Fabrication and characterization of 2D mPG heterostructures. The synthesis process of 2D mPG heterostructures is schematically shown in Fig. 1a. First, the GO nanosheets modified by polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride are employed as 2D free-standing substrates. Then, monodispersed SiO2 nanospheres with negative charge serve as mesoporous templates to orderly assemble on the surface of GO substrates through electrostatic adsorption. Afterwards, homogeneous polydopamine (Supplementary Scheme 1) layer is patterned on the surface of as-prepared SiO2-GO nanosheets to form SiO2-PGO nanosheets. Finally, 2D mPG heterostructures with defined mesopore size and sheet thickness are generated after hydrothermal treatment (defined as SiO2-PG) and SiO2 etching. It is worth noting that this template strategy can efficiently realize the strong coupling of sodiophilic polydopamine, defective graphene (Supplementary Fig. 1) and adjustable mesopores, which is highly conducive to construct multi-functional ion redistributors for dendrite-free Na metal anodes (Fig. 1b), as discussed below.
The microstructure and chemical composition of 2D mPG heterostructures are presented in Fig. 2. Taking mPG with 12 nm mesopores (mPG-12) nanosheets as example, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image displays flat and uniform 2D morphology with lateral size ranging from 0.5 to 3 µm (Fig. 2a). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images clearly indicate homogeneous 2D mesoporous structure of mPG-12 nanosheets with uniformly ordered mesopores of ~ 12 nm (Fig. 2b and 2c). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image reveals 2D flat structure with a uniform thickness of ~ 20 nm (Fig. 2d). More importantly, the accurate patterning of mesoporous polydopamine on graphene surface with definable pore size and thickness can be precisely controlled, e.g., by changing the size of SiO2 template (Fig. 2e-h and Supplementary Fig. 2). Specially, mPG-7 nanosheets show uniform mesopores of ~ 7 nm and an average thickness of 14 nm, while mPG-22 nanosheets present ordered mesopores of ~ 22 nm and sheet thickness of ~ 28 nm. Meanwhile, non-mesoporous polydopamine-graphene (nPG) nanosheets are also synthesized (Supplementary Fig. 3) to highlight the importance of structure-directing SiO2 templates. Moreover, N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of mPG-7, mPG-12, mPG-22, and nPG nanosheets represent type IV curves with H2-type hysteresis loop (Supplementary Fig. 4). Notably, mPG-12 nanosheets display larger SSA of 157 m2 g− 1 than mPG-7 (144 m2 g− 1), mPG-22 (114 m2 g− 1) and nPG (54 m2 g− 1) nanosheets (Supplementary Table 1). Further, the dominated mesopore sizes of 6.8 nm for mPG-7, 12.2 nm for mPG-12, and 18.6 nm for mPG-22 nanosheets are well validated by the pore size distribution (Fig. 2i), nearly consistent with TEM observation. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectrum of mPG-12 reveals the existence of double peaks at 2930 and 2863 cm− 1 featuring the indole structure, the characteristic vibration peak at 1712 cm− 1 assigning to quinone (C = O) groups, and two distinct peaks at 1572 and 1462 cm− 1 attributing to C = C resonance vibration and N-H bending vibration (Supplementary Fig. 5), demonstrative of the hybridization of polydopamine and graphene in mPG-1230, 34, 35. Furthermore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of mPG-12 confirms three strong signals of C1s, N1s and O1s (Supplementary Fig. 6). The C1s spectrum is fitted by four characteristic peaks of 284.5 ± 0.1 eV for CHx and sp2-hybridized carbon, 285.7 ± 0.2 eV for C-O/C-N, 287.8 ± 0.2 eV for C = O, and 288.9 ± 0.2 eV for O-C = O (Fig. 2j)34, 36, 37. The O1s spectrum exhibits two peaks centered at 533.0 ± 0.2 eV for O-C and 531.3 ± 0.1 eV for O = C34, 36, 37. Moreover, the N1s spectrum reveals three peaks at 401.7 ± 0.1 for -NH2, 400.0 ± 0.1 eV for -NH-, and 398.5 ± 0.1 eV for -N = functional groups, respectively34, 36, 37. It is evidenced that the mesoporous polydopamine layer is effectively grafted with graphene, and the abundant polar functional groups, e.g., C = O, -OH and -NH-, are existed in 2D mPG heterostructure.
