Topoisomerase is one of the most important targets of anticancer drugs. In order to develop effective and low-toxic topoisomerase inhibitors, a series of xanthone derivatives have been designed and synthesized using the principles of skeleton transition. In vitro growth inhibition experiments of human breast cancer(MCF-7), gastric cancer (MGC-803), and cervical cancer(Hela) cell lines were used to evaluate the compound's anti-tumor cell proliferation activity. Most of the compounds showed anti-tumor growth activity, and also showed low toxicity to human normal cells L929. In the enzyme activity inhibition experiment, compounds 7d and 8d showed the best inhibitory activity. The DNA binding studies disclosed that the most potent compounds 7d and 8d can intercalate into DNA, induce apoptosis in MGC-803 cells and arrested at G2/M phase. Molecular docking showed that compounds 7d and 8d could bind with topoisomerase II and DNA through hydrogen bonds and π-stacking interactions.
Research Article
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Xanthone Derivatives as Anti-Cancer Agents Targeting Topoisomerase II and DNA
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-857564/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
Journal Publication
published 12 Mar, 2022
Read the published version in Medicinal Chemistry Research →
You are reading this latest preprint version
Xanthone derivatives
Topoisomerase II
Selectivity
Anti-cancer activity
Molecular docking
In recent years, the incidence and mortality of cancer have been on the rise. Traditional anticancer drugs are mainly some cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, and the representative drugs include DNA alkylation agents (such as nitrogen mustard), metabolic antagonists (such as methotrexate), tubule inhibitors (such as paclitaxel), and topoisomerase II inhibitors (such as etoposide)[1]. Targeted cancer therapy, in which the drugs are used to specifically block the growth of cancer by interfering with molecular targets and consequently causing less damage to normal cells, has become one of the high potential cancer treatments [2, 3]. DNA plays a very important role in the cell cycle, and it is an important target for anti-tumor drugs[4]. Following the clinical success of the DNA-intercalating topo II inhibitors doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and analogues as anticancer drugs, a great deal of work has been devoted toward other classes of compounds with similar overall topology as topo II inhibitors[5–7].
Topoisomerase (Topo) was an enzyme that primarily addresses the conformational problems that arise in DNA during recombination, replication, transcription, and repair [8–10]. It was a dependent enzyme for eukaryotic cell proliferation and survival[11]. On the basis of their mechanisms, topoisomerases can be classified into two major classes: Topo I and Topo II. Topo I cleaves one single-stranded DNA during each catalytic cycle[12, 13]. Topo II breaks one double-stranded DNA strand, allowing another segment of duplex DNA to pass through the transient breakage before resealing the broken strand to resolve DNA knots and tangles[14, 15]. Because tumor cells have the characteristics of rapid proliferation, the content and activity of topoisomerase were significantly higher than that of normal somatic cells[16]. Therefore, the rapid proliferation of tumor cells can be prevented by inhibiting the activity of topoisomerase, thus killing tumor cells. In recent years, topoisomerase inhibitors have become one of the hot spots in the research and development of antitumor drugs[17–20].
Xanthones are a class of oxygen containing heterocyclic compounds with a broad range of biological activities, and they have prominent significance in the field of medicinal chemistry. They have diverse biological activities including anti-cancer, antimicrobial[21], antimalarial[22], anticholinesterase[23], anticonvulsant[24] and antioxidant[25] activities according to their diverse structures. In recent years, the research on the anti-tumor activity of xanthones has been studied deeply. Reported to date, oxygenated xanthones synthesized or isolated from natural resources inhibit the proliferation of several cancer cell lines[26]. Antitumor targets were found to be topoisomerase[27], P-glycoprotein[28], PKC[29] and IKKβ[30]. In 2016, Chaomei Liu[20] et al. synthesized 3,6-disubstituted methoxy amido xanthene derivatives. The compounds have good anti-tumor activity. They are resistant to MDA-MB-231, PC-3, A549, AsPC-1 and HCT116, the IC50 values of these cells are 8.06, 6.18, 4.59, 4.76, 6.09 µM, respectively. In 2017, Elirosa Minniti[31] et al designed and synthesized a series of xanthone derivatives and tested them for TopoIIα inhibitory activity. The results showed that the target compounds have inhibitory effects on Topo IIα, with IC50 values ranging from 1.0 to 2.5 µM. It can be seen that the xanthone derivatives have good anti-cancer activity targeting Topo II and high development value.
Based on the excellent antitumor activity of xanthones, we designed and synthesized a series of xanthones derivatives and studied the effect of different substituents on anticancer activity. The evaluation of biological activities of these compounds was carried out for topoisomerase I and II inhibitory activity, DNA binding activity and cytotoxicity against several human cancer cell lines.
2.1 Chemistry
i: acetic anhydride, 70 ℃, 0.5 h; ii: 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzoic acid, Cu, K2CO3, DMF, 130 ℃, 8-10h; iii: H2SO4, 70 ℃, 5 h; iv: chloroacetyl chloride or 3-chloropropionyl chloride, triethylamine, dichloromethane, ice bath, overnight; v: secondary amine, acetonitrile, K2CO3, KI, 70 ℃, 5 h. vi: ethyl acetate, SnCl2, HCl, 70 ℃, 1 h; vii: secondary amine, acetonitrile, K2CO3, KI, 70 ℃, 0.5-2 h.
The synthetic route of the target compounds 7a-7g, 8a-8g, 11a-11g, 12a-12f are described in Scheme 1. 2-(3-aminophenoxy)-5-nitrobenzoic acid 3 was afforded from 3-acetamidophenol and 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzoic acid as raw material via Ullmann reaction, then dehydration provided 6-amino-2-nitro-9H-xanthen-9-one 4[32]. The intermediate 4 was reacted with different acyl chloride to obtain the amide analogues 5 and 6 in the dichloromethane solvent system. Compounds 5 or 6 with different secondary amines provided target compounds 7a-7g, 8a-8g. Compounds 5 and 6 were reduced to compounds 9 and 10 under the catalysis of stannous chloride. The target analogues 11a-11g and 12a-12f were easily obtained at the reflux condition with different secondary amines.
