TACE has been shown to be beneficial for selected patients with unresectable HCC[17], however several questions remain to be elucidated. There are large variations in survival reported after TACE[18]. TACE uses arterial obstruction as well as sustained chemotherapeutic effect to induce tumor necrosis. There are a variety of agents for embolization, such as microspheres, drug-eluting microspheres and lipiodol. Among them, lipiodol was widely accepted in Asia, especially in China. Until now, no embolic agent has been widely accepted and used by all hospitals for a lack of consensus. There is still no answers for the optimal treatment modality of TACE[19]. Therefore, a suitable animal model for TACE therapy will help resolving those issues.
The ACI-rat TACE model has proved to show a high reproducibility of tumor growth characteristics. The tumor showed weak metastatic potential and was abundant with blood supply, which was better than the tumor models of Walker-256 、Novikoff hepatoma or VX-2[20–22]. In the present study, we discovered that the model showed a good potential application prospect for TACE experiments. We concluded that the tumor around 14 days after implantation was suitable for further TACE treatment, as the tumor had proper size, hypervascularization and no evident of necrosis. Besides, the model was characterized by easy to operate and convenient to make and the successful rate of implantation was 100% (20/20).
Abdominal implantation metastasis was easily to be seen in this model in our preliminary experiment, especially around the wound of the liver. Here, in this study, we improved the tumor implantation technique described by Trubenbach J al.[9]. We fixed the tumor cube with a small piece of adipose tissue covering the wound surface and then stitched the wound, thus the tumor fragement was guaranteed to stay and grow just in the implantation site. Our method was proved to be helpful in avoiding artificial abdominal implantation metastasis. Here in this study, we observed no detectable peritoneal tumor and abdominal adhesion formation up to day 14 after implantation.
18F-FDG can provide a useful indicator of tumor growth and metastasis because 18F-FDG accumulates in tumor mass with increased glucose metabolism[15, 23]. Here, our data demonstrated that the tumors showed an increased uptake of 18F-FDG in PET imaging which was markedly different from the surrounding liver tissues. Besides, only one single lesion with FDG positive accumulation was found. Thus, no sign of implantation metastasis was found at the beginning. F DG-PET may be useful for selecting proper candidates for further treatment of TACE. S.I. Park et al. have shown that FDG uptake serves as a good screening test to evaluate the feasibility of DEN-induced HCC in a rat liver tumor model[24]. Researchers have also indicated that FDG-PET could also be used for evaluating treatment efforts in animal liver cancer. On a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model, FDG uptake was significantly decreased after transcatheter arterial embolization(TAE) and radiotherapy. Thus FDG-PET was helpful for the early evaluation of the therapeutic effects on liver tumors[25, 26]. The aim of the present study was to improve the tumor implantation technique, introduce a noninvasive modality for monitoring the tumors growth and metastasis conditions and then selecting proper candidates for further TACE therapy. So we did not operate TACE and the usage of FDG-PET in evaluating the therapeutic effects of TACE was not investigated, which is absolutely one of the limitations of this study. This should be explored in further studies.
In the present research, MR imaging was also used to monitor tumor growth during the experimental period. With MR imaging we observed, as did Qian J et al.[12], the tumors were shown to be hypointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images, which was similar to those of the human hepatocellular carcinoma. On day 14, the mean tumor size measured by MR imaging was 106 ± 15 mm3 and no necrosis was observed, which is similar to the results of the others[10]. Hence, the tumor has a proper growth rate and is suitable for further TACE treatment.
Although the ACI-rat TACE model has proven to be valuable employed in the animal research of TACE, some limitations remained. First, the tumor is still a fast-growing tumor and the average life span of the tumor bearing rats is short. It is not suitable for evaluating the long-term effect of TACE. Second, the Morris 3924A tumor shows little metastatic spread. In this study, we observed no peritoneal metastasis, satellite liver nodules or lung metastasis. Thus, this model may not be suitable for researches on the metastasis potential of residue tumor after TACE.
In conclusion, the ACI-rat TACE model shows similar characteristics of human HCC. FDG-PET and MR imaging are useful in optioning and evaluating the model. It is strongly recommended to be widely used in the study of TACE.