1 Li, J. et al. Integrated tuneable synthesis of liquid fuels via Fischer–Tropsch technology. Nat. Catal. 1, 787-793 (2018).
2 Jenkinson, D. S., Adams, D. E. & Wild, A. Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming. Nature 351, 304-306 (1991).
3 Kang, X. et al. Highly efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CH4 in an ionic liquid using a metal–organic framework cathode. Chem. Sci 7, 266-273 (2016).
4 Zhong, J. et al. State of the art and perspectives in heterogeneous catalysis of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 1385-1413 (2020).
5 Yao, B. et al. Transforming carbon dioxide into jet fuel using an organic combustion-synthesized Fe-Mn-K catalyst. Nat. Commun. 11, 6395 (2020).
6 Hu, J. et al. Sulfur vacancy-rich MoS2 as a catalyst for the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Nat. Catal. 4, 242-250 (2021).
7 Ferri, P. et al. Chemical and Structural Parameter Connecting Cavity Architecture, Confined Hydrocarbon Pool Species, and MTO Product Selectivity in Small-Pore Cage-Based Zeolites. ACS Catal. 9, 11542-11551 (2019).
8 Ilias, S. & Bhan, A. Mechanism of the Catalytic Conversion of Methanol to Hydrocarbons. ACS Catal. 3, 18-31 (2013).
9 Tan, L. et al. Bifunctional Capsule Catalyst of Al2O3@Cu with Strengthened Dehydration Reaction Field for Direct Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether from Syngas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 22905-22911 (2019).
10 Tan, L. et al. Design of a core–shell catalyst: an effective strategy for suppressing side reactions in syngas for direct selective conversion to light olefins. Chem. Sci. 11, 4097-4105 (2020).
11 Tan, L. et al. Direct CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins by suppressing CO by-product formation. Fuel Process. Technol. 196, 106174 (2019).
12 Ma, S., Huang, S.-D. & Liu, Z.-P. Dynamic coordination of cations and catalytic selectivity on zinc–chromium oxide alloys during syngas conversion. Nat. Catal. 2, 671-677 (2019).
13 Behrens, M. et al. The Active Site of Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Industrial Catalysts. Science 336, 893-897 (2012).
14 Beck, A. et al. Following the structure of copper-zinc-alumina across the pressure gap in carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Nat. Catal. 4, 488-497 (2021).
15 Shi, Z. et al. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu-In intermetallic catalysts: Effect of reduction temperature. J Catal 379, 78-89 (2019).
16 Samson, K. et al. Influence of ZrO2 Structure and Copper Electronic State on Activity of Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts in Methanol Synthesis from CO2. ACS Catal. 4, 3730-3741 (2014).
17 Li, K. & Chen, J. G. CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol over ZrO2-Containing Catalysts: Insights into ZrO2 Induced Synergy. ACS Catal. 9, 7840-7861 (2019).
18 Wu, C. et al. Inverse ZrO2/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5767 (2020).
19 Bahruji, H. et al. Pd/ZnO catalysts for direct CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. J Catal 343, 133-146 (2016).
20 Wang, J. et al. A highly selective and stable ZnO-ZrO2 solid solution catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701290 (2017).
21 Martin, O. et al. Indium Oxide as a Superior Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis by CO2 Hydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 6261-6265 (2016).
22 Wang, J. et al. High-Performance MaZrOx (Ma = Cd, Ga) Solid-Solution Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. ACS Catal. 9, 10253-10259 (2019).
23 Sharafutdinov, I. et al. Intermetallic compounds of Ni and Ga as catalysts for the synthesis of methanol. J Catal 320, 77-88 (2014).
24 Kong, H., Li, H.-Y., Lin, G.-D. & Zhang, H.-B. Pd-Decorated CNT-Promoted Pd-Ga2O3 Catalyst for Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol. Catal Letters 141, 886 (2011).
25 Bai, S., Shao, Q., Feng, Y., Bu, L. & Huang, X. Highly Efficient Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation to Methanol Catalyzed by Zigzag Platinum–Cobalt Nanowires. Small 13, 1604311 (2017).
