Structural analysis of PKCδ
The modeled full length PKCδ protein indicates that the structure is composed of regulatory (1-329) and catalytic (330–676) subunits. The regulatory subunit consists of three small domains include a C2 domain (1-146) which is believed to be non-calcium binding domain and two Zinc finger motifs (158–208 and 230–280). The C2 domain comprises of 8 β strands that are involved in the formation of β sheet, and one helix. The catalytic subunit is composed of a protein kinase domain (349–603) and an AGC-kinase C-terminal domain (604–676) (Fig. 1). The protein kinase domain is composed of N-lobe and C-lobe and these two lobes are joined by a hinge linker region. This type of arrangement of protein kinase domain of bovine PKCδ shows homologue nature with other protein kinases. Six-stranded β-sheet and three α-helices collectively forms the N-lobe whereas the C-lobe consists mostly of helical structural elements (8 helices) and two β-strands. The ATP molecule binds in the ATP binding region (355–363) through hydrogen bond formation. Consequently, the β phosphate oxygen atom O8 forms hydrogen bonds with K378 and A490 with contact distance of 2.92 Å, 2.44 Å whereas the O5 oxygen atom forms hydrogen bonds with K378 with a contact distance of 3.04 Å respectively. The O2 and O3 atoms of the ribose moiety forms two non-classical hydrogen bonds with the backbone oxygen atom of N478 with a distance of 2.96 Å and 2.64 Å respectively. The NH2 atom of purine ring forms classical hydrogen bond with D634 oxygen atom of PKCδ with a distance of 3.03 Å. In addition, F633 (CZ) forms T-shaped π-π interaction with Cg of purine and pyrimidine moiety with contact distance of 4.1 Å and 3.8 Å respectively. The residues L401, F360, L480, V363, A376, A490, F637 and M427 forms hydrophobic interactions whereas T411, N478, K475, E397 and D477 forms polar and charged interactions with ATP (Fig. 2). All these interaction analysis shows that ATP resides in perfect binding mode at the ATP binding cavity as like in other PKC kinase family proteins with the Glide energy of -56.975 kcal/mol.
Structural analysis of ASM
The full length ASM model details were described in our previous publication [36]. However, after remodeling based on recently available human ASM crystal structure, the ASM structure has adapted some additional features. The full length ASM is comprised of three different domains, which includes N- terminal domain (NTD), phosphoesterase domain (PED) and C- terminal domain (CTD). The helical domains (contains only helices) NTD and CTD are positioned at the angle and distance of 45.6˚ and 23 Å with respect to the domain axis. The PED domain is placed with angle and distance of 83.2˚ and 7.8 Å from NTD and 50.0˚ and 16 Å from CTD (Fig. 3). The N-terminal domain comprises a total of 6 helices. The helices α1 (C29-A42) and α2 (K66-L74) were placed parallel to each other. The helices α3 (T84-L99), α4 (Q102-L119), α5 (P124-T143) and α6 (a152-L156) contributes to the formation of saposin B type domain and plays a role in lipid binding. Unlike, previous ASM model, saposin B type domain of remodeled ASM adopted open confirmation and this domain has moved towards the catalytic cavity. This clearly indicates that after lipid binding, saposin B type domain handover the lipid molecule to the catalytic site for its hydrolysis. The PED contains totally 9 helices (α 7- α 15) and 9 beta strands (β 1- β 9). Among 9 β strands, β4, β5, β6 and β7 have contributed to the catalytic site and oriented in such a way that the residues H421, H453 and H455 have coordinate interactions with zinc metal ions along with H203, D202, D274 and N314 residues. Particularly, the long loop region (D206-L248) has adopted open conformation by giving a way for the substrate entry into catalytic cavity. This confirmation is similar to ASM structure at pH 5.0 of our previous study.
Molecular dynamics simulation
To understand the structural stability of PKCδ and ASM, protein structures were subjected to molecular dynamics simulation studies at 50 ns for each protein. The backbone RMSD of PKCδ has shown higher fluctuations (0.5-1.75nm) upto 25 ns and then it was well equilibrated till 50 ns MD run. The backbone RMSD profile clearly indicates that PKCδ protein attains stable conformation from 25-50ns production MD run with little RMSD fluctuations (Fig. 4A). Further, the RMS fluctuation data of PKCδ indicates that more number of residues (125–150) of the C2 domain have higher fluctuations upto 1.8 nm whereas in other domain (zinc finger domains and protein kinase domain) only few residues have shown higher fluctuations.(Fig. 4B). The same analysis was carried out for ASM to know the protein stability by means of RMSD fluctuations. The RMSD profile of ASM shows that the protein took first 15 ns time period to reach equilibration state and subsequently equilibrated till 50 ns MD run with very less RMSD fluctuations. This clearly depicts that ASM is energetically stable for about 35 ns time scale of MD run (Fig. 4A). The RMS fluctuation profile shows that maximum number of residues of the signal peptide has higher fluctuations up to 1.25 nm. Residues of saposin B type domain have fluctuation up to 0.5 nm, and the residues of other domains like PED and CTD have very less fluctuations compared to NTD (Fig. 4C). This analysis clearly depicts the overall stability of individual domains of PKCδ and ASM.
Structural transitions of PKCδ
In order to understand the structural transitions attained in the MD run production, representative structures were extracted and explored based on the Principle Component Analysis and Free Energy Landscape graph. Accordingly, the first two principle components that show less than 0.2 cosine content were used to construct the FEL graphs. The contour map of the FEL analysis showed three different minimum energy clusters (Fig. 5). Representative structure of cluster 1 indicates that the C2 domain (C2D) is placed at about 27.1 Å distance from the Zinc finger domain (ZFD) whereas representative structures of cluster 2 and 3 moved closer with distance of 21.0 and 23.5 Å respectively, based on the domain-domain distance analysis (Table 1). The ZFD and Catalytic domain (CD) distance in cluster 1, 2 and 3 were about 27.4, 28.3 and 27.4 Å respectively, which clearly shows the compact nature of ZFD with CD throughout the time period of production MD run. In cluster1 and 2 the catalytic domain is placed at about 39.9 and 36.8 Å distance respectively with C2D whereas in cluster3 the C2D moved away from the catalytic domain with a distance and angle of 43.7 Å and 18.9˚ respectively. The AGC kinase domain loses its secondary structural elements in the cluster2 representative structure. Thus, Based on the domain distance analysis of clusters, cluster 1 was found to be best for further docking studies.
Table 1
Domain-Domain movement comparison of FEL representative structures of PKCδ
Domain-Domain
|
FEL representative structure
|
Structure1
|
Structure2
|
Structure3
|
Angle(˚)
|
Distance(Å)
|
Angle(˚)
|
Distance(Å)
|
Angle(˚)
|
Distance(Å)
|
C2D-ZFD
|
16.6
|
27.1
|
28.0
|
21.0
|
8.0
|
23.5
|
ZFD-CD
|
27.3
|
27.4
|
8.2
|
28.3
|
12.0
|
27.4
|
C2D-CD
|
16.3
|
39.9
|
21.7
|
36.8
|
18.9
|
43.7
|
Structural transitions of ASM
In the case of ASM structure, FEL analysis showed two free energy minimum clusters based on the first two principle components. The representative structure of each free energy minimum cluster was extracted and displayed in Fig. 6. NTD maintained an average distance of 24.1Å from PED in both FEL representative structures whereas CTD was placed at the distance of 20.2Å in average. There is no much deviation in the domain-domain movement of both representative structures. The loop region (206–248) which is believed to be controlling substrate entrance was displaced away from the catalytic cavity in both representative structures. Therefore, based on the free energy minimum cluster population, the cluster1 is selected as a best cluster and representative structure of this cluster used for protein-protein docking studies. Domain-Domain distances and angle of ASM structure were shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Domain-Domain movement comparison of FEL representative structures of ASM
Domain-Domain
|
FEL representative structure
|
Structure1
|
Structure2
|
Angle(˚)
|
Distance(Å)
|
Angle (˚)
|
Distance (Å)
|
NTD-PED
|
39.9
|
23.3
|
35.7
|
25.0
|
PED-CTD
|
49.4
|
20.9
|
43.3
|
19.5
|
NTD-CTD
|
13.9
|
41.9
|
9.5
|
42.5
|
Table 3
A) Solvation free energy of molecular complex calculated by using PDBePISA B) Hydrogen bonds formed between PKCδ and ASM and C) salt bridges formed between PKCδ and ASM. The distance of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are in Angstrom
ID
|
Structure1
|
Structure2
|
Interface Area, Å2
|
ΔiG
Kcal/mol
|
NHB
|
NSB
|
Mol
|
iNat
|
iNres
|
Mol
|
iNat
|
iNres
|
Interfaces between PKCδ and ASM
|
1
|
PKCδ
|
154
|
50
|
ASM
|
138
|
42
|
1369.5
|
-15.4
|
16
|
5
|
Hydrogen bonds
|
S.No
|
Residues of PKCδ
|
Distance (Å)
|
Residues of ASM
|
1
|
A:ARG 643[HH22]
|
1.81
|
B:SER 192[ OG ]
|
2
|
A:CYS 509[ HG ]
|
1.77
|
B:GLN 407[ OE1]
|
3
|
A:GLY 356[ N ]
|
2.79
|
B:TYR 500[ OH ]
|
4
|
A:ARG 643[HH11]
|
2.19
|
B:TYR 500[ O ]
|
5
|
A:GLY 358[ N ]
|
3.26
|
B:SER 501[ OG ]
|
6
|
A:LEU 644[ N ]
|
3.44
|
B:GLY 502[ O ]
|
7
|
A:ARG 643[HH11]
|
1.83
|
B:SER 503[ OG ]
|
8
|
A:SER 506[ O ]
|
3.82
|
B:ALA 176[ N ]
|
9
|
A:ASP 383[ OD2]
|
1.62
|
B:LYS 186[ HZ3]
|
10
|
A:ASP 477[ OD2]
|
1.99
|
B:ARG 412[ HE ]
|
11
|
A:ASN 478[ OD1]
|
1.81
|
B:ARG 412[HH21]
|
12
|
A:PHE 637[ O ]
|
1.78
|
B:TYR 500[ HH ]
|
13
|
A:GLY 356[ O ]
|
3.06
|
B:SER 501[ OG ]
|
14
|
A:SEP 645[ O3P]
|
2.70
|
B:GLY 502[ N ]
|
15
|
A:SEP 645[ OG ]
|
3.24
|
B:SER 503[ N ]
|
16
|
A:SEP 645[ O3P]
|
3.53
|
B:SER 503[ N ]
|
Salt bridges
|
1
|
A:ARG 643[ NH2]
|
3.55
|
B:ASP 497[ OD1]
|
2
|
A:ASP 383[ OD2]
|
2.61
|
B:LYS 186[ NZ ]
|
3
|
A:ASP 477[ OD2]
|
2.82
|
B:ARG 412[ NE ]
|
4
|
A:ASP 477[ OD1]
|
2.70
|
B:ARG 412[ NH2]
|
5
|
A:ASP 477[ OD2]
|
2.81
|
B:ARG 412[ NH2]
|
Molecular docking of PKCδ-ASM
Several studies have revealed that the interaction of PKCδ shows the influential effect on translocation of ASM from lysosomes to the plasma membrane. In order to understand the molecular level interacting mechanism, the selected representative structures of PKCδ and ASM were used for protein-protein docking. The PKCδ and ASM formed complex with an interface area of 1369.5Å2, constituted by 50 residues of PKCδ and 42 residues of ASM with − 15.4 kcal/mol solvation free energy gained upon interface formation. Both polar and non-polar residues collectively form 16 hydrogen bonds and 5 salt bridges with less hydrophobic contacts. The residues R643, C509, G356, G358, L644, S506, D383, D477, N478, F637 and S645 of PKCδ forms strong hydrogen bonds with the residues S192, Q407, Y500, S501, G502, S503, A176, K186 and R412 of ASM (Fig. 7). The residue S645 of PKCδ which is proven to be an auto phosphorylated residue formed a hydrogen bond with S503 residue of ASM by the contact distance of 3.2Å. This S503 residue is a neighboring residue of S504, which is the site for phosphorylation of ASM and thus these interactions are essential for making phosphorylation process possible.
Structural stability analysis of the bio molecular complex
To check stability of ASM upon complex formation with PKCδ, the complex structure was subjected to molecular dynamics simulation for about 80 ns MD run based on the earlier mentioned molecular dynamics simulation protocol. The backbone RMSD profile of complex was generated and analyzed. Initially, RMSD fluctuation was raised up to 1nm, and was continued up to 35 ns time scale (Fig. 8A). After 35 ns time scale, the RMS fluctuation restrained of about 0.2nm fluctuation range, which continued till 80 ns with a minimum RMSD fluctuation. Additionally, the hydrogen bond profile shows that 5–10 hydrogen bonds were well maintained in the equilibrated region of 50-80ns MD run describing the stable conformation of the complex (Fig. 8B). Moreover, the FEL analysis showed only one free energy minimum cluster based on the first two principle components. The representative structure from this free energy minimum cluster is extracted and displayed in Fig. 9, which indirectly claims that the transition of the complex was restricted as the stability is maintained upon complex formation. In addition, the interacting complex was subjected to MMPBSA calculation to find the binding free energy of protein-protein complex structure in the equilibrated region of MD simulation. Accordingly, best complex shown the binding energy of -585.613 +/- 222.974 kJmol− 1 (Table 4).
Table 4
The van der Waals, electrostatic, polar solvation, SASA and Binding energy calculated using MM-PBSA tool specifically designed for Gromacs MD package.
MM-PBSA complex
|
Van der Waals
(kJ mol-1)
|
Electrostatic Energy
(kJ mol-1)
|
Polar solvation Energy
(kJ mol-1)
|
SASA energy
(kJ mol-1)
|
Binding Energy
(kJ mol-1)
|
PKCδ- bASM
|
-357.996
(+/- 25.922)
|
-839.070
(+/- 101.172)
|
651.592
(+/- 221.792)
|
-40.139
(+/- 9.696)
|
-585.613
(+/- 222.974)
|
Allosteric interacting lead molecules
Accumulated evidence has revealed that the deficiency of ASM in lysosomes leads to a rare lysosomal storage disorder, called Niemann-Pick disease[51] [52] [53] [54] [55], thus ASM functional activity is very essential. However, its translocation to plasma membrane and subsequent ceramide elevation leads to AD. Hence, we aim to identify inhibitor molecules that could restrict ASM translocation. As an allosteric site, ASM interface that interacts with PKCδ was docked with a library of ligands and the docking results were analyzed. Among the library of compounds, the top four hits were selected based on binding mode, XP score and glide emodel scores. Zinc database code of each ligand and their structures were displayed in Table 5.
Table 5: The best lead compounds for allosteric inhibition of ASM

Among all the 4 selected complexes, the ligand of docking complex ASM-ZINC85551993 showed with better docking score of -10.292, and glide emodel energy of -78.569. Atom H33 of ligand positioned towards oxygen atom of S503 residue and formed hydrogen bond with distance of 1.96 Å, whereas oxygen atom of G413 residue showed two hydrogen bonds with H29 and H30 of ligand with bond distance of 1.95 and 1.92 Å respectively. At the same time atoms H36 and H37 of ligand showed hydrogen bonds (1.87 and 2.47 Å) with OG1 group of T445. Other atoms H25 and O13 of this ligand also form hydrogen bonds with E410 (1.71 Å) and N444 (1.95 Å) respectively. The complex formation of this ligand with ASM and interacting mode with hydrogen bonding and other interactions were displayed in Fig. 10A. Interestingly, ZINC85551993 (3'-Sialyllactose) has patented for its apoptotic activity (PATENT CN-110123822-A). While the role of acid sphingomyelinase in membrane associated, ceramide-induced apoptosis signaling has been reported [56]. These observations of molecular docking of ZINC85551993 with ASM, its pro-apoptotic activity, and ASM role in apoptosis, are strengthen allosteric binding efficacy of ZINC85551993.
Interacting complex of ASM-ZINC71928291 showed that ligand molecule have hydrogen bonds with S501, S503, H505, E410, D414 and E443. The H36 of ligand faced towards oxygen atom of S503 and formed hydrogen bond with 2.08 Å. Hydrogen atoms 37, 35 and 31 of ligand shown hydrogen bonds with ND1 group of H505, OG group of S501 and oxygen atom of D414 with 2.28, 1.78 and 1.81Å respectively. To stabilize the complex further, H44 (1.80 Å) and H42 (1.99 Å) groups of ligand formed two hydrogen bonds with OE2 group of E410 residue. Additionally, OE2 group of E443 involved in the formation of two hydrogen bonds with H26 (2.25 Å) and H27 (1.89 Å). This complex has shown XP score of -9.468 with glide emodel energy of -90.133. Atoms and groups of ASM and ligand, which are participated in hydrogen bonding, were shown in Fig. 10B. A recent study has revealed that gentamycin, an antibiotic used for treatment of many anti-microbial infections, targets ASM in cancer cells [57]. This report gives a hope that ZINC71928291 (neomycin), a compound of antibiotic class binding at allosteric site of ASM could be potential lead molecule for the evaluation of its efficacy in AD.
