Table 1.1
Response to data based on Gender, Age and Levels.
Gender | Age | Level |
F | (%) |
Description | F | (%) | Description | F | (%) | 100 | 39 | 25.8 |
Male | 74 | 49 | Less than 20yrs | 15 | 9.9 | 200 | 46 | 30.5 |
Female | 77 | 51 | 20 -29yrs | 128 | 84.8 | 300 | 36 | 23.8 |
Total | 151 | 100 | 30-40yrs | 8 | 5.3 | 400 | 30 | 19.9 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Table 1.1 shows gender, age and levels of students for the study. Based on gender, 74 (49%) were males whereas; 77 (51%) were females.
For age, 15 (9.9%) were less than 20 years, 128 (84.8%) aged between (20–29) years and 8 (5.3%) aged between (30–40) years. Also, based on the level of students, level 100 were 39 (25.8%), level 200 were 46 (30.5%), level 300 were 36 (23.8%) and level 400 were 30 (19.9%). From the table, it can be observed from the distribution that majority of the students fall between the ages of (20–29) years who should be provided with needed support in order to excel academically. It was revealed that students within these categories must be provided with the needed services to enhance their knowledge in some dimensions, especially in the dimension of studies engagement, vigor and dedication towards studies. A close look at the distribution of students by their levels means that adequate services are needed in terms of service delivery in order to foster good academic work.
Table 1.2
Level of satisfaction with library service delivery at UHAS by students
Statement | 1 (F) | % | 2 (F) | % | 3 (F) | % |
Reading environment | 39 | 25.8 | 91 | 60.3 | 21 | 13.9 |
Availability of current materials(books, journals, articles) | 21 | 13.9 | 92 | 60.9 | 38 | 25.2 |
Adequacy of sitting place(s) | 28 | 18.5 | 53 | 35.1 | 70 | 46.4 |
Knowledge and competence of library staff | 19 | 12.6 | 98 | 64.9 | 34 | 22.5 |
Book lending policies | 24 | 15.9 | 95 | 62.9 | 32 | 21.2 |
Opening hours of the Library | 24 | 15.9 | 64 | 42.4 | 63 | 41.7 |
Reprographic services (printing, photocopies) | 18 | 11.9 | 59 | 39.1 | 74 | 49.0 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Research question one. To what extent are students’ satisfied with library service delivery at UHAS?
The results presented in Table 1.2 shows the responses based on 1 = Very Satisfied; 2 = Satisfied; 3 = Dissatisfied
Table 1.2 indicates students' response on their levels of satisfaction with library service delivery in the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho. The findings per the statements reveal that, students were satisfied with the reading environment of the library (60.3%), availability of current materials (60.9%), knowledge and competence of library staff (64.9%) and book lending policies (62.9). The opening hours of the library obtained a moderate satisfaction response of (42.4%), hence needs greater improvement. Some students indicate dissatisfaction with adequacy of sitting places (46.4%) and reprographic services (such as; printing and photocopies) (49.0%). The analysis shows that majority of the students were satisfied with library services, whereas few were dissatisfied based on the opening hours and other auxiliary services provided by the library. From the analysis, it could be inferred that students were satisfied with library services but not very satisfied. Nnadozie (2006) indicated that basic facilities and tools needed to deliver quality library services were most of the time either not available, inadequate in quantity or out rightly not in existence, hence explains why users were not satisfied with library services. Also, Mu (2007), said that libraries need to market their services and resources proactively to students who are not familiar with the services and resources in a Western academic library. Reference librarians need to consider these learners' characteristics, language proficiency, learning styles and their subjects of interests so that the teaching methodology and examples used are effective with these students. Hence, there is the need to improve on the areas identified in order to address the satisfaction needs of students at UHAS. Moreover, Ekpoh (2018) asserted that one of the critical challenges of meeting 21st century demands of Ghanaian universities is the ever increasing population growth, inadequate library resources and facilities. It shows that once the population is growing, there should be adequate provision of resources to meet the demands of students in terms of service delivery in the library by expanding infrastructure to cater for the growing number of students at UHAS, Ho.
