Animal preparation
All experimental protocols, including animal use and surgical procedures, were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Ningbo First Hospital and were in conformity with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institutes of Health. Male ICR mice (28–32 g) were purchased from the Animal Center of Ningbo University, Zhejiang, China. The mice were raised in a humidified room (25 ± 1°C, 12-h light/dark cycle) and maintained on a standard pellet diet at the Animal Center.
Animal model of TBI
The TBI model employed in our study used a weight-drop protocol as previously described (Fig.2) (Flierl et al., 2009). Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate (1%, 4 mL/kg) and then fixed on a platform directly under the weight of the weight-drop device. A midline longitudinal scalp incision was made, and the skull was exposed. After locating the impact target area, which was the left anterior frontal area (1.5 mm lateral to the midline in the mid-coronal plane), a 200-g weight was released from a height of 2.5 cm directly onto the exposed skull. The rod was caught after each impact to prevent any rebound double strikes to the skull. The scalp wound was then sutured with standard suture material, and the mice were returned to their cage to recover from anesthesia. After these procedures, the mice were kept in cages and housed at 23 ± 1°C with free access to food and water. The sham-injured animals underwent the same procedures without being subjected to the impact of the weight drop.
Experimental groups and fisetin treatment
The mice were randomly divided into seven groups: sham, sham + fisetin (75 mg/kg), TBI, TBI + Vehicle, and TBI + fisetin (25 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, or 75 mg/kg). Fisetin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 98% pure), or vehicle was administered via intraperitoneal injection 30 min after TBI. The fisetin was dissolved in 15 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted immediately before injection in 150 µL of 10% aqueous cyclodextran (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) to give the final concentrations. The vehicle was 15 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide in 150 µL of 10% cyclodextran.
Two sets of experiments were conducted and totally 120 mice were used. In the first set, three concentrations of fisetin (25 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, and 75 mg/kg) were administered to assess the neuroprotective effect of fisetin after TBI. We chose these doses based on a study of ischemic stroke in mice (Gelderblom et al., 2012). The neurological severity score (NSS) and brain water content were assayed after TBI. In the second set, mice were treated with the best dose of fisetin identified in the first set for further mechanistic investigation.
Neurological evaluation and brain water content
The neurological function of the mice was evaluated 1 d, 3 d, and 7 d after TBI using the NSS (Table 1). All mice were trained 1 d before TBI. The investigators evaluated the ability of each mouse to perform 10 different tasks that tested motor function, balance, and alertness. One point was given for failing to perform each of the tasks; thus, 0 = minimum deficit and 10 = maximum deficit (Flierl et al., 2009). All tests were performed by two investigators who were blinded to experimental group.
Brain water content was measured as previously described (Manaenko, Chen, Kammer, Zhang, & Tang, 2011; Wei et al., 2015). Briefly, mice were sacrificed and their brains were removed 24 h after TBI. The brainstem and cerebellum were removed, and the left (ipsilateral) cortical tissues were weighed immediately to obtain the wet weight. The samples were then dried at 80°C for 72 h and re-weighed to obtain the dry weight. The brain water content was calculated as a percentage using the following formula: 100 × (wet weight – dry weight)/wet weight.
Perfusion–fixation and tissue preparation
Brain tissues were harvested from mice after transcardiac perfusion with 0.9% normal saline solution (4°C) under anesthesia. The left (ipsilateral) cerebral cortex pericontusion volume was collected and immediately transferred to a -80°C freezer pending further analysis. For immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF), the mice were perfused with 0.9% normal saline solution (4°C) followed by 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (4°C); the entire brain tissue was then immersed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (4°C).
BBB permeability
Evans blue (EB) extravasation was used to assay BBB permeability, as described previously (Manaenko et al., 2011). In brief, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with EB dye (2%, 4 mL/kg). They were anesthetized 3 h later and perfused transcardially with normal saline solution (4°C) to remove intravascular EB dye. After decapitation, the brains were removed and homogenized in physiological phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min. An equal volume of 50% trichloroacetic acid was then added to 0.5 mL of the resulting supernatant. After incubation overnight and centrifugation at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4°C, the dye concentration of the supernatant was spectrophotometrically determined at 610 nm. The EB content was calculated as (μg of Evans blue stain)/(g of tissue).
