Exposure to Baby-Friendly Hospital Practices and Mothers’ Achievement of their Planned Duration of Breastfeeding.

doi:10.21203/rs.2.18912/v2

Download PDF

Research article

Exposure to Baby-Friendly Hospital Practices and Mothers’ Achievement of their Planned Duration of Breastfeeding.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18912/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 01 May, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Both breastfeeding intentions and exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices have been associated with a longer duration of breastfeeding. This study aims to examine the effect of exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices on mothers’ achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding. Methods: A total of 1011 mother-newborn pairs from the postnatal units of four public hospitals in Hong Kong were recruited. Sociodemographic data and breastfeeding intention data were collected via self-report questionnaires during the postnatal hospitalization and exposure to Baby-Friendly hospital practices were assessed through hospital records and maternal self-report. Breastfeeding status after hospital discharge was assessed through telephone follow-up for up to 12 months postnatal, or until participants were no longer breastfeeding. Results: Only 55% (n=552) of study participants achieved their intended duration of breastfeeding. Participants with higher socioeconomic status, previous breastfeeding experience, and those who had lived in Hong Kong for less than 5 years, were more likely to achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding. Among baby-friendly hospital practices, feeding only breast milk during the hospitalization and providing information about breastfeeding support on discharge were associated with participants’ achieving their individual breastfeeding intentions. After adjustment, when compared with women who experienced one baby-friendly practice, participants who experienced six baby-friendly hospital practices were significantly more likely to achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio=8.45, 95% confidence interval 3.03 – 23.6). Conclusions : Nearly half of participants did not achieve their planned breastfeeding duration. Exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices, especially in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding and providing breastfeeding support information upon hospital discharge may help more mothers to achieve their individual breastfeeding goals.

Maternal & Fetal Medicine

Baby-friendly hospital practices

breastfeeding

Chinese

Intended duration

What is already known on this subject? Both breastfeeding intentions and exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices have been associated with a longer duration of breastfeeding. The effect of baby-friendly practices implemented in Hong Kong on mothers’ ability to meet their individual breastfeeding goals is needed. What this study adds? Exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices, especially in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding and providing breastfeeding support information upon hospital discharge may help more mothers to achieve their individual breastfeeding goals.

Breastfeeding has substantial protective health benefits and reduces the risk of infant morbidity and mortality from a number of infectious diseases [1] and the benefits of breastfeeding, especially exclusive breastfeeding, are well recognized [1, 2]. The World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund have set a goal to increase breastfeeding rates to 75% in early infancy, to 50% at six months and to 25% at one year of age [3]. To protect, promote, and support breastfeeding, the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund developed the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) as a global program in 1991 [4]. The BFHI is a set of 10 evidence-based practices (10 steps) that hospitals and maternity units should implement to support breastfeeding. Many studies have examined the effect of maternal exposure to “baby-friendly steps” on breastfeeding initiation and duration [6-10]. Thus, a substantive body of evidence shows that implementation of BFHI improves breastfeeding outcomes.

One study examining how non-compliance with each baby-friendly step influenced breastfeeding duration found that exposure to a greater number of baby-friendly steps was associated with longer breastfeeding duration [11]. Other studies have shown that, for new mothers, exposure to more steps is associated with lower risk of cessation and therefore with longer duration of breastfeeding [10]. A recent systematic review found a positive graded association between the number of BFHI steps that women experience in the hospital and earlier breastfeeding initiation, exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge and longer breastfeeding duration [6]. Therefore, efforts to increase implementation of the BFHI could be anticipated to result in an increased duration of breastfeeding.

Maternal breastfeeding intentions are also a significant predictor of actual breastfeeding practices [12, 13]. Despite setting breastfeeding goals, many mothers do not achieve their intended duration of breastfeeding. Findings from the Infant Feeding Practices Study II in the United States (US) showed that although 85% of pregnant women intend to exclusively breastfeed, only one-third of mothers (32.4%) achieve their planned duration of exclusive breastfeeding [12]. In Hong Kong, a recent study reported that 78.1% of participants intend to exclusively breastfeed, with a median intended duration of 26 weeks [13]. Population-based data shows that although more than 88% of mothers initiate breastfeeding, only one third of infants are still receiving any breast milk at six months of age and only 2% achieve six months of exclusive breastfeeding[14]. Therefore, similar to many developed countries, in Hong Kong breastfeeding duration is short and most new mothers fail to meet their individual breastfeeding goals.

