Minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect: postoperative complications and risk factors

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-93728/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect: postoperative complications and risk factors

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-93728/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 19 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Objectives

To summarize and analyze the clinical characteristics of postoperative complications after minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect, and to explore the risk factors for its occurrence.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 209 patients underwent transthoracic ventricular septal defect closure performed in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020, obtained relevant clinical data from the electronic medical record system and summarized their postoperative complications. And used univariate logistics regression and multivariate logistics regression to analyze the risk factors of its occurrence.

Results

The postoperative hospital stay of 27 patients was longer than 9 days. Residual shunt occurred in 33 patients recently after operation. One patient underwent surgical treatment again because of mechanical hemolysis after the operation. Two patients were re-operated 1 month and 10 months after surgery because of persistent moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. After surgery, 3 patients underwent pericardiocentesis due to a large amount of pericardial effusion, and 2 patients developed a new atrioventricular block after the operation. No other serious adverse events occurred. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of VSD defect (OR: 1.494, 95% Cl: 1.108-2.013, P value: 0.008) was related to long postoperative hospitalization. The residual shunt is related to the size of the occluder (OR: 1.452, 95%Cl: 1.164-1.810, P value: 0.001). In the univariate logistics regression analysis, no risk factors related to serious adverse events were found.

Conclusions

The minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect is very effective, with no mortality and low incidence of serious adverse events after surgery. The size of the defect is related to the long postoperative hospitalization, and the size of the occluder is related to the residual shunt in the early postoperative period. No risk factors related to the occurrence of serious adverse events after the operation were found.

Cardiothoracic Surgery

Congenital heart diseases

Ventricular septal defect

Risk factors

Surgery

Cardiac intervention

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases, accounting for about 20% of congenital heart disease [1]. The treatment methods of ventricular septal defect include repair of ventricular septal defect under cardiopulmonary bypass, minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect and interventional closure of ventricular septal defect by percutaneous puncture. In recent years, minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect has been widely used in China. This procedure is suitable for almost all patients. It does not require cardiopulmonary bypass, small surgical incisions, quick postoperative recovery, no X-ray exposure and wider indications than interventional closure, which has been increasingly recognized by clinicians and patients/parents[2, 3]. Chen's research of 1090 patients undergoing this procedure is the largest report [4]. However, no studies specifically summarized the postoperative complications and corresponding risk factors of this operation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications of minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect in a short-term single-center cohort and to determine the corresponding risk factors.

Source of data and participants

Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data all patients underwent transthoracic ventricular septal defect closure performed in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Chongqing Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients’ parents before inclusion in this study. The research data were anonymized, and personal identifiers were completely removed. Patients were selected according to the following indications: All patients were diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography before surgery, VSD size was 3–8 mm, clear left to right shunt and with or without mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension. Exclusion criteria: ①The size of the VSD is greater than 8 mm or less than 3 mm; ②The age is less than 5 months; ③Combined with other types of complicated congenital ④Patients who refuse to undergo this operation.

We included a total of 209 patients. We collected the patient's information from the hospital's electronic medical record system, ① basic information: gender, age, weight ②preoperative data: defect size, defect type, with or without pulmonary hypertension and with or without combined with aortic valve prolapse ③intraoperative data: the size of the defect, the size of the occluder, the type of the occluder, other operations during the operation, the surgeons and the operation time ④postoperative data: residual shunt, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative serious adverse events ⑤follow-up data.

The types of VSD defects can be divided into three groups: perimembrous defect, subatrial defect and muscular defect. Postoperative outcomes and complications were evaluated according to international standards [5], including postoperative hospital stay, residual shunt and serious adverse events. For severe residual shunt, reoperation, reintubation, wound infection, post-pericardiotomy syndrome, complete atrioventricular block, unplanned second surgery, heart block requiring permanent pacemaker, circulation failure and death are considered serious adverse events.

Surgical approach

After anesthetized the child in the operating room, took the supine position, and evaluated the position, size, upper and lower edges of the defect and the aortic valve by TTE. A small incision of 2 to 4 cm in the middle of the skin (the skin incision of the perimembrous VSD was located in front of the lower end of the sternum and entered the mediastinum through the lower part of the sternum. The skin incision of the subatrial VSD was located in front of the middle sternum, and the skin incision was pulled to the left to enter the mediastinum through the third intercostal space on the left edge of the sternum.) Cut and suspend the pericardium. After 0.5 mg/kg heparinization, TEE guided the positioning of the right ventricular surface purse-string suture, selected domestic eccentric or equilateral occluder, trocar punctured the right ventricular wall, removed the needle core, and under TEE monitoring, guided the wire from the right ventricle through the ventricular septal defect to the left ventricular cavity, placed the sheath, released the left ventricular surface umbrella disk, gently pulled back to make the left umbrella disk close to the ventricular septum, retracted the sheath to the right ventricular cavity, released the occluder waist and right ventricular surface umbrella tray. The "Mark" of the eccentric umbrella disc is far away from the aortic valve annulus. Subatrial ventricular septal defect or ventricular septal defect edge less than 2 mm from the aortic valve annulus choosed eccentric occluder, and the rest choosed equilateral occluder. For tunnel-type ventricular septal defects with inconsistent diameters of the left and right ventricular surfaces, the occluder is selected based on the right ventricular surface. TEE immediately evaluated the therapeutic effect, including residual shunt, function of the surrounding structure of the occluder, hemodynamics, stability of the occluder, pericardial effusion, heart rhythm, etc. If there is residual shunt, increase the occluder model. If it meets the quality control standards: no residual shunt, mild to moderate valve regurgitation, stable occluder, no complete atrioventricular block, no pericardial effusion, removed the occluder from the delivery device, and half protamine neutralized heparin. The surface of the right ventricle is ligated with a purse-string suture, stop bleeding and closed the chest. If it does not meet the quality control standards, transfer to surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is used to verify whether our data were normally distributed or not. For normally distributed data, we used the means and standard deviations to describe variables. For not normally distributed data, we used medians and ranges to describe variables. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical data. The related risk factors of surgical complications were analyzed by univariate logistics regression. In order to avoid meaningful factors from being screened out, we set P < 0.1 as statistically significant. The statistically significant factors of univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistics regression analysis, and the forward LR method is used. In the end, the statistically significant factors were independent risk factors. P < 0.05 means the difference is statistically significant. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, U.S.A).

Patient Characteristics

A total of 209 patients received minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect (Table 1). 55% were men, the median age of surgery was 29 months, the median weight was 12 kg, preoperative transthoracic ultrasound revealed 76.6% of the defects were perimembrous defects, and only 2.4% of muscular defects. Before surgery, 24.4% of patients had mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension, and 39.2% of patients had aortic valve prolapse.

Table 1

Patient characteristics
	All patients (n = 209)
gender
male	115(55%)
female	94(45%)
Weight(kg)	12(10.00–14.00)
Age(month)	29(15.00-42.50)
Type of defect
perimembrous defect	160(76.6%)
subatrial defect	44(21.1%)
muscular defect	5(2.4%)
Aortic valve prolapse
Yes	82(39.2%)
No	127(60.8%)
pulmonary hypertension
Yes	51(24.4%)
No	158(75.6%)

Operative Characteristics

A total of 7 surgeons were included in the study. 11% of patients underwent transthoracic atrial septal defect closure during the operation, 3% underwent arterial duct ligation during the operation, and 1 patient with diaphragmatic bulge underwent thoracoscopic surgery at the same time. The median size of the VSD defect was 5 mm, and the median size of the occluder used during the operation was 6 mm. 3 patients used 2 occluders during the operation due to the presence of two defects, and 30.1% of the patients used eccentric occluders (Table 2).

Table 2

Operative characteristics
	All patients (n = 209)
Combined other operations
VSD	180(86.1%)
ASD	23(11%)
PDA	3(1.4%)
ASD and PDA	2(1.0%)
Diaphragm swelling	1(0.5%)
Defect size(mm)	5(4.00–6.00)
Occluder size (mm)	6(5.00–7.00)
Type of occluder
eccentric	63(30.1%)
Equilateral	146(69.9%)
Surgeons
1	22(10.5%)
2	13(6.2%)
3	53(25.4%)
4	56(26.8%)
5	22(10.5%)
6	34(16.3%)
7	9(4.3%)
Operation time (min)	60(50–80)

Complications

After surgery, one patient was intubated for 95 hours due to severe lung infection and supraventricular tachycardia, and another patient was intubated for 406 hours due to severe pulmonary hypertension and severe lung infection. A total of 182 patients were hospitalized for no more than 9 days after surgery. The main reason for the prolonged hospital stay was infection (respiratory tract). A total of 33 patients had residual shunt after operation. After 1–12 months of follow-up, except for 4 patients who were lost to follow-up,2 patients persisted with residual shunt, and the residual shunt of the remaining patients closed spontaneously. One patient had mechanical hemolysis after surgery and immediately underwent a second operation to remove the occluder. Two patients were re-operated 1 month and 10 months after surgery because of persistent moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. A large amount of pericardial effusion was found in 3 patients after the operation and received pericardiocentesis, and 2 patients developed a new atrioventricular block after the operation. And no patients died. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.3% of patients after surgery and follow-up.

Predictors

Univariate analysis regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of long postoperative hospitalization, residual shunt and serious adverse events after surgery, and the meaningful factors of univariate analysis regression analysis were incorporated into the multivariate analysis regression analysis. Long postoperative hospitalization after surgery is defined as the length of hospital stay greater than 9 days. Due to the rarity of serious adverse events, we only conduct univariate analysis regression analysis on it. The analysis results of long postoperative hospitalization, residual shunt and serious adverse events are shown in Table 3. The size of VSD defect (OR: 1.494, 95% Cl: 1.108–2.013, P value: 0.008) is related to long postoperative hospitalization after surgery. The postoperative residual shunt is related to the size of the occluder (OR: 1.452, 95% Cl: 1.164–1.810, P value: 0.001). In univariate analysis, no risk factors related to serious adverse events were found.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for the postoperative complications.
Long-term hospitalization						residual shunt					serious adverse events
	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis			Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis		Univariate analysis
	OR(95%CI)	P Value	OR(95%CI)	P Value			OR(95%CI)	P Value	OR(95%CI)	P Value	OR(95%CI)	P Value
gender	0.571(0.244–1.337)	0.197	NA			1.126(0.603–2.103)		0.71	NA		1.659(0.362–7.605)		0.514
age	0.972(0.947–0.998)	0.032	NA			1.000(0.987–1.013)		0.979	NA		1.005(0.979–1.033)		0.706
weight	0.936(0.847–1.035)	0.199	NA			0.986(0.929–1.046)		0.63	NA		0.969(0.822–1.141)		0.703
pulmonary hypertension	1.667(0.697–3.983)	0.251	NA			1.495(0.745–3.001)		0.258	NA		4.397(0.950–20.350)		0.058
Aortic valve prolapse	0.747(0.318–1.752)	0.502	NA			0.590(0.303–1.149)		0.121	NA		0.610(0.116–3.221)		0.56
Type of defect	1.387(0.651–2.952)	0.396	NA			0.650(0.319–1.322)		0.234	NA		1.120(0.256–4.895)		0.881
Combined other operations	1.668(0.944–2.947)	0.078	NA			1.095(0.632–1.898)		0.746	NA		1.654(0.694–3.939)		0.256
Defect size	1.532(1.143–2.054)	0.004	1.494(1.108–2.013)		0.008	1.456(1.154–1.838)		0.002	NA		1.495(0.889–2.514)		0.13
Occluder size	1.337(1.017–1.758)	0.038	NA			1.452(1.164–1.810)		0.001	1.452(1.164–1.810)	0.001	1.526(0.919–2.537)		0.103
Type of occluder	0.788(0.315–1.969)	0.609	NA			0.689(0.339–1.402)		0.304	NA		0.376(0.044–3.192)		0.37
Operation time	1.004(0.988–1.021)	0.607	NA			1.016(1.004–1.029)		0.012	NA		1.022(0.998–1.047)		0.068
Surgeons	0.994(0.772–1.278)	0.961	NA			1.127(0.926–1.371)		0.232	NA		1.520(0.915–2.525)		0.106

At present, existing studies have summarized the minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect. Xu and colleagues [6] have reported a series of 235 cases of minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect of children with a success rate of 94.9%, Chen and colleagues [4]reported 1090 cases of minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect with a success rate of 94.8%. They all concluded that the method is safe and reliable. Our research further confirmed their conclusions. However, there is no research to thoroughly explore the postoperative complications of this operation and the corresponding risk factors. This study further summarizes and analyzes the postoperative complications of patients with minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect. Postoperative complications include long-term hospitalization after operation, residual shunt and serious adverse events, the corresponding risk factors were analyzed.

cAVB is one of the serious complications. There are early literature reports that the incidence of this complication accounts for 1–5% of patients undergoing interventional closure of ventricular septal defect [7–9]. Chen's study shows the incidence of this complication accounts for 1.6% of patients undergoing minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect [4], our research shows it is 0.9%. According to the report of Zhou [10], the possible cause of cAVB is the result of mechanical damage caused by the catheter or the occluder itself. Compared with interventional closure of ventricular septal defect, minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect has a shorter transmission path, which affects the conduction system. The potential risk of mechanical damage to the conduction system is smaller, so the incidence of cAVB will be lower. Aortic regurgitation is another serious complication. Fang[1] reported that no moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was found after traditional surgical repair. Our study showed that 2 patients had moderate to severe aortic regurgitation during the postoperative and follow-up period and were treated again by surgery. Considering that the lower edge of the aorta of VSD is short and the distance between the occluder and the aortic valve is close, the eccentric surface of the occluder is adjusted to the apex during the operation to avoid the occurrence of aortic regurgitation in the VSD near the aortic valve.

As one of the important indicators to evaluate the effect of surgical treatment of ventricular septal defect, residual shunt has received extensive clinical attention. In this study, 15.8% of patients were found to have residual shunts after surgery. All patients were followed up for 1 year. Except for 4 patients who were lost to follow-up, 2 patients had residual shunts, and the remaining shunts were closed spontaneously. Deng [11] reported that the incidence of residual shunt after repair of ventricular septal defect under cardiopulmonary bypass was 31.2%, Dodge-khatami [12] reported 35%; Mahimarangaiah reported the incidence of residual shunt after interventional closure of ventricular septal defect by percutaneous puncture was 29.4%, and Bai [14] reported that it was 6.8%. Our results are similar to previous studies, and all the residual shunts found are low-to-moderate, and there is no need for additional surgical intervention after surgery and follow-up.

Long-term hospitalization, residual shunt, and serious adverse events are considered to be important indicators of postoperative complications [5]. For these indicators, we analyzed their corresponding risk factors. In our study, serious adverse events occurred in 3.3% of patients, including 1 patient who had mechanical hemolysis after surgery and 2 patients who underwent surgery for moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. 2 patients who had cAVB after operation, 3 patients who underwent pericardiocentesis due to moderate to severe pericardial effusion after operation. Because of the rarity of serious adverse events in our study, we only performed a univariate logistics regression. Previous studies believed that low body weight was a risk factor of serious adverse events and prolonged hospital stay after traditional surgical repair [15] .However, our results showed that no risk factors related to transthoracic closure were found, so we believe that for transthoracic closure, patients with low body weight are not at greater risk of serious adverse events after surgery. This study shows that the risk factors of early residual shunt after minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect are related to the size of the occluder. The specific reason is not clear and needs to be further studied in the future. Long postoperative hospitalization is related to the size of the VSD defect. The main reason for the prolonged postoperative hospital stay is respiratory tract infection. We believe that the larger the VSD defect, the greater the left to right shunt flow in children and the worse the cardiopulmonary function, the greater the difference in hemodynamics after the operation, the immune function of the body will be further reduced, and the postoperative hospital stay will be further prolonged.

At present, for minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect, the largest report we have known is Chen's analysis of the efficacy of 1090 patients, but there is no research specifically to discuss and summarize the postoperative complications and risk factors of this operation. We evaluated the complications of the operation based on the three indicators of postoperative hospital stay, residual shunt and serious adverse events and analyzed their risk factors separately. However, due to the rarity of serious adverse events, we only performed a univariate logistics regression on them. In future research In order to truly determine its risk factors, a multicenter and larger sample size study should be conducted.

Minimally invasive closure of ventricular septal defect has excellent results, no mortality and low incidence of serious adverse events after surgery. Our research shows that the size of the defect is related to the long-term hospitalization after the operation, and the size of the occluder is related to the residual shunt in the early postoperative period. No risk factors related to the occurrence of serious adverse events after the operation were found.

VSD

Ventricular septal defect

TTE

transesophageal echocardiography

cAVB

complete atrioventricular block

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Chongqing Medical University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Contributions

Chunnian Ren drafted the manuscript. Yonggang Li participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. Chun Wu and Zhengxia Pan conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

All the authors agree to the publication of this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Fang G, et al. The Comparison of Perventricular Device Closure with Transcatheter Device Closure and the Surgical Repair via Median Sternotomy for Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect. 24, 308–314, doi:10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00085 (2018).
Wang S, et al. Perventricular closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using the concentric occluder device. 35, 580–586, doi:10.1007/s00246-013-0823-0 (2014).
Zhang X, Xing Q, Wu QJTT. & surgeon, c. Treatment of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect in Children Weighing Less than 15 kg: Minimally Invasive Periventricular Device Occlusion versus Right Subaxillary Small Incision Surgical Repair. 63, 409–418, doi:10.1055/s-0035-1546297 (2015).
Chen Q, et al. Intraoperative Device Closure of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defects: Experience on 1,090 Cases. 105, 1797–1802, doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.059 (2018).
Jacobs M, et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing morbidity associated with operations for congenital heart disease. 145, 1046–1057.e1041, doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.029 (2013).
Xu H, Inamdar K, Firoj K, Zhao WJT. J. o. t. & surgery, c. Perventricular device closure of ventricular defects in 235 young children: a single-center experience. 146, 1551–1553, doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.004 (2013).
Walsh M, et al. Atrioventricular block after transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. 92, 1295–1297, doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.084988 (2006).
Yang R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of post-procedure heart blocks after transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. 5, 422–427, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.015 (2012).
Zhou T, et al. Atrioventricular block: a serious complication in and after transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. 31, 368–371, doi:10.1002/clc.20243 (2008).
Butera G, Massimo C, Mario CJC. Angiography, c. i. o. j. o. t. S. f. C. & Interventions. Late complete atriovenous block after percutaneous closure of a perimembranous ventricular septal defect. 67, 938–941, doi:10.1002/ccd.20696 (2006).
Deng X, et al. Residual Shunts Following Isolated Surgical Ventricular Septal Defect Closure: Risk Factors and Spontaneous Closure. 41, 38–45, doi:10.1007/s00246-019-02218-9 (2020).
Dodge-Khatami A, et al. Spontaneous closure of small residual ventricular septal defects after surgical repair. 83, 902–905, doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.086 (2007).
Mahimarangaiah J, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with ductal occluders. 25, 918–926, doi:10.1017/s1047951114001255 (2015).
Bai Y, Liu J, Qin Y, Wu H, Zhao XJ. C. h. d. Percutaneous Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect with Modified Double-disk Occluder: What Is the Outcome at 10-year Follow-up? 11, 45–51, doi:10.1111/chd.12284 (2016).
Anderson B, et al. Contemporary outcomes of surgical ventricular septal defect closure. 145, 641–647, doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.032 (2013).

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 19 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery →

Review #1 received at journal
18 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
05 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
05 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
31 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
31 Oct, 2020
First submitted to journal
15 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
15 Oct, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
14 Oct, 2020
Editor invited by journal
14 Oct, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Minimally invasive closure of transthoracic ventricular septal defect: postoperative complications and risk factors

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Source of data and participants

Surgical approach

Statistical Analysis

Results

Patient Characteristics

Operative Characteristics

Complications

Predictors

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1