In this prospective observational study, 28 (27.7%) of 101 patients developed POCD, which was slightly higher than the result (23%) in the study of Jeongmin Kim on spinal surgery.[11] This may be because Jeongmin Kim's study was on elderly patients, while our study was on patients with hypertension in whom the average age was 64.8. Hypertension can raise the brain's threshold for self-regulation of blood pressure, cause blood-brain barrier breakdown, and frequently encounter labile hemodynamics during surgery, which is more likely to lead to cognitive decline.[1, 20, 21] The results of this study showed that POCD was strongly associated with the absolute decrease in intraoperative SstO2, but had little correlation with rScO2, in patients with hypertension undergoing open posterior spine surgery.
As the brain is known to consume a lot of oxygen that is supplied to the body, the cerebral function is very sensitive and vulnerable to hypoxemia. In the setting of open posterior spine surgery, the importance of avoiding cerebral oxygen deficiency has been increasingly recognized, and cerebral oximetry, as a non-invasive tool to assess the adequacy of cerebral oxygen delivery, is increasingly used in the clinic. However, there were few studies to monitor cerebral oxygen saturation and somatic oxygen saturation simultaneously. The results of this study showed that there was no correlation between intraoperative cerebral oxygen saturation and somatic oxygen saturation, nor was there any correlation between their respective declines. These results may suggest that there may be significant differences in the correlation between the oxygen saturation of different sites and the clinical outcome and prognosis. The strategy of multi-site monitoring may be beneficial at present, and identifying the best monitoring site is important to further improve patient outcomes.[22]
In the clinic, the purpose of monitoring is to simply and effectively prevent and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications. So far, there have been few comparisons of the correlation between different sites monitoring tissue oxygen and POCD, and it is not clear which site is better. In this study, there was no correlation between any indicator of intraoperative SctO2 in the forehead and POCD. This result was similar with the result of previous study that they found no correlation between intraoperative SctO2 and postoperative complications after spine surgery.[17] But, this result was completely inconsistent with other studies showing a good correlation between SctO2 and POCD in non-cardiac surgery. Although many preventive measures had been taken, the specificity of prone position might still affect the measurement of SctO2 in this study for two reasons: First, all patients were in prone position, which might result in cephalic and facial venous pooling. Second, patients in a prone position often have edema formation in the lower part of the body, including the forehead. Therefore, the prevention of neurological impairment by cerebral oxygen saturation may be seriously interfered with and weakened undergoing surgery in a prone position. Unfortunately, recent findings in prone surgery are conflicting, and postural factors may not be able to explain all causes.[11, 17] Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative SctO2 and postoperative complications in prone surgery.
In contrast, the present study found that intraoperative somatic tissue desaturations during spine surgery were significantly associated with POCD. Thus, we proved the previous hypothesis that SctO2 in the forehead is affected by position in prone position, while SstO2 is not. This also implied a potentially modifiable causal link, thereby concluding that a persisting somatic desaturation should be avoided. This result is similar to that of Meng L et al.[17] They found that muscular tissue desaturations were significantly associated with postoperative complications. However, in this study, the monitoring site was the midaxillary line of the waist at the same height as the operation, while in their study, the lower leg was monitored. The main reasons why we did not choose the lower leg and the more common arm (especially the thenar muscle) for SstO2 measurement are as follows: First, bilateral thenar muscles were usually used for evoked potential monitoring in our patients. Second, the monitoring locations we selected were almost at the same level as the vital organs and the brain, where hemodynamics might be more similarly affected by relative position. Third, the sites we monitored may involve muscle tissue or even splanchnic organs such as small intestine, colon or liver that are more sensitive to ischemia and hypoxia. Nearly all splanchnic organs possess weak autoregulation than the brain and heart.[23] Intuitively, during periods of hemodynamic instability, sites with the lowest priority may have a better correlation with postoperative complications. Therefore, our results further confirmed that different monitoring sites of local tissue oxygen saturation have different effects on the same outcome index, and it is important to study the best monitoring sites of specific prognostic index and its specific clinical practical value in the future. Unfortunately, even among the intraoperative SstO2 variables we studied, none completely distinguished POCD patients from non-POCD patients. Correspondingly, neither SctO2 nor SstO2 measured preoperatively was predictive for POCD, in contrast to previous reports. In addition, our study found that SstO2 desaturation did not occur in some POCD patients.
This current study indicated that the patients with POCD were more likely to have lower SstO2 values during surgery, and more likely to experience somatic desaturations below 90% of preoperative baseline. What’s more, a higher absolute/relative decrease in postoperative SstO2 was associated with POCD, independent of other risk factors, such as ASA III, preoperative platelet and postoperative sepsis.
This study had at least six limitations as follows: First, this was a single-center study with a small sample size, and the sample size was not pre-determined before the study. Hence, there is a chance that the association of intraoperative somatic desaturation and cerebral desaturation with POCD after spine surgery may be underestimated. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these associations. Second, this was an observational study, and therefore the somatic desaturation might be a manifestation or consequence of POCD rather than a causal mediator thereof. Third, different NIRS monitors are commercially available, which allow monitoring tissue oxygenation either cerebrally or peripherally. The differences in the methodological approaches may lead to the bias and variability between different devices.[24] Therefore, study results obtained with different NIRS devices might be hardly applicable and comparable with each other, which might partially explain the conflicting of the results from published studies. Fourth, the patients with hypertension included in this study were usually elderly, and the elderly generally had low education due to historical reasons (Table 1). Since education level may have a great influence on MMSE, the preoperative MMSE score in this study was relatively low. To ensure the representativeness of the study, we excluded the patients with preoperative MMSE < 18 rather than preoperative MMSE < 24 (Fig. 1). Fifth, as postoperative MMSE assessment was conducted only on the fourth day after surgery, it was not possible to determine the exact point in time when the patients developed POCD. This may lead to an underestimation of the incidence of cognitive dysfunction after spine surgery in patients with hypertension. Sixth, other studies were also using NIRS devices, so not all eligible patients were included. This could have increased the selection bias of the study.