1. Pirrone N, Mason R. Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models. Springer, London New York. 2009. pp 143-150.
2. Street I, Palmberg J, Artigas JC, Grubb M, 2013. Gold demand trends: full year 2012. World Gold Council, London, United Kingdom. 2012. https://www.exchangetradedgold.com/ media/ETG /file/ GDT_Q4_pdf. Accessed 21 July 2021).
3. Telmer KH, Veiga MM. World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining. In: Mason R., Pirrone N. (eds) Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere. Springer, Boston, MA. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_6 Accessed 21 July 2021.
4. Legg ED, Ouboter PE, Wright MAP. Small-Scale Gold Mining Related Mercury Contamination in the Guianas: A Review. Prepared for WWF Guianas. 2015. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/
downloads/mercury_contamination_in_the_guianas__2015.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2021.
5. Peplow D, and S Augustine. Neurological abnormalities in a mercury exposed population among indigenous Wayana in Southeast Suriname. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015;16(10):2415-22.
6. Peplow, D. and S. Augustine. Community-led assessment of risk from exposure to mercury by native Amerindian Wayana in Southeast Suriname. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012;2012:1-10.
7. Peplow, D. and S. Augustine. Community-directed risk assessment of mercury exposure from gold mining in Suriname. Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2007;22(3):202-210.
8. Healy C, Heemskerk M, Fontaine M, Viera R. Situation Analysis of the Small-Scale Gold Mining in Suriname: Reforming the Subsector to Promote Sound Management. Document of the World Wildlife Fund. 2005. http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/2005_situation_analysis_small_scale_mining.pdf Accessed 31 July 2021.
9. Veiga MM. Artisanal Gold Mining Activities in Suriname. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. 1997. http://artisanalmining.org/Repository/02/The_GMP_Files/raw%20files%20-%20globalmercuryproject.org/LatAmerica/Suriname/UNIDO%20Veiga%20Suriname1997-
nomap.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2021.
10. Sullivan A, Robertson L, Baca A. Report on the Republic of Suriname to the 39th Session of the Universal Periodic Review, Human Rights Council, Oct–Nov 2021. University of Oklahoma College of Law, [Available Online 13 November 2021].
11. Barbieri FL, Gardon j. Hair mercury levels in Amazonian populations: spatial distribution and trends. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2009. http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/ content/8/71 Accessed 21 July 2021.
12. Peplow, D, Edmonds RL. The effects of mine waste contamination at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecological Engineering 24. 2005; 101–119.
13. Peplow D, and S Augustine. Intervention Mapping to Address Social and Economic Factors Impacting Indigenous People’s Health in Suriname’s Interior Region. Globalization and Health. 2017;13:11.
14. Goodwin A. Principles of Precambrian Geology. Academic Press, New York. 1996; 319 pp.
15. Duplaix N. Giant otter Final Report: Rapid River Bio-Assesment in Suriname and Guyana 2002: Upper Coppename River (Central Suriname Nature Reserve), Pages 48-50 of 120. All content following this page was uploaded by Nicole Duplaix on 19 February 2015. Last viewed 21 June 2021: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272492103_Giant_otter_Final_Report_Rapid_River_Bio-Assesment_in_Suriname_and_Guyana_2002.
16. Hammond D, Gond V, et al. Causes and consequences of a tropical forest gold rush in the
Guiana Shield, South America. Ambio. , 2007;36(8):661-670.
17. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). WWF to Train Gold Miners in Suriname in Sustainable Production. Document of the World Wildlife Fund. 2006. https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?56360/WWF-to-train-gold-miners-in-Suriname-in-sustainable-production. Accessed 31 July 2021.
18. Brightman M. Securitization, alterity, and the state Human (in)security on an Amazonian Frontier. Reg Cohes. 2014;4(3):17-38.
19. Gray JE, Labson VF, Weaver JN, and Krab-benhoft DP. Mercury and methyl-mercury contamination related to artisanal gold mining, Suriname. Geophysical Research Letters.2002;29(23):201-4.
20. de Kom FMJ, et al. Mercury Exposure of Maroon Workers in the Small Scale Gold Mining in Surinam. Environmental Research. 1998;77(2):91-97.
21. Mohan S, Tiller M, van der Voet G, Kanhai H. Mercury exposure of mothers and newborns in Surinam: a pilot study. Clinical Toxicol. 2005;43(2):101–4.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methylmercury (MeHg) (CASRN 22967-92-6). Integrated Risk Information System. 2001. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0073.htm. Accessed 1 August 2021.
22. Ouboter PE, et al. Mercury Levels in Pristine and Gold Mining Impacted Aquatic Ecosystems of Suriname, South America. ABIO 2012;41:873–882.
23. Legg ED, Ouboter PE, Wright MAP. Small-Scale Gold Mining related to Mercury Contamination in the Guianas: A Review. Prepared or WWF Gianas. Affiliations: 1. Halcyon Medical Writing; 2. Anton de Kom Universiteit van Suriname; 3. WWF Guianas. 2015. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/
mercury_contamination_in_the_guianas__2015.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2021.
