Animals
Animal care and use were carried out in accordance with guidelines approved by Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University. Sprague-Dawley rats purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) were used in this study.
Preparation of PE-like rat model
Female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200-250 g were raised in a light- and humidity-controlled room with free access to food and water. The day on which pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of vaginal spermatozoa was designated GD0. Pregnant rats were randomly divided into four groups as follows: filtered-air+NaCl (FN), PM2.5-air+NaCl (PN), filtered-air+L-NAME (FL), and PM2.5-air+L-NAME (PL) groups (n=5 each group). Rats in FL and PL group were injected with 300 mg/kg L-NAME from GD12 to GD20 to establish preeclamptic models.
PM2.5 exposure
Pregnant rats were exposed to either ambient PM2.5 or FA from GD0 to GD20 (September-October 2016) in a “real-world” airborne PM2.5 exposure system for 24 h per day and 7 days per week as described in previous studies (Guan et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020), which is located in the Institute of Neuroscience of Beijing Luhe Hospital. For PM2.5, a cyclone was used in the PM2.5-exposed group to remove particles larger than 2.5 μm. For FA, a high-efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA) was positioned in the inlet valve to the exposure system to remove all of the particles from the air stream. Real-time PM2.5 concentration were measured continuously using monitoring equipment (JK-PDR1500, Jinan Qianya Purification Equipment Co., Ltd.) installed inside and outside the exposure facility.
Blood pressure measurement
The blood pressure of rats was measured by the noninvasive blood pressure methodology (Zhongshi Scientific Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), which consists of placing a cuff on the animal’s tail to occlude blood flow. All rats were weighed and had their blood pressure measured every 3 days until delivery. Three blood pressure values were adopted within the variation <5 mmHg, and the average was taken for the blood pressure values.
Sample collection and histological analysis
On GD21, the animals were euthanized, and the blood, spleen and placentas were rapidly removed for further analyses immediately after delivery. The following parameters of pregnancy outcomes were evaluated: fetal weight and placental weight. Sections of rat placentas at 5 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to the standard H&E protocol. All sections were from the middle of the respective placentas. The areas of the labyrinth and basal zone were determined using sections with the maximum parts for the layer of the whole placenta in ImageJ (NIH, USA). A single observer blinded to the experimental conditions at the time of the assessments performed all ImageJ assessments and quantification. The assessments were repeated a second time with a second blinded observer to confirm all results. The mean area per group was calculated from five individuals.
Flow cytometry
The rat spleen tissues were gently teased to release cells in PBS. The splenic mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation. Isolated splenic mononuclear cells were stimulated and incubated with Cell Stimulation Cocktail (plus Protein Transport Inhibitor) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 6 h. Then, the cells were fixed and permeabilized for 30 min at room temperature in the dark with Fixation/Permeabilization Diluent (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were stained with anti-mouse/rat Foxp3-PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) or anti-mouse/rat IL-17A-APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) antibodies. Finally, the cells were resuspended in 500 µl of PBS for subsequent flow cytometric analysis. All data were acquired on a FACScalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and processed using BD FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Serum levels of IL-17A, IL-6 and IL-22 were measured by flow cytometry using a multi-LegendPlex kit (Biolegend) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Microarray analysis and series test of cluster (STC) analysis
For microarray analysis, placental samples from the four groups were used to extract total RNA. Total RNA was quantified by a NanoDrop ND-2000 (Thermo Scientific), and RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). The expression profiles of the placental mRNAs were detected using an Agilent SurePrint G3 Rat GE V2.0 Microarray (OE Biotech, Shanghai, China). The threshold for up- and downregulated genes was a fold-change (FC) value of 2.0 or greater. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were applied to determine the roles of these differentially expressed mRNAs that exhibited a significance value of P<0.05. The series test of cluster (STC) algorithm of gene expression was performed to enrich the expression tendency of the genes and narrow the target genes with greatly significant differential expression among the four groups.
RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the placenta using RNeasy kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with TransScript II All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (Transgene, Beijing, China). cDNA was quantified using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequences of the primers used for real-time PCR are shown in Table 1. The quantitative fold changes in mRNA expression were determined relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA levels in each corresponding group.
ELISA
Placental tissues were weighed, placed in lysis buffer, homogenized and centrifuged at 10 000 ×g for 5 min. The supernatants were collected, and the ELISA assays were conducted by quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassays using commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Cloud-Clone Corp, Mbbiology, Wuhan, China). For each sample, the assay was conducted in triplicate, with duplicate standard curves.
Statistics
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows (version 22.0 software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism software (version 7.0, GraphPad). The differences were analyzed by ANOVA with Student-Newman. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.