1. Kirkwood J, Hargreaves D, O’Keefe S, Wilson J. Using isoelectric point to determine the pH for initial protein crystallization trials. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2015;31:1444–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv011
2. Kozlowski LP. IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator. Biol Direct [Internet]. 2016;11:55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0159-9
3. Kozlowski LP. Proteome-pI: proteome isoelectric point database. Nucleic Acids Res [Internet]. 2016/10/26. Oxford University Press; 2017;45:D1112–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789699
4. Stekhoven F, Gorissen M, Flik G. The isoelectric point, a key to understanding a variety of biochemical problems: a minireview. Fish Physiol Biochem [Internet]. 2008;34:1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-007-9145-6
5. Kenneth W, Kenneth G, Raymond E. General Chemistry. 4th ed. Saunders College Publishing; 1992.
6. Pace CN, Grimsley GR, Scholtz JM. Protein ionizable groups: pK values and their contribution to protein stability and solubility. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:13285–9.
7. Grimsley GR, Scholtz JM, Pace CN. A summary of the measured pK values of the ionizable groups in folded proteins. Protein Sci [Internet]. 2008/12/02. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company; 2009;18:247–51. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19177368
8. Masunov A, Lazaridis T. Potentials of Mean Force between Ionizable Amino Acid Side Chains in Water. J Am Chem Soc [Internet]. American Chemical Society; 2003;125:1722–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025521w
9. Zhu K, Zhao J, Lubman DM, Miller FR, Barder TJ. Protein pI Shifts due to Posttranslational Modifications in the Separation and Characterization of Proteins. Anal Chem [Internet]. American Chemical Society; 2005;77:2745–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac048494w
10. Locke D, Koreen I V, Harris AL. Isoelectric points and post-translational modifications of connexin26 and connexin32. FASEB J [Internet]. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; 2006;20:1221–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-5309fje
11. Youden WJ, Denny FE. Factors Influencing the pH Equilibrium Known as the Isoelectric Point of Plant Tissue. Am J Bot [Internet]. Botanical Society of America; 1926;13:743–53. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2435477
12. Shaw KL, Grimsley GR, Yakovlev GI, Makarov AA, Pace CN. The effect of net charge on the solubility, activity, and stability of ribonuclease Sa. Protein Sci [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001;10:1206–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374010/
13. Saraswathy N, Ramalingam P. Introduction to proteomics. In: Saraswathy N, Ramalingam PBT-C and T in G and P, editors. Woodhead Publ Ser Biomed [Internet]. Woodhead Publishing; 2011. p. 147–58. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781907568107500109
14. Gygi SP, Corthals GL, Zhang Y, Rochon Y, Aebersold R. Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2000;97:9390 LP-9395. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/97/17/9390.abstract
15. Rabilloud T, Lelong C. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: A tutorial. J Proteomics [Internet]. 2011;74:1829–41. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874391911002545
16. Kumar M, Singh R, Meena A, Patidar BS, Prasad R, Chhabra SK, et al. An Improved 2-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Method for Resolving Human Erythrocyte Membrane Proteins. Proteomics Insights [Internet]. SAGE Publications Ltd STM; 2017;8:1178641817700880. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178641817700880
17. Anderson JC, Peck SC. A simple and rapid technique for detecting protein phosphorylation using one-dimensional isoelectric focusing gels and immunoblot analysis. Plant J. 2008;55:881–5.
18. Jones LR, Simmerman HK, Wilson WW, Gurd FR, Wegener AD. Purification and characterization of phospholamban from canine cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 1985;260:7721–30. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/260/12/7721.abstract
19. Kiraga J, Mackiewicz P, Mackiewicz D, Kowalczuk M, Biecek P, Polak N, et al. The relationships between the isoelectric point and: length of proteins, taxonomy and ecology of organisms. BMC Genomics [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2007;8:163. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17565672
20. Carugo O. Isoelectric points of multi-domain proteins. Bioinformation. 2007;2:101–4.
21. Schwartz R, Ting CS, King J. Whole proteome pl values correlate with subcellular localizations of proteins for organisms within the three domains of life. Genome Res. 2001;11:703–9.
