2.1 In vitro test: experimental results
The results obtained through the experimental part of this work are summarized in
Table 1.
Table 1. Reactivation activity of trimedoxime (data obtained in triplicate experimental essays).
Trimedoxime
|
System
|
React. (%) Conc.
10-5 M
|
React. (%)
Conc. 10-3 M
|
AChE-GA
|
0
|
30
|
AChE-GB
|
7
|
54
|
AChE-GF
|
0
|
0
|
AChE-GD
|
0
|
0
|
AChE-VX
|
9.8
|
85.3
|
AChE-POX
|
50
|
46
|
AChE-DDVP
|
17.3
|
31.5
|
According to the literature, the efficiency (reactivation percentage) of an oxime should be at least 10% to provide an appropriate remediation for the intoxicated patient [22,23]. In this regard, we observe different reactivation percentages through trimedoxime, taking into account its concentration as well as the type of OP-AChE complex. According to our experimental findings, note that trimedoxime demonstrated the best results at higher concentrations (10-3 M). At this concentration, the oxime showed a remarkable reactivation percentage of 85.3% for AChE-VX reactivation. At a concentration of 10-3 M, trimedoxime also provides a good performance in the reactivation of the AChE-GB (54%) and AChE-POX (46%) adducts. This result was more modest for AChE-GA (30%). An interesting outcome from this experimental investigation is the fact of trimedoxime does not reactivate the AChE-GF and AChE-GD adducts. These trends are more deeply approached in the next sections. From the experimental essays with trimedoxime at lower concentrations, we can observe that the experimental values indicate a significant reactivation percentage for the AChE-POX (50%), as well as a sufficient reactivation rate for AChE-DDVP (17.3%). Indeed, this oxime showed insufficient reactivating power for the AChE inhibited by the other OP agents investigated, such as GA, GF and GD, considering a concentration of 10-5 M.
2.2 Affinity and thermodynamics: docking results
According to the docking protocol, the calculations were performed in order to investigate the affinity between trimedoxime and inhibited AChE. For this, a cavity prediction algorithm based on a 3D box was used to find the binding sites in the inhibited enzyme active site. The active cavity presented a volume of 113.66 Å3, being appropriate to support the reactivator.
The molecular mechanics-based calculations generated diverse poses of trimedoxime within the cavity of the inhibited complexes, and the respective intermolecular interaction energy was computed to each system. As usual in these computations, the best oxime conformation was chosen for subsequent QM calculations, based on the lowest interaction energies as well as the most reactive conformations. Table 2 shows the values obtained from the docking calculations for the most appropriated poses of trimedoxime with different inhibited complexes.
Table 2. Docking results for trimedoxime inside different AChE-OP adducts.
Trimedoxime
|
System
|
∆E* (kcal mol-1)
|
Residues
|
AChE-GA
|
-140.9
|
Ser298
|
AChE-GB
|
-154.7
|
Tyr124, Ser298, Arg296
|
AChE-GF
|
-161.3
|
Tyr124, Glu285
|
AChE-GD
|
-157.7
|
Tyr124, Glu285
|
AChE-VX
|
-115.0
|
Tyr124, Phe295, Arg296
|
AChE-POX
|
-144.1
|
Tyr124, Glu285
|
AChE-DDVP
|
-164.8
|
Arg296, Ser298, Trp286
|
*∆E = Intermolecular interaction energy.
According to the data reported in Table 2, note that trimedoxime showed stabilizing interactions within the inhibited enzyme complex site, for all OP agents investigated. From these results, the oxime demonstrated the lowest interaction energy in the AChE-DDVP (-164.8 kcal mol-1) adduct, followed by AChE-GF (-161.3 kcal mol-1) and AChE-GD (-157.7 kcal mol-1). In turn, the oxime showed a less stabilizing interaction energy within the AChE-VX cavity. As shown in the experimental section, at higher concentrations, the trimedoxime demonstrated to be more efficient in the reactivation of the AChE-VX adduct. This trend leads us to believe that the interaction energy is not the only factor responsible for the performance of this antidote in the reactivation, but others factors should be involved. In this regard, the results from the mechanistic study are presented in the next section.
From Table 2, the trimedoxime was stably docked in the inhibited AChE, with intermolecular interaction energy values in the range of -115.0 kcal mol-1 to -164.8 kcal mol-1. Diverse kinds of intermolecular interactions contribute to the stabilizing interaction in the site, such as hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds. It is important to mention that the AChE active site adopts distinct conformations according to the sort of OP agent. Thus, it is expected that trimedoxime performs different interactions with residues from the active site. These hydrogen bond-type interactions are generally the most important in studies of biological systems.
In most of the systems investigated, trimedoxime performed interaction with the Tyr124 amino acid residue, and according to the literature, this interaction is described as a possible π- π stacking, which takes place between Tyr124 residue and the pyridine ring of the oxime. This interaction is indicated to have an important role for helping in the transition state stabilization [2,24,25]. The hydrogen bonds revealed by the interaction of trimedoxime in each inhibited system are shown in figure 3.
