1. Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press, 2001, pp. 28-33.
2. Zhang J, Zhao X, Wang Q. Research Advances of Lepidium Plants. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences. 2016; 44(3):159-160,194.
3. Li XX, Zhao B, Cui C, Shen W, Gao A, Gong J, et al. Overview of Pharmacological Research on Lepidium L. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology. 2012;53(1):91-92,100.
4. Zhu J, Du Y, Sun S, Qi D, Ma J. Rearch Progress in Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Lepidium L. Journal of Qinghai Normal University. 2015;31(02):48-53.
5. Zhou TY, Lu LL, Yang G, Al-Shehbaz IA. Orychophragmus Bunge. In: WuZY, RavenPH , editors. Flora of China, Vol. 8. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 2010; pp. 29–31.
6. Bansal D, Bhasin P, Yadav OP, Punia A. 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity in L. sativum (Chandrasur) a medicinal herb used in folklore remedies in India using RAPD. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2012;10(1):39–45.
7.Mirzaee F, Mohammadi H, Azarpeik S, Amiri F, Shahani S. Attenuation of liver mitochondrial oxidative damage by the extract and desulfo glucosinolate fraction of Lepidium perfoliatum L. seeds. South African Journal of Botany. 2021;138:377-385
8.Chae YH, Shin DY, Park C. Induction of Apoptosis in Human Colon Carcinoma HCT116 Cells Using a Water Extract of L. virginicum L. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science Nutrition. 2011;40(5):649-659.
9. Fernando C, Elizabeth B, Roberto C. Antiamoebic activity of benzyl glucosinolate from L. virginicum. Phytother Res. 2003;17(6):618-619.
10. Li Y, Zhou P, Zhou X, Huang L, Yang L, Chen G. Research and application progress of L. meyenii(maca) China. Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2018;43(23):4599-4607.
11. Zhang H, Qiao T, Gu J. Research Progress on Biological Function and Application of Maca. Food and Nutrition in China. 2016;22(7):71-73.
12. Fan Q, Guo B, Huang W. Advances in studies on chemical constituents of L. sativum and its pharmacological activities. Drugs and Clinic. 2013;28(1):90-9.
13.Bao X, Zhou X, Guo Q, Han H, Shu Y, Wang Y. Study on the Antitussive, Anti-inflammatory and Bacteriostatic Effects of Semen Lepidii Sativi, an Uyghur Traditional Herbal. Medicine of Xinjiang Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research. 2009;20(9):2318-2320.
14.Dong W, Xu C, Cheng T, Zhou S. Complete chloroplast genome of Sedum sarmentosum and chloroplast genome evolution in Saxifragales. Plos One 2013; 8(10):e77965.
15.Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev. 2015;90(1):157–166.
16. Coissac E, Hollingsworth PM, Lavergne S, Taberlet P. From barcodes to genomes: extending the concept of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol. 2016;25(7):1423-1428
17. Borsch T, Quandt D. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Syst Evol. 2009;282(3-4):169-199.
18. Ochoterena H. Homology in coding and non-coding DNA sequences: a parsimony perspective. Plant Syst Evol. 2009;282(3):151-168.
19.Sabir J, Schwarz E, Ellison N, Zhang J, Baeshen NA, Mutwakil M. Evolutionary and biotechnology implications of plastid genome variation in the inverted-repeat-lacking clade of legumes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014; 12(6):743-754.
20. Lima MS, Woods LC, Cartwright MW, Smith DR. The (in)complete organelle genome: exploring the use and non-use of available technologies for characterizing mitochondrial and plastid chromosomes. Mol Ecol Resources. 2016;16(6):1279-1286
21.Chakraborty S, Yengkhom S, Uddin DA. Analysis of codon usage bias of chloroplast genes in Oryza species. Planta. 2020;4:1-20.
22.Li G, Pan Z, Gao S, He Y, Xia Q, Yan J, et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage of chloroplast genome in Porphyra umbilicalis. Genes Genomics. 2019; 41(10):1173–1181.
23.Duret L. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003;12(6):640-649.
24.Ruth H, Dmitri A. Selection on codon bias. Ann Rev Genet. 2008;42:287-299.
25.Wang H, Meng T, Wei W. Analysis of synonymous codon usage bias in helicase gene from Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus. Genes Genomics 2018;40(7):767-780
26.Long S, Yao H, Qi W, Li G. Analysis of compositional bias and codon usage pattern of the coding sequence in Banna virus genome. Virus Res. 2018;258:68-72
27.Romero H, Zavala A, Musto H. Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces. Nucl Acids Res. 2000;10:2084–2090.
