In order to identify the crystalline structure of the as-prepared ceramics, analysis of the powder XRD data is performed. Figure 1a displays the laboratory PXRD patterns of the Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. In general, BaTiO3 undergoes a distinct structural transformation with respect to the temperature such as rhombohedral (R3c) to orthorhombic (Amm2), orthorhombic to tetragonal (P4mm), and tetragonal to cubic (Pm\(\stackrel{-}{3}\)m) phase transition. BaTi0.95Fe0.05O3−δ ceramics shows both tetragonal (P4mm) and hexagonal (P63/mmc) phases with a phase percentage of 59% and 41% respectively [23]. The powder XRD profiles are matched with the JCPDS card no. of 05-0626 (P4mm) and 34–0129 (P63/mmc) and no evidence for the secondary phases likely, GdFeO3 and unreacted starting oxides. The structural coexistence of tetragonal + hexagonal (T + H) observed in y = 0.005 & 0.01 ceramics whereas, single T-phase alone in y = 0.015 ceramics. Similar structure has already reported in Dy3+-Fe3+ co-substituted BTO [21]. The occurrence of the structure coexistence with respect to the Gd-content indicates the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB). The diffraction patterns indicate a slight peak shifting towards the higher 2θ which is attributed to the mismatch of the ionic radius in A-site ions i.e. Ba2+(1.35Å) and Gd3+(0.938Å).
Due to the lack of visibility to identify the presence of phase, either tetragonal or cubic should be used through the (002)/ (200) splitting, Gaussian fitting is used in the vicinity of 45o as shown in Fig. 1b. Asymmetrical diffraction confirms the presence of the tetragonal phase in the lattice in all of the samples. The decline of H-phase (H(204)) intensity indicates that the instability of H-phase is triggered under the Gd-substitution. This suggests a decrease of defect content in ceramics, because the H-phase accepts more oxygen vacancies due to the presence of the oxygen bridge in the unit cell. The incorporation of Gd-content leads to the structural transformation from the coexistence of metastable H-phase and stable T-phase that suppresses the defect concentration.
The structural details yielded from the Rietveld refinement for Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics are shown in Fig. 2. For the tetragonal phase with the space group of P4mm, four ions Ba2+/Gd3+, Ti4+, Fe3+ and O2−, occupy the three distinct Wyckoff positions. Ba1 at the (1a) site, Ti4+/Fe3+ at the (1b) site, O1 at the (1b) site and O2 at the (2c) site with the positional coordinates of (0,0,0), (1/2,1/2,z), (1/2,1/2,z) and (0,1/2,z) respectively. For the hexagonal phase with the space group of P63/mmc, four ions Ba2+/Gd3+, Ti4+/Fe3+ and O2− occupy the five distinct Wyckoff sites. Bal at the (2b) site, Ba2 at the (4f) site, Ti4+/Fe3+ at the (2a) site, Ti4+/Fe3+ at the (4f) site, O1 at the (6h) site and O2 at the (12k) site with the positional coordinates of (0,0,1/4), (1/3,2/3,z), (0,0,0), (/1/3,2/3,z), (x,y,3/4) and (x,y,z) respectively. The sequence of the fitting has already been reported in BTO substituted BFO [24]. T(P4mm) + H (P63/mmc) for y = 0.005 & 0.01 and T(P4mm) for y = 0.015 profile models give the better fitting with less χ2 compared with other models like, T(P4mm), H(P63/mmc), C(Pm\(\stackrel{-}{3}\)m) and C(Pm\(\stackrel{-}{3}\)m) + H(P63/mmc). In which, the positional coordinates are taken from the standard crystallographic Table [25]. The structural parameters, volume phase percentage, and bond length listed are in Table 1. The increase in c/a ratio is consented to the increase in tetragonal phase percentage as an increase of Gd-content. The average grain size (D) calculated using Scherrer’s formula and listed in Table 1. As the Gd-content increases, the average grain size gradually declines, suggesting that Gd-content is not able to support grain growth.