From the discussed so far, it is important to notice that, together with the reactivation percentage, the interaction energy data do not explain thoroughly the experimental trends. The discussion of the mechanistic studies in the next section will rise new insights about the behavior of trimedoxime toward different AChE-OP systems.
2.3 Investigating kinetic parameters for biological activity: mechanistic studies
In the last part of this investigation, theoretical calculations were carried out to determine the relative activation energy (∆∆E#) through the hybrid QM/MM for the reactivation of each inhibited AChE system. The ∆E# values were computed based on the energy difference between the transition states and the initial system configurations from the reactants.
For the reaction mechanism simulation, steric and electronic effects of the chemical reactions are important aspects over the reaction pathway. In addition, the strain and interaction energies are significant contributing factors that dictate the reaction course. The interaction energy is responsible for stabilizing the reaction. On the other hand, the strain energy is responsible for distorting the reactants to adopt a pentacoordinate transition state. The relation between interaction and strain energies results in the height of the reaction barrier (∆E#), the so-called activation energy. This parameter was elucidated for some of these reactions in order to better comprehend the trimedoxime’s behavior in the reactivation process. For this, a combined procedure of docking and DFT calculations at the QM/MM interface for the mechanism was carried out. The transition states were characterized through potential energy curves. Table 3 shows the kinetic parameters ∆∆E#, as well as the experimental values of reactivation at the concentration of 10-3 M.
Table 3. Experimental reactivation percentage and relative activation energy for trimedoxime in the reactivation process.
Trimedoxime
|
System
|
∆∆E# *
(kcal mol-1)
|
React. (%)
Conc. 10-3 M
|
AChE-GA
|
46.83
|
30
|
AChE-GB
|
33.43
|
54
|
AChE-GF
|
-
|
0
|
AChE-GD
|
-
|
0
|
AChE-VX
|
0
|
85.3
|
AChE-POX
|
41.59
|
46
|
AChE-DDVP
|
47.75
|
31.5
|
*∆∆E# = Relative activation energy.
According to Table 3, these quantum theoretical results corroborate our experimental findings. Trimedoxime has shown itself to be very efficient in reactivating the inhibited AChE- VX at a concentration of 10-3 M, which is according to the reactional barrier observed in the reactivation of this inhibited complex. From Table 3, the reactivation of the AChE-VX adduct revealed the lowest barrier. This fact helps explain the higher experimental reactivation percentage of the AChE inhibited by VX, which was 85.3%. This fact suggests that its transition state is better stabilized, allowing for the oxime to interact stronger with the nerve agent.
As we can see from Table 3, the reactivation of the AChE-GB complex showed the second more stabilizing barrier (33.43 kcal mol-1), which corroborates the second best reactivation percentage found in our experimental essays (54%). In addition, it was computed for the AChE- POX a barrier of 41.59 kcal mol-1, and for the AChE-GA and AChE-DDVP, our computations indicate very close barriers, 46.83 kcal mol-1 and 47.75 kcal mol-1 respectively, which correlate very well with the close experimental reactivation percentages found for these respective systems. It is worth mentioning that our simulations for the reactivation of the AChE-GF and AChE-GD were not succeeded in our study, that is, the AChE inhibited by these OP agents did not provide a feasible conformation for the nucleophilic attack by trimedoxime in the active site.
This fact could be explained from the interaction modes of these toxic agents in the site, mostly due to steric hindrance effects, as well as intermolecular interactions.
From the ΔΔE# values in Table 3, we performed a multiple linear regression (MLR) between this parameter and the reactivation percentage, as well as the interaction energy. Our results revealed that the combination of interaction energy (ΔE) and activation energy (ΔΔE#) is able to efficiently explain the experimental outcomes. By increasing the number of system descriptors, a better correlation between theory and experiment is expected. Based on this, the MLR between the experimental and theoretical parameters resulted in the equation below. The regression was obtained with an excellent correlation value of 0.97.
By analyzing equation 1, we can observe some important trends about the studied systems. Starting with the correlation value from the MLR, it shows that the docking conjugated to QM/MM calculations result in a better representation of the systems investigated. According to the coefficients of the equation, the importance of each stage for the AChE reactivation process by trimedoxime can be evaluated. Note that the highest modulus of the coefficient of the term ΔΔE# (relative activation energy) indicates that the reaction step presents a greater contribution for the AChE reactivation than the interaction energy [23,25]. This means that trimedoxime can more easily fit to the transition state structure in the reactivation process. In addition, the binding mode of trimedoxime in the site is not a critical step for activity. With the exposed in this investigation, we observe that trimedoxime stands for a significant advance in the development of more efficient reactivators for the remediation of the intoxication caused by neurotoxic nerve agents.
Previous studies have shown that there is not a direct correlation in oxime-mediated reactivation between species, and comparative studies in one species may not truly reflect the reactivation effects in humans. Due to structural differences, the active site of both enzymes from rat and human may adopt distinct conformations in the presence of the neurotoxic agent, and the antidote might be led to specific reactional behaviors. In this context, in silico and in vitro investigations with the human AChE are equally important. These aspects will be considered in future investigations [26].