28.Chen X, Cai X, Chen Q, Zhou H, Cai Y, Ben X. Factors Affecting Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Chloroplast Genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey. Evol Bioinforma. 2019;7:271–278
29.Tang D, Wei F, Cai Z, Wei Y, Wei K. Analysis of codon usage bias and evolution in the chloroplast genome of Mesona chinensis Benth. Dev Genes Evol. 2020;(4):1-9.
30.Shen Z, Lu T, Zhang Z, Cai C, Tian B. Condon preference of chloroplast genome of Drynaria. Guihaia. 2021;41(2):266-273.
31.Li G, Zhang L, Xue P. Codon usage pattern and genetic diversity in chloroplast genomes of Panicum species. Gene. 2021;25:145866.
32.Zhou T, Zhu H, Wang J, Xu Y, Xu F, Wang X. Complete chloroplast genome sequence determination of Rheum species and comparative chloroplast genomics for the members of Rumiceae. Plant Cell Rep. 2020;39(6):811–824.
33.Alzahrani DA, Yaradua SS, Albokhari EJ, Abba A. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Barleria prionitis, comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetic relationships among Acanthoideae. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):393.
34.Du X, Zeng T, Feng Q, Hu L, Luo X, Weng Q, et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.) and its phylogenetic relationship to other Brassicaceae species. Gene. 2020;731:144340.
35.Yan C, Zhang L, Qi J, Zhang L. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Hibiscus cannabinus and Comparative Analysis of the Malvaceae Family. Front Genet. 2020;11:277.
36.Guo H, Liu J, Luo L, Wei X, Zhang J, Qi Y, et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Schisandra chinensis: genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationship of basal angiosperms. Sci China Life Sci. 2017;60 (11):1286–90.
37.Mariotti R, Cultrera NG, Díez CM, Baldoni L, Rubini A. Identification of new polymorphic regions and differentiation of cultivated olives (Olea europaea L.) through plastome sequence comparison. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10(1):211.
38.Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(7):499-510.
39.Wu JY, Xiao JF, Wang LP, Zhong J, Yin HY, Wu SX, et al. Systematic analysis of intron size and abundance parameters in diverse lineages. Sci China Life Sci. 2013;56(10):968–974.
40.Xu J, Feng D, Song G, Wei X, Chen L, Wu X, et al. The first intron of rice EPSP synthase enhances expression of foreign gene. Sci China Life Sci. 2003;46(6):561.
41.Yan J, Zhang Q, Yin P. RNA editing machinery in plant organelles. Sci China Life Sci. 2018;61(2):162–169.
42.Chen C, Bundschuh R. Systematic investigation of insertional and deletional RNA-DNA differences in the human transcriptome. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):616.
43.Knoop V. When you can’t trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(4):567–86.
44. Grennan AK. To thy proteins be true: RNA editing in plants. Plant Physiol, 2011;156(2):453–454.
45. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of the mangrove species Kandelia obovata and comparative analyses with related species. Peer J. 2019;7(4):e7713.
46. Nie XJ, Deng PC, Feng KW, Liu PX, Du XH, You FM, et al. Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of the Asteraceae family. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014;32:828-840.
47. Huo X, Liu S, Li Y, Wei H, Gao J, Yan Y, et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage of transcriptome database in Rheum palmatum. Peer J. 2021;9:e10450.
48. Wright F. The `effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87:23-29
49.Zhao Y, Yin J, Guo H, Zhang Y, Xiao W, Sun C, et al. The complete chloroplast genome provides insight into the evolution and polymorphism of Panax ginseng. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:696.
50.Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc B. 2003;270(1512):313–321.
51.Song Y, Chen Y, Lv J, Xu J, Zhu S, Li MF, et al. Development of chloroplast genomic resources for species discrimination. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1854.
52. Li J, Wang S, Jing Y, Wang L, Zhou S. A modified CTAB protocol for plant DNA extraction. Chin Bull Bot. 2013;48:72-78.
53.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477.
54.Wyman SK, Jansen R, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(17):3252–3255.
55.Dong W, Xu C, Cheng T, Lin K, Zhou S. Sequencing angiosperm plastid genomes made easy: A complete set of universal primers and a case study on the phylogeny of Saxifragales. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:989–997.
56.Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(22):4633–4642.
57.Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK, Graner A. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106(3):411–422.
58.Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:273-279.
59.Wei L, He J, Jia X, Qi Q. Analysis of codon usage bias of mitochondrial genome in Bombyx mori and its relation to evolution. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:262.
60.Wright F. The effective number of codons used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87:23–29
61.Yang GF, Su KL, Zhao YR. Analysis of codon usage in the chloroplast genome of Medicago truncatula. Acta Pratacul Sin. 2015;12:171–179.
64.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–2739.