Supragingival Microbiome Alternations as a Consequence of Smoking Different Tobacco Types and Its Relation to Dental Caries

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-923163/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Supragingival Microbiome Alternations as a Consequence of Smoking Different Tobacco Types and Its Relation to Dental Caries

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-923163/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 21 Feb, 2022

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

You are reading this latest preprint version

This study aimed to assess the effect of smoking different tobacco types on the supragingival microbiome and its relation to dental caries. Forty supragingival plaques were collected from smokers of a single tobacco type and non-smokers seeking treatment at the University Dental Hospital Sharjah, UAE. DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) was determined for all participants who were divided into two groups: no-low caries (NC-LC: DMFT= 0-4; n=18) and moderate-high caries (MC-HC: DMFT= 5-20; n=22). 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using third-generation sequencing with Nanopore technology. Microbiome composition and diversity were compared. Caries were most common among cigarette smokers. Supragingival microbiota were significantly altered among smokers of different tobacco types. In cigarette smokers, cariogenic bacteria from genus Streptococcus (including S. mutans) were significantly more among subjects with NC-LC, while Lactobacilli (including L. fermentum) were more among subjects with MC-HC. In medwakh smokers, several periodontopathogens were significantly elevated in subjects with NC-LC, while other pathogenic bacteria (as Klebsiella pneumoniae) were more in those with MC-HC. Cigarette and alternative tobacco smoking had a significant impact on the supragingival microbiome. Dysbiosis triggered by smoking can be a predisposing factor to caries. Tobacco cessation and oral health-promoting strategies are required to prevent dental caries when the oral microbiome is disturbed.

Dentistry

Internal Medicine

Supragingival microbiome

cigarette smoking

alternative tobacco use

dental caries

Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of mortality worldwide ¹. Globally, as well as in the Middle East, cigarette smoking has attracted serious public health concern. According to the WHO report on global tobacco use in 2019, the prevalence of active cigarette smoking among adults in the UAE was approximately 28% in men, but less in women ². Alternative forms of tobacco smoking such as shisha smoked in waterpipes are also common in the Middle East and spreading worldwide ^3,4. Dokha is another alternative form of tobacco consisting of tobacco mixed with herbs and other substances, smoked out of a narrow pipe called medwakh⁵. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey in 2013 demonstrated that the use of tobacco products in any form among youths aged 13–15 years in the UAE was 12.5%, and a higher percentage of young smokers used medwakh (9.1%) than cigarettes (6.2%) ⁶.

The human oral cavity has one of the most complex and diverse microbial communities in the human body ^7,8 . The oral microbiome plays key roles in human health and contributes to many diseases including both oral and systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease ⁹ and cancer ¹⁰. For instance, high abundances of Rothia and Neisseria genera have been found essential for the maintenance of homeostasis and cardiovascular health, while high abundances of Prevotella and Veillonella genera are detrimental to homeostasis ¹¹. The composition of the oral microbiome is dependent upon environmental conditions ⁸. Tobacco smoking affects the microbial ecology of the oral cavity through oxygen deprivation, antibiotic effects or other possible mechanisms leading to unbalanced microbiome or dysbiosis ¹². Loss of beneficial oral species due to smoking can lead to pathogen colonization and ultimately to progression of oral diseases such as periodontal disease and dental caries ¹¹.

Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic infectious diseases, affecting approximately 2.4 billion people worldwide ¹³. Dental caries can cause significant pain and negative overall quality of health. The burden of dental caries lasts for a lifetime because once the tooth structure is destroyed, it will need restoration and maintenance throughout life ¹⁴. Dental caries is a multifactorial disease that initiates from microorganisms in the oral cavity and host factors ¹⁵. Bacteria colonizing tooth surfaces in the form of supragingival dental plaque or biofilm are responsible for tooth decay. Streptococcus mutans was the first species isolated from caries lesions and has been considered the main cariogenic bacteria for decades ¹⁶.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing technologies have successfully been applied for oral microbial analysis ^17,18. It has been reported that bacterial diversity in the supragingival plaques of healthy individuals is different and higher than bacterial diversity in patients with dental caries, and this diversity gradually decreases with the severity of dental caries ¹⁹. However, the diversity and structure of supragingival plaque microbiota in relation to smoking different types of tobacco and dental caries have not yet been investigated. In this study, it is the first time that tobacco use, microbiome, and dental caries have all been connected together. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of smoking different types of tobacco on the supragingival microbiome and its relation to dental caries in adults using third-generation sequencing with Nanopore technology.

Study population

Adult patients who sought dental treatment at the University Dental Hospital Sharjah, UAE, during the period of one year (October 2018- October 2019), were invited to participate in the study. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent were recruited. Adults aged between 18-60 years who had at least 10 teeth in their mouth, being either non-smoker, or smoker of one type of tobacco only (cigarettes, shisha or medwakh only and no other tobacco product) were included in the study. Patients who were edentulous or had less than 10 teeth were excluded. Patients who received any periodontal treatment during the last 3 months, and patients who were on antibiotic or steroid therapy during or within 3 months of the study, and those with ongoing orthodontic therapy were excluded. Medically compromised patients (patients with chronic systemic diseases or therapy other than cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity) and female patients who were pregnant were excluded. A total of 40 patients were included, four equal groups (n=10 in each) including non-smokers and smokers of either cigarettes, shisha or medwakh.