Table 1.3
Level of satisfaction with ICT service delivery at UHAS by students
Statement | 1 (F) | % | 2 (F) | % | 3 (F) | % |
Availability of ICT facilities (computers, servers, etc.) | 13 | 8.6 | 77 | 51.0 | 61 | 40.4 |
Availability of Cyber Café on Campus | 9 | 6.0 | 51 | 33.7 | 91 | 60.3 |
Cost of ICT services on campus | 15 | 9.9 | 82 | 54.3 | 54 | 35.8 |
Power supply | 26 | 17.2 | 101 | 66.9 | 24 | 15.9 |
Access to Internet on campus | 20 | 13.2 | 54 | 35.8 | 77 | 51.0 |
Internet speed or Internet coverage | 12 | 7.9 | 41 | 27.2 | 98 | 64.9 |
Attitude of ICT staff | 17 | 11.3 | 92 | 60.9 | 42 | 27.8 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Research question two. To what extent are students' satisfied with ICT service delivery at UHAS?
The results presented in Table 1.3 shows the response based on 1 = Very Satisfied;
2 = Satisfied; 3 = Dissatisfied
In line with Table 1.3, it shows the extent of students’ satisfaction with ICT service delivery at UHAS, Ho.
The results further indicate that the students were dissatisfied with availability of cyber café on campus (60.3%), access to internet on campus (51.0%), internet speed or internet coverage (64.9%). In terms of availability of ICT facilities (such as; computers, servers) (51.0%), cost of ICT services on campus, (54.3%), power supply (66.9%) and attitude of ICT staff (60.9%) were satisfied. It can be observed; therefore, that students were dissatisfied with three of the statements and were marginally satisfied with only four signally that the satisfaction with the ICT service delivery was not adequate hence needs to be addressed by management of the University of Health and Allied Sciences. The key components of the ICT services that need to be available at all times to meet the needs of the students were rather not available therefore caused the students not to be satisfied but rather dissatisfied. It can therefore be inferred that students were not satisfied with ICT service delivery at UHAS, Ho. Although other items were somehow good, access to internet on campus was poor due to several connectivity problems.
Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) is the hardware and software that enables data to be digitally processed, stored and communicated. However, this result is not totally surprising, but considering the fact that previous studies conducted by Ongori and Mburu (2010) pointed out challenges affecting the integration of ICT into Nigerian education to include; lack of ICT facilities, low internet connectivity, irregular power supply, and network failure among others. ICTs can be used to access, process, manage and present information. In addition, ICTs could be used for model and control events, construct new understanding and communicate with others. ICT, an interdisciplinary domain, focuses on providing students with the tools to transform their learning and to enrich their learning environment. The knowledge, skills and behaviors identified for this domain enable students to develop new thinking and learning skills that produce creative and innovative insights, develop more productive ways of working and solving problems individually and collaboratively. Mbuyisa and Leonard (2015). This means that ICT is a basic necessity in the 21st century of technology era to achieve results and promote efficiency in education. This suggests that ICT is mostly needed in all aspects to solve problems and to promote growth; hence there should be much budgetary allocation for its deployment in order to satisfy the needs of students in their teaching and learning in the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho. Moreover, it can be observed that during the era of COVID-19 pandemic, most institutions switch to the adoption of electronic learning platforms to teach, give assignments and examine students by the use of virtual learning platforms and this needs a good, efficient and reliable internet connectivity to carry out this task. In other words, the satisfactory needs of students is very important therefore management should take appropriate measures to meet the demands of the students feedback in areas seen to be worrisome to them and address them appropriately.
Table 1.4
Level of satisfaction with health service delivery at UHAS by students
Statement | 1 (F) | % | 2 (F) | % | 3 (F) | % |
Availability of health service providers (doctors, nurses, etc.) | 17 | 11.3 | 52 | 34.4 | 82 | 54.3 |
Time spent waiting to see a health service provider | 14 | 9.3 | 49 | 32.4 | 88 | 58.3 |
Drugs dispensation | 16 | 10.6 | 67 | 44.4 | 68 | 45.0 |
Opening hours | 19 | 12.6 | 82 | 54.3 | 50 | 33.1 |
Educational programmes | 16 | 10.6 | 64 | 42.4 | 71 | 47.0 |
Emergency service(s) | 19 | 12.6 | 59 | 39.1 | 73 | 48.3 |
Attitude of staff | 18 | 11.92 | 81 | 53.64 | 52 | 34.44 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Research question three. To what extent are students' satisfied with health service delivery at UHAS?