Table 1: Structural parameters such as cell values, c/a ratio, phase percentage, crystallite size, micro-strain, dislocation density and bond length of the Ba1-yGdyTi1-xFexO3; x=0.05; y=0.005, 0.01 and 0.015 ceramics
|
x=0.05; y=0.005
|
x=0.05; y=0.01
|
x=0.05; y=0.015
|
Crystal symmetry
|
P4mm
|
P63/mmc
|
P4mm
|
P63/mmc
|
P4mm
|
a (Å)
c(Å)
V(Å)3
c/a ratio
|
3.999
4.006
64.1
1.0017
|
5.715
13.999
396
-
|
3.998
4.007
64
1.0021
|
5.715
14.003
396.1
-
|
3.995
4.005
63.9
1.0024
|
Phase %
|
82.2
|
17.8
|
99.07
|
0.93
|
100
|
D (nm)
ε (10-3) (nm)-2
δ (10-3)
|
82
1.810
0.494
|
67
1.808
0.236
|
57
2.038
0.345
|
Gd2-O4
Gd3-O4
Fe3-O4
|
-
-
-
|
2.884
1.757
1.691
|
-
-
-
|
2.69
2.89
1.476
|
-
-
-
|
Figure 3(a-c) displays the HR-TEM micrographs of the as-prepared Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. The micrographs show much more dislocations and grain boundary (GB) with bulging. In general, in order to understand the formation of dynamic recrystallisation (DRX) grains, the micro-strain and dislocation density are much more important. The micro-strain (ε) and dislocation density (δ) are calculated using XRD data by the following formula as\(\epsilon =1/{D}^{2} \left({nm}^{-2}\right)\), where D-crystallite size (nm) and\(\delta =\beta /tan\theta\), where β- FWHM (deg.), θ-diffraction angle (deg.) respectively. The values of D, β, and θ are obtained from XRD data and the calculated values of ε and δ are listed in Table 1. Both of the ε and δ values decreased up to y = 0.01 ceramics and then they increased with the further increase of Gd-content. A lower strain value suppresses the formation of lower angel GBs (LAGBs) that restricts the onset of DRX grain growth [26, 27]. The serrated GB in y = 0.01 ceramics is due to the low value of ε that leads to the unfeasibility of the DRX grain growth. Since, lower strain value produces less strain energy, which is not sufficient to reorder the dislocations near the GBs. However, serrated GB is a good location for the GB elongation, which facilitates the nucleation process. The complete growth of DRX occurs after the disappearance of GB bulging with the further increase of strain rate 1.2 [26] that obliterated the dislocations. Even though the increase of strain, the DRX growth is not evidenced in the y = 0.015 sample. Because the strain energy is much higher than the required level for the deformation because of the time limitation which results in heterogeneous grains.
Figure 4(a-c) shows the HREM of the Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. The clear lattice fringes confirm the high crystallinity of the ceramics. The lattice fringes with d-spacing of 0.404nm is for the H-phase of y = 0.005 and correspond to the (102) plane. The other two ceramics (y = 0.01&0.015) confirm the presence of the T-phase with the d-spacing of 0.284nm, 0.282nm that correspond to the (101) and (110) plane respectively. Figure 5(a-c) displays the SAED patterns of Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics, along the [010]PC zone axis. Structural coexistence of the T + H phase is confirmed in y = 0.005, 0.01 ceramics and y = 0.015 ceramics shows the T-phase alone. The aforementioned HREM and SAED investigations are concurrence with the XRD results.