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sharjah, UAE (REC-18-10-23-01), in compliance with the national and international standards including Helsinki declaration. All methods and procedures were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations²⁰.

Oral clinical examination and questionnaire

Information about participants’ general health status, detailed smoking history, and oral hygiene habits was obtained by a questionnaire. The oral clinical examinations were performed by a trained dental professional and consisted of a visual assessment of the oral mucosa, tongue, palate and floor of the mouth for any soft tissue abnormalities. The presence of dental plaque on tooth surfaces was recorded when clearly visible and expressed using the visible plaque index (VPI) ²¹. The proportion of surfaces (%) with visible dental plaque was calculated for each subject. The sum of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) was calculated to measure the severity of dental caries for each subject ²². In accordance with the DMFT index, the 40 subjects were divided into 2 groups as follows ¹⁹;

(1) No-caries to low-caries (NC-LC; DMFT = 0-4, n =18)

(2) Moderate-caries to high-caries (MC-HC; DMFT = >4, n = 22)

Specimen collection

Supragingival plaques were collected from all participants using sterile Gracey curettes (Hu-Friedy, USA). We collected supragingival samples from the area with maximum plaque accumulation on the teeth after isolation with cotton rolls and air drying of the area ¹⁹. Samples were placed in 1.5 ml micro centrifuge tubes with 300 μl of sterile phosphate buffer. Samples were placed on dry ice and then transferred to -80 ˚C freezer until further analysis.

Sample processing and microbiome profiling

DNA extraction from each sample was done using Epicentre MasterPure^TM DNA Purification Kit (Epicenter, USA), as recommended by the manufacturer. Assessment of the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA was done using a nanodrop (Colibri Microvolume Spectrometer; Titertek-Berthold, Germany). Amplification of the entire (~1500 bp) 16S rRNA gene was done using the 16S Barcoding Kit (SQK‐RAB204; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and LongAmp™ Taq 2× Master Mix (New England Biolabs, UK) with 1 µg of input DNA per sample. Purification of PCR products was done by using AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter, USA) followed by quantification by fluorometer Qubit 4 (Thermo Scientific, US). Equimolar amounts of the amplification products were pooled together, then a total of 100 ng DNA of the pooled sample was used for library preparation. Microbiota were identified using third-generation sequencing with Nanopore technology, on a MinION device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). MinION™ sequencing was performed using R9.4 flow cells (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. MinKNOW version 2.0 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK) was used for live base calling and data acquisition. Raw data were converted into FASTQ format using Guppy v3.4.4, followed by demultiplexing, removal of nanopore and adaptor sequences. FASTQ files were analyzed on Nanopore EPI2ME platform with default minimum Q score of 7. Preliminary bacterial identification was done via ‘What’s in my Pot?’ (WIMP) workflow provided by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK. Reads assigned to all targets were re-analyzed by Kraken taxonomic sequence classification system (version 2.0.8-beta) using Partek^® Genomics Suite^® software, version 7.0 (Copyright ^© 2020; Partek Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). The numbers of reads assigned per taxon were counted and the relative abundance of reads per taxon were used for separate downstream analysis ²⁰.

Statistical and bioinformatics analyses

Continuous variables were presented using mean ± SD. Clinical, demographic, microbiota relative abundance and alpha diversity were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test for samples grouped based on tobacco types smoked. Correlations between relative abundance of taxa and DMFT were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficients (SPSS software, version 20). All statistical tests were two-sided. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Venn diagrams were generated to show the shared and unique Operatinal Taxonomic Units (OTUs) among groups, based on the occurrence of OTUs in a group regardless of their relative abundance using Venny bioinformatic tool (version 2.1)²³. Shared taxa (genera and species) present in all four groups were deﬁned as the core microbiome. For the species, relative abundance values were transformed into log2 values, then the mean value of each smoking group was normalized against the non-smokers as a control group to calculate log2 fold changes between non-smokers and smokers of each tobacco type independently for each bacterial taxa identified ²⁰. Heatmap was constructed using R version 4.0.1 (package: gplots; function: heatmap.2). Vegan package in R was used to calculate the estimates of alpha diversity (within sample diversity), including Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices, estimators for richness including Chao1-type (diversity from abundance data), and Pielou’s index of species evenness. To compare alpha diversity metrics among groups, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann–Whitney U test were utilized. For beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity matrix between samples was calculated with Bray Curtis method using vegdist function from Vegan package in R. Based on the species level classification, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to evaluate the similarity of microbial community structure among all samples. PCA was done using “prcomp” function of package (ggfortify) in R.

