Table.1 composition and nutrient levels of the basal diets
Ingredient g/kg
|
Content
|
Corn
|
670
|
Soybean meal
|
250
|
Wheat bran
|
40
|
Pre-mixturea
|
40
|
Total
|
1000
|
Nutrition levels, g/kg
|
|
Digestible energy, MJ/kg
|
13.36
|
CPb
|
162.5
|
Cab
|
5.8
|
Total Pb
|
3.8
|
Lys
|
8.6
|
Met
|
2.0
|
Thr
|
6.5
|
Trp
|
2.8
|
a The premix provided the following per kg of the diet: Fe ( as ferrous sulfate) 80 mg, Cu ( as copper sulfate) 15 mg, Zn ( as zinc sulfate) 80 mg, Mn ( as manganese sulfate ) 5 mg, Se ( as sodium selenite ) 0.1 mg, I ( as potassium iodide) 0.1 mg, VA 4 480 IU, VD3 500 IU, VE 20 IU, VK3 2.20 mg, VB1 1.80 mg, VB 2 2.20 mg, VB 6 1.50 mg, VB12 12 μg, folic acid 0.30 mg, biotin 0.05 mg, nicotinic acid 10 mg, calcium pantothenate 8 mg.
b CP, crude protein; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; Three samples were analyzed for the analyzed values and the mean value was calculated and showed.
Table 2 Effect of TTO on the genes expression of GH, IGF-I, IGF-II, and MSTN of finishing pigs (n=6).
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Sites
|
Symbol
|
CON
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P-value
|
Liver
|
GH
|
1.06
|
1.02
|
1.52
|
1.13
|
0.09
|
0.21
|
|
IGF-I
|
1.03b
|
2.98a
|
4.25a
|
3.06a
|
0.33
|
0.002
|
|
IGF-II
|
1.01
|
0.93
|
0.93
|
0.78
|
0.05
|
0.47
|
|
MSTN
|
1.02a
|
0.69b
|
0.73b
|
0.70b
|
0.47
|
0.03
|
LD muscle
|
GH
|
1.02b
|
1.17ab
|
1.88a
|
1.94a
|
0.15
|
0.04
|
|
IGF-I
|
1.00b
|
1.11b
|
1.72a
|
1.24b
|
0.07
|
<0.001
|
|
IGF-II
|
1.02
|
1.29
|
1.03
|
0.98
|
0.66
|
0.36
|
|
MSTN
|
1.00a
|
0.72b
|
0.73b
|
0.74b
|
0.04
|
0.007
|
Backfat
|
GH
|
1.01
|
1.10
|
1.32
|
1.26
|
0.08
|
0.48
|
|
IGF-I
|
1.01
|
1.12
|
1.10
|
1.08
|
0.07
|
0.95
|
|
IGF-II
|
1.01
|
1.04
|
1.20
|
0.96
|
0.07
|
0.70
|
a, b Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect. 1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
Table 3. Effects of tea tree oil on the serum immunity of finishing pigs (n=6).
|
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Time /d
|
CON
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P value
|
IgA/(μg/mL)
|
|
28
|
104.26
|
165.44
|
151.70
|
120.34
|
9.23
|
0.06
|
|
56
|
114.90
|
123.58
|
116.85
|
126.10
|
4.68
|
0.83
|
IgG/(μg/mL)
|
|
28
|
384.90b
|
490.47a
|
575.80a
|
463.71a
|
18.61
|
<0.001
|
|
56
|
273.04b
|
371.49a
|
407.97a
|
366.82a
|
17.24
|
0.03
|
IgM/(μg/mL)
|
|
28
|
82.05b
|
116.96a
|
122.48a
|
89.44b
|
5.14
|
0.003
|
|
56
|
83.07
|
91.18
|
89.31
|
87.62
|
3.4
|
0.87
|
a, b Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect.
1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
Table 4. Effects of tea tree oil on the serum enzyme of finishing pigs (n=6).
|
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Time /d
|
CON
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P value
|
ALT/(U/L)
|
|
28
|
54.50
|
51.50
|
47.67
|
47.50
|
1.08
|
0.052
|
|
56
|
50.91
|
56.17
|
51.33
|
54.33
|
1.58
|
0.63
|
AST/(U/L)
|
|
28
|
47.00a
|
44.17ab
|
40.83bc
|
36.83c
|
1.35
|
0.04
|
|
56
|
49.00a
|
54.67a
|
39.50b
|
36.00b
|
2.08
|
0.001
|
ALP/(U/L)
|
|
28
|
70.66b
|
73.17b
|
93.33a
|
85.93a
|
2.52
|
<0.001
|
|
56
|
130.00
|
148.50
|
143.17
|
138.00
|
4.90
|
0.61
|
a, b, c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect.
