Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants
We carried out ten in-depth interviews among mothers who underwent early removal of long-acting family planning methods. All study participants were married. The majority of participants were protestant in religion. In terms of age, the participants were between 25-32 years old, and the mean age was 29.10+ (3.01 The majority of the participants (8 out of 10) were government employees, and 2 out of 10 were housewives. Half of all study participants were diploma holders (5 out of 10) (Table 1).
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of women who underwent early removal of long-acting family planning methods in Bedesa town, Wolaita Zone, 2020.
Code
|
Age
|
Religion
|
Ethnicity
|
Educational status
|
Marital status
|
Occupation
|
IDI1
|
25
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Health informatics technician
|
IDI2
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
government employee
|
IDI3
|
32
|
protestant
|
Wolaita
|
2 nd cycle
|
Married
|
Home manager
|
IDI4
|
25
|
protestant
|
Wolaita
|
BSC
|
Married
|
Teacher
|
IDI5
|
28
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Runner
|
IDI6
|
30
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
2nd cycle
|
Married
|
Merchant
|
IDI7
|
25
|
Orthodox
|
Wolaita
|
High school
|
Married
|
Home manager
|
IDI8
|
30
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Digree
|
Married
|
Midwives
|
IDI9
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Government
|
IDI10
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Government
|
User experience on contraceptive use
The majority of participants sufficiently explained their lived experience of contraceptive use. The most commonly mentioned experiences were types of contraceptive methods used, duration of using contraceptives and decisions for changing from one family planning method to the other. They also said that long-term use resulted in some problems with their health status.
“…Before I gave my first birth, I had been using depo. I used Jadelle after the second child. But Jadelle was removed because of side effects, and then I switched Jadelle to depo.” (IDI2)
Most women perceived that they regained their health immediately after removal of the long-acting contraceptive method. Furthermore, most study participants diverted their attention to short-acting contraceptives, mainly Depo-Provera.
“…After removal of Implanon, I regained my health and peaceful life. I have changed to Depo Provera, and I have been comfortable with depo. ” (IDI10)
“… After removal of Implanon, the bleeding was not improved, and I went to the health center, and they removed it. However, the bleeding remained without showing any improvement. ” (IDI7)
Some participants had fear of procedures during insertion and removal of long-acting family planning. Delayed fertility after removal of long-acting was another frequently stated fear by the clients. Some of them perceived that these contraceptive methods require eating special food and drinks. Some concerns of women regarding long-acting family planning methods were fear of death and paralysis, which causes medical illness and discomfort during sex.
“I feared using loop because of the information that was circulating in the community… mothers who used loop as birth control developed paralysis…. which refrained me from using it (IDI 1)”.
“Implant can move in your body from arm to leg, it can stab you, and you ’can’t work while the implant is in your arm. It is painful on insertion and removal and challenging to do hard works such as cooking food and washing clothes. Health workers are not interested in removal within six months after insertion”. (IDI 10)
“IUD is not good during sex. It can be lost in the body and may cause foul smelling vaginal discharge”. (IDI 6)
Reasons for early removal of long-acting family planning methods
The majority of participants mentioned that the side effects of the method were the main reason for early removal. There are different side effects mentioned for early removal, of which the frequently mentioned were heavy and irregular menses, weight loss, and dizziness. The other mentioned side effects were crampy abdominal pain, skin discoloration, itching, behavioral change, numbness, burning sensation on micturation, malaisma, headache, sleep disturbance, amenorrhea, delayed fertility, dysmenorrhea, frequent hunger, thirst, weakness, difficulty walking, and activity intolerance.
“…I decided to discontinue early because of heavy and irregular menses and weight loss. The bleeding stayed for one to two months. I also had skin discoloration and itchy skin” (IDI10)
“…Implanon was inserted for 3 years, but it was kept only for 7 months. Because I was not comfortable, my facial skin color was changed, and black patches such as melasma appeared on my face. In addition, there was a movement in my abdomen like baby kicking during pregnancy, persistent neck pain, and absence of menses.” (IDI1)
Almost all clients received counseling services by the health care provider. However, some of them mentioned that the counseling service was not adequate.
“Health workers gave me a counseling service before inserting Implanon. However, they didn’t inform me in detail about the benefits and risks of Implanon.” (IDI3)
“The health care providers informed me that an implant is more advantageous than injectable. Injectables do have an effect on bone damage, cause weight gain and contain additives. Pills are also full of additives, which may lead to gastritis.” (IDI5).
Male involvement in contraceptive use and sharing responsibilities in reproductive life is essential. However, there was no consensus about the role of husbands in contraceptive decision making and use. Some women mentioned good support from their husbands for contraceptive use:
“…I stopped the injectable to get pregnant due to the influence made by my husband and few neighbors. Following the cessation of the injectable, I was on normal menstrual period for one year and half. Finally, I got pregnant and faced no problem during the whole pregnancy period until I gave birth at the health center.” (IDI7)
Another woman pointed out that the husband’s disapproval was one of the reasons for the early removal of Implanon “… My intention is to use Implanon for 3 years; however, my husband was against my intention. He even fought with me and bitten my hands.” (IDI10)
Seeking more children was also found to be the other reason for the early removal of long-acting family planning methods. The majority of women desired two to three children. However, some of them desired more than five children
“…. Even though I took Implanon according to my personal choice and voluntary base, I have removed it because of seeking more children.” (IDI2)
Participant suggestion and future plan
Most mothers identified different sorts of opinion regarding their future plan on family methods. The most frequently mentioned suggestions were to choose family planning methods without the influence of health professionals and to delay contraceptive use until the first child delivery.
“…information regarding family planning needs adequate counseling. However, health professionals do not provide adequate information. Most of the time, mothers obtain information from neighbours and become worried. ” (IDI10)
“…I visited health facility three months after Implanon insertion to take Implanon off, but the health professional did not agree to remove it before six months.” (IDI8)