2.2 Antiproliferative activity
All compounds were assessed for in vitro anti-proliferative activity using MTT assay against three different human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (human breast cancer), Hela (human cervical cancer), MGC-803 (human gastric cancer), and a normal cell L929 (fibroblasts cell line), etoposide, camptothecine and adriacin were used as positive controls. The inhibitory activities (IC50 values) of the compounds against tested cancer cell lines and a normal cell are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, all of the target compounds had the best inhibitory effect on MGC-803, and poor effect on Hela. Among them, compounds 7d, 8a, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8f, 8g and 12c showed well anti-proliferation against MGC-803 cancer cell lines with IC50 values lower than 10 µM. In general, most of the compounds showed better activity when n is 2 than when n is 1. When R is substituted by the same secondary amines, the nitro-substituted compounds on the xanthone ring are more cytotoxic than amino-substituted compounds.
2.3 DNA topoisomerase I inhibition activity
The inhibitory properties of the compounds against topoisomerase I was determined by DNA relaxation assay using agarose gel electrophoresis[33]. Camptothecin as a potent Topoisomerase I inhibitor, was used as positive control in this test. The obtained results of topoisomerase I inhibitory properties of the compounds were presented in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1, in the blank control group (Lane D), DNA kept the supercoil structure during electrophoresis and ran the farthest. In the negative control group (Lane T), DNA was completely transformed from supercoiled DNA to relaxed DNA under the action of Topo I. In the experimental group (Lane C and Lanes 7a-7g, 8a-8g, 11a-11g and 12a-12f), the positive control camptothecin can almost completely inhibit the relaxation effect mediated by Topo I, and DNA still maintains a supercoiled structure (Line C). While none of the tested compounds 7a-7g, 8a-8g, 11a-11g and 12a-12f exhibited topoisomerase I inhibition potency even at 100 µM, indicating that these compounds may display selective inhibition against Topoisomerase II.
2.4 DNA topoisomerase II inhibitory activity
All compounds were evaluated the inhibitory activities against topoisoerase II by pBR322 DNA relaxation assay at a high concentration of 100 µM for the screening of candidate topoisomerase inhibitors[34]. Etoposide was used as positive control for topoisomerase II. The obtained results of topoisomerase II inhibitory properties of the compounds were presented in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2, most of the compounds (7a, 7b, 7d, 7e, 7g, 8a, 8b, 8d, 8e, and 8g) exhibit inhibitory activity. Among them, compounds 7d and 8d with N-methylpiperazine showed significant inhibitory activity at 20 µM. As shown in Fig. 2, 11a-11g and 12a-12f with amino substitution groups on xanthone ring showed none inhibitory. None of the tested compounds exhibited topoisomerase I inhibition potency, and most of the compounds showed selective inhibition for topoisomerase II.
2.5. UV-Visible titration assay
UV-Visible studies are useful in examining the mode of binding of DNA with small molecules[35, 36]. When small molecules intercalated into DNA, the stacking interaction between aromatic chromophore and the base pairs of DNA will lead to bathochromic shifts and hypochromicity on the UV-Visible curve of compound-DNA complex[37, 38]. In the absence of ctDNA, all the compounds has absorption peak at around 300 nm. Increasing ctDNA concentration, the absorption bands of 7d, 7e, 8d, and 8e displayed clear hypochromism with a concomitant minor red shift. The results indicated that 7d, 7e, 8d, and 8e probably interact with DNA by intercalation mode, involving a stacking interaction between xanthone ring of compounds and DNA base pairs.
2.6 EB displacement assay
The intercalation mode of compounds binding to DNA was further examined using the competitive binding ethidium bromide (EB) displacement assay[3]. The DNA bound form of EB has a stronger fluorescence emission than free EB. If there is a compound compete with EB for DNA-binding sites, the fluorescence quenching of DNA-EB system is observed, so the DNA-EB displacement experiments could be investigated whether compounds can intercalate into DNA[39]. As showed in Fig. 4, the emission intensity of DNA-EB system at about 600 nm decreased distinctly when the concentration of 7d, 7e, 8d, and 8e increased, indicating that these compounds can intercalate into DNA.
2.7 DNA unwinding assay
The unwinding effect is caused by certain compounds intercalating into the DNA, and the effect may yield false positive outcomes in the Topo-mediated DNA relaxation assay[40]. In order to determine the intercalating or non-intercalating ability of these compounds, a DNA unwinding assay was carried out using supercoiled pBR322 DNA as substrate and EB as control[3, 8]. As shown in Fig. 5, EB, a classic DNA intercalator, is able to transform the relaxed DNA into supercoiled DNA in the presence of excess Topoisomerase in a dose dependent manner. And compounds 7d, 7e, 8d and 8e could intercalate into DNA at 200 µM. This finding provides evidence that these compounds were DNA intercalator.
2.8 Annexin V-FITC/PI (AV/PI) dual staining assay
According to the above experiments, compounds 7d and 8d could inhibit the activity of Topo II and interact with DNA, which may induce apoptosis in cancer cell lines. Annexin V and PI dual staining assay was used to detect early and late apoptotic cells (annexin-V+/PI− and annexin-V+/PI+), necrotic (annexin-V−/PI+) as well as viable cells (annexin-V−/PI−)[41]. As showed in Fig. 6, 7d as well as 8d significantly increased the percentage of late apoptotic cells in comparison with untreated cells. After 48 h of incubation, a significant proapoptotic effect was observed in MGC-803 in all cases. At a concentration of 2.5 µM, the late apoptotic rates of compound 7d and 8d on MGC-803 cells were 6.53% and 10.59%, respectively. When the concentration was increased to 10 µM, the late apoptotic rates of compound 7d and 8d on MGC-803 cells increased to 91.20%, 98.13% respectively.. It can be seen that the compound can significantly inhibit the late apoptosis of MGC-803 cells, and the inhibitory rate of compound 8d on the late apoptosis of cells is greater than that of 7d, which further proves that the carbon chain of the substituent at position 6 of the compound When the length is longer, the inhibitory effect on cancer cells is greater.
2.9 Cell cycle analysis
The cell cycle analysis experiment[42]used different concentrations of compounds 7d and 8d (2.5, 5µM) to treat MGC-803 cells to detect which stage of the growth cycle the cells were blocked. The experimental results showed that after 48h of compounds treatment, the cell population in G2/M phase increases from 2.51% in the untreated cells to 4.76% and 9.19% in the cells treated with 7d at 2.5, 5µM, and from 2.51% in the untreated cells to 6.86% and 15.45% in the cells treated with 8d, respectively. Obviously, these compounds arrested cell growth in the G2/M phase and caused cell apoptosis.