26 Graciani, J. et al. Highly active copper-ceria and copper-ceria-titania catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2. Science 345, 546-550 (2014).
27 Gong, J. et al. Synthesis of Ethanol via Syngas on Cu/SiO2 Catalysts with Balanced Cu0–Cu+ Sites. J Am Chem Soc. 134, 13922-13925 (2012).
28 Samson, K. et al. Influence of ZrO2 Structure and Copper Electronic State on Activity of Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts in Methanol Synthesis from CO2. ACS Catal. 4, 3730-3741 (2014).
29 Wang, Y. et al. Insight into the Balancing Effect of Active Cu Species for Hydrogenation of Carbon–Oxygen Bonds. ACS Catal. 5, 6200-6208 (2015).
30 Karelovic, A. & Ruiz, P. The role of copper particle size in low pressure methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation over Cu/ZnO catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 869-881 (2015).
31 Rong, W. et al. Size-Dependent Activity and Selectivity of Atomic-Level Copper Nanoclusters during CO/CO2 Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 466-472 (2021).
32 Zhu, Y. et al. Copper-zirconia interfaces in UiO-66 enable selective catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Nat. Commun. 11, 5849 (2020).
33 Witoon, T., Chalorngtham, J., Dumrongbunditkul, P., Chareonpanich, M. & Limtrakul, J. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/ZrO2 catalysts: Effects of zirconia phases. Chem. Eng. J. 293, 327-336 (2016).
34 Qiao, B. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634-641 (2011).
35 Nguyen, L. et al. Ir1Znn Bimetallic Site for Efficient Production of Hydrogen from Methanol. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 18793-18800 (2019).
36 Tang, Y. et al. Synergy of Single-Atom Ni1 and Ru1 Sites on CeO2 for Dry Reforming of CH4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7283-7293 (2019).
37 Li, H. et al. Synergetic interaction between neighbouring platinum monomers in CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 411-417 (2018).
38 Ye, X. et al. Highly Selective Hydrogenation of CO2 to Ethanol via Designed Bifunctional Ir1–In2O3 Single-Atom Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19001-19005 (2020).
39 Han, Z., Tang, C., Wang, J., Li, L. & Li, C. Atomically dispersed Ptn+ species as highly active sites in Pt/In2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation. J. Catal. 394, 236-244 (2021).
40 Chen, C. et al. The significant role of oxygen vacancy in Cu/ZrO2 catalyst for enhancing water–gas-shift performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 317-324 (2014).
41 Ikuno, T. et al. Methane Oxidation to Methanol Catalyzed by Cu-Oxo Clusters Stabilized in NU-1000 Metal–Organic Framework. J Am Chem Soc. 139, 10294-10301 (2017).
42 Wang, L.-C. et al. Structural Evolution and Catalytic Properties of Nanostructured Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts Prepared by Oxalate Gel-Coprecipitation Technique. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 16549-16557 (2007).
43 Velu, S., Suzuki, K., Gopinath, C. S., Yoshida, H. & Hattori, T. XPS, XANES and EXAFS investigations of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3/ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 1990-1999 (2002).
44 Sun, J. et al. Freezing copper as a noble metal–like catalyst for preliminary hydrogenation. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau3275 (2018).
45 Yang, H. et al. Scalable Production of Efficient Single-Atom Copper Decorated Carbon Membranes for CO2 Electroreduction to Methanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12717-12723 (2019).
46 Pang, J. et al. Hierarchical Echinus-like Cu-MFI Catalysts for Ethanol Dehydrogenation. ACS Catal. 10, 13624-13629 (2020).
47 Espinós, J. P. et al. Interface Effects for Cu, CuO, and Cu2O Deposited on SiO2 and ZrO2. XPS Determination of the Valence State of Copper in Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6921-6929 (2002).
48 Cui, G. et al. ZrO2-x modified Cu nanocatalysts with synergistic catalysis towards carbon-oxygen bond hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. B 280, 119406 (2021).
49 Lamberti, C. et al. XAFS, IR, and UV−Vis Study of the CuI Environment in CuI-ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 344-360 (1997).
