3.1 Characterization analysis
The XRD patterns of the samples are shown in Fig. 1. For GB and GM-1.4, the XRD pattern showed a major peak at 2θ = 27.7°, which can be indexed to the (002) plane.[22, 23] However, the weak diffraction peak indexed to the (100) facet of GB and GM-1.4 disappeared, it may be due to the formation of g-C3N4 in the sample similar to the structure of the heptazine ring[24] and the plane size of the CN layer was small.[25] Compared with GB, the characteristic peaks at the (002) plane of the GM-X samples slightly shifted to high angles. The results indicated that the SiO2 template promoted the molecular gap and interlayer spacing of the GM-X, and restrained the formation of the stack structure.[26]
Fig. 2 showed the FT-IR spectra of the samples. The characteristic peaks in the range of 1000-1700 cm-1 were attributed to the stretching vibration and in-plane bending vibration of C- N or C=N aromatic heterocycle compounds.[24, 27] The peak located at 810 cm-1 could be contributed to the inner-ring bending vibration of the heptazine ring unit.[24, 28] In addition, for GB and GM-X, the characteristic bands observed at 2173 cm-1 and 2192 cm-1 could be assigned to asymmetric vibration of cyano (–C≡N), which was caused by the loss of NH3 group.
The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherm curves and pore size distribution curves of GB and GM-X were shown in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3(a), all isotherm curves exhibited type Ⅲ isotherms, suggesting that they all possessed macro-meso porous structure.[29, 30] The type H3 hysteresis loop in the isotherm of GM-0.7 and GM-2.8 are more obvious than those of GB, which indicated that the SiO2 template makes the structure of mesoporous g-C3N4 change greatly. However, there was no obvious hysteresis loop in GM-1.4, and the specific surface area and pore volume were shown relatively small from Table 1, which may be caused by the collapse of the structure of GM-1.4 to a certain extent, and the mesopores with small pore sizes were interconnected to form mesopores with larger pore size. From Fig. 3(b), the pore sizes of all the materials were concentrated in the range of 2–50 nm, while the average pore size of the sample materials shown in Table 1 was in the range of 18-25 nm, it was also concluded that all g-C3N4 samples were found to be mesoporous materials.
Table 1
specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore size of the samples.
Samples
|
SBET/m2·g-1
|
VTP/cm3·g-1
|
DP (nm)
|
GB
|
19.16
|
0.07
|
18.55
|
GM-0.7
|
40.52
|
0.16
|
18.30
|
GM-1.4
|
1.94
|
0.091
|
23.24
|
GM-2.8
|
32.2
|
0.14
|
20.75
|
The optical properties of GB and GM-X were characterized by the UV diffuse reflectance spectra and the results were showed in Fig. 4. The GB showed a clear absorption edge at around 475 nm, while the absorption edges of the GM-X presented blue shift compared with GB.[31] The band gap values of all samples was calculated using Eq. (1) as follows:
ahv=A(hv−Eg) n/2 (1)
where A is the absorption coefficient, v is the incident light frequency, a is a constant, Eg is the band gap width and n is the constant of the g-C3N4 electron transfer indirectly, n = 1.
The calculation results can be seen from the Fig. 4, the band gap values of GB and GM-X(X=0.7, 1.4, 2.8) were estimated to 2.53, 2.62, 2.42 and 2.66, respectively. It was indicated that the proper introduction of template could improves the electron transport capacity of photocatalyst and increases the separation efficiency of photogenerated electrons.[32] In this paper, the sample of GM-1.4 improved the photoelectric transmission performance of mesoporous g-C3N4 better.
Fig. 5 presents PL spectra of sample characterized by fluorescence analysis under 355 nm excitation wavelength. the PL peaks of GM-X are both lower than GB, indicating that the SiO2 aerogel template can effectively inhibit the recombination of photogenerated carriers and improve the separation ability of photoelectric charge.[23, 33] Compared with GM-0.7 and GM-2.8, the PL peak of GM-1.4 was the lowest, which indicated the lowest recombination rate of photogenerated electron hole pairs of the samples,[34] it was reasonably concluded that the introduction of 1.4 g SiO2 aerogel template had a stronger promoting effect on the separation rate of photogenerated carriers of mesoporous g-C3N4 to improve the photocatalytic activity.
