3.1 Reflectance of the mc-Silicon wafers
The acid etching is sufficient to create isotropic surface texture of the wafer and to avoid the saw damages. The reflectance of the mc-Silicon textured surfaces are investigated from wavelength between 300–1000 nm and shown in Figure.1. Three set of etched samples and reference silicon sample reflectance results were compared and shown in Figure.1. It is clearly seen that Set-2 (HF-H2O2-KMnO4) chemical ratio reduces the reflectivity and the reduction up to 12.5 %. The Set- 2 chemical ratios in etching process strongly influences the effective reflectance. It has higher light absorbance compared to other chemical textured wafers since, the higher light absorbance leads to increase the solar cell efficiency. Kulesza et al., have optimized [12] the time efficient texturization of mc-Silicon in the HF/HNO3 solution and its effect on the optoelectonic parameters of the solar cells. The optimal chemical etching ratio has increased the solar cell efficiency up to 13.9 %.
3.2 Crystalline structure of the grain orientation
Figure. 2 shows the XRD pattern before and after chemically etching the samples. The crystalline structure of the wafers is investigated by using Analytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with CuKα radiation ((λ = 1.5406 Å). The XRD pattern of silicon wafer shows the characteristic peak 28.40 and 56.10 (JCPDS file 271402) which correspond to (111) and (311). From the Fig. 2(a), HF: H2O2: CH3COOH etched wafer gives slight peak shift to a lower value of 2θ in the (311) orientations. Sheng et al., [18] have optimized the mixture solution of HF: HNO3: CH3COOH with different time and concentration. From the Fig. 2(b), HF: H2O2: KMnO4 etched wafer gives higher intensity in the (111) orientations and lower light reflection. Zou et al., [17] have done the alkali and Ag- MCCE etching of the (111) orientated mc-Silicon wafers expose dark appearance owing to the excellent light-trapping ability with Pyramid structure. From the Fig. 2(c), HF: H2O2:HNO3: KMnO4 etched wafer gives higher intensity in the (311) orientations and appear shiny. This refers to the higher inter planer spacing values of the atomic layers in silicon. In XRD results, the etched silicon wafers have given the higher intensity with slight peak shift in lower 2θ angle side. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) result of HF: H2O2:KMnO4 indicates that the crystalline peak intensity of the etched mc-Silicon is higher than non- etched wafer and HF: H2O2: CH3COOH = 3:2:2 etched results indicates the peak shift slightly to lower 2θ. Moreover, the HF: H2O2:KMnO4 = 3:2:0.2M textured wafers have the advantages of lower reflectance and increased etching of the mc-Silicon wafer.
3.3 Surface morphology of the mc-Silicon wafers:
The surface structures of the etched mc-Silicon wafers were investigated by using an optical microscope and SEM. Figure. 3, shows the changes occurred on the mc-Silicon wafers after etching by using an optical microscope at a resolution of 500X. Different etched patterns were produced by using three different chemical etching solution in the silicon surface. The comparison in results, the surface structures are considerably changed by using HF:H2O2: KMnO4 chemical solution. This chemical solution induces the small size uneven worm-like trenches and it has given lower reflectance compared to other two chemical solutions etched samples. The HF: H2O2:HNO3: KMnO4 chemical solution induces the medium size worm-like trenches structures. The HF: H2O2: CH3COOH chemical solution gives very small size worm-like trenches structures and it has given slightly lower reflectance compared to non-etched wafer.
An optimization of the three different textured solutions were helpful to achieving lower reflectance. The SEM images of silicon wafer surface are shown in Figure.4. The saw damage has been removed and the mc-Silicon defects have disappeared by the etching process. Images show the formation of oval pits smoothened surface after etching the wafers at in HF/ H2O2/CH3COOH and HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 textured solutions. HF/ H2O2/CH3COOH gives 3–6 µm size oval pits and HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 textured solutions gives 2–4 µm size oval pits which are shown in figure.5. HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 results is reduced loss of weight compared to HF/ H2O2/CH3COOH textured solution and it is shown in Table.2.
Kulesza et al have performed [12] the time efficient texturization process with HF/HNO3 solutions. They reported that this etching process is improving the optoelectronic parameters of the solar cell. Higher concentration of HF/ HNO3 results in the formation of round pits with varying diameters. Optimized etching solution gives lower reflectance and higher efficiency. HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 textured solution led to formation of round pits in some places and MnO4 is glazed. The solution HF/H2O2/ KMnO4/ HNO3 is causing more corrosion and it is shown in Figure.6. It reduces more weight and it is shown in Table.2. The HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 solution is showing the optimal oval pit structure with the lowest reflectance.
Table. 2 Weight of wafer before and after chemical etching
Chemical Etchant
|
Before etching (g)
|
After etching for 60 sec (g)
|
Loss of Weight (g)
|
HF + H2O2 + CH3COOH
|
0.14708
|
0.14675
|
0.00033
|
HF + H2O2 + KMnO4
|
0.14903
|
0.14890
|
0.00013
|
HF + H2O2 + HNO3 + KMnO4
|
0.22467
|
0.22420
|
0.00040
|
3.4 FTIR Studies for Analysing impurities:
Wet etching of the mc- Silicon wafers is a critical step in the solar cell making process. Optimized wet etching process improves the optical properties [19, 20]. The recombination properties of mc-Silicon solar cells are more complex owing to the structural defects, point defects and interaction among defects. Oxygen segregation in structural defects affects electrical activity and further complicates it. Pizzini et al., [21] confirmed an oxygen segregation in the structural defects and they showed its influence on dislocation electrical activity. IR absorption spectroscopy is an important tool to study the nature of HF etched silicon. Reduction of oxidation is confirmed in three different textured solutions and it is shown in the IR spectrum of Figure.7. The peak position of Si–O–Si bonds at 1107 cm− 1 and its reflectance are decreased in Figure.7. The combination of HF/ H2O2/CH3COOH etching solution significantly decreases the Si–O–Si reflectance. The combination of HF/H2O2/ KMnO4 reduces the Si–O–Si reflectance and C-H reflectance. The combination of HF/H2O2/ KMnO4/ HNO3 greatly decreases the Si–O–Si reflectance and C-H reflectance compared to the combination of HF/H2O2/ KMnO4. But, the combination of HF/H2O2/ KMnO4/ HNO3 is causing more corrosion and it is more reflecting the light source.