Figure 6 illustrates the core-level spectra of Ba, Gd, Ti, Fe, and O elements in the Ba0.995Gd0.005Ti0.95Fe0.05O3 ceramics. To find out the accurate binding energy (B.E) positions of the elements Gaussian function was used for peak fitting. In the Ba 3d core-spectrum, the peaks at 779.71eV correspond to the Ba 3d5/2 and 795.04eV assigns to the Ba 3d3/2 spin-orbit doublet. The energy separation between the Ba spin-orbit doublets is 15.33eV [28]. In the core-level spectra of Ti 2p, the binding energy position of Ti 2p3/2 and Ti2p1/2 are obtained at 459.2eV and 464.80eV respectively, and the weak reflection at 457.8eV assigned to Ti3+. The energy separation of Ti 2P doublet is 5.6eV, which is correlated to the literature [29, 30]. The asymmetric nature of the Gd 4d spectrum indicates the spin-orbit doublets of Gd i.e Gd 4d5/2 and Gd 4d3/2, which presented at the B.E positions of 141.8eV and 146eV that agree with the literature [28]. The O 1s spectrum fitted at four B.E positions and the B.Es are 529.49eV, 530.67eV, 532.59eV and 533.99eV. The peak at 529.49eV confirms the metal-oxygen bond that is lattice oxygen and the peak at 530.67eV corresponds to the dangling bond i.e. oxygen vacancy. The other two reflections at 532.59eV and 533.99eV indicate that the O-Gd and Gd-O-Gd respectively. As a result, XPS core spectra confirm the incorporation of Gd at Ba-site and Fe at Ti-site in the as-prepared ceramics.
Figure 7 reveals the EPR spectrum as prepared of Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. A strong asymmetric single EPR feature was noticed in all the ceramics. The calculated gyromagnetic (g) factors are listed in Table 2. These signals corresponding to Ti3+ paramagnetic defect matched with the literature [31–33]. The signal gradually decreases as it increases in Gd- content that suggests the Gd-substitution to try to suppress the generation of Ti3+ ion that implies the removal of Fe2+. On the other hand, the tetragonal and cubic phase EPR signal are featureless which Kondiazhuyi et.al, has already reported [31]. The change in intensity depends on the defect valence state, low to high spin configuration, and spin-lattice relaxation time [33]. The wide and less intense signals are observed with the g-factor of 6.244 and 1.613, which are associated with Fe2+ ion and are weak with the further increase of Gd-content. Moreover, the EPR signals which did not shift towards the g = 2.00 signal indicate that Gd-substitution does not affect the T-crystal symmetry. From that, Gd-substitution controls the defect formation through the charge compensation process. Spin-orbit coupling is confirmed by the slight deviation of the g-factor from the standard g-factor of the unpaired electrons [34]. ΔBP−P is the width of the signal that creates the separation between the upper and lowers the lower peak [35]. A higher value of line-width parameters (ΔBP−P) suggests strong magnetic dipolar interaction within the sample and is tabulated (Table 2).
Table 2
EPR parameters such as g-factor, Δg/g, ΔBP−P and Pasy of the Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3; x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01and 0.015 ceramics
|
x = 0.05; y = 0.005
|
x = 0.05; y = 0.01
|
x = 0.05; y = 0.015
|
Crystal symmetry
|
P4mm
|
P63/mmc
|
P4mm
|
P63/mmc
|
P4mm
|
a (Å)
c(Å)
V(Å)3
c/a ratio
|
3.999
4.006
64.1
1.0017
|
5.715
13.999
396
-
|
3.998
4.007
64
1.0021
|
5.715
14.003
396.1
-
|
3.995
4.005
63.9
1.0024
|
Phase %
|
82.2
|
17.8
|
99.07
|
0.93
|
100
|
D (nm)
ε (10− 3) (nm)−2
δ (10− 3)
|
82
1.810
0.494
|
67
1.808
0.236
|
57
2.038
0.345
|
Gd2-O4
Gd3-O4
Fe3-O4
|
-
-
-
|
2.884
1.757
1.691
|
-
-
-
|
2.69
2.89
1.476
|
-
-
-
|
Furthermore, the EPR study was also used to understand the presence of magneto-crystalline anisotropy in the samples through the asymmetric parameter (Pasy). It is calculated from the following relation, Pasy = [\(1-\frac{{\text{h}}_{\text{U}}}{{\text{h}}_{\text{L}}}\)], Where hU-maximum height of the upper peak above the baseline (cts.), hL-maximum height of the lower peak below the baseline (cts.). The calculated values are tabulated in Table 2. As an increase of Gd-content, the values of Pasy decrease, and a high value obtained in y = 0.005 ceramics which denotes that the strong magnetic interaction is expected in that sample (y = 0.005) through magnetocrystalline anisotropy. In addition, magneto-crystalline anisotropy of Fe3+ in 2b-site (1.4cm− 1/ion) is significantly higher than the 12k-site (-0.18 cm− 1/ion) that has already been reported in TM doped barium ferrite system [36]. The bond length of Gd2-O4 (Gd2 at 2b-site) > Gd3-O4 (Gd3 at 12k-site) for y = 0.005 ceramics and Gd2-O4 (2b-site) < Gd3-O4 (12k-site). The reduction in the length of the Gd-O bond strengthens the Gd-O bond, which favors strong magnetization. In this sense, the 12k-site unable to exhibit high magneto-crystalline anisotropy than 2b-site, which is concurrence to the asymmetric parameter (Pasy).
