Our behavioral assessments indicated that pre-treatment with Nicotine could improve secondary complications of SCI such as locomotor dysfunction and neuropathic pain. The Nicotine alleviating effects appeared to be dose-dependent since 1 mg/kg of Nicotine had the most notable impact on behavioral recovery, while 3 mg/kg of the reagent apparently had no significant effect on locomotion and mechanical sensation. Therefore, the optimal dosage (1 mg/kg) was chosen for molecular assay. Spinal cord injured rats exhibited reduced levels of α7 nAChR gene compared to the sham ones, which was partially reversed by administration of Nicotine. Moreover, Nicotine attenuated the elevated levels of NF-κB gene, cavity formation, M1 macrophages, and inflammatory factors while it simultaneously increased M2 macrophages and an anti-inflammatory marker (IL-10) at the injury site. Notably, these alterations were absent in the MLA-treated rodents. Our proposed model regarding the association between α7 nAChR and neuroinflammation in SCI is summarized in Fig. 8.
Neuro-inflammatory responses are integrated with secondary SCI, which is initiated in the first 24 hours after primary SCI and would last chronically. Neuroinflammation plays a critical role in the development of neuropathic pain and locomotor exasperation, induced by SCI [15]. Although various mechanisms have been suggested to explain deficiencies after SCI, macrophages activity has been recently regarded as one of the main factors influencing neuroinflammation and axonal survival [16]. In general, it seems that nervous-immune interactions take a remarkable part in the process of secondary SCI, which potentially could lead to significant positive and negative effects on neural survival and neural regeneration. In detail, M1/M2 macrophage polarization paradigm is acting as a seesaw in post-SCI neuroinflammation. The M1 phenotype, recognized as “classic macrophage polarization”, produce inflammatory markers (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) that bring about neurotoxic and inflammatory interactions, whereas the M2 phenotype, known as “alternative macrophage polarization”, tends to mediate neuro-regenerative responses through secretion of anti-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-10). However, it appears that one-sided shift to M1 phenotype during the secondary SCI may facilitate undesirable outcomes varying from excessive inflammatory responses to fibrosis scarring [17]. Previous studies have confirmed this issue, showing that transplantation of M2 macrophages or manipulation of the existing macrophages towards M2 phenotype could lessen neuroinflammation and histopathological abnormalities [4, 18–21]. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the effects of α7 nAChR modification on neuroinflammation and histopathology in an animal model of SCI considering the role of M1/M2 macrophage polarization paradigm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines this relationship in SCI setting.
α7 nAChR is a member of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors family and is expressed on both neuronal and non-neuronal cells, including endothelial cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells and T cells. It has been well established that α7 nAChRs are involved in various inflammatory contexts such as sepsis, hemorrhage, rheumatoid arthritis, brain ischemia, myocardial infarction, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, pain and SCI [22–25]. In addition, a remarkable number of studies have explored the effect of α7 in the extent of traumatic brain injury (TBI), which could be considered a close model to SCI. It has been shown that TBI could result in reduced levels of α7 nAChR in the injured region at both acute and chronic phases after the damage [26]. Besides, Nicotine has been found effective in the improvement of neural loss and behavioral outcomes of subjects with TBI [27, 28]. The effects of α7 nAChR on regulation of inflammation in TBI models have been supported by observing that vagal nerve stimulation leads to the reduction of pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) through activation of the receptor [29, 30].
Various studies have revealed neuroprotective influences of α7 nAChR on the spinal cord tissue. There is solid evidence concerning the stimulatory effects of α7 nAChR agonists on the level and activity of the receptor [23, 31–34]. Rong et al. has indicated that pre-treatment with α2-adrenoreceptor selective agonist could enhance locomotor recovery after SCI among rats via amplification of α7 nAChR pathway [32]. Furthermore, it has been reported that α7 nAChR participates in determining the severity of neuropathic pain and mechanical allodynia. In this respect, Loram et al. demonstrated that both systemic and local administrations of α7 nAChR agonist could improve mechanical resistance to the forces, probably via reducing the spinal TNF-α level in a rat model of neuropathic pain [35, 36]. In two distinct studies, Ravikumar et al. showed that both single and multiple administrations of Nicotine, a potent α7 nAChR agonist, attenuate oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory markers, and NF-κB activity while enhance sparring of spinal cord tissue and therefore, the recovery of SCI-induced locomotor dysfunction [11, 37]. Moreover, Richardson et al. indicated that nonsmokers with SCI experience lower grades of neuropathic pain after Nicotine therapy [38]. Furthermore, Lee et al. suggested that Nicotine may reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein and mRNA levels, probably due to the activation of α7 nAChR on microglial cells [39]. Herein, we also detected significant improvement in functional and molecular status of the spinal cord injured rodents following administration of 1 mg/kg of Nicotine, whereas 3 mg/kg of Nicotine appeared less beneficial. Interestingly, paradoxical effects of Nicotine have been an issue in previous relevant studies and have been related to several features, including dosage, timing and selectivity [25, 40].