In maternal and child health care settings, a primary goal of practitioners should be to help new mothers achieve their individual breastfeeding goals. In Hong Kong, there has been a recent government directive for the full implementation of the BFHI in all public hospitals over the next five years [15]. Although several studies have examined the effect of baby-friendly practices on mothers’ ability to meet their individual breastfeeding goals [8, 12], the availability of non-US data is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effect of exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices on mothers’ achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding.

Study design and participants

The basis for this analysis was a multi-center prospective cohort study that recruited mother-infant pairs (n=1287) from the postnatal obstetric units of four geographically distributed public hospitals in Hong Kong from 2011 to 2012. Only 1011 participants reported their intended duration of breastfeeding and was included in the analysis as we used this question to categorize meeting their intended duration of breastfeeding. The remaining 276 participants had missing data for the main variables so was excluded. Participants were all Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong residents who gave birth to a single full-term infant, intended to breastfeed, and had no serious medical or obstetric complications. Participants were excluded if the newborn had a birthweight of <2,500 grams, a 5-minute Apgar score of <7, and if they were admitted to the special care nursery for >48 hours after birth or were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Study participants were recruited by a trained research nurse within the first 24 hours after giving birth. In-hospital data collection consisted of a baseline self-administered demographic questionnaire, maternal and newborn data, exposure to six of the ten baby-friendly steps (except for step 10), and in-hospital infant feeding data. These six steps were chosen as they are steps that affect individual mothers. Maternal and newborn data, exposure to baby-friendly hospital steps, and in-hospital infant feeding data were extracted from the maternal and/or newborn health record by the research nurse and were validated with the participant. Follow-up newborn feeding data were collected over the telephone by a trained study research assistant at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months post-partum or until weaned.

As part of the in-hospital demographic questionnaire, mothers were asked “How many weeks in total do you plan to breastfeed?” At the follow-up telephone interviews, participants were asked “What was the age of your baby (in weeks) when she or he was no longer receiving any breast milk?” We used these two questions to compute a proportion that reflected the achieved intended duration of breastfeeding, with a possible range from 0 to 100%. Participants were then categorized as having achieved their intended breastfeeding duration (yes/no), with those who breastfed for ≥90% of their intended duration categorized as yes and those who breastfed for <90% as no. Participants still breastfeeding at the end of the 12-month follow-up were also considered to have met their intentions, irrespective of their intended duration of breastfeeding. The main predictor variables were the six baby-friendly hospital steps, and maternal and infant data. Consistent with other studies [9-11], we measured the six out of ten baby-friendly steps that affect individual mothers including: (1) step 4: help mothers to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth; (2) step 6: give newborns no food or drink other than breast milk, unless medically indicated; (3) step 7: practice of rooming-in; (4) step 8: encourage breastfeeding on demand; (5) step 9: give breastfeeding newborns no artificial teats or pacifiers; and (6) step 10: provide mothers with information about breastfeeding support on hospital discharge.

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster and the participating study sites ethics committees approved the study. All participants provided informed written consent.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to compare the sociodemographic characteristics of participants by achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to examine the effect of baby-friendly hospital steps on participants’ meeting their planned duration of breastfeeding. Model 1 was adjusted for the six BFHI steps only and Model 2 was additionally adjusted for sociodemographic variables. We computed the proportion of participants’ who achieved their planned duration of breastfeeding by how many Baby-friendly hospital practices they experienced, and we used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis to examine the effect of the number of practices on achieving breastfeeding intentions. In all multiple logistic regression models, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test [16] was used to assess the goodness of fit of the models.

Data were analyzed using Stata version 14.1 statistical software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) [17]. A 5% level of significance was used in all statistical tests.

A total of 1011 participants were included in this study that reported their intended duration of breastfeeding. The median intended duration of breastfeeding was 26 weeks and only 55% (n=552) of participants achieved their planned duration of breastfeeding. The median difference between intended and actual duration of breastfeeding was 14.5 weeks.

The characteristics of the study participants by achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding are shown in Table 1. Participants meeting their planned duration of breastfeeding had a higher education level (p=.006), lived in Hong Kong for a shorter duration (p=.022), were themselves breastfed (p<.001), had previous breastfeeding experience (p<.001), were multiparous (p<.001), and had a partner who preferred breastfeeding (p<.001). Exposure to four of the six measured baby friendly hospital practices was significantly associated with achieving breastfeeding intentions (p< 0.05).