The morphology of mesoporous g-C3N4 was observed using SEM and TEM images in Fig. 6. Fig. 6(a) and (b) shows the nanorod shaped morphologies of GB, and that for GM-1.4, Fig. 6(e) and (f) displays a coral-like rod and a protruded dot morphology on the surface.[35] This morphological feature can increase the number of active sites of GM-1.4 and enhance the photocatalytic performance. In addition, the morphology and structure of the samples was further observed by TEM in Fig. 6 (c) (d) (g) (h). Light and dark rod-like images were presented in Fig. 6 (c) and (g), which may be caused by the parallel and scattered arrangement of samples.it was further verified that the samples have the rod morphology. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 6 (d), the lattice fringe spacing is 0.73nm, it was attributed to the (100) crystal plane, which was consistent with the characterization of XRD. However, the lattice fringe of GM-1.4 could not be captured in Fig. 6 (h), it was deduced that the thin pore wall of the samples was shattered by the ultrasonic pre-treatment before TEM test, which made the fringes difficult to photograph.
C1s, N1s and O1s of GB and GM-1.4 measured by XPS were shown in Fig. 7, respectively. Fig. 7(a) showed that the GB and GM both have distinct characteristic peaks of C1s, N1s and O1s.[36] According to Fig. 7(b), For C1s spectra, the g-C3N4 showed three typical characteristic peaks at 284.8 eV,286.8 eV and 288.1 eV, which could be attributed to C–C bonds of graphitic impurities in g-C3N4, C-O species of SP2 hybrid carbon defect and SP2 hybridized carbon bonded to the N atoms of the aromatic heterocycles (N–C=N), respectively.[37-39] Besides, it is worth noting that the peak intensities of GM-1.4 is lower than that of GB at located of 286.8 eV, indicating that there were fewer C-O species in the GM-1.4. As shown in Fig. 7(c), the spectrum of N1s was fitted into three distinct peaks at 399.4 eV, 401.6 eV and 405.0 eV, corresponding to the nitrogen atoms in the aromatic rings (N–C=N), tertiary nitrogen N–(C)3 groups[40] and π bond[32], respectively. It is indicated that the mesoporous g-C3N4 was synthesized to the structure of heptazine ring, which can be also confirmed by the XRD spectra in Fig. 1. Furthermore, the O1s spectra of the samples in Fig. 7(d) shows two peaks with the binding energies of 532.2 eV and 533.5 eV, where refers to the H-O bond and N-C-O bond of the mesoporous g-C3N4, respectively.[21, 41, 42] In addition, the characteristic peaks of GM-1.4 moved to a larger band, and the peak intensity at 534.0 eV was weaker than GB, indicating that there were less N-C-O species in the GM-1.4.
3.2 Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of TC on mesoporous g-C3N4
3.2.1 Photocatalytic degradation performance of TC on mesoporous g-C3N4
Fig. 8(a) shows the photocatalytic degradation curve of 10 mg·L-1 TC solution by different dosage of GB and GM-1.4. As can be observed from the figure, with the increasing of mesoporous g-C3N4 dosage, the photocatalytic degradation performance of TC was also enhanced. However, compared with the dosage of 30 mg mesoporous g-C3N4, adding 40 mg mesoporous g-C3N4 did not significantly improve the degradation effect of TC. Therefore, the optimal dosage of mesoporous g-C3N4 in the subsequent experiments were carried out at 30 mg. Fig. 8(b) shows the photocatalytic degradation curves of 30 mg mesoporous g-C3N4 on TC solutions with different concentrations (5 mg·L-1, 10 mg·L-1, 15 mg·L-1 and 20 mg·L-1). Although the optimal efficiency of degradation was displayed at the TC concentration of 5 mg·L-1, this concentration is too low to adjust exactly. With careful comparison the, TC concentration of 10 mg·L-1 were determined for the subsequent studies on the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis. As shown in Fig. 8 (c), the photocatalytic degradation rate of TC solution with pH = 7 by GM-1.4 was about 83.4% after 120 min visible light irradiation, indicate that the mesoporous g-C3N4 also has a good photocatalytic degradation effect on TC. In addition, the blank experiment results show that the degradation of TC was negligible in the absence of mesoporous g-C3N4 catalyst. The standard deviation of all data is within 3.9%, which indicates that there is no significant error in the experiment.