2.10 Molecular docking
Compounds 7d and 8d exhibited Topo II inhibition and efficient DNA binding abilities. In order to visualize the binding mode of the title compounds, molecular docking studies were performed with human topoisomerase II (PDB ID: 4G0V) and DNA (PDB ID: 2DES).
These compounds fit well into mitoxantrone binding pocket present in DNA-Topo II, complex xanthone ring intercalated with DNA and one benzene ring of xanthone exhibited π-stacking interactions with ARG503 residues, DG13 nitrogen bases and another benzene ring of xanthone exhibited π-stacking interactions with DA12 and DG13 nitrogen bases (Fig. 6A and B). Additionally, the carbonyl group in 7d of xanthone ring form hydrogen-bonding with the side chain of GLN778 and DT9 (Fig. 6A) and the carbonyl group in 8d of xanthone ring form hydrogen-bonding with the side chain of GLN778 (Fig. 6B). N atoms on the piperazine ring on the side chain form hydrogen bonds with DC11.
The molecular docking studies revealed that the xanthone ring is responsible for intercalation, and xanthone ring substituents exhibited π-stacking interactions with DG8 and DG6, nitrogen and nitro form metal bonds with Mg2+(Fig. 6C and D).
Xanthone derivatives are co-planar structures obtained by the fusion of multiple aromatic rings, and this is the key for them to enter the topoisomerase activity pocket, where the substituents on the amino nitrogen have a greater impact on the anti-tumor activity. Among these compounds, 7d and 8d with N-methyl piperazine substituent showed excellent anti-tumor cell proliferation activity and topo II inhibitory activity. DNA binding studies disclosed that 7d and 8d were DNA intercalator, and this is correlated with the docking studies. Annexin V-FITC/PI assay revealed that these compounds induce apoptosis in MGC-803. Cell cycle analysis indicated that these compounds stop the cell cycle at G2/M phase.
4.1 Chemistry
4.1.1 General
Most chemicals and reagents were obtained commercially of analytical grade and used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using precoated silica gel plates (silica gel GF/UV 254), and spots were visualized under UV light (254 nm).
1H NMR and 13C NMR are measured on a Bruker AVANCE III 600MHz (Switzerland) spectrometer in DMSO-d6, using TMS as the internal standard. High Resolution Mass Spectral (HRMS) data is determined on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer.
4.1.2. Synthesis of intermediates
Compounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 were prepared according to the reported[43]. Compounds 5 or 6 and SnCl2 dissolved in acetic ether, then hydrochloric acid was added. The mixture was stirred well for 6 h at 70℃ and monitored by TLC. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured over a saturated solution of NaHCO3. Light yellow precipitate appeared was collected by filtration and crystallized to produce compound 9 or 10.
To a stirred refluxing suspension of compounds 5 (or 6, 9, 10) (1 mmol), K2CO3 (2mmol) and KI (0.6 mmol) in acetonitrile (10 mL) was added dropwise appropriate secondary amine (1.0 mL) which dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL). The mixture was stirred under reflux for 6 h, cooled down to room temperature, and diluted with distilled water. The precipitate was filtered, washed with ether, dried and evaporated to afford raw product, and further recrystallized by acetone and hydrochloride acid to yield 7a-7g (or 8a-8g, 11a-11g, and 12a-12f).
2-(diethylamino)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)acetamide (7a), White solid, 32.5% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.76 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.87 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.63 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.24 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.14, (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.93 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.66 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 3.33 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.10–2.08 (m, 4H, -CH2), 1.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 177.7, 166.1, 158.1, 156.1, 143.3, 140.1, 134.2, 127.1, 121.8, 120.2, 119.8, 118.3, 108.9, 81.5, 53.1, 48.6, 8.9. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+C19H20N3O5: 370.1403, Found: 370.1373.
2-morpholino-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)acetamide (7b), White solid,27.5% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.90 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.80 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.59 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.17 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.11 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.88 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.68 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 4.38 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 3.98–3.71 (m, 4H, -OCH2), 3.38–2.95 (m, 4H, -NCH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.8, 158.7, 156.0, 155.9, 144.6, 143.3, 129.1, 127.1, 121.7, 121.0, 120.1, 116.6, 106.6, 99.3, 62.9, 56.4, 51.7. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+C19H18N3O5: 383.1117, Found: 382.1369.
N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide(7c), White solid, 26.9% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.71 (s, 1H, H+), 10.43 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.82 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.61 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.11 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.89 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.66 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 4.41 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.52–2.50 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.08–1.93 (m, 4H, -CH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.1, 170.7, 158.8, 156.32, 145.1, 143.5, 129.2, 127.4, 121.9, 121.3, 120.3, 116.7, 116.6, 106.9, 61.8, 55.9, 22.8. (ESI+) [M + H]+ C19H18N3O5: 368.1246, Found: 368.1223.
2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)acetamide (7d), White solid, 25.7% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.39 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.84 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.61 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.20 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.90 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 3.22 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 3.18–3.17 (m, 4H, -CH2), 3.17–3.16 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.18 (s, 3H,-CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.8, 169.6, 158.9, 156.3, 145.5, 143.4, 129.1, 126.9, 121.8, 121.2, 120.2, 116.8, 116.0, 106.2, 61.8, 54.5, 52.6, 45.7. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H21N4O5: 397.1512༌Found: 397.1482
N-2-(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)acetamide (7e), White solid,63.0% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.39 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.83 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.60 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.19 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 3.31 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.50–2.43 (m, 8H, -CH2), 2.34–2.33 (m, 2H, -CH2), 1.00 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.9, 169.7, 158.9, 156.3, 145.6, 143.4, 129.1, 127.0, 121.9, 121.2, 120.2, 116.8, 116.1, 106.2, 61.9, 52.8, 52.1, 51.6, 11.9. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H23N4O5: 411.1668, Found: 411.1636.