Calculation of sodiophilic nature and Na deposition behavior for mPG. To examine the effect of polar functional groups and 2D mesoporous structure on Na metal deposition, density functional theory (DFT) calculation and finite volume method (FVM) simulation were conducted. Figure 3a-c and Supplementary Fig. 7 display the binding energies and charge densities between Na atom and polydopmine, graphene, PP and Cu. It can be seen that the interaction between Na and Cu (-1.20 eV) or PP (-0.41 eV) is much weaker than that between Na and polydopmine, owing to abundant polar groups (C = O of -4.24 eV, -OH of -3.47 eV, -NH- of -3.37 eV). Thus, the sodiophilic nature of mPG coupled polydopmine and graphene with a high binding energy of -2.08 eV can serve as active site to realize more uniform ion transport and Na deposition. Furthermore, the effect of mesopore size of 2D mPG on Na ions distribution is investigated by FVM simulation. As shown in Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 8, the migration of Na ions driven by electric field and diffusion flow through 20 layers of mPG nanosheets is taken into account for the simulation. With the shunting of 2D mesoporous structure in mPG, the distribution of Na ions becomes increasingly uniform as ions migrate along the Y-axis, and achieves almost stability after four layers of mPG (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 9). The 2D mPG-7 reveals the lowest standard deviation whether with same amplitude and period or same fluctuation and period of Na ion distribution at the entrance, implying the smaller mesopores are more beneficial to the redistribution and uniformity of Na ions (Fig. 3f, g). However, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) shows that mPG-12 possess lower charge transfer resistance (14.9 Ω) and higher Na ion diffusion coefficient (5.7 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1), compared with mPG-7 (36.2 Ω and 2.7 × 10− 13 cm2 s− 1) and mPG-22 (32.9 Ω and 2.6 × 10− 12 cm2 s− 1), possibly because of larger SSA, appropriate meopore size and thickness for faster ion diffusion transport38–40 (Supplementary Fig. 10). Taken the above into consideration, 2D mPG heterostructures (especially mPG-12) possess huge merits of serving as multi-functional redistributor to homogenize distribution of Na ions and prevent “tip effects” of Na deposition33, 41.
Characterization and performance of mPG-12 redistributor for Na metal anode. Considering the unique advantages of 2D mPG heterostructures, we fabricated mPG-12 based PP (mPG-12@PP) hybrid separators for Na metal anodes and Na metal batteries. Compared with bare PP separator with plenty of large pores (~ 500 nm) and 25 µm thickness, mPG-12@PP separators exhibit uniform, layer-stacked film (only ~ 9 µm thickness) of 2D mPG-12 nanosheets on the surface of PP, while retain outstanding flexibility and well-defined pores (Fig. 4a-c and Supplementary Fig. 11, 12). Further, the contact angle of electrolyte on mPG-12@PP separator is ~ 8° (Fig. 4d), which is much lower than that on PP separator (31°), indicative of enhanced affinity of mPG-12@PP with electrolyte that is beneficial for Na ion diffusion28, 42.
To highlight the importance of mesopores in mPG-12, nPG based PP (nPG@PP) separator was also assembled. The electrochemical performance of Na/Cu half cells with mPG-12@PP, nPG@PP and PP separators was first evaluated to illustrate Na deposition behavior. At a current density of 0.5 mA cm− 2 with a cycling capacity of 0.5 mAh cm− 2, the Na/Cu cells with mPG-12@PP separator exhibit ultrastable plating/stripping process for 550 cycles (~ 1100 h) with a steady Coulombic efficiency of ~ 99.8%, which is better than that of nPG@PP (400 cycles with ~ 99.5% Coulombic efficiency) and PP separators (200 cycles with < 90.0% Coulombic efficiency) (Fig. 4e). It can be well explained by the enlarged plating-stripping curves (Fig. 4f), in which the Na/Cu cells with mPG-12@PP separator show the lowest nucleation overpotential of only 20 mV than those of Na/Cu cells with nPG@PP (60 mV) and PP (170 mV) separators. The reduced nucleation overpotential verifies the low interface resistance and enhanced Na ion transport kinetics through mPG-12@PP separator. Even at higher current density and areal capacity (4.0 mA cm− 2 and 4.0 mAh cm− 2; 8.0 mA cm− 2 and 8.0 mAh cm− 2), the Coulombic efficiency and cycling performance of Na/Cu cells with mPG-12@PP separator (~ 99.9% for 450 cycles; ~99.7% for 350 cycles) still outperform PP separator (~ 78.5% for 90 cycles; ~51.7% for 50 cycles), further demonstrating the superiority of mPG-12@PP separator for protecting Na metal anodes (Fig. 4g and Supplementary Fig. 13). To visually understand the impact of mPG-12@PP separator on Na plating/stripping process, the morphologies of Na metal anodes were traced by SEM (Supplementary Fig. 14). For the cell with bare PP separator, the anode exhibits obvious Na dendrites with loosely moss-like structure at a Na loading of 1.0 mAh cm− 2. In a sharp contrast, mPG-12@PP separator endows Na metal anode with a rather uniform and smooth surface without obvious dendrites, and this morphology becomes denser upon an increased Na loading of 2.0 mAh cm− 2. The distinctive morphological transition of Na metal anodes with different separators demonstrates the key role of mPG-12 on efficient regulation of the Na ions distribution and Na deposition.
