1. UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. (2015).
2. Kriegler Elmar et al. Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376, 20160457 (2018).
3. Rogelj, J. et al. Chapter 2: Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development. in Global Warming of 1.5 °C an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018).
4. Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F. & van Vuuren, D. P. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Clim. Change 6, 576–583 (2016).
5. Hirt, L. F., Schell, G., Sahakian, M. & Trutnevyte, E. A review of linking models and socio-technical transitions theories for energy and climate solutions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 162–179 (2020).
6. Jewell, J. & Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5°C? WIREs Climate Change 11, e621 (2020).
7. Trutnevyte, E. et al. Societal Transformations in Models for Energy and Climate Policy: The Ambitious Next Step. One Earth 1, 423–433 (2019).
8. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, 8–23 (2015).
9. Bauer, N. et al. Quantification of an efficiency–sovereignty trade-off in climate policy. Nature 588, 261–266 (2020).
10. Schreyer, F. et al. Common but differentiated leadership: strategies and challenges for carbon neutrality by 2050 across industrialized economies. Environmental Research Letters 15, 114016 (2020).
11. Nordhaus, W. Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy. American Economic Review 105, 1339–1370 (2015).
12. Voigt, C. The Compliance and Implementation Mechanism of the Paris Agreement. RECIEL 25, 161–173 (2016).
13. Sabel, C. F. & Victor, D. G. Governing global problems under uncertainty: making bottom-up climate policy work. Climatic Change 144, 15–27 (2017).
14. Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E. & Zysman, J. Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science 349, 1170–1171 (2015).
15. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Tosun, J., Gordon, J. A. & Jewell, J. National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets. Nat Energy 6, 742–754 (2021).
16. Bauer, N. et al. CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, Part A, 243–256 (2015).
17. McGlade, C. & Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517, 187–190 (2015).
18. Jewell, J., Vinichenko, V., Nacke, L. & Cherp, A. Prospects for powering past coal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 592–597 (2019).
19. Rauner, S., Bauer, N., Dirnacher, A. & Van Dingenen, R. Coal exit health and environmental damage reductions outweigh economic impacts. Nature Climate Change (accepted) (2020).
20. Lamb, W. F. & Minx, J. C. The political economy of national climate policy: Architectures of constraint and a typology of countries. Energy Research & Social Science 64, 101429 (2020).
21. Jakob, M., Flachsland, C., Steckel, J. C. & Urpelainen, J. The political economy of climate and energy policy: A Theoretical Framework. 22.
22. Pahle, M. et al. Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nature Climate Change 8, 861–867 (2018).
23. Schwerhoff, G., Kornek, U., Lessmann, K. & Pahle, M. Leadership in climate change mitigation: consequences and incentives. Journal of Economic Surveys 32, 491–517 (2018).
24. Arroyo-Currás, T. et al. Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, Part A, 192–203 (2015).
25. Minx, J. et al. Coal transitions – Part 1: Phase-out dynamics in global long-term mitigation scenarios. Environmental Research Letters (submitted) (Submitted).
26. Bauer, N. et al. Assessing global fossil fuel availability in a scenario framework. Energy 111, 580–592 (2016).
27. Tong, D. et al. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target. Nature 1 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1364-3.
28. Fofrich, R. et al. Early retirement of power plants in climate mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 094064 (2020).
29. Johnson, N. et al. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, 89–102 (2015).
30. Edenhofer, O. King Coal and the queen of subsidies. Science 349, 1286–1287 (2015).
31. Edenhofer, O., Steckel, J. C., Jakob, M. & Bertram, C. Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 024019 (2018).
32. Jakob, M. et al. The future of coal in a carbon-constrained climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 704–707 (2020).
33. Gilabert, P. & Lawford-Smith, H. Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies 60, 809–825 (2012).
34. Baumstark, L. et al. REMIND2.1: Transformation and innovation dynamics of the energy-economic system within climate and sustainability limits. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions 1–50 (2021) doi:10.5194/gmd-2021-85.
35. Bertram, C. et al. COVID-19-induced low power demand and market forces starkly reduce CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2021) doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00987-x.
36. Bauer, N. et al. The 1.5°C global climate target and China’s carbon neutrality pledge. Science (in review).
37. Fricko, O. SSP2: A middle of the road scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change This Special Issue. (2016).
38. Li, F. G. N., Trutnevyte, E. & Strachan, N. A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 100, 290–305 (2015).
39. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E. & Sovacool, B. Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science 37, 175–190 (2018).
40. van Sluisveld, M. A. E. et al. Comparing future patterns of energy system change in 2 °C scenarios with historically observed rates of change. Global Environmental Change 35, 436–449 (2015).
41. Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Bauer, N., Krey, V. & Riahi, K. Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence? Climatic Change 118, 381–395 (2013).
42. Loftus, P. J., Cohen, A. M., Long, J. C. S. & Jenkins, J. D. A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? WIREs Clim Change 6, 93–112 (2015).
43. Rocha, M. et al. IMPLICATIONS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT FOR COAL USE IN THE POWER SECTOR. https://climateanalytics.org/media/climateanalytics-coalreport_nov2016_1.pdf (2016).
44. Global Energy Monitor. Global Coal Plant Tracker January 2021. EndCoal.org https://endcoal.org/global-coal-plant-tracker/ (2021).
45. IEA. World energy balances. IEA World Energy Statistics and Balances https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00512-en (2017).
46. Edelenbosch, O. Y. et al. Comparing projections of industrial energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term energy models. Energy 122, 701–710 (2017).
47. Ritchie, J. & Dowlatabadi, H. Why do climate change scenarios return to coal? Energy 140, 1276–1291 (2017).
48. Gunnar Luderer et al. Accelerated electrification based on cheap renewables facilitates reaching Paris Climate targets. Submitted to Nature Energy.
49. Luderer, G. et al. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways. Nature Climate Change 8, 626–633 (2018).
50. Asheim, G. B. et al. The case for a supply-side climate treaty. Science 365, 325–327 (2019).
51. Erickson, P., Lazarus, M. & Piggot, G. Limiting fossil fuel production as the next big step in climate policy. Nature Climate Change 1 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0337-0.
52. Gaulin, N. & Le Billon, P. Climate change and fossil fuel production cuts: assessing global supply-side constraints and policy implications. Climate Policy 1–14 (2020) doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1725409.
53. Manych, N., Steckel, J. C. & Jakob, M. Finance-based accounting of coal emissions. submitted (in prep.).
54. Cassimon, D., Prowse, M. & Essers, D. The pitfalls and potential of debt-for-nature swaps: A US-Indonesian case study. Global Environmental Change 21, 93–102 (2011).
55. Simshauser, P. & Gilmore, J. Climate policy discontinuity & Australia’s 2016-2021 renewable investment supercycle. Energy Policy-forthcoming (In Review).
56. International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. 224 https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (2021).
57. Levi, S. Why hate carbon taxes? Machine learning evidence on the roles of personal responsibility, trust, revenue recycling, and other factors across 23 European countries. Energy Research & Social Science 73, 101883 (2021).
58. Bertram, C. et al. Complementing carbon prices with technology policies to keep climate targets within reach. Nature Climate Change 5, 235–239 (2015).