Clinical features of the study population

The majority of participants (85%) were males and ranged in age from 18 to 62 years. Eighteen (45%) participants had no or low (NC-LC) caries (DMFT= 0-4) and 22 (55%) participants had moderate-high (MC-HC) caries (DMFT= 5-20). Within smoking groups, it was found that dental caries (MC-HC) was more common among cigarettes smokers (n=8; 80%), followed by shisha smokers (n=6; 60%), medwakh smokers (n=5; 50%) and non-smokers (n=3; 3%).

Visible Plaque Index (VPI) was not significantly different among different smoking groups (P> 0.05), although smokers of cigarettes had the highest VPI (mean ± SD = 0.50±0.30) compared to medwakh smokers (0.38±0.25), shisha smokers (0.37±0.18) and non-smokers (0.30±0.26). DMFT was not significantly different among different smoking groups (P> 0.05), although smokers of cigarettes had the highest DMFT (9.7±6.0) compared to medwakh smokers (5.60±3.60), shisha smokers (5.80±4.26) and non-smokers (4.30 ±4.90).

Regardless of smoking, VPI was not significantly different between participants who had NC-LC and MC-HC (mean ± SD= 0.37± 0.26 and 0.40 ±0.25, respectively). VPI was not significantly different among smokers of different tobacco types in each of the NC-LC and MC-HC groups. There was no significant correlation between DMFT and VPI (P> 0.05); however, there was significant positive correlation between DMFT and duration of smoking (correlation coefficient = 0.375; P = 0.017). Clinical data of all participants is included in supplementary data file 1.

Bacterial abundance and distribution

Phyla

Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in the supragingival plaque samples collected from non-smokers, smokers of cigarettes, medwakh and shisha. Abundance of Proteobacteria was significantly greater in shisha smokers compared to medwakh smokers. Actinobacteria were significantly more present in shisha smokers compared to cigarette smokers.

Comparison of the relative abundances of phyla detected in the 40 supragingival plaque samples from smokers of different types of tobacco and non-smokers in relation to dental caries status are shown in Figure 1. Fusobacteria was found significantly more often in medwakh than shisha smokers in patients with no-low caries. For those in the moderate-high caries group, Spirochaetes was found significantly less often in medwakh than shisha smokers. Actinobacteria was found significantly more often in shisha smokers than in cigarettes smokers and non-smokers. Bacteroidetes were significantly more common in non-smokers than shisha and cigarette smokers and Firmicutes were significantly more common in non-smokers than cigarette smokers.

Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 1 show the relative abundance of phyla detected in supragingival plaque samples from the 4 study groups (i.e. non-smokers, cigarettes, medwakh and shisha).

Additionally, we compared the number of genera and species detected in the samples (grouped based on either smoking status or dental caries). In subjects with MC-HC, the number of genera (n= 901) and species (n=3192) detected in at least one sample was higher than those with NC-LC (n=861 and 2830, respectively). Figure 2 shows the number of common genera (A and C) and species (B and D) in both groups and those found exclusively in one group. The number of genera and species exclusively found in subjects with MC-HC was almost double those found in subjects with NC-LC. As for smoking, 614 (64.6%) genera and 1743 (49.4%) species were shared between all the groups. Shisha smokers had the highest number of exclusive genera and species whereas medwakh smokers had the least (Fig 2).

Genera

For statistical analyses, genera with relative abundance of ≥1% in at least one sample were investigated (shown in Figure 3). Based on the relative abundance of genera, the samples were differentiated into 6 clusters (C1-C6 in Figure 3). Each cluster contained samples from various smoking groups with NC-LC or MC-HC, and no cluster contained any specific group exclusively.

We compared the relative abundance of the major genera detected in the supragingival plaque samples collected from patients with NC-LC and MC-HC, in smokers of different types of tobacco and non-smokers (shown in Figure 4).

Overall, the most abundant genus in this study was Streptococcus (27.3% of the total abundance), which was also the most abundant genus in each of the 40 samples tested. Other common genera are Selenomonas (7.2%), Capnocytophaga (6.3%), Veillonella (6.2%), Gemella (5.6%), Campylobacter (5.2%), Fusobacterium (5.2%), Aggregatibacter (4.7%) and Neisseria (4.3%). A total of 16 genera were significantly different between the study groups considering both smoking and dental caries (marked with red asterix in figure 4, also shown in supplementary figure 2).

Most of the alterations were seen in the MC-HC group, especially among smokers. Ottowia was significantly increased and Actinomyces was significantly decreased in non-smokers than in smokers of any tobacco type (medwakh, shisha or cigarettes) with MC-HC. Capnocytophaga and Aggregatibacter in cigarette smokers were significantly decreased compared to non-smokers with MC-HC. Cardiobacterium was also decreased in cigarettes smokers compared to both shisha and medwakh smokers with MC-HC. Gemella was significantly increased and Treponema was significantly decreased in medwakh smokers than shisha smokers with MC-HC. Compared to non-smokers, Staphylococcus was significantly greater and Porphyromonas was significantly less in medwakh smokers with MC-HC.

