Study design and participants
The study was designed as a randomized, open-label clinical trial with a parallel standard control group. The 12-week, single-centered study was conducted at Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Clinic in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The participants were enrolled from the outpatient treatment facility of the hospital from September 2018 to June 2019. Before the trial commencement, all participants attended a briefing session with a dietician and were provided with a structured program based on the AHA guidelines, including a low-fat diet; increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables, and growing consumption of fish instead of red or processed meat [21]. Furthermore, all groups were directed not to change their physical activity during the study period.
Participants
The study participants consisted of adult men and women with active phase of UC referred to the Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Clinic in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Diagnosis of UC was performed by a gastrointestinal specialist, and those who met the criteria were included in the study. The criterion for diagnosing UC by gastroenterologist was based on histopathological results in the last three months. As shown in Figure 1, out of 93 volunteers to participate in this trial, 70 patients met the inclusion criteria. The age range of patients participating in this trial was between 18 and 55 years old and BMI> 20 kg/m2. Participants were screened for eligibility using the following inclusion criteria: 1) willingness to participate, 2) age range between 18 to 60, 3) patients with active phase of the disease (mild to moderate) according to determine by the gastroenterologist based on laboratory findings and colonoscopy. Patients were excluded from the study if there was evidence of other intestinal diseases, inflammatory diseases, and autoimmune diseases, regular consumption of omega-3, flaxseed, or any supplements with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties during the past month, pregnancy and lactation, sensitivity to flaxseed compounds, use of anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids, immune-modulators (such as Azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, and Cyclosporine A), and anti-TNF-α medications (such as Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, and Infliximab) in the baseline or during the study, and unwilling to participate.
Randomization
At visit 2 (day 0), a card shuffling method was employed for patients' randomization, and the patients were provided with a unique randomization code. Patients were randomized according to a preexisting list produced by a card shuffling method, and the group assignments were concealed in an opaque sealed envelope. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the flaxseed and control groups. Due to the open-label design of the study, researchers and participants were aware of the nature of these two groups. However, the unit secretary, nurses in relevant units, technicians, laboratory, and statistics specialists were unaware.
Procedures and outcomes
After the baseline measurements, the intervention group was provided with a flaxseed powder package. The duration of intervention in this trial was 12 weeks. At the beginning of the study, after recording the demographic information of all patients, patients in the intervention group were asked to consume 30 grams of flaxseed powder daily, and the control group was advised to follow their routine medication regimen. The same nutritional recommendations were given to all patients to observe ethical issues and encourage participants in both groups to participate in the study. The dose of flaxseed powder was selected based on the results of previous studies[22, 23]. Flaxseed was provided from a farm in Khoy, West Azerbaijan province of Iran. The School of Pharmacy analyzed flaxseed powder, and the composition of macronutrients and micronutrients per 100 g of powder was as follows: energy: 450 kcal; fat:41 g; ALA:21.5 g; protein: 20 g; carbohydrate: 29 g and fiber:28 g. Flaxseed was cleaned, milled, and packed (250 g each pack) with a 15 g measure. Participants in the flaxseed group were asked to use one serving (15 g) of flaxseed powder mixed in a glass of cold water after breakfast and one serving in the evening with an hour interval of taking medications. To prevent gastrointestinal complications such as cramps, patients were advised to use the flaxseed powder in two divided doses. They were also notified to take flaxseed powder mixed with 250 ml water two times daily or add flaxseed powder into a salad and eat it at lunch or dinner. Packages were given to the participants at the beginning, 4thand 8thweeks of the study. Patients were asked not to consume flaxseed products during the 12-week study period. Participants were asked about their adherence to the intervention plan and provided a sufficient supply of supplements at each follow-up visit. Participants were instructed to return the empty and non-empty containers of the supplements, which were weighed/ counted as a measure of study compliance, at weeks 4, 8, and 12. If they had consumed less than 90% of the prescribed flaxseed powder, they were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome of this trial was to evaluate the effect of flaxseed supplementation on adiponectin concentration. The secondary outcomes in this trial were serum concentration of resistin and visfatin.
Data collection
Fasting venous blood (10 ml) was collected from each subject after 12 hours fast. To separate the serum, blood samples were centrifuged at room temperature at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and the isolated serum was stored at -80 °C until the biochemical tests were carried out. Serum concentrations of adiponectin, resistin, and visfatin were measured using ELISA kits (Eastbiopharm Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, PRC, and Diagnostics Biochem Canada (DBS)).
The 3-day 24-hour recall was designed to quantitatively assess current nutrient intake at baseline and end of the study. Then, each food item was entered into Nutritionist IV software (1997, First DataBank Inc., San Bruno, CA), and the mean intake of energy, micronutrients, and macronutrients was calculated at the baseline and end of the study. Physical activity was assessed using the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) questionnaire.
At the beginning and end of the study, the weight and height of patients participating in both groups were assessed using standard equipment. Patients 'weight was assessed using Seca device with 100 g precision, and patients' height was evaluated using Seca stadiometer in a standing position and without shoes, with an accuracy of 0.1 cm. The standard formula was used to calculate the BMI.
Ethical considerations
The executive protocol of this trial was presented by the Research Council of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and approved by the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (Ethics Code: IR.SBMU.ENDOCRINE.REC.1397.115), and carried out by the Helsinki Declaration. The protocol for this trial was submitted as prospective in the protocol records system for the Iranian Clinical Trials Registration (www.irct.ir) with and after the corresponding evaluations, the code (IRCT20180311039043N1) was recorded. Also, written informed consent was acquired from all the study participants in agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical methods
Quantitative and qualitative data were reported as mean (standard deviation) and frequency (%). Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normality of the data. Qualitative variables were compared using the chi-square test. For normal distribution variables, the independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were used to compare parameters at the beginning and the end of the study between and within groups, respectively. Also, One-way analysis of variance and LSD post-hoc tests were used to compare groups in terms of quantitative variables.
Moreover, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust the effect of confounding variables (dietary intake of energy, protein, fat, polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and omega 6 polyunsaturated fatty acids). The P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24 (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY).