Dizziness, headache and neurocognitive/neuropsychological dysfunction are commonly reported symptoms after head injury. This as much seems agreed.
Much has been written about mTBI following concussion and sports related injury. Large scale population studies addressing dizziness from workplace head injury does not exist nor been appropriately studied. Longitudinal outcomes for dizziness post-head injury are generally not available, excepting in certain select patient series (i.e. post-traumatic BPPV). There is significant controversy over the terminology (i.e. the use of dizziness vs. vertigo) and whether certain conditions such as post-traumatic endolymphatic hydrops, cervicogenic vertigo and traumatic PLF exist or whether their reported incidence has been inappropriately amplified through a lens of personal bias. The interplay between traumatic vestibular dysfunction and associated non-organic (i.e. mood change, functional amplification, catastrophization etc.) features also requires careful consideration. Both may converge and adversely influence each another including other workplace considerations (i.e. return to a toxic work environment).
A deliberate decision was made to exclude those with symptoms likely reflective for cognitive vestibular dysfunction. Euphemistic terms such as medically unexplained dizziness, psychogenic dizziness, non-organic dizziness and chronic non-specific dizziness have all been applied. Predisposing circumstances and specific symptoms absent of fluctuant vestibular activity have received diagnoses such as mal d’embarquement, chronic phobic dizziness, persistent perceptual postural dizziness (PPPD) etc. While a traumatic vestibular injury may have been the epiphenomenon, the persistent downstream complaints strongly indicate another generator. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) seems of limited value. Treatment with mood stabilizing medications (i.e. the SSRI or SNRI classes of antidepressant therapy) and interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy seem likely to be recommended.
All 4291 head injured workers had had complaints of dizziness as their point of entry. (See Appendix, Supplementary Fig. 3 for diagnostic groups in the whole database). Of those approximately 25.7% (1,105 head injured workers) were identified with evidence suggestive for a peripheral vestibular disorder. The majority (82.17%) were identified with positional vertigo based on history, subjective complaints during testing or objective findings on examination. Not all with BPPV had findings for PSCC canalolithiasis. The “other “ positional vertigo category was designated for positional vertigo involving other semicircular canals, if cupulolithiasis was present, if nystagmus patterns atypical for canalothiasis/cupulolithiasis were identified (i.e. downbeat nystagmus) and those rarely arising from a central vestibular localization.
The remaining 22% (244 head injured workers) diagnosed with a recurrent peripheral vestibular disorder was the subject of this paper. Diagnostic entities included recurrent attacks of episodic vertigo identified as RV, post-traumatic MD, DEH, drop attacks (so-called “crisis of Tumarkin”), trauma associated SSCD and undiagnosed (unknown) peripheral vestibular disorders.
Recurrent vestibulopathy (78/244)
RV was diagnosed in 78 of 244 (35%) head injured workers. By definition RV denotes individuals with recurrent bouts of spontaneous episodic vertigo lasting minutes to hours (similar to MD) in the absence of auditory or focal neurologic dysfunction. (4, 5) Episodes of rotational type vertigo were primarily attributed to semicircular canal dysfunction. Those with complaints of episodic rocking, imbalance or translational pulsion arose from an otolithic source.(1, 4)
In Rutka and Barber’s (4) longitudinal RV study of 86 non-head injured patients over 8.5 years, 62% had complete resolution of symptoms, 9.5% continued to have active episodes, 13.5% evolved into MD and 8% developed BPPV. A further 7% remained undiagnosed but had continued symptoms for a peripheral vestibular localization. In the current study group, no head injured worker with RV evolved to MD. Most were female. Mean presentation age did not differ significantly between RV and Meniere’s overall.
Five patients (17.2%) with otolithic RV developed BPPV compared to only 1 patient (2.1%) with a semicircular origin. Detachment of otoconia from the utricular neuroepithelium into the semicircular canal circulation that float freely or attach to the cupula seemed likely to account for positional vertigo from canalolithaisis or cupulothiasis (12). Workers with otolithic RV had a greater likelihood of developing concomitant BPPV compared to those with a semicircular canal RV origin. Long-term follow up is needed to determine whether both variant phenotypes might evolve to other identifiable inner ear disorders.
In the absence definitive pathophysiology RV has been ascribed in certain circles to post-traumatic headache (PTH) or as an equivalent of vestibular migraine (diagnostic criteria specific for vestibular migraine were formally established by Barany society in 2012(13) and added into the International Classification of Headache Disorders in 2013(14, 15)). In our opinion both unfortunately fail to account for differences and further complexities in those with head injury. Headache along with neuropsychological/neurocognitive change commonly intersected in 3884 (90.5%) and 3189 (74.3%) of the 4291 head injured workers respectively. In those with RV, 93.2% had significant complaints of headaches (including migraine) in this series. Headache was also the most commonly associated symptom in those with a peripheral vestibular disorder. All 11 (100%) workers with MD conversely reported headache more frequently than those with RV.
When deep phenotyping evaluated PTH in one series, 87 of 100 individuals with mTBI had concomitant complaints of dizziness/vertigo. (16) Chronic migraine-like headache occurred in 61 and a combination of episodic migraine and tension-type headache in 29. Difficulty however arose in determining whether headache and dizziness together were causally related or represented an intersection between two common post-head injury symptoms. Therapeutic migraine-specific preventative mediations seemed to lack efficacy overall. (16) Trauma as the sole cause for migraine development also seemed poorly correlated to severity of injury and other factors such as an individual’s pre-morbid emotional status, past history of motion sickness and positive family history. (17)
By definition, in vestibular migraine, the migraine headache should temporally coincide largely with a vertiginous attack. Inclusion of an “amigrainous” vertigo category (episodic vertigo without headache) seems to further blur what we categorized as RV. In our opinion the commonality of PTH (including migraine) meant we could not reliably differentiate migraine especially as a cause for recurrent attacks of peripheral vestibular dysfunction.
Meniere’s (Definite and Probable/Possible) (11/244)
Post-traumatic MD was rare in our series. In earlier literature, Paparella and Mancini hypothesized trauma could cause mechanical or biochemical changes within the inner ear leading to the dysfunction endolymph producing cells and/or affect mechanisms of endolymph absorption. The latter mechanism resulted in Meniere’s syndrome from post-traumatic hydrops. Nearly 2/3rd of their cohort with physical trauma developed Meniere’s syndrome one or more years later. One third of their patients however presented within 1 month of injury. (8) In another series with 120 MD patients, less than 3% were found to have the condition arise from trauma. (18) MD additionally has been reportedly associated with temporal bone fracture. (19, 20)
A diagnosis for formal MD was based on criteria put forth by the 1995 AAO-HNS CHE Guidelines. (11)
A total of 11 patients (0.26%) were diagnosed (6 definite and 5 probable/possible) with MD. Since 2017, no new patients have surfaced with this diagnosis (1). The incidence of MD from the UHN WSIB database at 0.25% seems comparable to a quoted incidence of 0.2% in the general population. (21, 22) Accordingly one cannot conclusively state that Meniere’s disease/syndrome arises in a greater proportion following head injury compared to its occurrence in the general population. This also seems in accord with the reported incidence of MD by Segal et al in their study of Israeli Defence Force (IDF) personal post acute acoustic trauma. (23) See Appendix, Supplementary Table 3.
The association between BPPV and Meniere’s however is well recognized and some studies have shown that about 1/3 with MD can develop concomitant BPPV (24). The high prevalence of BPPV in MD is generally explained by pathophysiological injury to the otolithic organs with release of displaced otoconia /particulate debris into the PSCC circulation.
Most with MD received conservative medical treatment typically with diuretics or betahistine (Serc) → (BGP pharma ULC, Etobicoke, Ontario). To date, only one patient with established Meniere’s disease has developed concomitant BPPV. Of 9 patients who visit us regularly 5 remain symptomatic. Differences in the natural history for post-traumatic MD versus MD from idiopathic endolymphatic hydrops would require further long-term prospective cohort studies with larger numbers in the former.
Drop attacks (9/244)
Drop attacks occurred in 9/244 (3.7%) workers with peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Tumarkin falls (“crisis of Tumarkin”) or sudden drop attacks are typically seen in a subset of patients with MD. Falls are sudden and occur without warning, LOC or concomitant neurologic symptoms. They are likened to a feeling of being pushed/pulled or arise from an unanticipated loss of postural tone linked to vestibular causes (25). They have also been associated with vertiginous disorders such as a SCDS (26) and other peripheral vestibulopathies.(27)
Non-Meniere’s drop attacks with associated recurrent spontaneous vertigo spells have been described in a previous case series of 6 patients.(28) No patient had had a history of head trauma. There was an association with migraine mentioned in 5 of 6 cases interestingly. The authors however concluded that an etiologic link between the two could not be established. In our study, drop attacks were observed in 9 patients who did not meet the criteria for MD. None specifically complained of major vertiginous attacks.
The natural history of vestibular drop attacks has not reported extensively. Treatment remains a matter of pointed discussion; most cases having a benign course and a high rate of spontaneous remission.(28, 29) Intratympanic (IT) dexamethasone injections have been promoted with a success rate of 70 % quoted.(30) In severe cases where falls might be associated with further head injury or fractures more aggressive management maybe necessary. Under these circumstances IT gentamicin reportedly achieved success rates from 60–100% controlling drop attacks in MD. (31) More invasive intervention (i.e. total osseous labyrinthectomy) has been studied in the elderly and reported to have provided good symptom control. (32)
All patients with drop attacks were managed conservatively (mean 20.6 months). Five workers continued to have drop attacks with the same severity, 3 had some improvement with respect to frequency of their drops and 1 patient has remained free of attacks for one-year’s duration. As less seems known about the progression of these attacks and whether certain individuals might warrant more aggressive treatment, the debate for best management strategy remains open.
Delayed endolymphatic hydrops (10/244):
Schuknecht (6) generally receives credit for clinically differentiating and for the histopathology study of DEH in this related condition to MD. On clinical grounds DEH is diagnosed in patients with a significant SNHL (secondary to trauma, surgery, infection etc.) who later develop attacks of episodic vertigo similar in duration to MD. Attacks of vertigo can arise from the side with the hearing loss (ipsilateral DEH) or rarely, the contralateral side (contralateral DEH).(6)
Head trauma is a well-established predisposing factor for DEH. The latent timeframe for developing vertiginous attacks can be as early as one month from inner ear injury (7, 8) to many years later. The proposed hypothesis assumes a labyrinthine insult strong enough to cause a significant hearing loss but simultaneously preserves some vestibular function; over a period of time atrophy or fibrous obliteration of endolymphatic system could lead to episodes of vertigo on the basis of hydrops. (33)
Treatment options include conservative management, IT therapies (both steroid and gentamicin) and surgical labyrinthectomy (6, 34) Workers with DEH had a mean follow up period of 65.9 months. All were managed conservatively. About 30% had symptomatic improvement, 10% had no symptoms over their last 6 months of follow up while 50% continued to be symptomatic. Resolution of the vertiginous attacks in this series differs from those reported by Kamei and Matsuzaki, who observed that about 65% of their patients with DEH had resolution of symptoms managed conservatively within 5 years of symptom onset. (7)
SSCD (3/244):
A SSCD syndrome has been identified in some following head injury. Carey et al suggested that approximately 2% of individuals in the general population likely have a dehiscence or very thin bone overlying the superior canal. (9) An event such as a closed head injury causing transient elevations in intracranial pressure may be all that is required to fracture the thin bone overlying the superior canal or destabilize its dural covering over a pre-existing dehiscence, leading to a symptomatic dehiscence syndrome. (35)
Our series had 3 workers with recognized symptoms and audiovestibular characteristics for a SCCD. All had significantly elevated oVEMP amplitudes (> 17uV). Temporal CT imaging confirmed the dehiscence in all 3. There was no history/symptoms referable to a SSCD syndrome prior to head injury. None have warranted surgical intervention at the time of writing.
Uncompensated fixed vestibular loss (77/244):
A significant peripheral vestibular loss was diagnosed and confirmed on laboratory testing in 77 workers. Mechanisms for injury included temporal bone fracture (4 workers) or from suspected shearing type injuries within the inner ear. Acute vertigo from labyrinthine injury usually resolved over a period of weeks or months. (3) Not all patients however following a vestibular loss seemed to compensate equally. Failure to compensate from a fixed uncompensated vestibular loss remains another cause for movement aggravated dizziness post head injury. While vestibular suppressants may dramatically improve symptoms in the acute phase of vestibular loss, continued use can delay compensation and subsequent recovery. (36) VRT remains the mainstay treatment by enhancing vestibular plasticity. Failure to compensate raises concerns regarding whether existing pathology involves the contralateral ear (i.e. in a coup and contracoup type injury). Functional amplification of symptoms from anxiety or the development of an underlying mood change may also adversely affect the compensation process. (37)
Undiagnosed peripheral (55/244):
Approximately 23% of head injured workers initially had signs/symptoms suggestive for peripheral vestibular dysfunction but could not be formally categorized into a well-recognized disorder or syndrome. Whether there could be evolution to a more recognizable vestibular disorder remains to be determined. Some 31 head injured workers were later demonstrated to have findings attributable to positional vertigo.
The major strength of this study is found in the large number of workers who were comprehensively examined and investigated by the senior author from 1988–2018 in a multidisciplinary DAC approach. The collection of “big data” has allowed further insight into the presenting symptoms and spectrum of peripheral vestibular disorders seen post-head injury exclusive of post traumatic positional vertigo. Continued review especially in those with “Other” Positional Vertigo or an Undiagnosed peripheral vestibular disorder will help determine the natural progression and/or evolution towards a more recognizable forms of vestibular dysfunction over time.
Weaknesses in this study reside in the usual criticisms applied to any retrospective study. All head injured workers were also reviewed within a single institutional setting by the senior author. Consideration for diagnostic bias might limit the study’s generalizability. New vestibular testing beyond conventional ENG/rotational chair also became available during the study meaning that VEMP and vHIT was not available for head injured workers early on. Longterm outcome data was also not available for most and whether those with a peripheral vestibular disorder ultimately had resolution or remained symptomatic cannot be answered. The burden post-traumatic dizziness places on both the worker and society at large cannot be answered. The exclusion or failure to identify/include what we considered clinical entities not without controversy such as post-traumatic PLF, cervicogenic vertigo, post-traumatic vestibular migraine (including amigrainous vertigo) etc. may also be a point of concern to some. Diagnostic entities that largely have a persistent non-organic basis increasingly being referred to as syndromes of cognitive vestibular dysfunction (i.e. chronic subjective dizziness (38), PPPD (39, 40), chronic phobic postural dizziness (41), medically unexplained dizziness (42), dizziness with catastrophization(37), mal d’embarquement (43, 44) etc.) were also excluded despite acknowledgement an acute vestibular event might be a precipitating cause.