Previous studies have addressed the role of α7 nAChR in the orchestration of cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP), which is a key element in modulation of neuroinflammation through restoring tissue redox homeostasis [41]. In detail, in the process of secondary SCI, neuroinflammation is facilitated when injured cells within the CNS release DAMPs (damage associated molecular patterns) like high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) that bind to toll-like receptors (TLRs) and successively over-activate the NF-κB, which is a crucial modulator in the initiation of inflammatory cascades and macrophages polarization. One of the main reasons for Nicotine therapeutic effects is that there is an opposite interaction between α7 nAChR and NF-κB, presumably via Jak2/STAT3 signaling pathway [41]. In another word, activation of α7 nAChR could reduce neuroinflammation via inhibiting the expression of NF-κB and therefore, reducing inflammatory cytokines production [42, 43]. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that this pathway is reversible in case of MLA administration. Our results confirm this association as activation of α7 nAChR was accompanied by lower level of NF-κB and subsequently higher TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels.
There is mounting evidence that α7 nAChR is associated with microglial activity. For instance, it was shown that pre-conditioning with Nicotine could prevent LPS-induced activated microglial cells from releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and this effect was faded following the administration of MLA [44]. Several in vivo studies have also pointed to the anti-inflammatory effects of α7 nAChR on microglial cells. In a rat model of focal brain ischemia, Guan et al. discovered that Nicotine regulates microglial proliferation and correspondingly the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β and neural loss even in the acute phase of post-injury and these effects were reversed by pre-treatment with α-bungarotoxin [45]. Several studies of CNS have exclusively discussed the role of α7 nAChR in the polarization status of M1/M2 macrophages. In two recent studies of brain ischemia, it was noticed that activation of α7 nAChR is related to the inhibition of NF-κB, reduction of M1 markers (CD68, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) and lesion volume, elevation of M2 markers (CD206, Arg-1, IL-10), as well as both short-term and long-term behavioral recoveries [6, 7]. Meanwhile, Ma et al. demonstrated that electroacupuncture therapy could enhance axonal survival via activation of α7 nAChR that leads to reduction of M1 markers and simultaneous elevation of M2 markers in a rat model of brain stroke [8].
There has been increasing interest regarding the role of M1/M2 macrophages polarization paradigm in mediation of secondary SCI, as well. A few experiments have targeted this theory to find novel therapeutic options for SCI. The shift of macrophages to the M1 phenotype has been attributed to the activation of NF-κB in response to the binding of HMGB1 to TLRs. Results obtained from related investigations are consistent, suggesting higher levels of M1 markers (e.g., CD86) and lower levels of M2 markers (e.g., CD163, CD206) at the injury region of spinal cord. Observing higher concentrations of pro-inflammatory (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and lower concentrations anti-inflammatory (e.g., IL-10) downstream markers confirms this alteration. Therefore, it is not surprising to detect neurodegenerative activities due to the established neuroinflammation [3, 17, 46]. Here, we consistently detected similar results in non-treated SCI rodents. Additionally, we discovered that elevation of α7 nAChR level due to Nicotine therapy is correlated with shift reversion to M2 phenotype, probably through inhibition of NF-κB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that addresses the association between α7 nAChR and macrophages polarization, indicating congruence with previous CNS models.
This study has several limitations. Promotion in SCI outcomes could be related to either suppression of excessive inflammation through inhibiting M1 polarization or enhancement of axonal repair through stimulating M2 polarization; these two seem undistinguishable in vivo models. However, recent innovative points of view highlight the importance of M1/M2 plasticity, suggesting that there is a dynamic time-dependent interaction between the two mechanisms after SCI [47, 48]. After all, in this study, we concluded that Nicotine could improve SCI outcomes and neuroinflammation possibly via activation of α7 nAChR; however, further clarification of the binding lines between α7 nAChR and macrophages polarization pattern is warranted in SCI setting [49]. On a side note, studies containing larger sample size are recommended to provide better insight into the dose-dependent effects of Nicotine.