Plant material
Plant collecting and in vitro growth condition was performed according to our previous research (Hemmati et al. 2020). The plant grown in Hoagland nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon 1950) was used as a source of apical meristem and leaf explants. For sterilization of explants, the samples rinsed 3 times with sterile distilled water, followed by immersing in 70% (v/v) methanol (for 30 sec and once). Leaf explants were also plunged in 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (3 min and once). The final wash of both explants was done 3 times with sterile distilled water.
Culture conditions and callus induction
Because one of the aims of the present study was to assess the effect of elicitors on the best callus-inducing hormonal medium, some hormonal conditions related to Hemmati's study were nominated to evaluate the best conditions (Hemmati et al. 2020). Apical meristem and leaf explants were cultured on MS medium with different concentrations of BAP (0, 0.5, and 1 mg L-1) and 2,4-D (0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg L-1). Three replications were considered for each treatment, and five explants were cultured in each jar. After 3 weeks of dark treatment, the samples were exposed to 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness at 25 ± 2 °C for 4 weeks. Subculturing was performed in the 7th week with the same hormone concentrations. 90-day-old calli were harvested, and some morphological characteristics, including the percentage of callus induction and fresh and dry weight (FW and DW), were recorded. The percentage of callogenesis was calculated based on the following equation:
Rate of callogenesis = number of explants with callus / total number of explants used × 100
The data obtained from the best growth rates of callus (the highest percentage of callogenesis and callus DW) was used to determine the best culture media.
Preparation of elicitors
Two elicitors, including nano-TiO2 (10, 60, and 120 mg L-1) and MeJa (50, 100, and 200 μM), were used. The stock of nano-TiO2 (stock #: US3490, US Research Nanomaterials, Inc.) was prepared by dissolving the specified amounts (1.2 mg) of nano-TiO2 powder in 10 mL of sterile distilled water and dispersed using ultrasonic vibration by providing 40 kHz wave signals at the temperature of 40 °C for 25 min (Ghorbanpour 2015). To prepare MeJa stock, a certain amount of it was dissolved in 96% ethanol (Wang et al. 2015). Both elicitors were filtered and sterilized using 0.22 μm filters.
Elicitation
The culture of selected media was performed in a like manner to the first experiment till the 7th week. At the end of the 7th week and during the subculturing, elicitor solutions were added to basal culture media. The calluses were harvested after 10 days of elicitors' treatment, and the callus biomass (FW and DW) was estimated.
Extraction for phytochemical analysis
The 60-day-old calli were dried in an oven at 40 °C for 48 h, and then, 80% (v/v) methanol was added to the callus powder in a ratio of 1 to 100 (w/v). The obtained extracts were placed in an ultrasonic device (Parsonic 2600s, Japan) for 30 min at a temperature of 30 °C and a frequency of 40 kHz. Then the extracts were filtered with Whatman paper (No. 1), and the solvent was evaporated under air condition. To prepare the final extract, the extract powder (0.0015 g) was dissolved in 5 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol (Annegowda et al. 2012). This solution was used as a "methanolic extract" for all the phytochemical assays.
Determination of total phenolic compounds
The content of phenolics in elicitor-treated calli was assessed by the Folin-Ciocalteu method (Marinova et al. 2005). For this purpose, 2.5 mL of 10% (v/v) folin was added to 100 μL of "methanolic extract". After 5 min in the dark condition and room temperature, 2 mL of 7.5% (w/v) sodium carbonate was added, and after 1.5 h, the absorption was read by a spectrophotometer (Jasco7800, Germany) at 765 nm. The content of phenolic compounds of any sample was calculated based on the standard curve of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) (y = 0.0032x + 0.0313, r2 = 0.987), and the result was presented in terms of mg GAE per 100 g DW of the callus sample.
Determination of total O-diphenols content
The reaction mixture was prepared by adding 2 mL of 50% (v/v) aqueous methanol and 0.5 mL of 5% (w/v) sodium molybdate dihydrate to 100 μL of "methanolic extract". The samples were shaken for 15 min and exposed to darkness at room temperature. Finally, the light absorption of the samples was recorded at 370 nm (Carrasco-Pancorbo et al. 2005). The basis for calculating of total O-diphenols content was the gallic acid graph (y= 0.0042x + 0.0674, r2= 0.998), which was expressed as mg of GAE per 100 g DW of callus.
Determination of phenolic acids content
The content of phenolic acids was determined based on the Matkowski method (Matkowski 2008). Distilled water (1.25 mL), hydrogen chloride (250 μL), Arnow's reagent [10% (w/v) aqueous sodium molybdate and 10% (w/v) aqueous sodium nitrite] (250 μL) were added, respectively, to 250 μL of "methanolic extract". After being kept in total darkness for 30 min (25 ± 2 °C), 250 μL of sodium hydroxide with 250 μL of distilled water were added to the sample, and the absorbance was read at 490 nm. The phenolic acid content was calculated based on the standard caffeic acid equivalent (CAE) graph (y= 0.0041x + 0.0258, r2= 0.983), and the result was presented in terms of mg of CAE per 100 g DW of callus.
Determination of flavonoids content
A valoum of 300 μL of "methanolic extract" was mixed to 3.4 mL of 30% (v/v) methanol. Then 150 μL of 0.5 M sodium nitrite and 150 μL of 0.3 M aluminum chloride were added, respectively. After keeping the samples in the dark at room temperature for 5 min, 1 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide was added, and the absorbance was recorded at 510 nm (Zhishen et al. 1999). Catechin (CAT) equivalent was used to prepare the standard curve (y = 0.0018x + 0.0106, r2= 0.989), and the result was calculated in mg of CATE per 100 g DW of callus sample.
