Despite significant progress in the diagnosis and treatment of disease, Colon cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide[4]. At present, TNM staging is considered to be the gold standard for predicting the prognosis of colon cancer. Colon cancer showed recurrence diversity and survival heterogeneity at the same disease stage. Obtaining accurate prognostic information is essential to help doctors make better clinical decisions and consult on life expectancy after surgical removal of tumors. Nomogram is widely used to predict the prognosis of various cancers, and compared with the traditional TNM staging system, the nomogram is a simpler tool with many advantages. Personalized risk prediction for patients is one of the main advantages of nomograms [5, 6]. Some studies on the prognosis of colon cancer have been reported. However, the number of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer in these studies is small [7,8].
In this study, We conducted an in-depth analysis of the data of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer after tumor resection in the United States SEER database. We found that age, tumor grade, t-stage, n-stage and marital status are independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer. These variables were used to draw a nomogram. The nomogram we constructed in this way can better predict the specific 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer specific survival rates of patients. Consistency tests show that the nomogram can effectively predict the specific 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer specific survival rates of patients. The nomogram C- index of cancer specific survival rate is 0.781 (95% CI: 0.77414–0.78786), which is better than AJCC TNM stage (C-index: 0.734, 95%CI: 0.72616–0.74184). Based on the research results already obtained, the nomogram clearly shows better discrimination than the TNM staging system.
This is the first nomogram study among patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer in the SEER database. Complications are common in patients with colon cancer and can affect clinical decisions and survival prognosis. Therefore, the end point event selected in this study was cancer specific survival, which minimized the impact of comorbidities on survival and more accurately highlighted the impact of colon cancer on its prognosis. This is a feasible strategy for the treatment of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer and can predict their individual survival prognosis.
By analyzing cases in the entire population in the SEER database, you can effectively avoid the bias of patients from a single institution to the study. However, the SEER database lacks information such as imaging, smoking history, gene mutations, tumor markers, and detailed treatment methods. Our study also did not involve the impact of these factors on the prognosis of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer, and these factors may seriously affect the prognosis of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer. Second, it is impossible to obtain comorbidities and adjuvant treatment information (including radiotherapy and chemotherapy) for all patients. Deleting those incomplete cases may lead to selection bias, which may affect the prediction of the survival prognosis of patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer, Thereby reducing the number of patients counted and the prediction accuracy of the nomogram.
In summary, we have developed a valuable nomogram to estimate the specific survival probability of cancer in patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer at 1-year, 3-year and 5-year. The nomogram shows good performance in stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer and can be used as valuable tool for clinical decision-making consultation and guidance for patients with stages Ⅰ-Ⅲ colon cancer.