The Characteristicsof Study population
There were 1,821 villagers who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 131 had a cerebrovascular disease or other neurological conditions, 143 did not complete questionnaires, 86 were excluded because of limited data. Finally, 1,461 were included in the analysis (Figure 1).
Among 1,461 participants, 87(5.95%) had cognitive impairment and 842(57.63%) had sleep disturbance. Table 1 lists the clinical characteristics of the population. Compared with normal sleep group, the sleep disturbance group were older (P<0.001), had more female subjects (P=0.002), shorter years of education (P<0.001), higher rates of drinking (P=0.027), and more likely to suffer from anxiety and depression (P=0.001) and hypertension (P<0.001), but lower rates of smoking (P=0.015).
Cognitive impairment in sleep disturbance group and normal sleep group
The prevalence of cognitive impairment in sleep disturbance group was obviously higher than that in the normal sleep group (7.84% vs. 3.39%, P<0.001). Further, as the degree of sleep disturbance increases, the prevalence of cognitive impairment increases accordingly (Figure 2). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the degree of sleep disturbance is positively correlated with the prevalence of cognitive impairment (ρ=0.102, P< 0.001).
The factors Associated with cognitive impairment
According to the cognition states, the total population is divided into normal cognition group and cognitive impairment group. Compared with normal cognition group, the cognitive impairment group were older (P<0.001), more likely to suffer from hypertension (P=0.020), but shorter years of education (P<0.001), lower BMI (P=0.018) and have less smoking problems (P=0.012). Above all, the prevalence of sleep disturbance in the cognitive impairment group was obviously higher than that in the normal sleep group (75.86% vs. 56.48%, P<0.001) (Table 2).
Multiple analysis of factors associated with Cognitive Impairment.
In order to clarify the variables related to cognitive impairment, a Spearman binary correlation analysis was conducted. Cognitive impairment was positively correlated with sleep disturbance (ρ=1.000, P<0.001), drinking (ρ=0.058, P=0.027), hypertension (ρ=0.108, P<0.001), but negatively with education level (ρ=-0.160, P<0.001), gender (ρ=-0.082, P<0.002), smoking (ρ=-0.059, P=0.025) and anxiety and depression (ρ=-0.089, P=0.001) (Table 3). Besides, greater cognitive impairment was reported by patients older than 60 years (ρ=0.172, P<0.001) compared with those younger than 60 years.
To eliminate the influence of covariates, binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Cognitive impairment was positively associated with sleep disturbance (OR=1.779, 95%CI=1.055-3.001, P=0.031) and age>60 (OR=2.013, 95%CI=1.167-3.472, P=0.012), but negatively associated with smoking (OR=0.455, 95%CI=0.208-0.992, P=0.048). Besides,participants with elementary school education(OR=0.263, 95%CI=0.137-0.503, P<0.001) and junior high school and above education(OR=0.247, 95%CI=0.085-0.721, P=0.011) were less likely to have cognitive impairment than those who are illiterate (Table 4).
The Relationship Between Sleep disturbance and Cognitive Impairment.
Mann-Whitney U test and median (quartile) was employed to compare the difference of components of sleep between cognitive impairment group and cognitive impairment group. Compared to normal cognitive group, the cognitive impairment group had shorter sleep duration (6.0 hours vs. 6.5 hours, P=0.010), lower habitual sleep efficiency (66.67% vs. 78.95%, P<0.001) and more sleep interference (6.0 points vs. 5.0 points, P<0.001) (Table 5).
Spearman binary correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between cognition and components of sleep. As shown in the Table 6, cognitive impairment was positively correlated with sleep interference (ρ=0.110, P<0.001), but negatively with Sleep duration (ρ=-0.067, P=0.010) and Habitual sleep efficiency (ρ=-0.132, P<0.001)
To further exclude the interference of other factors, the internal composition of sleep and other basic variables were included in the binary logistic regression. As shown in Figure 3, cognitive impairment was still positively associated with the sleep interference (OR=1.678, 95%CI=1.029-2.736, P=0.038), and negatively associated with the habitual sleep efficiency (OR=0.115, 95%CI=0.043-0.306, P<0.001). In order to more accurately evaluate the effect of actual sleep duration on cognitive impairment, different sleep duration was included in the regression analysis in turn, and it was found that cognitive impairment was more likely to occur if the sleep duration was more than eight hours a day (OR=3.174, 95%CI=1.570-6.417, P=0.001) (Figure 3).