Determination of flavone and flavonol content
Quercetin equivalent (QE) was used to make the calibration curve for this assay (y = 0.0022x – 0.007, r2=0.982). It was added 250 μL of "methanolic extract" to 50 μL of 10% (w/v) aluminum chloride and 50 μL of 1 M potassium acetate. Then, 750 μL of 80% methanol (v/v) and 1.4 mL of distilled water were added till the final volume reached 2.5 mL. After 30 min at room temperature, the absorbance was read at 415 nm (Kosalec et al. 2004). Using the standard curve line equation obtained from quercetin, the amount of flavone and flavonol in the extract was calculated and expressed as mg QE per 100 g DW of callus sample.
Determination of total proanthocyanidins content
In this step, 250 μL of the diluted extract was added to pure methanol (1 mL) and then, to 3 mL of 1% (w/v) vanillin. After vortex (WiseMix, Korea) for 30 sec, 2.5 mL of 9 N methanolic sulfuric acid was added. The samples were placed in Ben-Marie (Kavoosh Mega, Iran) for 15 min at 38 °C (in the dark). Finally, the optical absorption of the reaction mixture was recorded at 500 nm (Sun et al. 1998). Total proanthocyanidin content was defined with the standard curve of catechin solution (y= 0.001x+0.0653, r2= 0.939) and expressed as mg of CATE per 100 g DW of callus sample.
Determination of rosmarinic acid content
According to the method described by Öztürk et al. (2010), the concentration of rosmarinic acid in the samples was calculated based on the rosmarinic acid complex with zirconium ions (Zr4+) by spectrophotometer assay. 920 μL of pure ethanol was added to 40 μL of the extract, and the final volume was increased to 1 mL by adding 40 μL of 0.5 M zirconium chloride. About 5 min following the addition of the zirconium salt solution, the absorbance of the sample was measured at 362 nm. Using the obtained equation (y= 0.014x+0.024, r2= 0.991) from the standard curve of RA, the amount of rosmarinic acid was calculated as mg of RA per 100 g of DW of callus sample.
Antioxidant activity
DPPH scavenging activity assay
As described by de Torre et al. (2019), 100 μL of "methanolic extract" and 100 μL of methanolic DPPH solution (0.2 mM) were poured into each well of the 96-well plate, respectively. The plate was incubated in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C for half an hour, and then, its absorbance was read at 490 nm by the Elisa Reader (Gentaur ST2100, America). The antioxidant capacity was calculated in terms of Inhibitory concentration (IC50; effective concentration of sample with 50% DPPH inhibitory capacity), and in comparison with the antioxidant capacity of ascorbic acid (as positive control) at the same concentrations of the sample. To calculate IC, the following equation was used:
IC %= [1- (AS – AB) / (AC – AB)] × 100
In the above equation, AS represents the adsorption of the extracted sample, AB represents the adsorption of the blank sample (100 μL of extract and 100 μL of pure methanol), and AC represents the adsorption of the control sample (100 μL of pure methanol and 100 μL of DPPH solution).
Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay
The reduction ability of callus extract was analyzed using FRAP assay according to Li et al. (2017) with a minor modification. For this purpose, FRAP reagent was prepared by adding acetate buffer (300 mM; pH=3.6), 10 mM 2,4,6-tri (2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ) solution in 40 mM HCL, and 20 Mm FeCl3.6H2O solution in a volume ratio of 10:1:1. The "methanolic extract" of callus (20 µL) was mixed with 130 µL of FRAP solution and incubated in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance of reaction mixture was assayed through the ELISA system at 630 nm. Ferrous sulfate ІІ (FeSO4) was applied to produce a standard curve (y = 0.0165x + 1.323, r2= 0.908). The results were expressed in mg of Fe+2 per 100 g DW of callus sample.
LC-MS analysis
Callus extraction
For LC-MC analysis, both explant-derived calli with the highest content of flavonoids, flavone and flavonols, were selected. 0.25 gr of dry callus powder was dissolved in 2.5 mL of HPLC grade methanol. After 2 h using an ultrasonic bath at a temperature of 30 °C and a frequency of 40 kHz, the solution was filtered through a 45 μm filter, and the solvent was evaporated under air condition (Skerget et al. 2005). For flavonoid extraction of each dry sample, the extractive solution (75% methanol/0,1% formic acid) and continuing process were done according to the method described by Gómez et al. (2018).
LC-MS analysis of specific individual flavonoids
HPLC separation was carried out using the mobile phase containing solvent A and B in gradient. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (v/v), and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in H2O (v/v). The volume of injection was 5 μL in all samples. Chromatographic separation was performed on an Atlantis T3-C18 3µ, 2.1×150 mm column at a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min. The column oven temperature was set at 40 °C. Mass spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode (ESI+). The following parameters were used in all experiments: cone voltage, 30 V; capillary voltage, 4kV; extractor, 2 V; RF lens, 0.2 V; collision energy, 30 eV; gas nebulizer, N2 (grade 5); flow gas, 200 L/h; source temperature, 120 °C; desolation temperature, 300 °C. A Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC-Micromass Quattro micro API Mass Spectrometer was used for the analysis. The reference substances of flavone (Apigenin) and flavonols (Quercetin and Rutin) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luis, MO, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of data was performed using SPSS software (version 25). Using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, the mean values were compared with the probabilities of P ≤ 0.01 and P ≤ 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis was used to assess the associations between different parameters. The graphs were drawn by EXCEL software (Office 2016).