1. Goodenough, D.A. & Paul, D.L. Gap junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1, a002576 (2009).
2. Unwin, P.N. & Zampighi, G. Structure of the junction between communicating cells. Nature 283, 545-9 (1980).
3. Unwin, P.N. & Ennis, P.D. Two configurations of a channel-forming membrane protein. Nature 307, 609-13 (1984).
4. Unger, V.M., Kumar, N.M., Gilula, N.B. & Yeager, M. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science 283, 1176-80 (1999).
5. Maeda, S. et al. Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Nature 458, 597-602 (2009).
6. Bennett, B.C. et al. An electrostatic mechanism for Ca(2+)-mediated regulation of gap junction channels. Nat Commun 7, 8770 (2016).
7. Myers, J.B. et al. Structure of native lens connexin 46/50 intercellular channels by cryo-EM. Nature 564, 372-377 (2018).
8. Flores, J.A. et al. Connexin-46/50 in a dynamic lipid environment resolved by CryoEM at 1.9 A. Nat Commun 11, 4331 (2020).
9. Lee, H.J. et al. Cryo-EM structure of human Cx31.3/GJC3 connexin hemichannel. Sci Adv 6, eaba4996 (2020).
10. Kumar, N.M. & Gilula, N.B. The gap junction communication channel. Cell 84, 381-8 (1996).
11. Alexander, D.B. & Goldberg, G.S. Transfer of biologically important molecules between cells through gap junction channels. Curr Med Chem 10, 2045-58 (2003).
12. Lin, L.C. et al. Downregulated myocardial connexin 43 and suppressed contractility in rabbits subjected to a cholesterol-enriched diet. Lab Invest 85, 1224-37 (2005).
13. Plotkin, L.I., Speacht, T.L. & Donahue, H.J. Cx43 and mechanotransduction in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep 13, 67-72 (2015).
14. Xu, H. et al. Connexin 43 channels are essential for normal bone structure and osteocyte viability. J Bone Miner Res 30, 436-48 (2015).
15. Batra, N. et al. Mechanical stress-activated integrin alpha5beta1 induces opening of connexin 43 hemichannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 3359-64 (2012).
16. Zhang, X.F. & Cui, X. Connexin 43: Key roles in the skin. Biomed Rep 6, 605-611 (2017).
17. Xing, L., Yang, T., Cui, S. & Chen, G. Connexin Hemichannels in Astrocytes: Role in CNS Disorders. Front Mol Neurosci 12, 23 (2019).
18. Ribeiro-Rodrigues, T.M., Martins-Marques, T., Morel, S., Kwak, B.R. & Girão, H. Role of connexin 43 in different forms of intercellular communication - gap junctions, extracellular vesicles and tunnelling nanotubes. J Cell Sci 130, 3619-3630 (2017).
19. Srinivas, M., Verselis, V.K. & White, T.W. Human diseases associated with connexin mutations. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1860, 192-201 (2018).
20. Liu, S. et al. Distinct cardiac malformations caused by absence of connexin 43 in the neural crest and in the non-crest neural tube. Development 133, 2063-73 (2006).
21. Kajiwara, Y. et al. GJA1 (connexin43) is a key regulator of Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6, 144 (2018).
22. Kawasaki, A. et al. Modulation of connexin 43 in rotenone-induced model of Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience 160, 61-8 (2009).
23. Aasen, T. et al. Connexins in cancer: bridging the gap to the clinic. Oncogene 38, 4429-4451 (2019).
24. Chen, Q. et al. Carcinoma-astrocyte gap junctions promote brain metastasis by cGAMP transfer. Nature 533, 493-498 (2016).
25. Sinyuk, M., Mulkearns-Hubert, E.E., Reizes, O. & Lathia, J. Cancer Connectors: Connexins, Gap Junctions, and Communication. Front Oncol 8, 646 (2018).
26. Luo, B. et al. Connexin 43 reduces susceptibility to sympathetic atrial fibrillation. Int J Mol Med 42, 1125-1133 (2018).
27. Peracchia, C. Chemical gating of gap junction channels; roles of calcium, pH and calmodulin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662, 61-80 (2004).
28. Bukauskas, F.F. & Verselis, V.K. Gap junction channel gating. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662, 42-60 (2004).