2-(2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)acetamide(7f), White solid, 33.3% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.33 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.87 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.64 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.23 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.94 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 3.32 (s, 2H -COCH2), 2.09 (s, 2H, -CH2), 1.97–1.64 (m, 6H, -CH2), 1.50 (s, 1H, -CH), 1.36 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.1, 170.3, 158.8, 155.6, 145.5, 144.1, 129.4, 127.3, 121.9, 121.2, 120.1, 116.8, 116.2, 106.5, 66.1, 61.7, 53.5, 33.5, 27.2, 25.4, 20.8. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H22N3O5:396.1559, Found: 396.1526.
N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(piperidin-1-yl)acetamide (7g), White solid, 33.3% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.84 (s, 1H, H+), 10.05 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.84 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.62 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.20 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.14 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 7.91 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 7.69 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8Hz 1H, -ArH), 3.13 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.52–2.50 (m, 4H, -CH2), 1.90–1.68 (m, 6H, -CH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.0, 169.8, 158.9, 156.3, 144.9, 143.5, 129.3, 127.4, 121.9, 121.2, 120.3, 116.7, 116.5, 106.7, 57.3, 53.1, 22.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H20N3O5: 382.1403, Found: 382.1368.
3-(diethylamino)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)propanamide(8a), White solid, 48.4% yield, 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.85 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.62 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.20–8.15 (m, 2H, -ArH), 7.93 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.68 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 3.39 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 3.17–3.13 (m, 4H, -CH2), 3.07 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, -COCH2), 1.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.9, 172.3, 159.0, 156.4, 145.9, 143.4, 129.2, 127.2, 121.9, 121.2, 120.2, 116.6, 116.1, 106.1, 54.9, 46.5, 30.9, 8.4. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H22N3O5:384.1559, Found: 384.1524.
3-morpholino-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)propanamide (8b), White solid, 9.2% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.26 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.86(d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.63 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.18–8.17 (m, 2H, -ArH), 7.93 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.64 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 3.97( t, J = 5.4 Hz, 4H, -OCH2), 3.78 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 3.14–3.10 (m, 2H, -COCH2), 3.08 (s, 4H, -NCH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.0, 171.4, 159.0 156.8, 145.3, 143.5, 128.5, 127.4, 121.9, 121.3, 120.3, 116.7, 116.2, 106.2, 63.3, 54.8, 51.3, 33.4. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H20N3O6: 398.1352, Found: 398.1331.
N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)propanamide (8c), White solid, 46.7% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.25 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.85 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.62 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.18 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.94–7.90 (m, 2H, -ArH), 7.59 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 3.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 3.00 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, -COCH2), 2.03–1.99 (m, 4H, -CH2), 1.93–1.85 (m, 4H, -CH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.0, 171.9, 159.0, 156.4, 145.7, 143.8, 129.2, 127.2, 121.9, 121.3, 120.3, 116.6, 116.2, 106.2, 53.7, 53.2, 32.4, 22.7. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H20N3O5: 382.1403, Found: 382.1367.
3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)propanamide (8d), White solid, 64.7% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.26 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.86 (s, 1H, -ArH), 8.65 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.52 (s, 1H, -ArH), 7.91 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 7.41 (s, 1H, -ArH), 3.67 (s, 2H, -CH2), 3.25–3.07 (m, 8H, -CH2), 2.84 (s, 3H, -CH3), 2.50 (s, 2H, -COCH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.2, 170.3, 158.1, 156.2, 146.3, 143.6, 129.2, 127.1, 121.9, 120.9, 120.1, 116.8, 116.3, 106.3, 57.4, 57.3, 56.2, 53.2, 35.0. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H23N4O5: 411.1668, Found: 411.1631.
3-(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)propanamide (8e), White solid, 8.2% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.93 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.85 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.61 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.17 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.90 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 2.66 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.58 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 2.49–2.31 (m, 8H, -CH2), 2.31–2.26 (m, 2H, -CH2), 0.97 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.9, 170.0, 159.2, 156.8, 146.1, 143.8, 129.7, 127.6, 122.2, 121.4, 120.5, 117.1, 116.4, 106.6, 53.9, 51.9, 51.5, 51.1, 49.0, 47.5, 32.5, 9.3. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C22H25N4O5: 425.1825, Found: 425.1791.
3-(2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)-N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)propanamide (8f), White solid, 7.5% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.80 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.85 (s, 1H, -ArH), 8.61 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.29–8.02 (m, 2H, -ArH), 7.91 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.49 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 2.99 (dt, J = 13.5, 6.9 Hz, 2H, -COCH2), 2.74–2.55 (m, 2H, -CH2), 2.35 (d, J = 35.5 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 2.17 (t, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H, -CH-), 1.54 (dt, J = 68.0, 36.0 Hz, 4H, -CH2), 1.30–1.13 (m, 2H, -CH2), 1.03 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.7, 171.8, 158.8, 156.3, 146.0, 143.3, 129.0, 127.0, 121.8, 121.1, 120.1, 116.3, 115.7, 105.7, 54.8, 51.5, 49.4, 34.1, 33.2, 25.7, 23.5, 18.6. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C22H24N3O5: 410.1779, Found: 410.1691.
N-(7-nitro-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(piperidin-1-yl)propanamide (8g), White solid, 14.6% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.00 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.85 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.63 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.7 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 8.14 (s, 1H, -Ar-H), 7.92 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 7.68 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H, -Ar-H), 4.27 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 3.20–3.01 (m, 2H, -CH2), 2.54 (s, 4H, -CH2), 1.83–1.39 (m, 6H, -CH2).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.0, 158.4, 156.2, 144.6, 143.4, 129.0, 127.7, 121.5, 121.1, 120.5, 116.8, 106.2, 56.7, 55.6, 52.9, 21.9, 20.7. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H22N3O5: 396.1559, Found: 396.1523.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(diethylamino)acetamide (11a), Yellow solid, 11.6% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.94 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.14 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.01 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.13 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.44 (s, 2H, -NH2), 4.09 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 3.17 (s, 4H, -CH2), 1.20 (d, J = 16.7 Hz, 6H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 162.2, 156.2, 147.8, 145.7, 143.3, 127.1, 122.9, 121.8, 118.5, 116.7, 115.3, 106.4, 106.2, 63.2, 48.5, 11.0. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C19H22N3O3: 340.1661, Found: 340.1639 .