For participants with NC-LC, Butyrivibrio and Dialister were significantly increased in non-smokers compared to shisha smokers. Eikenella was significantly increased and Lachnoanaerobaculum was significantly decreased in non-smokers compared to medwakh smokers. Blautia, Lachnoclostridium and Prevotella were significantly more and Aggregatibacter was significantly less in medwakh smokers than shisha smokers with NC-LC (all are shown in supplementary figure 2).

Species

Species (n=271) with relative abundance > 0.1% in at least one sample were considered in the analysis. Overall, a few species (n=5) were significantly different between patients with no-low and moderate-high caries (regardless of smoking status), namely Campylobacter gracilis, Capnocytophaga sp. oral taxon 864, Leptotrichia sp. oral taxon 498, Weissella sp. 26KH-42, Candidatus Gracilibacteria bacterium HOT-871. However, more significant differences were found within each smoking group, when subjects with NC-LC and MC-HC were compared for species in the supragingival samples. In non-smokers, significant differences were found in 8 species (shown in Fig 4A); however, none of them were related to dental caries. In medwakh smokers, several periodontopathogens (Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fusobacterium periodonticum, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were significantly elevated in patients with no-low caries compared to moderate-high caries. Other pathogenic bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica were significantly increased in patients with moderate-high caries compared to no-low caries (shown in Fig 4B). Except for Streptococcus oralis, other members of the genus Streptococcus (S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, S. suis, S. mutans, S. infantarius, S. viridans, S. iniae, S. ruminantium, S. pasteurianus, S. australis, S. acidominimus, S. equinus and S.marmotae) were significantly more among cigarette smokers with no-low caries compared to moderate-high caries. On the other hand, Lactobacilli including Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus fermentum were significantly increased among cigarette smokers with moderate-high caries compared to those with no-low caries (shown in Fig 4C). For shisha smokers, significant differences were found in 5 species (shown in Fig 4D); however, none of them were related to dental caries. Important pathogens such as Aggregatibacter aphrophilus and Gemella haemolysans were significantly elevated in shisha smokers with no-low caries compared to those with moderate-high caries (shown in Fig 4D).

Smokers of different tobacco types were compared to non-smokers in both NC-LC and MC-HC groups (Fig 5 A and B). In patients with no-low caries, we found significant difference in the relative abundance of multiple species in smokers of different tobacco types compared to non-smokers (shown in Figure 5 A). Interestingly, smokers had significantly higher abundance of multiple species from the genus Streptococcus, namely S. marmotae and S. acidominimus in cigarette smokers, S. mutans, S. cristatus, S. mitis, S. parasanguinis, S. halotolerans and S. sp. FDAARGOS_520 in medwakh smokers, and S. halotolerans in shisha smokers. For cigarette smokers, Clostridium sp. SY8519 and Tannerella forsythia were significantly increased compared to non-smokers, while other species were decreased (shown in Figure 5 A).

In patients with moderate-high caries, we found significant differences in the relative abundance of multiple species in smokers of different tobacco types compared to non-smokers (shown in Figure 5 B). Interestingly, smokers had significantly higher abundance of multiple species from the genus Streptococcus, namely S. parasanguinis, S. pasteurianus, S. dysgalactiae, S. marmotae, S. mutans, S. sp. FDAARGOS_522, S. ferus, and S. sp. I-P16 in cigarette smokers, S. parasanguinis, S. ferus, S. marmotae and S. sp. HSISS1 in medwakh smokers, and S. parasanguinis, S. ferus, S. marmotae, and S. sp. I-P16 in shisha smokers. For medwakh smokers, several periodontopathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Porphyromonas cangingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans were significantly decreased. Pathogenic bacteria such as Moraxella catarrhalis and Acinetobacter baumannii were significantly elevated in shisha smokers compared to non-smokers.

Intergroup comparisons of smokers of different tobacco types revealed non-significant differences in the relative abundance of different species in cigarette smokers compared to smokers of shisha and medwakh with no-low caries. However, the latter two groups showed significant differences in the relative abundance of 16 species (shown in Figure 6 A). There was a significant increase in several pathogenic organisms such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica in the samples collected from shisha smokers in the no-low caries group. An important periodontopathogen (Prevotella intermedia) was significantly increased in medwakh smokers, compared to shisha smokers with no-low caries.

Intergroup comparisons in the moderate-high caries group revealed the presence of significant differences among smokers of different tobacco types (Fig 6 B-D). A total of 7 species were significantly different in cigarette smokers compared to medwakh smokers. An important periodontopathogen (Tannerella forsythia) was significantly decreased in medwakh than cigarette smokers (Fig 6 B). A total of 6 and 7 species were significantly different in shisha smokers compared to medwakh and cigarette smokers, respectively (Fig 6 C and D). Streptococcus parasanguinis was significantly decreased in shisha smokers compared to both medwakh and cigarette smokers, Streptococcus gordonii and Tannerella forsythia were significantly decreased in shisha smokers compared to cigarette smokers, while most of the other species were elevated when compared to medwakh and cigarette smokers.