Total protein extraction and western blot analysis
To extract total protein, the tissues were mechanically lysed in 20 mM Tris at pH 7.6, containing 0.2% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, and 0.11 IU/mL aprotinin (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and stored at -80°C pending analysis.
Equal quantities of total protein were loaded into each lane of a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, electrophoresed, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked to prevent non-specific binding in 5% skimmed milk for 2 h at 25°C and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. The primary antibodies were: rabbit anti-TLR 4 (1:200; sc-293072, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti-matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (1:5,000; ab38898, Abcam), rabbit anti–ZO-1 (1:200; sc-10804, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti–Bcl-2 (1:200; sc-492, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti–cleaved caspase-3 (1:5,000; 9661, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), and rabbit anti–β-actin (1:5000; AP0060, Bioworld Technology, Minneapolis, MN, USA). anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (1:5000, BS13278, Bioworld Technology, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 2 h at 25°C. Bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent kit (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), quantification was performed with ImageJ software (NIH) using optical density methods, and the data were normalized to β-actin.
Nuclear protein extraction and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
The nuclear protein of the tissue was extracted and quantified as previously described (Hang et al., 2004). EMSA was performed using a kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) to measure NF-κB DNA-binding activity according to the manufacturer's instructions and a previous study. A consensus oligonucleotide probe for NF-κB (5-AGT TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3, 3-TCA ACT CCC CTG AAA GGG TCC G-5) was end-labeled with biotin. Binding reactions were carried out for 20 min at 25°C in the presence of 50 ng/μL of poly(dI-dC) with 0.05% nonidet P-40, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EDTA, and 2.5% glycerol in a 1× binding buffer using 20 fmol of biotin-end-labeled target DNA and 10 μg of nuclear protein. Assays were loaded onto native 6% polyacrylamide gels, pre-electrophoresed for 60 min in 0.5× tris-borate-EDTA, and electrophoresed at 100 V before being transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane in 0.5× tris-borate-EDTA at 300 mA for 30 min. Transferred DNAs were cross-linked to the membrane and detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Total protein was assayed using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Pierce Biochemicals). The production of inflammatory cytokines in the brain tissue was quantified using ELISA kits specific for rat proteins, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Diaclone Research, France). The inflammatory cytokine levels were calculated as picograms per milligram of protein.
IHC and IF staining
IHC staining was performed as described in our previous study (Li, Wu, et al., 2014). The brains were immersed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 10-μm slices. The sections were deparaffinized and incubated with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 10 min. The sections were then blocked with 5% normal fetal bovine serum in PBS for 2 h before incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibody was rabbit anti-TLR 4 (1:200; sc-293072, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG–horseradish peroxidase (1:500, BS13278, Bioworld Technology, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 25°C for 60 min. The sections were then stained with diaminobenzidine and counterstained with hematoxylin.
IF staining was performed by the method of our previous study (Sun et al., 2014). Brain tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and dehydrated in 20% sucrose in PBS for 2 days, followed by 30% sucrose in PBS for another 2 days. Brain sections of 6-μm thickness were blocked with 5% normal fetal bovine serum in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 2 h at 25°C, followed by incubation with antibodies against p65 (1:200; sc-8008, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), neuronal nuclei (NeuN; MAB377X, 1:200, Millipore, USA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (1:200, 556327, BD Biosciences, USA), or ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba 1) (1:20, NBP2-19019, Novus Biologicals, USA), overnight at 4°C. The following day, after washing with PBS for 45 min, the sections were immunolabeled with appropriate fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) in the dark for 1 h at 25°C. The sections were then washed with PBS for 45 min and counterstained with DAPI for two min. After three further washes, the sections were observed under a fluorescence microscope.
Statistical analysis
All results of the summary statistical analysis are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 and GrahPad Prism 5.0 software. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The threshold of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.