29. Locke, D. & Harris, A.L. Connexin channels and phospholipids: association and modulation. BMC Biol 7, 52 (2009).
30. Sahu, G. & Bera, A.K. Contribution of intracellular calcium and pH in ischemic uncoupling of cardiac gap junction channels formed of connexins 43, 40, and 45: a critical function of C-terminal domain. PLoS One 8, e60506 (2013).
31. Xu, Q. et al. Gating of connexin 43 gap junctions by a cytoplasmic loop calmodulin binding domain. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302, C1548-56 (2012).
32. Shao, Q. et al. Structure and functional studies of N-terminal Cx43 mutants linked to oculodentodigital dysplasia. Mol Biol Cell 23, 3312-21 (2012).
33. Xu, Q., Lin, X., Matiukas, A., Zhang, X. & Veenstra, R.D. Specificity of the connexin W3/4 locus for functional gap junction formation. Channels (Austin) 10, 453-65 (2016).
34. Gemel, J., Lin, X., Veenstra, R.D. & Beyer, E.C. N-terminal residues in Cx43 and Cx40 determine physiological properties of gap junction channels, but do not influence heteromeric assembly with each other or with Cx26. J Cell Sci 119, 2258-68 (2006).
35. Unger, V.M., Kumar, N.M., Gilula, N.B. & Yeager, M. Expression, two-dimensional crystallization, and electron cryo-crystallography of recombinant gap junction membrane channels. J Struct Biol 128, 98-105 (1999).
36. Oshima, A., Tani, K., Hiroaki, Y., Fujiyoshi, Y. & Sosinsky, G.E. Three-dimensional structure of a human connexin26 gap junction channel reveals a plug in the vestibule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 10034-9 (2007).
37. Oshima, A. et al. Asymmetric configurations and N-terminal rearrangements in connexin26 gap junction channels. J Mol Biol 405, 724-35 (2011).
38. Khan, A.K. et al. A Steric "Ball-and-Chain" Mechanism for pH-Mediated Regulation of Gap Junction Channels. Cell Rep 31, 107482 (2020).
39. Swietach, P., Rossini, A., Spitzer, K.W. & Vaughan-Jones, R.D. H+ ion activation and inactivation of the ventricular gap junction: a basis for spatial regulation of intracellular pH. Circ Res 100, 1045-54 (2007).
40. Garciarena, C.D., Malik, A., Swietach, P., Moreno, A.P. & Vaughan-Jones, R.D. Distinct moieties underlie biphasic H(+) gating of connexin43 channels, producing a pH optimum for intercellular communication. FASEB J 32, 1969-1981 (2018).
41. Duffy, H.S. et al. pH-dependent intramolecular binding and structure involving Cx43 cytoplasmic domains. J Biol Chem 277, 36706-14 (2002).
42. Hirst-Jensen, B.J., Sahoo, P., Kieken, F., Delmar, M. & Sorgen, P.L. Characterization of the pH-dependent interaction between the gap junction protein connexin43 carboxyl terminus and cytoplasmic loop domains. J Biol Chem 282, 5801-13 (2007).
43. Voegtli, W.C., White, D.J., Reiter, N.J., Rusnak, F. & Rosenzweig, A.C. Structure of the bacteriophage lambda Ser/Thr protein phosphatase with sulfate ion bound in two coordination modes. Biochemistry 39, 15365-74 (2000).
44. Schlieker, C. et al. Structure of a herpesvirus-encoded cysteine protease reveals a unique class of deubiquitinating enzymes. Mol Cell 25, 677-87 (2007).
45. Penkov, N.V. & Penkova, N. Key Differences of the Hydrate Shell Structures of ATP and Mg.ATP Revealed by Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy and Dynamic Light Scattering. J Phys Chem B 125, 4375-4382 (2021).
46. Roh, S.H. et al. Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 8259-8264 (2017).
47. Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat Methods 14, 71-73 (2017).
48. Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20, 8432-8449 (2018).
49. Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. Improved Parameterization of Amine-Carboxylate and Amine-Phosphate Interactions for Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using the CHARMM and AMBER Force Fields. J Chem Theory Comput 12, 430-43 (2016).
50. Dydowiczová, A., Brózman, O., Babica, P. & Sovadinová, I. Improved multiparametric scrape loading-dye transfer assay for a simultaneous high-throughput analysis of gap junctional intercellular communication, cell density and viability. Sci Rep 10, 730 (2020).