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-morpholinoacetamide (11b) Yellow solid, 8.4% yield, 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.27 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.15 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.07 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.52 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.66 (t, J = 3.9 Hz, 4H, -OCH2), 3.22 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.54 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 4H, -N-CH2).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 169.1, 156.3, 147.8, 145.6, 144.0, 126.7, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.2, 115.4, 106.2, 106.1, 66.0, 62.0, 53.1. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C19H20N3O4: 354.1454, Found: 354.1430 .
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide (11c)Yellow solid, 16.5% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.94 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.14 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 8.00 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.45 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.40 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.26 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.13 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 5.44 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.11 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.05–1.80 (m, 8H, -CH2).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 165.3, 156.2, 147.7, 145.7, 143.4, 127.1, 122.9, 121.8, 118.5, 116.6, 115.2, 106.3, 106.2, 63.3, 54.3, 22.8. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C19H20N3O3: 338.1505, Found: 338.1477 .
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)acetamide(11d)Yellow solid, 10.45% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.23 (s, 1H, -NH-), 8.08 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H ), 7.51 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.20 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.51 (s, 4H, -CH2), 2.43–2.35 (m, 4H, -CH2), 2.18 (s, 3H, -CH3).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 169.4, 156.3, 147.8, 145.6, 144.1, 126.7, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.2, 115.4, 106.2, 106.0, 61.8, 54.4, 52.6, 45.7. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H23N4O3: 367.1770, Found: 367.1750.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)acetamide (11e) Yellow solid, 13.4% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.28 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.59 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.72 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.28 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.17 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.50 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.22 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.65 (d, J = 35.9 Hz, 8H, -CH2-), 2.39 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 1.08 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, -CH3), 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 178.9, 170.2, 156.3, 146.8, 145.8, 140.3, 135.3, 123.7, 121.7, 118.1, 112.5, 111.6, 108.8, 105.7, 62.2, 52.7, 51.9, 51.6, 11.8, HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H25N4O3: 381.1927, Found: 381.1889.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)acetamide (11f) Yellow solid, 18.6% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.16 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.10 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.08 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.57–7.51 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.17 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.84 (s, 1H, -N-CH-), 1.64 (s, 2H, -CH2), 1.57 (s, 2H, -CH2), 1.35–1.23 (m, 2H, -CH2), 1.24 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 1.05 (s, 3H, -CH3).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 163.7, 156.3, 147.8, 145.6, 143.9, 126.8, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.2, 115.4, 106.2, 106.0, 53.3, 49.2, 48.6, 31.1, 30.3, 29.8, 18.8. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H24N3O3: 366.1818, Found: 366.1789.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-2-(piperidin-1-yl)acetamide (11g) Yellow solid, 9.5% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.37 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.10 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.06 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.42 (s, 2H, -NH2), 2.68 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.51 (s, 4H, -N-CH2), 1.67–1.60 (m, 4H, -CH2), 1.44 (s, 2H, -CH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 172.0, 156.3, 147.8, 145.6, 143.8, 126.8, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.3, 115.4, 106.2, 106.1, 61.1, 53.8, 22.1, 21.0. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H22N3O3: 352.1661, Found: 352.1627.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(diethylamino)propanamide (12a) Yellow solid, 25.4% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.69 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H),7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.17 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.80 (s, 2H, -CH2), 2.53 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H, -CH2), 0.99 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H, CH3).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 171.4, 156.4, 147.8, 145.6, 144.6, 126.8, 122.7, 121.8, 118.4, 116.0, 115.0, 106.3, 105.6, 48.1, 46.1, 34.2, 11.6. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H24N3O3: 354.1818, Found: 354.1799.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-morpholinopropanamide (12b) Yellow solid, 35.1% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.58 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.58 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 4H, -OCH2), 2.66 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 2.57 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, -COCH2), 2.42 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 4H, -N-CH2).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 171.1, 156.4, 147.8, 145.6, 144.6, 126.8, 122.7, 121.8, 118.4, 116.0, 115.1, 106.3, 105.7, 66.2, 53.9, 53.0, 34.1. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H22N3O4: 368.1610, Found: 368.1593.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)propanamide (12c), Yellow solid, 12.4% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.85 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.07 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.42 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.10 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 2.74 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, -CH2), 2.57 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, -COCH2), 2.49–2.47(m, 4H, -CH2), 1.69–1.67 (m, 4H, -CH2 ).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 171.4, 156.4, 147.8, 145.6, 144.9, 126.7, 122.7, 121.8, 118.4, 115.9, 115.2, 106.2, 105.6, 53.4, 51.3, 36.2, 23.1. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C20H22N3O3: 352.1661, Found: 352.1640.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)propanamide (12d) Yellow solid, 8.4% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.57 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.41 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.34 (s, 2H, -CH2), 2.71 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H, -CH2), 2.58 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H, -CH2), 2.50 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 2.39 (s, 3H, -CH3).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 170.8, 156.4, 147.8, 145.6, 144.5, 126.8, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.0, 115.1, 106.2, 105.7, 52.9, 52.6, 49.9, 42.9, 34.1. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C21H25N4O3: 381.1927, Found: 381.1903.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)propanamide (12e) Yellow solid, 7.9% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.55 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.40 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.40 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.32 (s, 2H, -CH2), 3.17 (s, 2H, -COCH2), 3.09–2.71 (m, 8H, -CH2), 2.61 (s, 2H, -CH2), 1.15 (s, 3H, -CH3). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.8, 170.9, 156.2, 147.6, 145.4, 144.4, 126.6, 122.6, 121.6, 118.2, 115.8, 114.9, 106.1, 105.5, 53.0, 51.6, 51.4, 51.4, 51.1, 43.0, 33.9, 10.9. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C22H27N4O3: 395.2083, Found: 395.2061.
N-(7-amino-9-oxo-9H-xanthen-3-yl)-3-(2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)propanamide (12f), Yellow solid, 23.4% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.70 (s, 1H, -NH), 8.11 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.04 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.12 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 5.42 (s, 2H, -NH2), 3.17–3.16 (m, 1H, -CH-), 2.91 (s, 2H, -CH2 ), 2.52–2.51 (m, 2H, -CH2 ), 2.51–2.50 (m, 2H, -COCH2 ), 1.90–1.43 (m, 6H, -CH2 ), 1.40–1.25 (m, 3H, -CH3 ).13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.0, 171.1, 156.3, 147.8, 145.6, 144.3, 126.9, 122.8, 121.8, 118.4, 116.2, 115.1, 106.2, 105.9, 64.8, 58.8, 48.8, 36.2, 31.4, 26.8, 21.1, 15.3. HRMS (ESI+) [M + H]+ C22H26N3O3: 380.1969, Found: 380.1953.