Bacterial Diversity

The alpha diversity indices of Shannon, Simpson, Chao1 and Pielou’s index evenness are shown in Figure 7. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups for both caries and smoking types (P>0.05). Although not statistically significant, the Shannon, Simpson and Pielou’s values for supragingival plaque samples from cigarette smokers with NC-LC were lower than those with MC-HC, as well as other groups of smokers and non-smokers (Fig 7 A-C). As for Chao1 index, it was higher in shisha smokers with both NC-LC and MC-HC compared to other groups of smokers and non-smokers. (Fig 7 D).

Our results indicate that similar community structures of supragingival plaques were present in the study groups (based on tobacco smoking and dental caries) according to PCoA analysis and Bray–Curtis PCoA plots (Figure 8 and Supplementary Figure 3). As seen in the figures, microbial communities from smokers of different tobacco types and also caries groups overlapped; no distinct clusters were identified.

It is well known that changes in the bacterial composition of dental plaques instigate dental caries ²⁴. There are many factors that contribute to these changes leading to caries. Earlier studies have demonstrated that exposure to nicotine promotes the cariogenic activity of oral microorganisms and the formation of a caries-susceptible environment ²⁵.

In this study, we found that the prevalence of dental caries (MC-HC) was increased among smokers, especially those using cigarettes. This is in agreement with a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of related studies that indicated a positive association between tobacco smoking and dental caries and a higher prevalence of caries among smokers compared to non-smokers ²⁶. We found that the VPI and DMFT, which are important indicators related to caries ²⁷, were not significantly different among smokers of different tobacco types. However, DMFT was positively correlated with the duration of smoking. A previous study revealed that long-term cigarette smoking is associated with multiple dental disorders including caries, but a cause-and-effect relationship is still not proven in this study or others ²⁸. It is possible that longer exposure to tobacco may predispose individuals to caries by inducing more profound alteration in the microbiota leading to oral dysbiosis ²⁵. In dysbiosis, the delicate equilibrium of the oral ecosystem is disrupted, allowing disease-causing pathogenic bacteria to manifest and predisposing individuals to various conditions such as caries ²⁹.

It has been shown that smoking has an impact on various stages of dental plaque formation. However, previous studies focused on investigating the effect of smoking on oral microbiome using either mouth wash or buccal swabs, which are not specific to caries. In contrast, we used supragingival plaque microbes that are directly attached to the tooth surface ^30,31. In our study, we explored the effects of different types of tobacco smoking on the supragingival plaque microbiome and its association with dental caries by specifically collecting isolated supragingival plaques from all participants using sterilized curettes. We believe that such an approach is more useful to reveal microbial alterations in smokers, as supragingival plaque is directly exposed to the tobacco smoked due to its location over the tooth surface. This approach was also used by Xiao, et al. 2016 ¹⁹ and He, et al. 2018 ³² who have investigated microbial changes in the supragingival plaques in adults with and without dental caries. Our results indicate that smoking different tobacco types is associated with different alterations in the supragingival microbiome at different taxonomic levels (phyla to species). These alterations are also linked to the stage of dental caries.

Although Firmicutes was the most abundant phyla in all participants; Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were significantly elevated in shisha compared to medwakh and cigarette smokers, respectively. In a study investigating the microbiota in oral rinse specimens of smokers of different tobacco types in the USA, Proteobacteria was less abundant in the microbiome of cigarette smokers ³⁰. According to the latter study, other phyla including Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were found more abundant in alternative tobacco smokers (e-cigarettes, hookah or shisha, and/or cigar/cigarillo) while Bacteroidetes and Saccharibacteria were more depleted. In those who only smoked shisha, genera Porphyromonas, Leptotrichia, Streptobacillus, Fusobacterium, and Saccharibacteria were depleted. One major limitation of the latter study is that the status of the oral health of the participants was not considered; thus, it is difficult to conclude that microbiota alterations were caused by tobacco use exclusively.

In our study, we considered both dental caries and smoking in our participants and we found variations in the microbiota related to the effect of both factors. For example, Bacteroidetes were significantly elevated in non-smokers compared to shisha and cigarette smokers, and Firmicutes were significantly increased in non-smokers than cigarette smokers. Additionally, both Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were depleted in smokers with moderate-high caries; thus, both factors seem to play a role in the microbiota alteration. Compared to other studies, Xiao, et al. 2016 reported multiple dominant phyla in the plaque microbiota such as Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and TM7 that were not significantly different in subjects with or without caries ¹⁹. It is noteworthy that the latter study used pyrosequencing to detect the microbiota in the samples, and other factors (such as smoking) affecting the microbiota composition were not considered. He, et al. 2018 had also investigated the supragingival plaque microbiota in caries and healthy adults, and found that multiple phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, and Spirochaetes) were dominant in both groups. Among these phyla, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and Spirochaetes were significantly higher in the caries patients than in the healthy individuals ³². This is consistent with our findings showing that Bacteroidetes were depleted in subjects with moderate-high caries among smokers of different tobacco types. One major limitation of the He, et al. 2018 study is that smoking was not considered; thus, it is not clear if microbial alteration in the latter study was exclusively caused by or associated with caries or attributed to other factors.