Figure 8(a-c) shows the polarisation (P)-electric field (E) hysteresis loops of Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. The unsaturated loops are noticed in all the ceramics even at the high electric field of 40kV/cm, which indicates the leaky-like behaviour. The value of remnant polarisation (Pr) non-monotonously varied and the large value of Pr is noticed in y = 0.01 ceramics. Because of the decline in the paraelectric phase, a decrease of the H-phase improves polarisation. Even though the increase of tetragonality (c/a ratio), the y = 0.015 ceramics are unable to exhibit better polarisation due to the B-side defect that produces oxygen vacancy for charge compensation. The decline in coercive field (Ec) indicates the softness of the ceramics. The ferroelectric parameters i.e. Pr, Pmax, and Ec are listed in Table 3. The enhancement of polarisation manifests the reduction in defect concentration by Gd-concentration. Both of the XPS and EPR investigations support the presence of B-site defect i.e. Ti3+/Fe2+ in the samples and the defect concentration decrease as an increase of Gd-content. Because the dissociation energy of Gd-O bond (719 ± 6kJ/mol) is much higher than the Ba-O (562 ± 42kJ/mol), which suppresses the defect formation [37, 38].
Table 3: Ferroelectric and ferromagnetic parameters such as remnant polarisation, maximum polarisation, coercive field and remnant magnetisation, squareness of the loop, coercive field respectively of the Ba1-yGdyTi1-xFexO3; x=0.05; y=0.005, 0.01and 0.015ceramics
y-content
|
Pr (μC/cm2)
|
Pmax (μC/cm2)
|
Ec (kV/cm)
|
Mr (memu/g)
|
Mr/Ms
|
Hc (kOe.)
|
0.005
|
1.65
|
5.93
|
6.35
|
2.325
|
0.282
|
0.408
|
0.01
|
2.44
|
10.52
|
4.79
|
2.812
|
0.274
|
0.653
|
0.015
|
1.89
|
9.17
|
4.53
|
4.127
|
0.262
|
0.968
|
Table 4: Extrinsic, intrinsic magnetodielectric constant (MDC) and magnetoelectric coupling coefficient (αME) values of the Ba1-yGdyTi1-xFexO3; x=0.05; y=0.005, 0.01 and 0.015 ceramics
y-content
|
Extrinsic MDC %
|
Intrinsic MDC %
|
αME (mV/cm.Oe)
|
0.005
|
-2.53
|
-0.51
|
5.42
|
0.01
|
-2.33
|
-0.31
|
3.32
|
0.015
|
-1.97
|
-0.36
|
3.74
|
Magnetisation (M)-magnetic field (H) hysteresis loops of Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics shown in Fig. 9(a-c). It is clear that all the ceramics show well-saturated loops, which denotes the ferromagnetic (FM) feature. The inserts of Fig. 9(a-c) reveal the ABK plots, which confirms the FM behaviour through the convex curvature. Pristine BTO exhibits weak FM due to the B-site vacancy i.e. Ti3+ [39–43]. In view of the literature, the nanosized BTO shows weak FM due to the formation of Ti3+, the intrinsic defect [42–45]. As the increase of Gd-concentration, both Mr and Ms simultaneously improved, while the squareness of the loops (Mr/Ms) decreases. In this work, the observed Mr is larger than that of Dy3+-Fe3+ co-substituted BTO [21]. The increase of the coercive field (Hc) envisages the magnetic hardness of the sample. Both Mr and Hc are significantly enhanced even though there is the supremacy of the T-phase. The structural distortion arises from the large mismatch of ionic radius difference between Ba2+ (1.35Ǻ), Gd3+ (0.938Ǻ) and Ti4+ (0.605Ǻ), Fe3+ (0.645Ǻ), which strengthens the Fe-O-Fe bond. Moreover, the substitution of magnetic Gd element (7.8µB) in Ba-site enhances the magnetisation.