22. Labeit S, Barlow DP, Gautel M, Gibson T, Holt J, Hsieh C-L, et al. A regular pattern of two types of 100-residue motif in the sequence of titin. Nature [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 1990;345:273. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/345273a0
23. Kurzban GP, Wang K. Giant polypeptides of skeletal muscle titin: Sedimentation equilibrium in guanidine hydrochloride. Biochem Biophys Res Commun [Internet]. 1988;150:1155–61. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006291X88907504
24. Kurisu G, Zhang H, Smith JL, Cramer WA. Structure of the Cytochrome b6f Complex of Oxygenic Photosynthesis: Tuning the Cavity. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 2003;302:1009 LP-1014. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/302/5647/1009.abstract
25. Leister D, Schneider ABT-. From Genes to Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int Rev Cytol [Internet]. Academic Press; 2003;228:31–83. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0074769603280025
26. Barbagallo RP, Finazzi G, Forti G. Effects of Inhibitors on the Activity of the Cytochrome b6f Complex: Evidence for the Existence of Two Binding Pockets in the Lumenal Site. Biochemistry [Internet]. American Chemical Society; 1999;38:12814–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi990424+
27. Cramer WA, Soriano GM, Ponomarev M, Huang D, Zhang H, Martinez SE, et al. Some New Structural Aspects And Old Controversies Concerning The Cytochrome B6f Complex Of Oxygenic Photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol [Internet]. Annual Reviews; 1996;47:477–508. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.477
28. Kallas T. The Cytochrome b6f Complex. In: Bryant DA, editor. Mol Biol Cyanobacteria [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1994. p. 259–317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0227-8_9
29. Filomeni G, Rotilio G, Ciriolo MR. Cell signalling and the glutathione redox system. Biochem Pharmacol [Internet]. 2002;64:1057–64. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006295202011760
30. Zhang H, Forman HJ. Glutathione synthesis and its role in redox signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol [Internet]. 2012/04/03. 2012;23:722–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504020
31. Aquilano K, Baldelli S, Ciriolo MR. Glutathione: new roles in redox signaling for an old antioxidant. Front Pharmacol [Internet]. 2014;5:196. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2014.00196
32. Su M, Ling Y, Yu J, Wu J, Xiao J. Small proteins: untapped area of potential biological importance. Front Genet [Internet]. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2013;4:286. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24379829
33. Setlow P. I will survive: DNA protection in bacterial spores. Trends Microbiol [Internet]. Elsevier; 2007;15:172–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.004
34. Schalk C, Cognat V, Graindorge S, Vincent T, Voinnet O, Molinier J. Small RNA-mediated repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by the DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN 2 and ARGONAUTE 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2017/03/21. National Academy of Sciences; 2017;114:E2965–74. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28325872
35. Xue Y, Shen L, Cui Y, Zhang H, Chen Q, Cui A, et al. Tff3, as a Novel Peptide, Regulates Hepatic Glucose Metabolism. PLoS One [Internet]. Public Library of Science; 2013;8:e75240. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075240
36. Basrai M a, Hieter P, Boeke JD. Small Open Reading Frames : Beautiful Needles in the Haystack Small Open Reading Frames : Beautiful Needles in the Haystack. Genome Res. 1997;7:768–71.
37. Ramírez-Sánchez O, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Delaye L, Tiessen A. Plant Proteins Are Smaller Because They Are Encoded by Fewer Exons than Animal Proteins. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2016/12/18. Elsevier; 2016;14:357–70. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27998811
38. Tiessen A, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Delaye-Arredondo LJ. Mathematical modeling and comparison of protein size distribution in different plant, animal, fungal and microbial species reveals a negative correlation between protein size and protein number, thus providing insight into the evolution of proteomes. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2012;5:85. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296664
39. Purugganan M, Wessler S. The splicing of transposable elements and its role in intron evolution. Genetica. 1992;86:295–303.
40. Huff JT, Zilberman D, Roy SW. Mechanism for DNA transposons to generate introns on genomic scales. Nature [Internet]. 2016/10/19. 2016;538:533–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760113
41. Lee S-I, Kim N-S. Transposable elements and genome size variations in plants. Genomics Inform [Internet]. 2014/09/30. Korea Genome Organization; 2014;12:87–97. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317107
42. Plasterk RHA. Transposable Elements [Internet]. Brenner S, Miller JHBT-E of G, editors. Encycl. Genet. New York: Academic Press; 2001. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122270800013161
43. Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. National Academy of Sciences; 2002;99:12246–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC129430/
44. Sloan DB, Moran NA. Genome Reduction and Co-evolution between the Primary and Secondary Bacterial Symbionts of Psyllids. Mol Biol Evol [Internet]. 2012;29:3781–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss180
45. Mohanta TK, Pudake RN, Bae H. Genome-wide identification of major protein families of cyanobacteria and genomic insight into the circadian rhythm. Eur J Phycol. 2017;52.