4.2 Antiproliferative activity using MTT assay
MTT method was used to detect the growth inhibitory effects of the compounds on MCF-7, Hela, MGC-803 cell lines and normal cells L929. Inoculate the cells in a 96-well cell culture plate containing complete medium at a cell density of 5×104 cells per well, and incubated for 12 h, then treated with the compounds (predissolved in DMSO) at a five-dose assay ranging from 5 to 120 µM (2.5–30 µM for etoposide and 0.05–1.5 µM for adriacin and camptothecine). After 48 h incubation at 37°C, MTT solution (10 µL, 5 mg/mL) in PBS (PBS without MTT as the blank) was fed to each well of the culture plate (containing 100 mL medium). After 4 h incubation, remove the medium and MTT, then add 100 µL DMSO to dissolve the crystals. Measure the absorbance of each well at OD490nm with a Bio-Tek microplate Reader. All experiments were performed in triplicate and each experiment was repeated at least three times. The IC50 values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism).
4.3 DNA topoisomerase I inhibition assay in vitro
The supercoiled DNA pBR322 (TaKaRa Bio) relaxation experiment was used to detect the effect of the compound on the activity of DNA topoisomerase I. The experimental method refers to previous reports[44]. Add 1U of DNA topoisomerase I (TaKaRa Bio), 250 ng of supercoiled DNA pBR322, 2 µL of a reaction 10×buffer (TaKaRa Bio) (35 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 72 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT) to the reaction system, 5 mM spermidine, 0.01% BSA) and different concentrations of the test compound dissolved in DMSO in advance and the control camptothecin. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and then the reaction was terminated by adding 2 µL of 10% SDS solution, 1 µL of DNA loading buffer. The reaction product was subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in the absence or presence of ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL). When the agarose gel electrophoresis was performed in the absence of ethidium bromide, the gel was stained with 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide after electrophoresis.
4.4 DNA topoisomerase II inhibition assay in vitro
Topoisomerase II was purified and extracted from the nuclei from MGC-803 cells as described previously[45]. The reaction mixture of pBR322 (250 ng) and Topoisomerase II (1 unit) was incubated with etoposide, compounds (100 µM or 20 µM) in a final volume of 10 µL in Topo II reaction buffer ( Tris-HCl (50 mM, pH 8.0), NaCl (150 mM), MgCl2 (10 mM), dithiothreitol (0.5 mM), ATP (2 mM) ) for 30 min at 37°C. And then the reaction was terminated by adding 1 µL of 10% SDS solution, 1 µL of 6 × DNA loading buffer. Electrophoresis was performed on a 1% agarose gel at 83 V for 55 min in TBE buffer (Tris-borate and EDTA). Gels were stained for 15 min in an aqueous solution of EB (0.5 µg/mL) and photographed under UV light (Tanon-1600 Gel Imaging System).
4.5 UV-Visible titration assay
The ctDNA solution was prepared in 10mM Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH = 7.4). In order to verify whether the DNA is purified, the UV absorbance of the DNA was measured at 260 nm and 280 nm. The results showed that the absorbance of the DNA at these two wavelengths was greater than 1.8, indicating that the DNA does not contain protein and meets the experimental requirements. The concentration of ctDNA was determined by UV absorbance at 260nm using a molar absorptivity constant of 6600 L·mol− 1·cm− 1. Compounds 7d (7e, 8d and 8e) were dissolved in 3 mL Tris-HCl buffer solution in the present or absence of increasing concentration of ctDNA (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 µM). Absorption spectra were recorded in the wavelength range of 200–400 nm after equilibration at room temperature for 5 min using UV evisible spectro photometer (T6 new century ultraviolet - visible spectrophotometer,Beijing Purkay General Instrument Co. Ltd).
4.6 EB displacement assay
In brief, increasing concentration (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400 µM) of 7d (7e, 8d, and 8e) was added to samples containing 200 ng pBR322 DNA plasmid and 2.5mM EB in a fluorescence buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 7.4). Fluorescence emission spectra were obtained for each 7d (7e, 8d, and 8e) concentration.
4.7 DNA unwinding assay
DNA relaxation experiment mediated by topoisomerase I: treating negatively supercoiled pBR322 with Topo I in Topo I reaction (35 mM pH 8 Tris-HCl, 72 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 5 mM spermidine, 0.01% BSA) buffer at 37°C for 30 min. Then add 1 µL 10% SDS to the reaction system to stop the reaction, and incubate at 37°C for 60 min. Finally, add EB and diluted test compound 7d (7e) or 8d (8e) to the reaction system, and incubate at 37°C for 30 min. After addition of loading buffer, electrophoresis was performed on a 1% agarose gel at 83 V for 60 min in TBE buffer (Tris-borate and EDTA). Gels were stained for 15 min in an aqueous solution of EB (0.5 µg/mL) and photographed under UV light (Tanon-1600 Gel Imaging System).
4.8 Cell apoptotic analysis
Flow cytometric analysis was performed to evaluate the cell apoptotic analysis. MGC-803 (5 ×104) cells were seeded in six-well plates and allowed to grow 24 h. The medium was then replaced with complete medium containing compounds 7d and 8d at 2.5 and 10 µM concentrations for 48 h. After 48 h of compound treatment, cells from the supernatant and adherent monolayer cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with PBS at 1200 rpm. Then the cells were stained with Annexin-VFITC/PI (Solarbio). Then the samples were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACS Caliber instrument) as described earlier[42].
4.9 Cell cycle analysis
Flow cytometry was performed to analyze the distribution of cell cycles. MGC-803 cells were treated with compounds 7d and 8d at 2.5 and 5 µM concentrations for 48 h. Untreated and treated cells were harvested, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in ice-cold 75% ethanol, and stained with RNaseA/PI (Solarbio). Cell-cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry.