50 Zhang, Z. et al. Transfer Hydrogenation of Fatty Acids on Cu/ZrO2: Demystifying the Role of Carrier Structure and Metal–Support Interface. ACS Catal. 10, 9098-9108 (2020).
51 Gao, J. et al. Cu2In Nanoalloy Enhanced Performance of Cu/ZrO2 Catalysts for the CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 12331-12337 (2020).
52 Zhang, Z. et al. The most active Cu facet for low-temperature water gas shift reaction. Nat. Commun. 8, 488 (2017).
53 Ladera, R. et al. Catalytic valorization of CO2 via methanol synthesis with Ga-promoted Cu–ZnO–ZrO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 142-143, 241-248 (2013).
54 Liu, A. et al. Controlling Dynamic Structural Transformation of Atomically Dispersed CuOx Species and Influence on Their Catalytic Performances. ACS Catal. 9, 9840-9851 (2019).
55 Andersen, C. W. et al. Redox-Driven Migration of Copper Ions in the Cu-CHA Zeolite as Shown by the In Situ PXRD/XANES Technique. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 10367-10372 (2017).
56 Zhang, X. et al. Reaction-driven surface reconstruction of ZnAl2O4 boosts the methanol selectivity in CO2 catalytic hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. B 284, 119700 (2021).
57 Dandekar, A. & Vannice, M. A. Determination of the Dispersion and Surface Oxidation States of Supported Cu Catalysts. J Catal 178, 621-639 (1998).
58 Pokrovski, K., Jung, K. T. & Bell, A. T. Investigation of CO and CO2 Adsorption on Tetragonal and Monoclinic Zirconia. Langmuir 17, 4297-4303 (2001).
59 Ma, Y. et al. Reactivity of a Zirconia–Copper Inverse Catalyst for CO2 Hydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 22158-22172 (2020).
60 Yang, C. et al. Strong Electronic Oxide–Support Interaction over In2O3/ZrO2 for Highly Selective CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19523-19531 (2020).
61 Wang, Y. et al. Strong Evidence of the Role of H2O in Affecting Methanol Selectivity from CO2 Hydrogenation over Cu-ZnO-ZrO2. Chem 6, 419-430 (2020).
62 Wang, J. et al. A highly selective and stable ZnO-ZrO2 solid solution catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701290 (2017).
63 Li, H. et al. CO2 activation on ultrathin ZrO2 film by H2O co-adsorption: In situ NAP-XPS and IRAS studies. Surf Sci 679, 139-146 (2019).
64 Soerensen, K. J. & Cant, N. W. Alternating nitrous oxide/reductant cycles and the determination of copper area in supported copper catalysts. Catal Letters 33, 117-125 (1995).
65 Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev., B Condens. Matter 54, 11169-11186 (1996).
66 Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev., B Condens. Matter 50, 17953-17979 (1994).
67 Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758-1775 (1999).
68 Perdew, J. P. & Wang, Y. Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244-13249 (1992).
69 Huang, S. D., Shang, C., Kang, P. L., Zhang, X. J. & Liu, Z. P. LASP: Fast global potential energy surface exploration. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., e1415 (2019).
70 Guan, S. H., Zhang, K. X., Shang, C. & Liu, Z. P. Stability and anion diffusion kinetics of Yttria-stabilized zirconia resolved from machine learning global potential energy surface exploration. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 094703 (2020).
71 Ma, S. C., Shang, C., Wang, C. M. & Liu, Z. P. Thermodynamic rules for zeolite formation from machine learning based global optimization. Chem. Sci. 11, 10113-10118 (2020).
72 Guan, S. H., Shang, C., Huang, S. D. & Liu, Z. P. Two-Stage Solid-Phase Transition of Cubic Ice to Hexagonal Ice: Structural Origin and Kinetics. J Phys Chem C 122, 29009-29016 (2018).
73 Huang, S.-D., Shang, C., Zhang, X.-J. & Liu, Z.-P. Material discovery by combining stochastic surface walking global optimization with a neural network. Chem. Sci. 8, 6327-6337 (2017).
74 Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).