24. Molina CI, Gibon FM, Duprey FM, Dominquez E, Guimarães, Roulet M. Transfer of mercury and methylmercury along macroinvertebrate food chains in a floodplain lake of the Beni River, Bolivian Amazonia. Science of the Total Environment. 2010; 408:3382-3391.
25. Ramírez MGV, et al. Mercury in soils impacted by alluvial gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 288: 112364.
26. Bishop K, Shanly JB, Riscassi A. et al. Recent advances in understanding and measurement of mercury in the environment: Terrestrial Hg cycling. Science of the Total Enviornment. 2020;721:137-647.
27. Boening DW. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere. , 2000; 40:1335-1351.
28. D riscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, Jacob DJ, Pirrone N. Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environmental Science and Technology. 2013; 47:4967-4983.
29. Kwon SY, Blum JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Dconch JT, Tsui MT. Isotopic study of mercury sources ad transfer between a freshwater lake and adjacent forest food web. Science of the Total Environment. 2015; 532:220-229.
30. Roach KA, Jacobson NF, Fiorello CV, Stronza A. Gold mining and mercury bioaccumulation in a floodplain lake and main channel of the Tambopata River, Perú. Journal of Environmental Protection; 2013;4:51-60.
31. Frery N, Maury-Brachet R, Maillot E, Deheeger M, DeMerona B, Boudou A. Gold-mining activities and mercury contamination of native Amerindian communities in French Guiana: key role of fish in dietary uptake. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(50):449–56.32.
32. Glenn E. Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes, and plant physiological processes: what vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors. , 2008; 8:2136-2160.
33. Dunagan C, Gilmore MS, Varekamp JC. Effects of mercury on visible/near infrared reflectance spectra of mustard spinach plants (Brassica rapa P.). Environmental Pollution. 2007;148:301-311.
34. Sellers P. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. International Journal of Remote Sensing; 1985; 6:1335-1372.
35. Hoff R, Hensel P, Profritt E, Delgado P, Shigenaka G, Yender R, and Mearns AJ. Oil Spills in Mangroves. Planning & Response Consideratins. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA_). EUA. Technical Report. 2002. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Oil_Spills_ in_Mangroves/49HC-gYagj8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover. Accessed 8 July 2021.
36. van der Meer F, van Dijk P, van der Werff H, Yang H. Remote Sensing and Petroleum Seepage: A Review and Case Study. Terra Nova. 2002; 14:1-17.
37. WHO. Policy Paper: Mercury in Health Care. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08). 2005; http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/ medicalwaste/mercury/en/index.html
38. Heemskerk M, Delvoye K, Noordam D, Teunissen P. Wayana Baseline Study, Amazon Conservation Team, Paramaribo, Suriname. 2007. http://www.act-suriname.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/
05/Wayana-Baseline-Study_2007.pdf (Accessed 29 July 2021).
39. Boudou A, Maury-Brachet, Coquer M, Durrieu G, Cossa D. Synergic effect of gold mining and damming on mercury contamination in fish. Environmental Science and Technology. 2005; 39(8): 2448-2454.
40. Dolbec, J.; Mergler, D.; Larribe, F.; Roulet, M.; Lebel, J.; Lucotte,M. Sequential analysis of hair mercury levels in relation to fish diet of an amazonian population, Brazil.Sci. Total Environ. 2001;271,87-97.
41. Grandjean, P.; White, R. F.; Nielsen, A.; Cleary, D.; de OliveiraSantos, E. C. Methylmercury neurotoxicity in Amazonianchildren downstream from goldmining.Environ. Health Per-spect. 1999;107, 587-591.
42. Lebel, J.; Mergler, D.; Lucotte, M.; Amorim, J.; Dolbec, D.;Miranda, G.; Arantes, I.; Rheault, I.; Pichet, P. Evidence of earlynervous system dysfunction in Amazonian populations exposedto low levels of methylmercury.Neurotoxicology. 1996;17, 157-168.
43. Cordier, S.; Garel, M.; Mandereau, L.; Morcel, H.; Doineau, P.;Gosme-Seguret, S.; Josse, D.; White, R.; Amiel-Tison, C.Neurodevelopmental investigations among methylmercury-exposed children in French Guiana.Environ.Res. 2002;89,1-11.
44. MacKinnon B. Pricing human life. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1986; 11(2);29-39.
45. Miller, Native America, supra note 2, at 21–22, 24, 26–28, 56. See also Johnson, 21 U.S. at 595–97 (discussing the Crown’s ownership of, and right to grant titles to, the vacant lands in America); Martin v. Waddell, 41 U.S. 367, 409 (1842) (“[T]he territory  occupied was disposed of by the governments of Europe at their pleasure, as if it had been found without inhabitants.”); United States v. Rogers, 45 U.S. 567, 572 (1846) (“the whole continent was divided and [parceled out], and granted by the governments of Europe as if it had been vacant and unoccupied land”).
46. Miller R. The Doctrine of Discovery: The International Law of Colonialism. The Indigenous People’s Journal of Law, Culture and Resistance. 2019; 5(1):35-42.