Table 2 presents the associations between the baby-friendly hospital practices and achieving breastfeeding intentions. In the fully adjusted analysis (Model 2), the association between achieving the planned duration of breastfeeding and exposure to baby-friendly hospital practices was statistically significant for step 6 (aOR=2.11; 95% CI 1.48-3.01) and step 10 (aOR=1.36; 95% CI 0.92-2.00).

The proportion of participants who experienced one to six baby-friendly hospital practices is presented in Table 3. The frequency of exposure to one baby-friendly hospital practices was 3.1% while 19.8% of participants experienced all six practices. Among participants who experienced all six baby-friendly practices, a higher proportion achieved their individual breastfeeding goals. In the adjusted logistic regression analyses, there was a graded positive association between the number of baby-friendly hospital practices experienced and the odds of participants achieving their intended duration of breastfeeding. Participants who experienced 6 hospital practices were eight times more likely (aOR=8.45; 95% CI 3.03-23.6) to achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding when compared with women who experienced one hospital practice. Finally, when compared with participants exposed to only one baby-friendly hospital practice, for each extra baby-friendly practice experienced, participants’ odds of achieving their planned duration of breastfeeding increased by approximately 20% (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32) (data not shown). The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests of the logistic regression models ranged from 0.39 to 0.40, indicating a good fit for the data.

This study is the first to examine the effect on the exposure to the baby-friendly hospital practices on mothers’ achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding in a non-Western population. In this study, we identified key maternal characteristics that were strongly related to just over half of the participants who were able to achieve participant’s individual goals. Educated mothers with previous breastfeeding experience and those living in Hong Kong for a shorter period of time were more likely to achieve participant individual goals. The characteristics can be frequently associated with a longer breastfeeding duration in other studies [18, 19]. Although these are non-modifiable characteristics, additional breastfeeding support should be provided to less educated first-time mothers both during the postnatal hospitalization and after hospital discharge to help mothers achieve their individual breastfeeding goals. Also, because breastfeeding duration with a first child is a strong predictor of breastfeeding duration with subsequent children [20], providing adequate breastfeeding support to first time mothers can be beneficial beyond that pregnancy. In contrast to other studies [21, 22] we found that returning to work was not associated with participants achieving their individual goals. In this study with a high proportion of maternal employment and only 10 weeks of mandated maternity leave in Hong Kong, returning to work has been shown to be strongly associated with overall breastfeeding duration [23]. A local study show that approximately 85% of employed new mothers return to full-time employment before 10 weeks postnatal and 88% work 40 hours per week or more [24]. Therefore, most pregnant women make plans about returning to work before giving birth and their ability to combine breastfeeding and employment is likely reflected in their intended duration of breastfeeding.

Our findings also show that baby-friendly hospital practices were strongly associated with mothers’ achievement of their intended breastfeeding duration. Step 6, giving newborns only breast milk almost doubled a mother’s likelihood of achieving her planned duration of breastfeeding. This finding is consistent with previous studies conducted in the US on the effect of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding on mothers’ achievement of their individual breastfeeding goals [12, 25]. In this sample however, even among participants who achieved their planned duration of breastfeeding, only 36% exclusively breastfed while in the hospital. Unfortunately, in-hospital formula supplementation of healthy breastfeeding infants is all too common [26, 27] and rarely medically indicated [28]. Numerous studies have shown that early formula supplementation directly undermines the initiation and duration of breastfeeding [19, 26, 29]. In 2006, Hong Kong adopted a policy that all public and private hospitals have to purchase infant formula at market price as a step to becoming more baby-friendly. This significant change differ from US population, that culturally our sample are exposed to Step 6 that no free or low cost supplies of breastmilk substitutes are accepted. This study reinforces previous studies that early supplementation affects the initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Our study extends this finding that it also help mothers achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding in the long term. Early breastfeeding initiation after birth, minimizing separation between mother and baby, and support and advice to minimize maternal anxiety over perceived insufficient milk supply can help to reduce unnecessary formula supplementation during the postnatal hospital stay [30]. Our findings differ from previously published findings in US population that step 10, providing mothers with information on breastfeeding support before hospital discharge was associated with 36% increased odds of participants achieving their planned duration of breastfeeding. Many new mothers report that after going home from the hospital they feel alone and isolated and have to figure out how to breastfeed on their own [31]. Therefore among Chinese population, providing clear information to new mothers about where to find breastfeeding support may help mothers achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding and assist them to find support if needed.