The results presented in Table 1.4 shows the responses based on 1 = Very Satisfied; 2 = Satisfied; 3 = Dissatisfied
Table 1.4 illustrates the extent of students’ satisfaction with health service delivery in the University of Health and Allied Sciences; Ho. Marginal satisfaction was obtained as a percentage response on the statements depicting drugs dispensation (44.4%); opening hours (54.3%) and attitude of staff (53.64%). Also, statements 1, 2, 5 and 6 with their percentages as follows: availability of health service providers (doctors, nurses) (54.3%), time spent waiting to see a health provider (58.3%), educational programmes (47.0%) and emergency services (48.3%) respectively. Statement 1, 2, 5 and 6 show dissatisfaction as the highest percentage responses respectively on health service delivery. It could be observed that majority of the response shows dissatisfaction. Therefore, it can be inferred that the extent of students’ satisfaction with health service delivery in the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, was inadequate hence needs a massive improvement in health service delivery on campus. Satisfaction is said to be a state of pleasure or contentment with an action, event or service, especially one that was previously desired and when applied to medical care; patient satisfaction can be considered in the context of patient’s appraisal of their desires and expectations of health care, Ofili and Ofovwe (2005). Satisfaction with healthcare services is associated with many contributing factors, among which are related to health providers and healthcare delivery process. Since quality clinical outcome is dependent on patients’ satisfaction the latter has come to be seen as a legitimate health care goal and therefore of quality care. Care cannot be of high quality unless the patient is satisfied.
Nabbuye-Sekandi et al. (2011), define patients satisfaction as a subjective evaluation of the service received against the individual’s expectations. Patients’ judgment of hospital service quality and their feedback are essential in quality of care monitoring and improvement. Patient satisfaction is measured over a wide range of health service dimensions, including availability, accessibility and convenience of services, technical competence of the providers, interpersonal skills and the physical environment where services are delivered. Patient perceptions of quality are often influenced by their interaction with the health provider. Patient’s satisfaction assessment is widely used to evaluate the quality and the effectiveness of various healthcare service deliveries. Patients’ satisfaction is a key criterion by which the quality of health care services is evaluated. However, the findings are in contrast to Abbasi et al (2011), whose research showed that students were dissatisfied with medical services, hence there should be an improvement in quality delivery of health services to students on campus and management of UHAS should ensure adequate funds are allocated to provide the necessary basic logistics to enhance quality health care delivery at UHAS. Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to carry out massive educational programmes in order to educate the people in and around the university enclaves about the preventive measures or etiquettes to adopt in other to bring to an end the deadly virus for it not to further spread across. Therefore, management should enforce educational programmes and seminars to create awareness among students about their health services on campus.
Table 1.5
Level of satisfaction with transport service delivery at UHAS by students
Statement | 1 (F) | % | 2 (F) | % | 3 (F) | % |
Availability of number of buses for students | 11 | 7.3 | 7 | 4.6 | 133 | 88.1 |
Efficiency of bus services | 11 | 7.3 | 11 | 7.3 | 129 | 85.4 |
Level of comfort in the buses | 11 | 7.3 | 7 | 4.6 | 133 | 88.1 |
Bus loading duration | 12 | 7.9 | 24 | 15.9 | 115 | 76.2 |
Road Network | 9 | 6.0 | 10 | 6.6 | 132 | 87.4 |
Fare charges | 15 | 9.9 | 51 | 33.8 | 85 | 56.3 |
Behavior of transport officer(s) (drivers, conductors, etc.) | 18 | 11.9 | 51 | 33.8 | 82 | 54.3 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Research question four. To what extent are students' satisfied with transport service delivery at UHAS?
The results presented in Table 1.5 shows the responses based on 1 = Very Satisfied; 2 = Satisfied; 3 = Dissatisfied
Table 1.5 indicates the extent of students’ satisfaction with transport service delivery at UHAS, Ho, in the study. Two out of seven statements; 5 and 6 showed a marginal satisfaction with little above average percentages that is; fare charges (33.8%) and behavior of transport officers (drivers, conductors) (33.8%) respectively. Statements 1,2,3,4 and 5 showed the highest percentage response of dissatisfaction that can be seen from the data respectively. The results also showed that students were more than half of the total percent were dissatisfied with two statements being fare charges and behavior of transport officers (33.8%) respectively. Since majority of the statements are seen to have the highest percentage of response as dissatisfied, it can be concluded that the extent of students’ satisfaction with transport service delivery at UHAS was poor and needs to be addressed by management of the University. According to Cole, Burke, Leslie, Donald, and Owen (2010) active transport bridges many shared concerns in the public health and transport sectors. To positively affect opportunities for active transport, public health and transport professionals are engaging with other sectors, including urban planning, housing, recreation, retail, education, and employer groups. A first step in such inter-sectorial collaboration is to understand the perceptions of key players in all of these sectors. The management of the University should put in place the necessary measures by soliciting funds either from internally generated funds (IGF) with the support from the government for the provision of adequate means of transport for students and also good roads for smooth and comfortable service delivery at UHAS. According to Abbasi et al (2011), whose research showed that students were dissatisfied with transport services. Management has it as a great responsibility to ensure the safety of students on campus with regards to their transportation issues in order not to endanger their lives. Roads should be improved to make movement from one place to another for lectures more comfortable enjoyable. Also, private transports should be allowed in and out of the university to operate to meet the high demand of students needs in terms of transport service delivery at UHAS.