In general, the origin of ferromagnetism depends on the various kinds of magnetic interactions such as, (i) octahedral Fe3+ -octahedral Fe3+ interaction (ii) pentahedral Fe3+ - pentahedral Fe3+ interaction (iii) Fe2+-Fe3+ and Fe3+-Fe4+ double exchange interactions and (iv) pentahedral Fe3+ - octahedral Fe3+ interaction. XPS core-level spectra of Fe 2P (Fig. 6) evidences the aliovalent feature of the Fe element i.e. Fe2+/Fe3+, which induces the magnetisation through Fe2+-O2−-Fe3+double-exchange interaction. Nevertheless, EPR investigation indicates that the defect signal intensity gradually decreases with the increase of Gd-concentration, which implies the feasibility of double-exchange interaction weak upon Gd-concentration. Even though the inadequate of Fe2+-O2−-Fe3+double-exchange interaction, the magnetisation significantly enhanced this symbolizes the possibility of super-exchange interactions. The bond length of Fe3-O4 gradually reduces which manifests the strong bonding force in Fe3-O4 that much more strengthens the Fe3-O4 bond. This strengthens the super-exchange interaction Fe3+-O2−-Fe3+ that promotes the magnetisation. Moreover, Gd-substitution superimposed a new interaction between Gd3+-O2−-Gd3+ along with Fe-Fe interactions also contributes the magnetisation. In La, Ho & Gd doped BFO system, the new magnetic interaction of Ho-Fe, Ho-Ho through the oxygen brings the magnetisation along with Fe-Fe interaction [44]. In Fe-enforced BTO, the observed ferromagnetisation depends on the structural heterogeneity [23] whereas; in this present case, it is independent of the structural heterogeneity (T + H phase) since Mr improved as the increase of T-phase. Therefore, the observed magnetisation entirely originated from the co-contribution of Fe3+-O2−-Fe3+ super-exchange interactions and a new Gd3+- O2−-Gd3+ interaction.
Figure 10(a-c) displays the magnetodielectric constant as a function frequency (100-106 Hz). The magnetodielectric effect consists of distinct origin such as, extrinsic MD effect and intrinsic MD effect, which classified from the response as a function of frequency [23]. The observed MD constant is large and negative among the TM-RE co-substituted BTO systems. An increase of Gd-content, the extrinsic MD constant monotonously decreased. To understand the lower frequency dispersion trend, the investigation of the dielectric dispersion without an applied magnetic field as a function frequency is required which has already been reported [23]. At lower frequency (102 Hz), the observed MD constant obeys with the applied magnetic field whereas, as the frequency increases the MD constant remains relatively constant. This strongly confirms the low frequency magnetodielectric dispersion due to the presence of space charge polarisation. XPS and EPR investigations confirmed the presence of point defects in the ceramics. Thus, the trapping of electrons at the oxygen vacancy sites promotes the space charge polarisation. The degradation of the concentration of point defects by the suppression of structural heterogeneity due to the increase of Gd3+ weakens the space charge polarisation that decreases the MD constant.