Overall, each of the baby-friendly steps is highly interconnected with the others, structurally and physiologically, and the steps are statistically correlated with each other. Although only two of the six measured baby-friendly practices were individually associated with participants achieving their planned duration of breastfeeding, there was a clear dose-response pattern and exposure to increasing numbers of baby-friendly practices was associated with increasingly higher odds of participants reaching their individual goals. Participants who experienced six baby-friendly hospital practices were four and one-half times more likely to achieve their planned duration of breastfeeding when compared with women who experienced only one practice. Unfortunately, only 19.8% of our participants experienced all six baby-friendly practices. Encouragingly, since our study was conducted, two of our four study hospitals have been officially designated as baby-friendly and the other two are progressing toward baby-friendly status. Full implementation of the BFHI improves hospital practices, reduces unnecessary infant formula supplementation, and improves breastfeeding rates [32, 33].

Strengths of this study were study attrition was minimal, and we had follow-up data on 97.6% of the study sample. Weaknesses of this study were despite the large sample size, participant recruitment was not population based. Therefore, new mothers with more breastfeeding confidence may have been more likely to participate in our study, and we do not have data on eligible mothers who declined to participate. Furthermore, participants self-reported breastfeeding data in this study and therefore it may be subject to recall bias. However, other studies have shown that maternal reports of breastfeeding duration are accurate for many years after women have stopped breastfeeding [34].

Findings from this study show that while a majority of new mothers fail to achieve their individual breastfeeding goals, exposure to a greater number of baby-friendly hospital practices substantially increases their odds of achieving their planned duration of breastfeeding. Broader implementation of BFHI and the provision of more breastfeeding support in the early postnatal period is also necessary to help mothers’ breastfeed for longer.

BFHI: Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative; aOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

K.L. conducted data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. C.C, H.F and V.C actively contributed to data collection and analysis. M.T. contributed to the study design, obtained the funding of the study, assisted with the data analysis, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data and critically review its content and the final version submitted for publication.