51. Paznekas, W.A. et al. GJA1 mutations, variants, and connexin 43 dysfunction as it relates to the oculodentodigital dysplasia phenotype. Hum Mutat 30, 724-33 (2009).
52. Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. Molecular Dynamics of Membrane-Spanning DNA Channels: Conductance Mechanism, Electro-Osmotic Transport, and Mechanical Gating. J Phys Chem Lett 6, 4680-7 (2015).
53. Mim, C., Perkins, G. & Dahl, G. Structure versus function: Are new conformations of pannexin 1 yet to be resolved? J Gen Physiol 153, e202012754 (2021).
54. Burendei, B. et al. Cryo-EM structures of undocked innexin-6 hemichannels in phospholipids. Sci Adv 6, eaax3157 (2020).
55. Nguyen, T.A. et al. Functional Anatomy of the Human Microprocessor. Cell 161, 1374-87 (2015).
56. Lee, H.J. et al. Cryo-EM structure of human Cx31.3/GJC3 connexin hemichannel. Sci Adv 6, eaba4996 (2020).
57. Ritchie, T.K. et al. Chapter 11 - Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs. Methods Enzymol 464, 211-31 (2009).
58. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7(2018).
59. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J.L., Fleet, D.J. & Brubaker, M.A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat Methods 14, 290-296 (2017).
60. Zheng, S.Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14, 331-332 (2017).
61. Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J Struct Biol 193, 1-12 (2016).
62. Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S.H.W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5-17 (2019).
63. Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S.H.W. Estimation of high-order aberrations and anisotropic magnification from cryo-EM data sets in RELION-3.1. IUCrJ 7, 253-267 (2020).
64. Scheres, S.H. & Chen, S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat Methods 9, 853-4 (2012).
65. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F.J. & Tagare, H.D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat Methods 11, 63-5 (2014).
66. Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat Methods 16, 1153-1160 (2019).
67. Roh, S.H. et al. Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 8259-8264 (2017).
68. Gestaut, D. et al. The Chaperonin TRiC/CCT Associates with Prefoldin through a Conserved Electrostatic Interface Essential for Cellular Proteostasis. Cell 177, 751-765 e15 (2019).
69. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 486-501 (2010).
70. Casañal, A., Lohkamp, B. & Emsley, P. Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of Electron Cryo-microscopy and Crystallographic Data. Protein Sci 29, 1069-1078 (2020).
71. Afonine, P.V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 531-544 (2018).
72. Moriarty, N.W., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W. & Adams, P.D. electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 65, 1074-80 (2009).
73. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46, W296-W303 (2018).
74. Flores, J.A. et al. Connexin-46/50 in a dynamic lipid environment resolved by CryoEM at 1.9 A. Nat Commun 11, 4331 (2020).
75. Williams, C.J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27, 293-315 (2018).
76. Smart, O.S., Neduvelil, J.G., Wang, X., Wallace, B.A. & Sansom, M.S. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J Mol Graph 14, 354-60, 376 (1996).
77. Chovancova, E. et al. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Comput Biol 8, e1002708 (2012).
78. Abraham, M.J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19-28 (2015).
79. Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat Methods 14, 71-73 (2017).
80. Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20, 8432-8449 (2018).
81. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52, 7182-7190 (1981).
82. Nosé, S. & Klein, M.L. Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Molecular Physics 50, 1055-1076 (1983).
83. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98, 10089-10092 (1993).
84. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H.J.C. & Fraaije, J.G.E.M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18, 1463-1472 (1997).
85. Miyamoto, S. & Kollman, P.A. Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J Comput Chem 13, 952-962 (1992).
86. Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. Molecular Dynamics of Membrane-Spanning DNA Channels: Conductance Mechanism, Electro-Osmotic Transport, and Mechanical Gating. J Phys Chem Lett 6, 4680-7 (2015).
87. el-Fouly, M.H., Trosko, J.E. & Chang, C.C. Scrape-loading and dye transfer. A rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication. Exp Cell Res 168, 422-30 (1987).
88. Tahrir, G.F. et al. Role of Bcl2-associated Athanogene 3 in Turnover of Gap Junction Protein, Connexin 43, in Neonatal Cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep 9, 7658 (2019).