Although HIV prevalence is decreasing [1], the drivers of ongoing HIV infections are yet to be addressed in more detail. The causal role of co-factors (STIs, intravaginal practices, intimate partner violence) seem unclear and biological transmission risk for infection remains essential among MSM [3, 6–8]. In this study, dyspareunia and signs of epithelial trauma were highly prevalent in FSWs and MSM, indicating considerable limitations to sexual health and personal well-being. Exposure to blood during sexual encounters may increase HIV transmission risk as evidenced by previous research [20, 27]. Vaginal coital bleeding in this study was more prevalent than previously described [17–19], and direct signs of anal bleeding were rife among MSM, justifying the need for further aetiological analysis for possible prevention measures.
Steady sexual relationships alongside sex work were common, which implies the importance of regular partner testing or considering pre-exposure prophylaxis given that HIV infections within heterosexual regular partnerships and unions classically outweigh the burden of HIV infections through every other mode of exposure in Kenya [29]. Artificial lubricant use was moderately popular with FSWs, indicating a possible benefit of lubricants for vaginal intercourse, confirmed by the sex workers' favourable subjective assessment of lubricants as a remedy against dyspareunia. Lubricants, in combination with condoms, have been recommended for MSM [8] and have found high acceptance with Black American women [30]. Intravaginal substance insertion was rather common in the sex worker sample and linked to increased HIV acquisition risk, yet its large-scale impact as a driver of the HIV pandemic seems questionable according to meta-analyses [7]. Pain killers and sedatives were reported to be used in moderation but alcohol use was very common among the sex workers and this may be a possible risk factor for HIV transmission due to reduced self-care and precaution measures under the influence of alcohol. Alternatively, drinking and drug use may be a self-treatment for dyspareunia, and thus the association between HIV-seropositivity and sex drug or alcohol use may in turn be mediated via the infection risk from epithelial disruption linked to painful intercourse.
Contrary to the hypothesis that longer abstinence may subsequently lead to HIV acquisition, longer abstinence gaps in the previous month were positively associated with HIV-seronegativity among FSWs. This may be due to extremely reduced numbers of clients or much lower risk-taking behaviour among cautious HIV-negative participants. Some HIV-positive sex workers may, in turn, take fewer precautions and abstinence breaks, which, however, may not reflect their abstinence intervals at the time around their actual HIV infection as participants had contracted HIV earlier than the previous month. For the longest abstinence gaps in adult life from memory, there was no significant association with any HIV status, neither among FSWs nor MSM, so the curious association with abstinence remains unclear. Determining the role of abstinence intervals would require determining abstinence behaviour at the time of the actual HIV acquisition in the past, which was an impossible task within this study approach. Therefore, a lack of significant association between longest memorized abstinence gaps in adult life and HIV status may not necessarily contradict the hypothesis of shorter abstinence gaps or higher intercourse regularity as protective against HIV acquisition.
We found that later sexual debut may protect against HIV infection, which is somewhat intuitive. The apparent protection against HIV acquisition by having anonymous partners is not clear and needs further exploration. The apparent protection against HIV infection by foreplay may be explained by more relaxed tissues and better lubrication and hence less epithelial trauma, reducing the efficiency of HIV infection.
The hypothesis linking sexual dysfunction and epithelial trauma signs to HIV infection status could be confirmed since dyspareunia levels and frequency, as well as epithelial trauma signs and relationship dissatisfaction, were positively associated with positive HIV status. The temporal or possibly causal direction of this suggested link remains debatable given the cross-sectional study design, and further investigation is needed.
The subjective assessment of dyspareunia factors by FSWs implies modes of prevention against the sexual dysfunction. Steady partnerships seem to be beneficial as FSWs rather unanimously agreed that discomfort occurs less with a steady partner than a casual one. Whatever their protective mechanism, they are difficult to maintain for FSWs, people with a promiscuous sex life or unable to enter steady relationships, or in social contexts favouring concurrency. As for more experience with sex partners and having several partners at once, no clear recommendation can be drawn from the sex workers' assessment for the prevention of dyspareunia. Longer duration of intercourse may worsen discomfort so that extremely prolonged sex may be recommended against. Higher regularity of intercourse, foreplay and lubricant use may, however, be recommended as protective as the women agreed that these factors may ease sexual dysfunction. The ideal maximum abstinence gaps between receptive sex appear unclear at the time of writing, and further investigation is needed. Interviewer and confirmation bias cannot be ruled out for the consensus of sex regularity as preventing painful intercourse, and blinded interviewing in further studies may be advisable to corroborate or refute the links to HIV risk and overall sexual health. Condoms seem not to interfere as most women judged their effect on dyspareunia to be irrelevant, so their role as an effective means to HIV prevention may be upheld. Finally, alcohol or sedative and analgesics use may increase HIV infection risk as seen in the inferential statistics, and there was no subjective agreement that drugs or alcohol would ease dyspareunia in any way.
The study revealed significant associations among FSWs for known HIV risk-taking behaviour such as early sexual debut, intravaginal substance insertion, alcohol and drug use as well as for the new link between sexual dysfunctions and HIV serostatus. The latter was self-reported, which helped establish a trusting relationship with participants but brought less reliability and objectivity for the HIV status variable. Among MSM, who also self-reported HIV status and were interviewed in the same fashion as sex workers, no similar significant results were found for anal dyspareunia. This difference may be due to more variation in the extent of vaginal sexual dysfunction in the sample because of higher variability of disorders of lubrication, arousal, of psychological confounding factors or physiological vaginal variation, co-infections or bacterial vaginosis. Gynaecological or rectal examinations and laboratory tests were not performed. The Nairobi population is culturally and ethnically diverse, and the role of genetics and different ethnic traits may be taken into consideration in further studies. Differences in vaginal anatomy were found between African-American and Caucasian women [31], and Frank Plummer had observed in his early HIV immunity research that many highly exposed persistently seronegative FSWs were related to one another [32]. As for anal HIV transmission risk, matters of anatomy and physiology may be more uniform in nature so that differences in epithelial disruption may be more elusive and harder to differentiate in a sample because related complaints and signs may in turn be more uniform among MSM than among heterosexual women.