All authors affirm that this manuscript is an honest, accurate and transparent account of the study being reported. The reporting of this work is compliant with STROBE guidelines. All authors affirm that no important aspects of the study have been omitted. This study was not registered.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Health and Medical Research Fund of the Food and Health Bureau, Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (grant 05060721), the University of Hong Kong (grant 10207306), the University of Hong Kong Strategic Research Theme of Public Health, and the School of Nursing, the University of Hong Kong.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available yet.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hong Kong West Cluster and Kowloon Central Cluster. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC et al: Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387(10017):475-490.
Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, Piwoz EG, Richter LM, Victora CG, Grp LBS: Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet 2016, 387(10017):491-504.
World Health Organization: The World Health Organization's Infant Feeding Recommendation 2002.
World Health Organization: Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding: the special role of maternity services. In. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization / UNICEF; 1989.
World Health Organization:Ten steps to successful breastfeeding (revised 2018) [https://www.who.int/nutrition/bfhi/ten-steps/en/]
Perez-Escamilla R, Martinez JL, Segura-Perez S: Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr 2016.
Balogun OO, O'Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, Renfrew MJ, MacGillivray S: Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016, 11:CD001688.
Brodribb W, Kruske S, Miller YD: Baby-friendly hospital accreditation, in-hospital care practices, and breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013, 131(4):685-692.
Tarrant M, Wu KM, Fong DY, Lee IL, Wong EM, Sham A, Lam C, Dodgson JE: Impact of baby-friendly hospital practices on breastfeeding in Hong Kong. Birth 2011, 38(3):238-245.
Tarrant M, Lok KY, Fong DY, Wu KM, Lee IL, Sham A, Lam C, Bai DL, Wong KL, Wong EM et al: Effect on Baby-Friendly Hospital Steps When Hospitals Implement a Policy to Pay for Infant Formula. J Hum Lact 2016, 32(2):238-249.
Nickel NC, Labbok MH, Hudgens MG, Daniels JL: The extent that noncompliance with the ten steps to successful breastfeeding influences breastfeeding duration. J Hum Lact 2013, 29(1):59-70.
Perrine CG, Scanlon KS, Li R, Odom E, Grummer-Strawn LM: Baby-Friendly hospital practices and meeting exclusive breastfeeding intention. Pediatrics 2012, 130(1):54-60.
Lok KYW, Bai DL, Tarrant M: Family members' infant feeding preferences, maternal breastfeeding exposures and exclusive breastfeeding intentions. Midwifery 2017, 53:49-54.
Department of Health: Breastfeeding Survey 2019 [https://www.fhs.gov.hk/english/archive/files/reports/BF_survey_2019.pdf]
Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative Hong Kong Association: World breastfeeding week 2017: annual summary.
Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S: A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997, 16(9):965-980.
StataCorp: Stata statistical software: release 14.1 [program]. In. College Station, Tx: StataCorp LP; 2015.
Lok KY, Bai DL, Tarrant M: Predictors of breastfeeding initiation in Hong Kong and Mainland China born mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15:286.
Dennis CL, Brown HK, Chung-Lee L, Abbass-Dick J, Shorey S, Marini F, Brennenstuhl S: Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding among immigrant and Canadian-born Chinese women. Matern Child Nutr 2018:e12687.
Bai DL, Fong DY, Tarrant M: Previous breastfeeding experience and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding among multiparous mothers. Birth 2015, 42(1):70-77.
Zhang Y, Jin Y, Vereijken C, Stahl B, Jiang HJA: Breastfeeding experience, challenges and service demands among Chinese mothers: A qualitative study in two cities. 2018.
Thomas-Jackson SC, Bentley GE, Keyton K, Reifman A, Boylan M, Hart SL: In-hospital Breastfeeding and Intention to Return to Work Influence Mothers' Breastfeeding Intentions. J Hum Lact 2016, 32(4):Np76-Np83.
Tarrant M, Fong DY, Wu KM, Lee IL, Wong EM, Sham A, Lam C, Dodgson JE: Breastfeeding and weaning practices among Hong Kong mothers: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10:27.
Bai DL, Fong DY, Tarrant M: Factors associated with breastfeeding duration and exclusivity in mothers returning to paid employment postpartum. Matern Child Health J 2015, 19(5):990-999.
Declercq E, Labbok MH, Sakala C, O'Hara M: Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(5):929-935.
Chantry CJ, Dewey KG, Peerson JM, Wagner EA, Nommsen-Rivers LA: In-hospital formula use increases early breastfeeding cessation among first-time mothers intending to exclusively breastfeed. J Pediatr 2014, 164(6):1339-1345.
Biro MA, Sutherland GA, Yelland JS, Hardy P, Brown SJ: In-hospital formula supplementation of breastfed babies: a population-based survey. Birth 2011, 38(4):302-310.
Kellams A, Harrel C, Omage S, Gregory C, Rosen-Carole C: ABM Clinical Protocol #3: Supplementary Feedings in the Healthy Term Breastfed Neonate, Revised 2017. Breastfeed Med 2017, 12:188-198.
Tarrant M, Lok KYW, Fong DYT, Lee ILY, Sham A, Lam C, Wu KM, Bai DL, Wong KL, Wong EMY et al: Effect of a hospital policy of not accepting free infant formula on in-hospital formula supplementation rates and breastfeeding duration. Public Health Nutr 2015, 18(14):2689-2699.
Requejo J, Black R: Strategies for reducing unnecessary in-hospital formula supplementation and increasing rates of exclusive breastfeeding. J Pediatr 2014, 164(6):1256-1258.
Tarrant M, Dodgson JE, Wu KM: Factors contributing to early breastfeeding cessation among Chinese mothers: An exploratory study. Midwifery 2014, 30(10):1088-1095.
Hawkins SS, Stern AD, Baum CF, Gillman MW: Compliance with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and impact on breastfeeding rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014, 99(2):F138-143.
Martens PJ: What do Kramer's Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative PROBIT studies tell us? A review of a decade of research. J Hum Lact 2012, 28(3):335-342.
Natland ST, Andersen LF, Nilsen TI, Forsmo S, Jacobsen GW: Maternal recall of breastfeeding duration twenty years after delivery. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012, 12:179.

Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC et al: Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387(10017):475-490.
Leung GM, Lam TH, Ho LM, Lau YL: Health consequences of breastfeeding: doctors' visits and hospitalisations during the first 18 months of life in Hong Kong Chinese infants. Epidemiology 2005, 16(3):328-335.
Tarrant M, Kwok MK, Lam TH, Leung GM, Schooling CM: Breast-feeding and childhood hospitalizations for infections. Epidemiology 2010, 21(6):847-854.
Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, Piwoz EG, Richter LM, Victora CG, Grp LBS: Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet 2016, 387(10017):491-504.
Organization WH: The World Health Organization's Infant Feeding Recommendation 2002. 2002.
World Health Organization: Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding: the special role of maternity services. In. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization / UNICEF; 1989.
World Health Organization: Evidence for the ten steps to successful breastfeeding. In. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.
Perez-Escamilla R, Martinez JL, Segura-Perez S: Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr 2016.
DiGirolamo AM, Grummer-Strawn LM, Fein SB: Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2008, 122:S43-49.
Balogun OO, O'Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, Renfrew MJ, MacGillivray S: Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016, 11:CD001688.
Brodribb W, Kruske S, Miller YD: Baby-friendly hospital accreditation, in-hospital care practices, and breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013, 131(4):685-692.
Tarrant M, Wu KM, Fong DY, Lee IL, Wong EM, Sham A, Lam C, Dodgson JE: Impact of baby-friendly hospital practices on breastfeeding in Hong Kong. Birth 2011, 38(3):238-245.
Tarrant M, Lok KY, Fong DY, Wu KM, Lee IL, Sham A, Lam C, Bai DL, Wong KL, Wong EM et al: Effect on Baby-Friendly Hospital Steps When Hospitals Implement a Policy to Pay for Infant Formula. J Hum Lact 2016, 32(2):238-249.
Nickel NC, Labbok MH, Hudgens MG, Daniels JL: The extent that noncompliance with the ten steps to successful breastfeeding influences breastfeeding duration. J Hum Lact 2013, 29(1):59-70.
Perrine CG, Scanlon KS, Li R, Odom E, Grummer-Strawn LM: Baby-Friendly hospital practices and meeting exclusive breastfeeding intention. Pediatrics 2012, 130(1):54-60.
Lok KYW, Bai DL, Tarrant M: Family members' infant feeding preferences, maternal breastfeeding exposures and exclusive breastfeeding intentions. Midwifery 2017, 53:49-54.
Breastfeeding Survey 2017 [http://www.fhs.gov.hk/english/reports/files/BF_survey_2017.pdf]
Association BFHIHK: World breastfeeding week 2017: annual summary. In.; 2017.
Declercq E, Labbok MH, Sakala C, O'Hara M: Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. Am J Public Health 2009, 99(5):929-935.
Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S: A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 1997, 16(9):965-980.
StataCorp: Stata statistical software: release 14.1 [program]. In. College Station, Tx: StataCorp LP; 2015.
Tarrant M, Fong DY, Wu KM, Lee IL, Wong EM, Sham A, Lam C, Dodgson JE: Breastfeeding and weaning practices among Hong Kong mothers: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10:27.
Lok KY, Bai DL, Tarrant M: Predictors of breastfeeding initiation in Hong Kong and Mainland China born mothers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15:286.
Dennis CL, Brown HK, Chung-Lee L, Abbass-Dick J, Shorey S, Marini F, Brennenstuhl S: Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding among immigrant and Canadian-born Chinese women. Matern Child Nutr 2018:e12687.
Li R, Fein SB, Chen J, Grummer-Strawn LM: Why Mothers Stop Breastfeeding: Mothers' Self-reported Reasons for Stopping During the First Year. Pediatrics 2008, 122(Supplement_2):S69-76.
Bai DL, Fong DY, Tarrant M: Previous breastfeeding experience and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding among multiparous mothers. Birth 2015, 42(1):70-77.
Zhang Y, Jin Y, Vereijken C, Stahl B, Jiang HJA: Breastfeeding experience, challenges and service demands among Chinese mothers: A qualitative study in two cities. 2018.
Mikami FCF, Francisco RPV, Rodrigues A, Hernandez WR, Zugaib M, de Lourdes Brizot MJJoHL: Breastfeeding Twins: Factors Related to Weaning. 2018:0890334418767382.
Bai DL, Fong DY, Tarrant M: Factors associated with breastfeeding duration and exclusivity in mothers returning to paid employment postpartum. Matern Child Health J 2015, 19(5):990-999.
Chantry CJ, Dewey KG, Peerson JM, Wagner EA, Nommsen-Rivers LA: In-hospital formula use increases early breastfeeding cessation among first-time mothers intending to exclusively breastfeed. J Pediatr 2014, 164(6):1339-1345.
Biro MA, Sutherland GA, Yelland JS, Hardy P, Brown SJ: In-hospital formula supplementation of breastfed babies: a population-based survey. Birth 2011, 38(4):302-310.
Tender JA, Janakiram J, Arce E, Mason R, Jordan T, Marsh J, Kin S, Jianping H, Moon RY: Reasons for in-hospital formula supplementation of breastfed infants from low-income families. J Hum Lact 2009, 25(1):11-17.
World Health Organization, Unicef: Acceptable medical reasons for use of breast-milk substitutes. In. Geneva; 2009.
Kellams A, Harrel C, Omage S, Gregory C, Rosen-Carole C: ABM Clinical Protocol #3: Supplementary Feedings in the Healthy Term Breastfed Neonate, Revised 2017. Breastfeed Med 2017, 12:188-198.
Tarrant M, Lok KYW, Fong DYT, Lee ILY, Sham A, Lam C, Wu KM, Bai DL, Wong KL, Wong EMY et al: Effect of a hospital policy of not accepting free infant formula on in-hospital formula supplementation rates and breastfeeding duration. Public Health Nutr 2015, 18(14):2689-2699.
Requejo J, Black R: Strategies for reducing unnecessary in-hospital formula supplementation and increasing rates of exclusive breastfeeding. J Pediatr 2014, 164(6):1256-1258.
Tarrant M, Dodgson JE, Wu KM: Factors contributing to early breastfeeding cessation among Chinese mothers: An exploratory study. Midwifery 2014, 30(10):1088-1095.
Hawkins SS, Stern AD, Baum CF, Gillman MW: Compliance with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and impact on breastfeeding rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014, 99(2):F138-143.
Martens PJ: What do Kramer's Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative PROBIT studies tell us? A review of a decade of research. J Hum Lact 2012, 28(3):335-342.
Natland ST, Andersen LF, Nilsen TI, Forsmo S, Jacobsen GW: Maternal recall of breastfeeding duration twenty years after delivery. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012, 12:179.
Li R, Scanlon KS, Serdula MK: The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutr Rev 2005, 63(4):103-110.