4.10 Molecular Docking
In order to further explore the mode of action between the compound and topoisomerase II, molecular docking was used to study, and the maestro software was used for the docking. Drew the 7d and 8d molecular structures and transformed them into three-dimensional structures and minimized energy. The X-ray structures of the human topoisomerase II (PDB ID: 4G0V) and DNA (PDB ID: 2DES) were obtained from the RCSB protein database (http://www.rcsb.org). The ligands were prepared by Ligprep module. The proteins were prepared, optimized and minimized using pre-process method of Prepwiz module of Maestro molecular modeling with default parameters. All the water molecules and ligands were removed and the hydrogen atoms were added. The grid box was generated around the centroid of the co-crystallized ligand at the Mitoxantrone/Adriamycin binding site. The prepared ligands and protein/DNA were docked using the Glide module with the standard precision.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (ZD2019060); Hebei Province (B2018201269 and B2019201359); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82003597); Institute of Life Science and Green Development; Natural Science Interdisciplinary Research Program of Hebei University (DXK201912); Post-graduate’s Innovation Found Project of Hebei Province（CXZZSS2021012） and Project of Hebei University Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (2021193) for financial support; And this work also supported by the High-Performance Computing Center of Hebei University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
1. Jaracz S, Chen J, Kuznetsova LV, Ojima I. Recent advances in tumor-targeting anticancer drug conjugates. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2005;13(17):5043-54. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.04.084.
2. Li PH, Zeng P, Chen SB, Yao PF, Mai YW, Tan JH et al. Synthesis and Mechanism Studies of 1,3-Benzoazolyl Substituted Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyrazine Derivatives as Nonintercalative Topoisomerase II Catalytic Inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2016;59(1):238-52. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01284.
3. Sangpheak K, Mueller M, Darai N, Wolschann P, Suwattanasophon C, Ruga R et al. Computational screening of chalcones acting against topoisomerase IIα and their cytotoxicity towards cancer cell lines. Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry. 2019;34(1):134-43. doi:10.1080/14756366.2018.1507029.
4. Sheng J, Gan J, Huang Z. Structure-based DNA-targeting strategies with small molecule ligands for drug discovery. Medicinal research reviews. 2013;33(5):1119-73. doi:10.1002/med.21278.
5. Deady LW, Kaye AJ, Finlay GJ, Baguley BC, Denny WA. Synthesis and antitumor properties of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]carboxamide derivatives of fused tetracyclic quinolines and quinoxalines: a new class of putative topoisomerase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 1997;40(13):2040-6. doi:10.1021/jm970044r.
6. Hu W, Huang XS, Wu JF, Yang L, Zheng YT, Shen YM. Discovery of Novel Topoisomerase II Inhibitors by Medicinal Chemistry Approaches. J Med Chem. 2018;61(20):8947-80. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01202.
7. Dileep KV, Vijeesh V, Remya C. Rational design and interaction studies of combilexins towards duplex DNA. Molecular bioSystems. 2016;12(3):860-7. doi:10.1039/c5mb00808e.
8. Zhou DC, Lu YT, Mai YW, Zhang C, Xia J, Yao PF et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel perimidine o-quinone derivatives as non-intercalative topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitors. Bioorganic chemistry. 2019;91:103131. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103131.
9. Jun KY, Kwon H, Park SE, Lee E, Karki R, Thapa P et al. Discovery of dihydroxylated 2,4-diphenyl-6-thiophen-2-yl-pyridine as a non-intercalative DNA-binding topoisomerase II-specific catalytic inhibitor. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014;80:428-38. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.066.
10. Chen W, Shen Y, Li Z, Zhang M, Lu C, Shen Y. Design and synthesis of 2-phenylnaphthalenoids as inhibitors of DNA topoisomeraseIIα and antitumor agents. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2014;86:782-96. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.073.
11. Wang JC, Kirkegaard K. DNA topoisomerases. Gene amplification and analysis. 1981;2:455-73.
12. Pommier Y. DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors: chemistry, biology, and interfacial inhibition. Chemical reviews. 2009;109(7):2894-902. doi:10.1021/cr900097c.
13. Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annual review of biochemistry. 2001;70:369-413. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369.
14. Wei H, Ruthenburg AJ, Bechis SK, Verdine GL. Nucleotide-dependent domain movement in the ATPase domain of a human type IIA DNA topoisomerase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005;280(44):37041-7. doi:10.1074/jbc.M506520200.
15. Hu W, Huang XS, Wu JF, Yang L, Zheng YT, Shen YM. Discovery of Novel Topoisomerase II Inhibitors by Medicinal Chemistry Approaches. 2018;61(20):8947-80. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01202.
16. Creemers GJ, Lund B, Verweij J. Topoisomerase I inhibitors: topotecan and irenotecan. Cancer treatment reviews. 1994;20(1):73-96. doi:10.1016/0305-7372(94)90011-6.
17. Pogorelčnik B, Janežič M, Sosič I, Gobec S, Solmajer T, Perdih A. 4,6-Substituted-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-ones as monocyclic catalytic inhibitors of human DNA topoisomerase IIα targeting the ATP binding site. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2015;23(15):4218-29. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2015.06.049.
18. Chang SM, Christian W, Wu MH, Chen TL, Lin YW, Suen CS et al. Novel indolizino[8,7-b]indole hybrids as anti-small cell lung cancer agents: Regioselective modulation of topoisomerase II inhibitory and DNA crosslinking activities. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2017;127:235-49. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.12.046.
19. Jadala C, Sathish M, Reddy TS, Reddy VG, Tokala R, Bhargava SK et al. Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of β-carboline-combretastatin carboxamides as apoptosis inducing agents: DNA intercalation and topoisomerase-II inhibition. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2019;27(15):3285-98. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2019.06.007.
20. Liu C, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Zhang SB, Yang S, Zhang A et al. Synthesis and anticancer potential of novel xanthone derivatives with 3,6-substituted chains. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2016;24(18):4263-71. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.020.
21. Zou H, Koh JJ, Li J, Qiu S, Aung TT, Lin H et al. Design and synthesis of amphiphilic xanthone-based, membrane-targeting antimicrobials with improved membrane selectivity. J Med Chem. 2013;56(6):2359-73. doi:10.1021/jm301683j.
22. Kelly JX, Winter R, Peyton DH, Hinrichs DJ, Riscoe M. Optimization of xanthones for antimalarial activity: the 3,6-bis-omega-diethylaminoalkoxyxanthone series. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2002;46(1):144-50. doi:10.1128/aac.46.1.144-150.2002.