3.2.2 Effect of pH on TC adsorption properties
The effect of pH value on the adsorption of TC by mesoporous g-C3N4 was investigated by adsorption experiments of mesoporous g-C3N4 on TC solution with pH value of 3,5,7. Fig. 8 (d) shows the variation in the adsorption capacity of GB and GM-1.4 for TC solution under different pH conditions after processing the experimental data. The error analysis of the experimental data shows that the standard deviation of all data was within 7.1%, which indicated that the experimental results were well conducted and the experimental results have no obvious deviation. As shown in Fig. 8 (d), the adsorption capacity of GB and GM-1.4 for TC solution reached the maximum at pH = 3, with the increasing of the pH value, the adsorption capacity of GB and GM-1.4 for TC solution decreases gradually. In addition, the adsorption capacity of TC on GM-1.4 at different pH value was greater than that GB, this indicated that the adsorption capacity of TC is not only related to the specific surface area and pore size, but also depended on the surface charge, electrostatic force interaction and ion interaction between mesoporous g-C3N4 and TC molecules. The zeta potential of GB and GM-1.4 samples in deionized aqueous solution systems at different pH values are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, The zeta potential of GB and GM-1.4 in pH = 3 solution was -30.8 and 15.0 mV, respectively. With the increase of pH value, the absolute value of zeta potential is between 30-60 mV, it means that the ionization degree of TC solution decreased, and the mesoporous g-C3N4 shows good stability at pH 3, 5,7,9,11. Moreover, the mesoporous g-C3N4 is more stable in aqueous solution at pH = 5/7 than that at pH = 3, and more difficult to react with other charged ions. According to previous studies, TC solution mainly exists in the form of TCH3+ in a highly acidic environment (pH = 2).[43] However, the electrostatic repulsion between mesoporous g-C3N4 and TC is relatively large and the adsorption effect is very weak. Therefore, the study of TC solution with pH ≤ 2 is not carried out in this study. TC mainly exists in the form of amphoteric ions in the solution of pH = 3-6,[44] and the electrostatic repulsion between TC and mesoporous g-C3N4 is weakened, so the adsorption capacity is enhanced. In this experiment, GB and GM-1.4 displayed the highest adsorption capacity of TC solution at pH = 3, so the subsequent experiments on the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis were carried out with TC solution at pH = 3.
Table 2
zeta potential (mV) of GB and GM-1.4.
Samples
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
9
|
11
|
GB
|
-30.8
|
-46.0
|
-50.5
|
-44.2
|
-31.7
|
GM-1.4
|
15.0
|
-44.6
|
-47.0
|
-44.3
|
-48.6
|
3.2.3 Synergistic Effect of Mesoporous g-C3N4 on Adsorption of TC and Photocatalysis
Fig. 9(a), (b) and (c) shows the dark adsorption kinetics, the degradation kinetics and the cyclic adsorption of GM-1.4 on TC solution at pH = 3, respectively. The kinetic fitting equations used in Fig. 9 (a) is as follows:
The pseudo-first order: qt=qe·(1−e(−k1t)) (2)
The pseudo-second order: qt=(qe·k2·t)/(1+qe·k2·t) (3)
where t represents the reaction time, qt and qe represent the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent to TC at adsorption time t (min) and adsorption equilibrium, k1 and k2 are the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order rate constant, respectively.
As shown in Fig. 9(a), the adsorption equilibrium of TC by GM-1.4 was achieved within 10 min, the k2 values are larger than the k1 values, and the R2 values of them are the opposite, which indicates that the pseudo-first-order model was much better than the pseudo-second-order model.
In order to investigate the photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation more intuitively. The reaction kinetics of photodegradation of TC was evaluated by fitting the quasi-first order kinetic equation. The formula is as follows:
ln(C0/ Ct)= k3·t (4)
where C0 and Ct are the initial concentration of TC and the concentration at t (min), respectively, and k3 is the pseudo-first-order kinetic constant. Kad is the kinetic constant of light removal after dark adsorption, and kwd is the kinetic constant of direct light removal without dark reaction; both of them are equal to k3.
As shown in Fig. 9(b), the rate of photodegradation (Kad) after dark adsorption is faster than the rate of photodegradation (Kwd) without dark adsorption, while the R2 of the former is a little less than that of the latter, indicating that the photocatalytic degradation of TC solution on mesoporous g-C3N4 is caused by the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis.