Figure 11(a-c) depicts the intrinsic magnetodielectric constant as a function of an applied magnetic field at 1MHz of frequency. With an increase in Gd-content, the intrinsic MD constant gradually decreases up to y = 0.01 ceramic then it increases. The lesser value of intrinsic magnetodielectric constants at IT are obtained and listed in Table 3. The intrinsic MD constant of Fe-substituted BTO ceramics is -3.7% where the sample calcination and sintering temperatures are 950oC/5h and 1300oC/2h that has already been reported [23]. In this work, there is only less value of intrinsic magnetodielectric constant due to the high calcination temperature of 1050oC/4h and sintering temperature of 1370oC/2h that stabilizes the H-phase through the generation of oxygen vacancies. The observed weak intrinsic magnetodielectric constant is originated from the strain-induced magneto-electric coupling through the magnetostriction.
The above-mentioned explanations indicate that the magnetoelectric coupling (ME) is plausible i.e coupling between magnetic and ferroelectric order in the sample. In general, ME measurement is carried out by the lock-in-amplifier method. The ME voltage was recorded by varying the a.c magnetic field (Hac) with a frequency of 850 Hz at constant d.c. magnetic field (Hdc at1000 Oe). The variation of ME voltage is shown in Fig. 12 of the Ba1 − yGdyTi1−xFexO3 (x = 0.05; y = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.015) ceramics. A linear increasing trend of αME with Hdc is obtained and αME is calculated with Hac using the following relation, \({\alpha }=\frac{\text{d}\text{E}}{\text{d}\text{H}}=\left(\frac{1}{\text{t}}\right)\left(\frac{\text{d}\text{V}}{\text{d}\text{H}}\right)=\frac{{\text{V}}_{\text{o}\text{u}\text{t}}}{\text{h}\text{t}}\) Where, Vout-ME voltage, h-amplitude of Hac, t-thickness of the sample.
Tesfakiros Woldu et al have already reported the detailed descriptions about ME measurement [3]. In TM doped BTO system, a high value of αME 31.15mV/cm.Oe has been reported by Verma et. al., [8]. In Dy3+-Fe3+ co-substituted BTO ceramics, the ME coupling is originated from the magneto-crystalline anisotropy and microstrain [21]. The true ME coupling is originated from the magneto-crystalline anisotropy, super-exchange interaction, and strain via magnetostriction [45]. Fe3+-O2−-Fe3+ super-exchange and Gd3+- O2−-Gd3+ interactions enhance the magnetisation as an increase of Gd-concentration. On contrary to this, the ME coupling coefficient (αME) decreases up to y = 0.01 then increases in y = 0.015 ceramics. The large value of magneto-crystalline anisotropy depends on the 2b-site than the 12k-site [35]. Nevertheless, the absence of 2b-site in y = 0.015 ceramics are due to the T-symmetry restricts the magneto-crystalline anisotropy and it is independent of the trend of αME. Thus, both super-exchange and magneto-crystalline anisotropy are excluded from the discussion of the ME effect.
The next feasibility is the strain driven ME coupling. The aforementioned discussions denote that the increase of Gd-concentration tries to maintain charge neutrality. This reduces the oxygen vacancies that lead to a decrease in microstrain, which assures the probability for the degradation of αME in the samples with structural heterogeneity. While ME coupling is not feasible for the single T-phase ceramics due to the absence of bridging oxygen in the tetragonal unit cell is unable to permit the creation of oxygen vacancy than the hexagonal phase. Eventhough, the value of αME in the single T-phase ceramics is increased which indicates the Gd-substitution is insufficient for the charge compensation that promotes oxygen vacancies. Cao. et. al., reported that the T-phase oxygen vacancy and Ti-vacancy induce the magnetic moment of 1.54 µB and 2.34µB [46]. The calculated strain (ε) is listed in Table 1, which gradually decreases up to y = 0.01 ceramics and then increases in y = 0.015 ceramics, suggests the linear relation between strain and ME coupling coefficient. To conclude this, the observed multiferroic feature is originated from the strain mediated ME coupling.