1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
Table 6. Effects of TTO supplementation on fatty acids composition and content in Longissimus dorsi muscle in finishing pigs. (n=6)
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Item
|
|
CON
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P value
|
C10:0
|
|
0.12
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
0.14
|
0.01
|
0.14
|
C12:0
|
|
0.12a
|
0.10ab
|
0.07b
|
0.13a
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
C14:0
|
|
1.08
|
1.06
|
1.12
|
1.13
|
0.02
|
0.46
|
C16:0
|
|
22.77a
|
22.06ab
|
21.83b
|
22.07ab
|
0.13
|
0.04
|
C16:1
|
|
2.90
|
3.06
|
2.61
|
3.02
|
0.07
|
0.08
|
C18:0
|
|
9.37
|
9.97
|
9.40
|
11.34
|
0.31
|
0.08
|
C18:1
|
|
41.94
|
41.57
|
41.77
|
38.96
|
0.50
|
0.11
|
C18:2n6t
|
|
3.63b
|
4.06a
|
4.08a
|
4.06a
|
0.05
|
<0.001
|
C18:2n6c
|
|
12.70
|
12.27
|
13.26
|
12.26
|
0.18
|
0.16
|
C20:1
|
|
0.53
|
0.44
|
0.43
|
0.80
|
0.06
|
0.10
|
C20:4
|
|
1.94
|
1.96
|
1.93
|
1.92
|
0.10
|
0.99
|
C22:4
|
|
0.49
|
0.35
|
0.39
|
0.45
|
0.03
|
0.54
|
SFA2
|
|
33.47
|
33.29
|
32.54
|
34.81
|
0.31
|
0.06
|
MUFA3
|
|
45.37
|
45.07
|
44.82
|
42.78
|
0.47
|
0.20
|
PUFA4
|
|
18.77
|
18.64
|
19.66
|
18.70
|
0.18
|
0.17
|
PUFA/SFA
|
|
0.56b
|
0.56b
|
0.60a
|
0.54b
|
0.01
|
0.003
|
a, b Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect.
1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
2SFA = C10:0+C12:0+C14:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0;
3MUFA = C16:1 + C18:1+ C20:1;
4PUFA = C18:2n6t + C18:2n6c + C20:4 + C22:4;
Table 7. Effects of TTO supplementation on the genes expression of H-FABP, CAPN1, CAST, and HAL in Longissimus dorsi muscle in finishing pigs. (n=6)
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Symbol
|
|
Control
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P-value
|
H-FABP
|
|
1.00b
|
1.08b
|
1.37a
|
0.60c
|
0.06
|
<0.001
|
CAPN1
|
|
1.00b
|
0.96b
|
1.29a
|
1.34a
|
0.05
|
0.001
|
CAST
|
|
1.01
|
1.01
|
1.10
|
1.20
|
0.09
|
0.89
|
HAL
|
|
1.00
|
1.09
|
1.14
|
1.06
|
0.09
|
0.96
|
a, b, c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect.
1 CON(control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
Table 8. Effects of tea tree oil supplementation on antioxidant activity in finishing pigs (n=6).
|
|
Treatment1
|
|
|
Sites
|
Symbol
|
CON
|
LTO
|
MTO
|
HTO
|
SEM
|
P-value
|
Serum
|
MDA(nmol/ml)
|
2.97a
|
3.08a
|
1.99b
|
1.93b
|
0.17
|
0.014
|
|
CAT(U/ml)
|
5.68
|
4.76
|
5.68
|
5.04
|
0.17
|
0.13
|
|
T-SOD(U/ml)
|
114.52
|
114.84
|
120.52
|
126.57
|
4.02
|
0.71
|
|
GSH-PX(U/ml)
|
879.02b
|
889.69b
|
963.49a
|
966.73a
|
10.83
|
<0.001
|
Liver
|
MDA(nmol/mg prot)
|
0.52
|
0.63
|
0.45
|
0.60
|
0.03
|
0.36
|
|
CAT(U/mg prot )
|
40.39
|
49.53
|
54.08
|
40.38
|
3.2
|
0.37
|
|
T-SOD(U/ mg prot )
|
136.41
|
136.76
|
146.51
|
149.15
|
7.82
|
0.92
|
|
GSH-PX(U/mg prot )
|
239.95
|
239.90
|
244.12
|
232.23
|
6.06
|
0.92
|
LD muscle
|
MDA(nmol/mg prot)
|
0.32
|
0.42
|
0.35
|
0.31
|
0.01
|
0.09
|
|
CAT(U/mg prot)
|
0.93
|
0.90
|
1.66
|
1.16
|
0.15
|
0.28
|
|
T-SOD(U/mg prot)
|
12.36
|
16.47
|
15.26
|
13.94
|
0.83
|
0.33
|
|
GSH-PX(U/mg prot)
|
11.85b
|
13.19ab
|
17.80a
|
10.45b
|
0.96
|
0.03
|
a, b Means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly for treatment effect.
1CON (control), pigs receiving a control diet; LTO (low tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree oil; MTO (middle tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 200mg/kg tea tree oil; HTO (high tea tree oil supplemented treatment), pigs receiving a control diet supplemented with 300 mg/kg tea tree oil; TTO, tea tree oil.
MDA = malondialdehyde; CAT = Catalase; T-SOD = total superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase.