1. Mautalen, C. A., Vega, E. M. & Einhorn, T. A. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? Bone. 18, 133S-137S. (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00490-4
2. Haidukewych, G. J. Intertrochanteric fractures: ten tips to improve results. Instr. Course Lect. 59, 503-509. (2010)
3. Palm, H. et al. Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter: 311 consecutive patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop. 82, 166-170. (2011) https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.566143
4. Lobo-Escolar, A., Joven, E., Iglesias, D. & Herrera, A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 41, 1312-1316. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009
5. Yaozeng, X., Dechun, G., Huilin, Y., Guangming, Z. & Xianbin, W. Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail. Injury. 41, 1234-1238. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.005
6. Fuse, Y. et al. Treatment experience of a new device for trochanteric fractures. Hip Joint. 41, 321-324. (in Japanese) (2015)
7. Patel, P. S., Shepherd, D. E. & Hukins D. W. The effect of screw insertion angle and thread type on the pullout strength of bone screws in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models. Med. Eng. Phys. 32, 822-828. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.005
8. O'Neill, F. et al. Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade: A biomechanical comparison of the fixation achieved by each implant in bone. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 93, 616-621. (2011) https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25539
9. Goffin, J. M., Pankaj, P., Simpson, A. H., Seil, R. & Gerich, T. G. Does bone compaction around the helical blade of a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) decrease the risk of cut-out?: A subject-specific computational study. Bone Joint Res. 2, 79-83. (2013) https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.25.2000150
10. Windolf, M. et al. Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance. Clin. Biomech. 24, 53-58. (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.09.005
11. Fang, C., Lau, T.W., Wong, T. M., Lee, H. L. & Leung, F. Sliding hip screw versus sliding helical blade for intertrochanteric fractures: A propensity score-matched case control study. Bone Joint J. 97-B, 398-404. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34791
12. Ito, J. et al. Prevention of excessive postoperative sliding of the short femoral nail in femoral trochanteric fractures. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 135, 651-657. (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2200-3
13. Yoo, J. H., Kim, T. Y., Chang, J. D., Kwak, Y. H. & Kwon, Y. S. Factors influencing functional outcomes in united intertrochanteric hip fractures: A negative effect of lag screw sliding. Orthopedics. 37, e1101-e1107. (2014) https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141124-58
14. Kozono, N. et al. Direct reduction may need to be considered to avoid postoperative subtype P in patients with an unstable trochanteric fracture: A retrospective study using a multivariate analysis. Arch Orthop. Trauma Surg. 134, 1649-1654. (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2089-2
15. Chinzei, N. et al. Comparison of the sliding and femoral head rotation among three different femoral head fixation devices for trochanteric fractures. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 7, 291-297. (2015) https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.291