The fitting residual error of the above model is within 11.1%, indicating that the experimental data is in good agreement with the model prediction, and the model used can well explain the co-degradation process of GM-1.4 adsorption photocatalytic TC solution at pH = 3. Fig. 9(c) shows the comparison of the TC adsorption capacity on GM-1.4 in twice adsorptions, the TC adsorption capacity on GM-1.4 in the second time is not much different from that of in the first time. The results showed that the first adsorption on TC was almost completely degraded after 120 min of visible light irradiation, while the adsorption on the samples surface accelerated the photodegradation. What’s more, the standard deviations of the adsorption experiment data are all within the range of 4.7%, it can be deduced that the experimental results have no obvious errors.
3.2.3 Active group capture experiment
The results of active group capture experiments were shown in the Fig. 10. Fig. 10 (a) showed the photocatalytic activity of mesoporous g-C3N4 under irradiation with the addition of different trapping agents. The active species trapping agents used in the experiments included TEOA, BQ and IPA, which were used to scavenge the holes (h+), superoxide radicals (·O2-) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) for phtocatalytic reaction system, respectively. Obviously, the photdegradation efficiency remained unchanged in the presence of IPA. However, when BQ and TEOA trapping agents were added, the photodegradation efficiency reduced significantly, and BQ had the most obvious quenching effect on the reaction. It was indicated that·O2- and h+ were the main oxidative species in the photocatalytic reaction. Meanwhile, the ESR spectra of GB and GM-1.4 was shown in Fig. 10 (b) and (c). It can be seen from the ESR spectra that DMPO-·OH and DMPO -·O2- of GB and GM-1.4 had no obvious signal peak under dark conditions. However, four signal peaks of DMPO-·OH and DMPO-·O2- were appeared in the light condition, and the peak intensity of DMPO-·O2- was stronger than that of DMPO-·OH. These results indicated that ·O2- and ·OH were both the active species, and the influence of ·O2- species was greater. Compared to the dark state, TEMPO-h+ has weaker peak intensity in the light state, this may be because the mesoporous g-C3N4 produces more holes and neutralizes the trapping agent under light conditions, indicating that h+ also has a great influence on the photocatalytic reaction. This conclusion was also cosistent with the results of the active group capture experiments.
3.2.4 Cycle performance test.
The results of photodegradation cycle experiments of GM-1.4 photocatalytic degradation on TC was shown in Fig. 11. It can be observed that the photocatalytic efficiency of GM-1.4 on tetracycline showed no significantly decrease after repeated for five times. Although the degradation rate decreased gradually with the increase of reaction times, this may be because the loss of catalyst in the process of recovery resulted in the reduction of mesoporous g-C3N4, thus leading to the decline of photodegradation rate.
3.2.5 Mechanism analysis of photocatalytic degradation of TC by mesoporous g-C3N4.
The UV-Vis spectra of blank experiments without catalyst and TC photocatalytic degradation with GM-1.4 under visible light at different periods are shown in Fig. 12 (a) and (b). As shown in Fig. 12(a), the UV-Vis absorption spectra of TC without catalyst unchanged after 120 min of xenon lamp irradiation, indicating that TC is relatively stable under light conditions and would not be degraded by itself. Fig. 12 (b) shows the spectra variation in the process of GM-1.4 photocatalytic degradation of TC. When the GM-1.4 was added to the TC solution, the absorption peak intensity of TC at the wavelength of about 357.5nm gradually decreases with the increase of illumination time, and the peak position of GM-1.4 curve in each time has barely moved, indicating that the decreasing of absorption peak intensity of TC mainly due to the destruction of the structure of TC molecule caused by the photocatalytic reduction reaction to produce CO2 and H2O directly.[45-47] What's more, the variation of peak intensity presents a slight change after 60 min photocatalytic reaction, it meant that the TC molecules were mostly degraded within an hour, and also illustrated that the special coral-like rod shaped and porous structure of mesoporous g-C3N4 could enhance the above reaction process. As shown in Fig. 12 (c), the prepared mesoporous g-C3N4 with rich porous structure in this paper can provide more active sites, then to be excited by visible irradiation, and inhibit the recombination of electron and photogenerated hole, the photocatalytic efficiency of TC will be enhanced.