23. Qin J, Lan W, Liu Z, Huang J, Tang H, Wang H. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1, 3-dihydroxyxanthone mannich base derivatives as anticholinesterase agents. Chemistry Central journal. 2013;7(1):78. doi:10.1186/1752-153x-7-78.
24. Waszkielewicz AM, Gunia A, Szkaradek N, Pytka K, Siwek A, Satała G et al. Synthesis and evaluation of pharmacological properties of some new xanthone derivatives with piperazine moiety. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2013;23(15):4419-23. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.05.062.
25. Santos CM, Freitas M, Ribeiro D, Gomes A, Silva AM, Cavaleiro JA et al. 2,3-diarylxanthones as strong scavengers of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: a structure-activity relationship study. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2010;18(18):6776-84. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2010.07.044.
26. Woo S, Kang DH, Nam JM, Lee CS, Ha EM, Lee ES et al. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of new methyloxiranylmethoxyxanthone analogues. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2010;45(9):4221-8. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.06.017.
27. Park SE, Chang IH, Jun KY, Lee E, Lee ES, Na Y et al. 3-(3-Butylamino-2-hydroxy-propoxy)-1-hydroxy-xanthen-9-one acts as a topoisomerase IIα catalytic inhibitor with low DNA damage. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2013;69:139-45. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.07.048.
28. Chae SW, Woo S, Park JH, Kwon Y, Na Y, Lee HJ. Xanthone analogues as potent modulators of intestinal P-glycoprotein. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2015;93:237-45. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.006.
29. Mak NK, Li WK, Zhang M, Wong RN, Tai LS, Yung KK et al. Effects of euxanthone on neuronal differentiation. Life sciences. 2000;66(4):347-54. doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00596-2.
30. Mak NK, Lung HL, Wong RN, Leung HW, Tsang HY, Leung KN. Expression of protein kinase C isoforms in euxanthone-induced differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. Planta medica. 2001;67(5):400-5. doi:10.1055/s-2001-15809.
31. Minniti E, Byl JAW, Riccardi L, Sissi C, Rosini M, De Vivo M et al. Novel xanthone-polyamine conjugates as catalytic inhibitors of human topoisomerase IIα. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2017;27(20):4687-93. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.09.011.
32. Klesiewicz K, Karczewska E, Budak A, Marona H, Szkaradek N. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of some newly synthesized derivatives of xanthone. The Journal of antibiotics. 2016;69(11):825-34. doi:10.1038/ja.2016.36.
33. Han X, Zhong Y, Zhou G, Qi H, Li S, Ding Q et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of N-(carbobenzyloxy)-l-phenylalanine and N-(carbobenzyloxy)-l-aspartic acid-β-benzyl ester derivatives as potent topoisomerase IIα inhibitors. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2017;25(12):3116-26. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.03.065.
34. Feng J, Qi H, Sun X, Feng S, Liu Z, Song Y et al. Synthesis of Novel Pyrazole Derivatives as Promising DNA-Binding Agents and Evaluation of Antitumor and Antitopoisomerases I/II Activities. Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin. 2018;66(11):1065-71. doi:10.1248/cpb.c18-00546.
35. Plsikova J, Janovec L, Koval J, Ungvarsky J, Mikes J, Jendzelovsky R et al. 3,6-bis(3-alkylguanidino)acridines as DNA-intercalating antitumor agents. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2012;57:283-95. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.09.020.
36. El-Wakil MH, El-Yazbi AF, Ashour HMA, Khalil MA, Ismail KA, Labouta IM. Discovery of a novel DNA binding agent via design and synthesis of new thiazole hybrids and fused 1,2,4-triazines as potential antitumor agents: Computational, spectrometric and in silico studies. Bioorganic chemistry. 2019;90:103089. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103089.
37. Janovec L, Kožurková M, Sabolová D, Ungvarský J, Paulíková H, Plšíková J et al. Cytotoxic 3,6-bis((imidazolidinone)imino)acridines: synthesis, DNA binding and molecular modeling. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2011;19(5):1790-801. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2011.01.012.
38. Wang BD, Yang ZY, Crewdson P, Wang DQ. Synthesis, crystal structure and DNA-binding studies of the Ln(III) complex with 6-hydroxychromone-3-carbaldehyde benzoyl hydrazone. Journal of inorganic biochemistry. 2007;101(10):1492-504. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.04.007.
39. Wang HF, Shen R, Tang N. Synthesis and characterization of the Zn(II) and Cu(II) piperidinyl isoeuxanthone complexes: DNA-binding and cytotoxic activity. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2009;44(11):4509-15. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.06.019.
40. Palchaudhuri R, Hergenrother PJ. DNA as a target for anticancer compounds: methods to determine the mode of binding and the mechanism of action. Current opinion in biotechnology. 2007;18(6):497-503. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2007.09.006.
41. Li D, Yuan Z, Chen S, Zhang C, Song L, Gao C et al. Synthesis and biological research of novel azaacridine derivatives as potent DNA-binding ligands and topoisomerase II inhibitors. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2017;25(13):3437-46. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.04.030.
42. Song Y, Feng S, Feng J, Dong J, Yang K, Liu Z et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel pyrazoline derivatives containing indole skeleton as anti-cancer agents targeting topoisomerase II. European journal of medicinal chemistry. 2020;200:112459. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112459.
43. Shen R, Chen Y, Li Z, Qi H, Wang Y. Synthesis and biological evaluation of disubstituted amidoxanthones as potential telomeric G-quadruplex DNA-binding and apoptosis-inducing agents. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2016;24(4):619-26. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2015.12.025.
44. Lu Y, Yin W, Alam MS, Kadi AA, Jahng Y, Kwon Y et al. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Study of Cyclic Diarylheptanoids as Potential Anticancer Therapeutics. Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry. 2020;20(4):464-75. doi:10.2174/1871520619666191125130237.
45. Osheroff N, Shelton ER, Brutlag DL. DNA topoisomerase II from Drosophila melanogaster. Relaxation of supercoiled DNA. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1983;258(15):9536-43.
Scheme 1 is available in the Supplemental Files section
- GraphicalAbstract.png
Graphical Abstract
- Scheme1.png
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of compounds 7a-7g, 8a-8g 11a-11g, 12a-12f.
- SupportingInformation.docx
Supporting Information
