The Effect of a Decision-Support mHealth Application on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Two District Hospitals in Rwanda: Quasi-Experimental Study
Background: Globally, mobile health (mHealth) applications are known for their potential to improve healthcare providers’ access to relevant and reliable health information. Besides, electronic decision support tools, such as the Safe Delivery mHealth Application (SDA), help to reduce clinical errors and to ensure quality care at the point of service delivery. The current study assessed the effects of the SDA on basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) outcomes for the most frequent complications in Rwanda; post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and newborn asphyxia and its complications.
Methods: The study adopted a quasi-experimental design. A pre-intervention record review of the BEmONC outcomes: Apgar score and PPH progressions, was conducted. The intervention took place in two district hospitals in Rwanda and entails the implementation of the SDA for six months. Six months’ post-intervention, the effect of the SDA on BEmONC outcomes was evaluated. The study included 327 participants (114 cases of PPH and 213 cases of neonatal complications). The analysis compared the outcome variables between the baseline and the endline data. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportions and test between-group differences and significance level set at p<0.05.
Results: Unstable newborn outcome following neonatal resuscitation was recorded in 61.90% and 27.59% newborns cases at baseline and endline respectively, P-value = 0.000. Unstable maternal outcome following PPH management was recorded in 19.40 % and 6.38% maternal cases at baseline and endline respectively, P-value = 0.048. There was a significant association between the SDA intervention and newborns’ and maternal’ outcomes following neonatal resuscitation and PPH management, 6 months after baseline.
Conclusion: The use of the SDA supported nurses and midwives in the management of PPH and neonatal resuscitation thus improved maternal and neonatal outcomes after 6 months of the SDA intervention.
Figure 1
This work is quite similar to a study carried out in the DRCongo using the Safe Delivery App and published in 2018 but the research in DRC is neither mentioned nor cited. Since published research is supposed to discuss previous similar research, I am imagining this was an oversight? I would appreciate a response to this question. Thank you.
Posted 23 Sep, 2020
On 07 Jan, 2021
On 01 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 12 Oct, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 20 Sep, 2020
On 19 Sep, 2020
On 17 Sep, 2020
The Effect of a Decision-Support mHealth Application on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Two District Hospitals in Rwanda: Quasi-Experimental Study
Posted 23 Sep, 2020
On 07 Jan, 2021
On 01 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 12 Oct, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 20 Sep, 2020
On 19 Sep, 2020
On 17 Sep, 2020
Background: Globally, mobile health (mHealth) applications are known for their potential to improve healthcare providers’ access to relevant and reliable health information. Besides, electronic decision support tools, such as the Safe Delivery mHealth Application (SDA), help to reduce clinical errors and to ensure quality care at the point of service delivery. The current study assessed the effects of the SDA on basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) outcomes for the most frequent complications in Rwanda; post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and newborn asphyxia and its complications.
Methods: The study adopted a quasi-experimental design. A pre-intervention record review of the BEmONC outcomes: Apgar score and PPH progressions, was conducted. The intervention took place in two district hospitals in Rwanda and entails the implementation of the SDA for six months. Six months’ post-intervention, the effect of the SDA on BEmONC outcomes was evaluated. The study included 327 participants (114 cases of PPH and 213 cases of neonatal complications). The analysis compared the outcome variables between the baseline and the endline data. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportions and test between-group differences and significance level set at p<0.05.
Results: Unstable newborn outcome following neonatal resuscitation was recorded in 61.90% and 27.59% newborns cases at baseline and endline respectively, P-value = 0.000. Unstable maternal outcome following PPH management was recorded in 19.40 % and 6.38% maternal cases at baseline and endline respectively, P-value = 0.048. There was a significant association between the SDA intervention and newborns’ and maternal’ outcomes following neonatal resuscitation and PPH management, 6 months after baseline.
Conclusion: The use of the SDA supported nurses and midwives in the management of PPH and neonatal resuscitation thus improved maternal and neonatal outcomes after 6 months of the SDA intervention.
Figure 1
This work is quite similar to a study carried out in the DRCongo using the Safe Delivery App and published in 2018 but the research in DRC is neither mentioned nor cited. Since published research is supposed to discuss previous similar research, I am imagining this was an oversight? I would appreciate a response to this question. Thank you.
Dear Nancy Bolan, Thank you very much for your message which is very helpful and for providing information on the study carried out in the DRC using the Safe Delivery App. We will consider this research together with other comments received from reviewers. Thank you
Aurore Nishimwe
replied on 05 January, 2021
Dear Nancy Bolan, Thank you very much for your message which is very helpful and for providing information on the study carried out in the DRC using the Safe Delivery App. We will consider this research together with other comments received from reviewers. Thank you