Furthermore, symmetric Na/Na cells were fabricated to assess the voltage hysteresis and cycling stability. Figure 4h exhibits the voltage-time curves of Na/Na cells with mPG-12@PP, nPG@PP and bare PP separators at 1 mA cm− 2, 1 mAh cm− 2. Notably, the cells with mPG-12@PP separator delivers virtually flat voltage plateaus over 2000 h with small overpotential (4 mV), illustrating their excellent interfacial stability and outstanding cyclability. In a sharp contrast, the cells with nPG@PP display higher voltage hysteresis after 500 h (> 14 mV), and the cells with bare PP separators appear micro-short circuiting after dozens of hours (inset of Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 15). When increasing the areal capacity to 5 mAh cm− 2 or even 10 mAh cm− 2, the cells with mPG-12@PP separator still show stable voltage plateaus over 1700 h and 1400 h, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 16, 17). Remarkably, such an ultralong cycle life of Na anodes (~ 2000 h at 1 mA cm− 2 and 1 mAh cm− 2, ~ 1700 h at 5 mA cm− 2 and 5 mAh cm− 2, ~ 1400 h at 10 mA cm− 2 and 10 mAh cm− 2) is superior to those of other Na anodes stabilized by various methods under similar test conditions, such as 3D MXene-melamine foam (720 h at 10 mA cm− 2 and 10 mAh cm− 2)43, poly(vinylidene difluoride) coated Cu current collector (1200 h at 1 mA cm− 2 and 1 mAh cm− 2)44, and Na@reduced GO anodes (300 h at 5 mA cm− 2 and 5 mAh cm− 2)24, as shown as in Supplementary Fig. 18 and Supplementary Table 221, 45–50. What’s more, the cells with mPG-12@PP separator reveal excellent rate capability under increasing current densities up to 25 mA cm− 2 with 25 mAh cm− 2 (overpotential ≈ 83 mV, Fig. 4i), whereas the voltage-time curve of the cells with PP separator suffers from severe fluctuation (Supplementary Fig. 19), suggestive of the stable SEI and superior reaction kinetic of Na metal anodes with mPG-12@PP separator. To the best of our knowledge, such a ultrahigh rate performance (25 mA cm− 2, 25 mAh cm− 2) greatly surpassed to those of the state-of-the-art reported Na metal anodes stabilized by diversified strategies, such as 3D MXene-melamine foam (20 mA cm− 2, 20 mAh cm− 2)43, Na-Hg alloy (8 mA cm− 2, 8 mAh cm− 2)51, core-shell C@Sb nanoparticles (5 mA cm− 2, 1 mAh cm− 2)52, Sb2MoO6 microspheres (10 mA cm− 2, 8 mAh cm− 2)53, oxygen-functionalized carbon nanotube (10 mA cm− 2, 2 mAh cm− 2)14, reduced GO aerogel (5 mA cm− 2, 5 mAh cm− 2)54, Sn2+ pillared Ti3C2 MXene (8 mA cm− 2, 3 mAh cm− 2)55, porous Cu matrix (3 mA cm− 2, 1 mAh cm− 2)45, and 3D carbon felt (5 mA cm− 2, 2 mAh cm− 2)56 (Fig. 4j and Supplementary Table 3).
Electrochemical performance of Na/NVP full batteries. To highlight the applicability of mPG based separator, the Na/NVP full batteries were assembled (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 20), in which as-deposited Na metal foil (10 mAh cm− 2) with PG-12@PP or bare PP separator was used as the metal anode. Figure 5b exhibits the comparison of cycling stability of Na/NVP full cell with mPG-12@PP and PP separators at 1 C. Significantly, the Na/NVP cell with mPG-12@PP separator demonstrates exceptionally stable cycling performance with 90% retention of the initial capacity over 500 cycles (Fig. 5c). While the specific capacity of Na/NVP full cell with bare PP separator decays rapidly after 120 cycles caused by the formation of Na dendrites and “dead Na”. Moreover, the full battery with mPG-12@PP separator reveals superior rate capability to that with PP separator (Fig. 5d). Specifically, the discharge capacities of the full cell with mPG-12@PP separator are 103, 96, 86 and 75 mAh g− 1 at 1 C, 5 C, 15 C and 30 C, much higher than those of cell with PP separator (99, 91, 76 and 55 mAh g− 1; Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 21). These results further confirm that 2D mPG based separators enable Na metal batteries with significantly enhanced Coulombic efficiency, cycling stability and rate performance.