosure was used under ethics committee control.
Statistical data processing
GraphPad Prism 7 software was used to perform graphs and statistical analyzes. A comparison of mean was made with analysis of variances (ANOVA) followed by tukey's multiple comparison test. The differences are considered significant if p-value < 0.05 and very significant if p-value < 0.001.