Furthermore, we investigated in depth both genera and species present in the samples. We found that the number of genera and species exclusively present in subjects with MC-HC was almost double those found in NC-LC subjects. This may indicate that subjects with MC-HC have more complicated microbiome as a consequence of dysbiosis in dental caries ³³. It is highly accepted that polymicrobial synergy of multiple microorganisms is a major contributor to the formation of a cariogenic biofilm, in which microbial community changes lead to caries progression ³³.

At the genus level, Streptococcus was the most abundant genera (27.3%) in this study, while another 16 genera were significantly different between the study groups. Most of the alterations were detected in MC-HC group, especially among smokers. Other studies have reported significant variation at the genus level between caries and healthy individuals. Selenomonas, Treponema, and Atopobium showed higher relative abundance in the caries group, whereas the Bergeriella had a higher relative abundance in healthy subjects ³². In our study, Treponema was significantly less abundant in medwakh smokers than shisha smokers with MC-HC, and more genera were altered in relation to both smoking and caries.

Members of the genera Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Neisseria, Veillonella, Capnocytophaga, Leptotrichia, and Haemophilus are collectively known as early colonizing bacteria. On the other hand, later colonizing bacteria, such as members of the Fusobacterium, Treponema, Tannerella, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas genera, use adhesion receptors provided by the early colonizers³⁴. In our study, we noticed that the genera that were altered in early stages of caries (NC-LC) were different from those altered at later stages (MC-HC). From the early colonizers, significant variations of some genera were seen only in subjects with MC-HC. Actinomyces was significantly more abundant in smokers of any tobacco type (medwakh, shisha and cigarettes) compared to non-smokers with MC-HC, while Capnocytophaga in cigarette smokers was significantly less abundant than in non-smokers with MC-HC. For the late colonizers, most of the significant variations were observed in medwakh and shisha smokers. Treponema was significantly more abundant in shisha smokers than medwakh smokers with MC-HC, while Prevotella was significantly more abundant in medwakh smokers than shisha smokers with NC-LC. Porphyromonas was significantly less abundant in medwakh smokers compared to non-smokers with MC-HC. These alterations confirmed that different tobacco types have different effects on the bacteria composing the oral biofilm at different stages of biofilm development, potentially predisposing individuals to dental caries, which is a polymicrobial disease caused by various bacterial consortia.

For decades, acid-producing bacteria, mainly Mutans streptococci (especially Streptococcus mutans) and lactobacilli, have been considered the main pathogenic bacteria of caries. However, more recent molecular analyses have revealed the existence of a pathogenic community that includes non-streptococcal bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Actinomyces ³³. The effects of nicotine on different stages of caries are very well documented ^35,36. In the biofilm maturation stage, nicotine causes ecologic imbalance by encouraging Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli, Streptococcus gordonii, Actinomyces aggregation and facilitating S. mutans to compete with S. sanguinis ³⁷. An interesting finding in this study is that cigarette smokers in the NC-LC group had significantly more streptococci (including the cariogenic bacteria S. mutans) compared to those in the MC-HC group. On the other hand, Lactobacilli including Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus fermentum (also cariogenic bacteria) were significantly more abundant among cigarette smokers with moderate-high caries compared to those with no-low caries. This finding is in agreement with the hypothesis that the etiology of dental caries is community driven rather than the product of a single organism, and that S. mutans is not the sole microbe responsible for carious lesions ³⁸. This also highlightes that the effect of cigarettes smoking on the microbiota is related to the stage of dental caries.

As for cigarettes, the effect of medwakh smoking on the microbiota was different in subjects at different stages of dental caries. Several periodontopathogens were significantly more abundant in medwakh smokers with NC-LC compared to MC-HC. Pathogenic bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica were significantly more abudnant in medwakh smokers with MC-HC compared NC-LC. This is in accordance with the dynamic stability of the oral microbiota hypothesis where prolonged changes in microbial metabolic and loss of resilience factors may shift the ecological balance of the microbiota into either acidogenic or alkalinogenic stages, depending on the nature of the predominant substrates, leading to clinical diseases ³⁹.

For shisha smokers, significant differences were found in 5 species; however, none of them were related to dental caries. Despite this, important pathogens such as Aggregatibacter aphrophilus and Gemella haemolysans were significantly more abundant in shisha smokers with NC-LC compared to those with MC-HC. Our findings are in agreement with a report from the UAE showing alterations in the oral microbiome of cigarette and medwakh smokers, but no effect on shisha smokers ³¹. In our study, findings concerning shisha were not comparable to the latter report, considering that the latter report was based on testing the microbial composition of mouth rinse, which is not representative of the supragingival plaque microbiome investigated in our study.