46. Reyes-Prieto A, Weber APM, Bhattacharya D. The Origin and Establishment of the Plastid in Algae and Plants. Annu Rev Genet [Internet]. Annual Reviews; 2007;41:147–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130134
47. Martin W, Stoebe B, Goremykin V, Hansmann S, Hasegawa M, Kowallik K V. Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature [Internet]. Macmillan Magazines Ltd.; 1998;393:162. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30234
48. Mallick P, Boutz DR, Eisenberg D, Yeates TO. Genomic evidence that the intracellular proteins of archaeal microbes contain disulfide bonds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2002/07/09. The National Academy of Sciences; 2002;99:9679–84. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12107280
49. Brawley SH, Blouin NA, Ficko-Blean E, Wheeler GL, Lohr M, Goodson H V, et al. Insights into the red algae and eukaryotic evolution from the genome of Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta). Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2017;114:E6361 LP-E6370. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/31/E6361.abstract
50. Dring MJ, Wagner A, Boeskov J, Lüning K. Sensitivity of intertidal and subtidal red algae to UVA and UVB radiation, as monitored by Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements: Influence of collection depth and season, and length of irradiation. Eur J Phycol [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 1996;31:293–302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269600651511
51. Gröniger A, Hallier C, Häder DP. Influence of UV radiation and visible light on Porphyra umbilicalis: Photoinhibition and MAA concentration. J Appl Phycol [Internet]. 1999;11:437. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008179322198
52. Sillero A, Ribeiro JM. Isoelectric points of proteins: Theoretical determination. Anal Biochem [Internet]. 1989;179:319–25. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000326978990136X
53. Knight CG, Kassen R, Hebestreit H, Rainey PB. Global analysis of predicted proteomes: functional adaptation of physical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2004/05/18. National Academy of Sciences; 2004;101:8390–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15150418
54. Gibson F, Pittard J. Pathways of biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids and vitamins and their control in microorganisms. Bacteriol Rev [Internet]. 1968;32:465–92. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4884716
55. Tzin V, Galili G. New Insights into the Shikimate and Aromatic Amino Acids Biosynthesis Pathways in Plants. Mol Plant [Internet]. 2010;3:956–72. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674205214605475
56. Szabados L, Savouré A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci [Internet]. 2010;15:89–97. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360138509002982
57. Galili G, Höfgen R. Metabolic Engineering of Amino Acids and Storage Proteins in Plants. Metab Eng [Internet]. 2002;4:3–11. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096717601902034
58. Yoshida S. Biosynthesis and Conversion of Aromatic Amino Acids in Plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol [Internet]. Annual Reviews; 1969;20:41–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.20.060169.000353
59. Light SH, Anderson WF. The diversity of allosteric controls at the gateway to aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. Protein Sci [Internet]. 2013/02/11. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company; 2013;22:395–404. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400945
60. Berg J, Tymoczko J, Stryer L. Amino Acid Biosynthesis Is Regulated by Feedback Inhibition. Biochemistry. 5th ed. New York: WH Freeman; 2002.
61. Nelson D, Cox M. Amino acid biosynthesis is under allosteric regulation. In: Lehninger AL, editor. Lehlingers Princ Biochem. 4th ed. 2005. p. 833–80.
62. Nelson D, Cox M. Biosynthesis of amino acids, nucleotides, and related molecules. Lehlinger Princ Biochem. 4th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 2005. p. 842.
63. Novoselov S V, Rao M, Onoshko N V, Zhi H, Kryukov G V, Xiang Y, et al. Selenoproteins and selenocysteine insertion system in the model plant cell system, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. EMBO J [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2002;21:3681–93. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12110581
64. Reeves MA, Hoffmann PR. The human selenoproteome: recent insights into functions and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci [Internet]. 2009;66:2457–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0032-4
65. Bodley JW, Davie EW. A study of the mechanism of ambiguous amino acid coding by poly U: the nature of the products. J Mol Biol [Internet]. 1966;18:344–55. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283666802528