Table 1.6
Level of satisfaction with hostel service delivery at UHAS by students
Statement | 1 (F) | % | 2 (F) | % | 3 (F) | % |
Availability of rooms | 32 | 21.2 | 63 | 41.7 | 56 | 37.1 |
Condition of rooms | 29 | 19.2 | 62 | 41.1 | 60 | 39.7 |
Sanitary facilities (toilets, washrooms, etc.) | 26 | 17.2 | 59 | 39.1 | 66 | 43.7 |
Water facilities | 23 | 15.3 | 63 | 41.7 | 65 | 43.0 |
Cleanliness of the environment | 21 | 13.9 | 92 | 60.9 | 38 | 25.2 |
Lighting facilities | 33 | 21.9 | 84 | 55.6 | 34 | 22.5 |
Courtesy of hostel staff | 22 | 14.6 | 95 | 62.9 | 34 | 22.5 |
Source: Field work (2020)
Research Question five. To what extent are students' satisfied with hostel service delivery at UHAS?
The results presented in Table 1.6 shows the response based on 1 = Very Satisfied;
2 = Satisfied; 3 = Dissatisfied
In Table 1.6, it shows that, in terms of hostel service delivery, the students were somehow satisfied with availability of rooms (41.7%), condition of rooms (41.1%), cleanliness of environment (60.9%), lighting facilities (55.6%) and courtesy of hostel staff (62.9%). On the other hand, the students were dissatisfied with sanitary facilities (such as; toilets, washrooms) (43.7%) and water facilities (43.0%). Although a few students were very satisfied with hostel services but were far below the desirable rate of satisfaction per the data received. This suggests that adequate measures should be taken by management of the University to address these challenges respectively in areas identified by the students. Thus, it could be said that the students at UHAS were somehow satisfied with hostel service delivery at the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, even though the University adopted outsourcing system of hostel services to satisfy the needs of students’ accommodation on campus. This can be explained by the fact that congestion has been a common feature in most Ghanaian universities, which has led to overstretching of facilities. For instance, a room meant to be occupied by four students is occupied by about eight or more students since there are always limited spaces. This result supports the observation of Alani, Okunola, and Subair (2010) who deduced that the conditions of the hostels were very pathetic, with most hostels being jam-packed with more students than the required number. The authors further noted that some hostels lack basic facilities like adequate water and sanitary facilities. The conditions as observed by these authors’ could have accounted for demonstrations or outright riot by students.
According to Khozaei, Ramayah, Hassan, and Surienty (2012) the availability of students housing has been acknowledged as one of the major issues that students must consider when choosing a University. If universities are unable to provide quality and affordable housing for students, students face additional pressure, and the lack of affordable off-campus housing may become a significant problem. The result is that, in choosing between two similar universities, students may prioritize their accommodation before considering enrolment.
Implications for Management
The finding of this study shows that students were dissatisfied with health and transport service delivery in the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho. The findings also indicated that students were somehow satisfied with library, hostel and ICT services delivery. This outcome will help management of the University to target these areas by providing more resources in order to bring improvement so as to make students experience conducive environment for the attainment of necessary skills and academic abilities as possible. The outcome of this research has serious implications for educational management. This is so because, by giving students opportunity to express their opinions and views on services provided, the management of the university would be aware of the feelings and educational experiences of students. Such awareness will enable management meet the expectations of students and the information provided could be used to bring improvements in service delivery. The study has also brought to light the various indicators that will contribute to the reputation of the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, in the Volta Region of Ghana, which, if adopted, could further place the institution at a competitive edge with other institutions of higher learning in the world.
It is also generally observed that educational institutions in Ghana have not incorporated satisfaction measurement into its quality processes. Hence there is a need to give due attention by introducing feedback channels through which students’ satisfaction surveys could be used to effect continuous improvements into the quality of service delivery needs of the students in order to achieve their academic and social goals. It is therefore imperative that the university management should endeavor to maximize students’ satisfaction and minimize dissatisfaction to its minimum level with service delivery. Also, management should know the areas of deficiency in order to rectify and add value to their services, so as to retain students as well as improve institutional performance.