For alpha diversity, no statistically significant differences were detected between the groups. This is in agreement with a previous report comparing the supragingival microbiome in subjects with and without caries in adults from China ³². The latter study showed that the supragingival plaque of caries patients had higher evenness of species compared to healthy subjects. We could not find the same; however, we noticed that smokers of cigarettes at early stages of caries (NC-LC) had lower evenness (measured by Pielou’s index) than those with MC-HC. This was not shown in users of other tobacco types or non-smokers. We noticed that species richness (measured by Chao1 index) was greater in shisha smokers regardless of caries stages. It is noteworthy that shisha smokers had the highest number of exclusive genera and species compared to other groups (Fig 2), which may explain the observed highest richness in shisha smokers. Another study compared between healthy subjects and those with caries of various severity, using similar criteria to those we used in grouping subjects according to caries severity, but without considering the smoking status. In the latter study, microbial diversity in healthy plaques exceeded that of dental caries, with the diversity decreasing gradually with the severity of caries ¹⁹. We could not find the same; however, we noticed that smokers of cigarettes at early stages of caries (NC-LC) had lower species diversity (measured by Shannon and Simpson indices) than those with MC-HC. This was not shown in users of other tobacco types or non-smokers. This finding confirms the effect of cigarette smoking on the supragingival microbiota, and smoking’s ability to reduce microbial diversity, even in subjects with no oral pathology ⁴⁰.

According to PCoA analysis, it was noted that supragingival plaques did not form well-separated clusters corresponding to smoking type or dental caries. Related community structures might be present in the supragingival plaques from different groups, which is consistent with the results of Xiao, et al. 2016 who suggested that the bacterial structures in healthy and caries groups can be similar ¹⁹. In spite of the presence of similar bacterial members in different samples, the relative abundances of these bacteria are possibly different as seen in this study.

One of the limitations of this study is the small sample size, due to the difficulty in recruiting subjects smoking a single tobacco type and fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Therefore, large-scale follow-up studies are needed to prove the association between smoking and caries, and to show the contribution of the oral microbiome in the pathogenesis of caries in smokers. It is also essential to investigate the effects of other forms of smoking like smokeless tobacco in future studies.

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to shed light into the supragingival microbiome of smokers using different tobacco types and its relation to dental caries. We found that tobacco use had a significant impact on the composition of this microbiome. Cigarettes and alternative types of tobacco including medwakh and shisha significantly alter the supragingival plaque microbiome, and this effect is different in subjects with moderate-high caries compared to subjects with no or low dental caries.

Understanding the factors which alter the microbial community in the oral cavity and identifying keystone species in the oral microbiome is crucial to the design of health-promoting strategies to prevent dental caries. Indeed, tobacco cessation is a major strategy to achieve this goal, for better oral as well as general health.

Modification of the oral microbiome by using prebiotics and probiotics could also support the growth of beneficial species and reduce the likelihood of dysbiosis predisposing to dental caries.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors reports conflicts of interest related to this study.

Funding

This work was funded by Al Jalila Foundation for Medical Research, UAE (grant no. AJF2018014) to Sausan Al Kawas. Michael Weitzman was supported, in part, by a grant from NYU Abu Dhabi and NIH Grants numbers NIH/NIEHS 1R21ES026996-01A1 and NIH/NIEHS 1R01HL139239-01. We thank Professor Peter Loomer for the periodontal calibration of research assistants and for his valuable advice in the planning for this project.

Author contributions

FA, SA and BR designed the study. DB and HS collected the clinical samples and the clinical data. FA performed next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA gene, bioinformatics and statistical analyses and interpreted the data. JS revised the statistical analyses. FA, SA, and BR drafted the article. JS and MW provided critical revisions to the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data and material

Sequence data have been deposited in Sequence Read Archive, BioProject ID: PRJNA752710.

1. Wipfli, H. The Tobacco Atlas, Fourth Edition. Am. J. Epidemiol. 176, 1193–1193 (2012).

2. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2019: offer help to quit tobacco use. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241516204.

3. Maziak, W. The global epidemic of waterpipe smoking. Addict. Behav. 36, 1–5 (2011).

4. Kheirallah, K. A. et al. Collision of waterpipe and cigarette smoking epidemics among youth in Arab countries. J. Subst. Use 21, 530–536 (2016).

5. Al-Houqani, M., Ali, R. & Hajat, C. Tobacco Smoking Using Midwakh Is an Emerging Health Problem – Evidence from a Large Cross-Sectional Survey in the United Arab Emirates. PLOS ONE 7, e39189 (2012).

6. WHO EMRO | Global Youth Tobacco Survey fact sheets and country reports | Enquête mondiale sur le tabagisme chez les jeunes | Initiative Pour un monde sans tabac. http://www.emro.who.int/fr/tobacco/gtss-youth-survey/gyts-factsheets-reports.html.

7. Dewhirst, F. E. et al. The Human Oral Microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5002–5017 (2010).

8. Willis, J. R. & Gabaldón, T. The Human Oral Microbiome in Health and Disease: From Sequences to Ecosystems. Microorganisms 8, 308 (2020).

9. Koren, O. et al. Human oral, gut, and plaque microbiota in patients with atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4592–4598 (2011).

10. Irfan, M., Delgado, R. Z. R. & Frias-Lopez, J. The Oral Microbiome and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 0, (2020).

11. Radaic, A. & Kapila, Y. L. The oralome and its dysbiosis: New insights into oral microbiome-host interactions. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 1335–1360 (2021).

12. Macgregor, I. D. Effects of smoking on oral ecology. A review of the literature. Clin. Prev. Dent. 11, 3–7 (1989).

13. Vos, T. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet 388, 1545–1602 (2016).

14. Selwitz, R. H., Ismail, A. I. & Pitts, N. B. Dental caries. Lancet Lond. Engl. 369, 51–59 (2007).

15. Chen, W., Jiang, Q., Yan, G. & Yang, D. The oral microbiome and salivary proteins influence caries in children aged 6 to 8 years. BMC Oral Health 20, 295 (2020).

16. Lemos, J. et al. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Spectr. 7, 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051–2018 (2019).

17. Nyvad, B., Crielaard, W., Mira, A., Takahashi, N. & Beighton, D. Dental caries from a molecular microbiological perspective. Caries Res. 47, 89–102 (2013).

18. Zaura, E. Next-generation sequencing approaches to understanding the oral microbiome. Adv. Dent. Res. 24, 81–85 (2012).

19. Xiao, C., Ran, S., Huang, Z. & Liang, J. Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure of Supragingival Plaques in Adults with Dental Health or Caries Revealed by 16S Pyrosequencing. Front. Microbiol. 7, (2016).

20. Al Kawas, S. et al. The impact of smoking different tobacco types on the subgingival microbiome and periodontal health: a pilot study. Sci. Rep. 11, 1113 (2021).

21. Ainamo, J. & Bay, I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int. Dent. J. 25, 229–235 (1975).

22. Zeigler, C. C., Wondimu, B., Marcus, C. & Modéer, T. Pathological periodontal pockets are associated with raised diastolic blood pressure in obese adolescents. BMC Oral Health 15, 41 (2015).

23. Venny 2.1.0. https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html.

24. Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M. & Kulik, E. M. Cariogenic Biofilms and Caries from Birth to Old Age. Oral Biofilms 29, 53–64 (2021).

25. Wu, J., Li, M. & Huang, R. The effect of smoking on caries-related microorganisms. Tob. Induc. Dis. 17, 32 (2019).

26. Jiang, X., Jiang, X., Wang, Y. & Huang, R. Correlation between tobacco smoking and dental caries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob. Induc. Dis. 17, 34 (2019).

27. Julihn, A., Agholme, M. B., Grindefjord, M. & Modéer, T. Risk factors and risk indicators associated with high caries experience in Swedish 19-year-olds. Acta Odontol. Scand. 64, 267–273 (2006).

28. Rad, M., Kakoie, S., Niliye Brojeni, F. & Pourdamghan, N. Effect of Long-term Smoking on Whole-mouth Salivary Flow Rate and Oral Health. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects 4, 110–114 (2010).

29. Kilian, M. et al. The oral microbiome – an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br. Dent. J. 221, 657–666 (2016).

30. Beghini, F. et al. Tobacco exposure associated with oral microbiota oxygen utilization in the New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Study. Ann. Epidemiol. 34, 18-25.e3 (2019).

31. Vallès, Y. et al. Types of tobacco consumption and the oral microbiome in the United Arab Emirates Healthy Future (UAEHFS) Pilot Study. Sci. Rep. 8, 11327 (2018).

32. He, J. et al. Taxonomic and Functional Analyses of the Supragingival Microbiome from Caries-Affected and Caries-Free Hosts. Microb. Ecol. 75, 543–554 (2018).

33. Lamont, R. J., Koo, H. & Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 745–759 (2018).

34. Haffajee, A. D., Socransky, S. S., Patel, M. R. & Song, X. Microbial complexes in supragingival plaque. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23, 196–205 (2008).

35. Kolenbrander, P. E. et al. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol. 2000 42, 47–79 (2006).

36. Avşar, A., Darka, O., Bodrumlu, E. H. & Bek, Y. Evaluation of the relationship between passive smoking and salivary electrolytes, protein, secretory IgA, sialic acid and amylase in young children. Arch. Oral Biol. 54, 457–463 (2009).

37. Huang, R., Li, M. & Gregory, R. L. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm. Virulence 2, 435–444 (2011).

38. Marsh, P. D. In Sickness and in Health—What Does the Oral Microbiome Mean to Us? An Ecological Perspective. Adv. Dent. Res. 29, 60–65 (2018).

39. Nyvad, B. & Takahashi, N. Integrated hypothesis of dental caries and periodontal diseases. J. Oral Microbiol. 12, 1710953.

40. Huang, C. & Shi, G. Smoking and microbiome in oral, airway, gut and some systemic diseases. J. Transl. Med. 17, 225 (2019).

No competing interests reported.

Supplementalmaterial.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 21 Feb, 2022

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

Editorial decision: Major revision
16 Nov, 2021
Reviews received at journal
08 Oct, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
01 Oct, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
24 Sep, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Sep, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
23 Sep, 2021
Editor invited by journal
23 Sep, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Sep, 2021
First submitted to journal
20 Sep, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Supragingival Microbiome Alternations as a Consequence of Smoking Different Tobacco Types and Its Relation to Dental Caries

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1