The interaction of ZINC85432419 ligand with allosteric site of ASM was stabilized by 6 hydrogen bonds, and the ligand possesses docking score of -7.958 and glide emodel score of -67.997. The groups H22 and O11 of ligand establish hydrogen bonds with oxygen atom of S503 and hydrogen atom of G502 with distances of 1.74 and 2.14 Å respectively. Another hydrogen group H22 of ligand form hydrogen bond with OG group of S501with distance of 2.60 Å, whereas O5 and O14 atoms positioned towards HZ2 group of K415 and 2HD2group of N444 and formed hydrogen bonds with distances of 1.98 and 1.90 Å respectively. The complex also stabilized by constitutes hydrogen bond between H25 and Oxygen group of E410 with distance of 1.93 Å (Fig. 10C).
Formation of hydrogen bonds with S501, S503, G413, E443, T445 and N444 allows ZINC71773625 ligand to fit into the allosteric site giving a docking score of -7.625 and emodel score of -70.273. Atoms H27, H28 and H22 of ligand showed hydrogen bonding with oxygen of OG group of S501 and oxygen atom of G413 by the distance of 1.93, 2.19, 1.98 and 2.31 Å respectively (Fig. 11C). H30 atom of ligand with distance of 1.78 Å showed hydrogen bonds with OE2 group of E443. O1 atom of this ligand showed hydrogen bond with 1HD2 group of N444 by the distance of 2.37 Å (Fig. 10D). We recognized that ZINC71773625 (rapastinel) is a potent anti-depressant agent, and act as an allosteric modulator of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [58]. Based on our docking results and existing evidence, we believe that this lead molecule could also be a possible allosteric modulator of ASM. For the four complexes, the interacting residues were listed in the Table 6.
Table 6
Residues of ASM involved in the interactions with lead compounds
Molecules
|
Hydrogen-bonding interactions
|
Residues involved in polar and non polar interactions
|
Glide docking score
|
Glide emodel score
|
H-bond donar
|
H-bond acceptor
|
Bond length (Å)
|
|
|
ZINC85551993
|
Lig:H33
Lig:H29
Lig:H30
N444:HD2
Lig:H36
Lig:H37
Lig:H25
Lig:H23
Lig:H24
N444:2HD2
Q183:HE2
|
S503: O
G413:O
G413:O
Lig:O17
T445:OG1
T445:OG1
E410:OE2
E443:OE2
E443:OE2
Lig:O13
Lig:O6
|
1.96
1.95
1.92
1.95
1.87
2.47
1.71
1.84
1.86
1.95
2.00
|
H505, K415, R441, P180 and Y442
|
-10.292
|
-78.569
|
ZINC71928291
|
Lig:H37
Lig:H31
Lig:H35
Lig:H36
Lig:H40
Lig:H44
Lig:H42
Lig:H27
Lig:H26
|
H505:ND1
D414:O
S501:OG
S503:O
E410:O
E410:OE2
E410:OE2
E443:OE2
E443:OE2
|
2.28
1.81
1.78
2.08
2.12
1.80
1.99
1.89
2.25
|
G502, G413, D411, Y442, Q183, P180, K415 and T445
|
-9.468
|
-90.133
|
ZINC85432419
|
G502:H
Lig:N4
Lig:H25
K415:HZ2
N444:2HD2
Lig:H22
Lig:H19
|
Lig:O11
Q184:HE2
E410:O
Lig:O5
Lig:O6
S503:O
E410:OE2
|
2.18
2.12
1.93
1.98
1.90
1.74
1.78
|
E443, S504, K186, D414, T445, G413 and H505
|
-8.739
|
-67.997
|
ZINC71773625
|
Lig:H27
Lig:H22
N444:1HD2
Lig:H28
Lig:H30
Lig:H31
G502:H
|
S501:OG
G413:O
Lig:O1
G413:O
E443:OE2
E410:OE2
Lig:O5
|
1.97
2.23
2.37
2.29
1.78
1.76
1.83
|
D414, E410, Y442, Q183, P180, K415 and T445
|
-7.625
|
-70.273
|