Table 1. Comparison of characteristics by participants’ achievement of their planned duration of breastfeeding (n=1011)
Characteristics	Total N (%) N=1011	Did Not Meet Planned Duration N (%) N=552	Met Planned Duration N (%) N=459	p-value
Maternal age				.063
18-24 years	63 (6.2)	44 (8.0)	19 (4.1)
25-29 years	251 (24.8)	139 (25.2)	112 (24.4)
30-34 years	435 (43.0)	235 (42.6)	200 (43.6)
≥ 35 years	262 (25.9)	134 (24.3)	128 (27.9)
Maternal education				.006
Primary	30 (3.0)	18 (3.3)	12 (2.6)
Secondary	575 (56.9)	337 (61.1)	238 (51.9)
University degree or above	406 (40.2)	197 (35.7)	209 (45.5)
Monthly family income (HKD)				.165
<$15,000	175 (17.3)	100 (18.1)	75 (16.3)
$15,000-$29,999	369 (36.5)	212 (38.4)	157 (34.2)
≥ $30,000	467 (46.2)	240 (43.5)	227 (49.5)
Length of Residence in Hong Kong				.022
< 5 years	78 (7.7)	36 (6.5)	42 (9.2)
5 to ≥ 15 years	332 (32.8)	167 (30.3)	165 (36.0)
Since birth	601 (59.5)	349 (63.2)	252 (54.9)
Returning to work post-partum				.074
No	360 (35.6)	183 (33.2)	177 (38.6)
Yes	651 (64.4)	369 (66.9)	282 (61.4)
Planning to exclusively breastfeed				<.001
No	232 (23.0)	150 (27.2)	82 (17.9)
Yes	779 (77.1)	402 (72.8)	377 (82.1)
Participant was breastfed				.026
No	591 (58.5)	340 (61.6)	251 (54.7)
Yes	420 (41.5)	212 (38.4)	208 (45.3)
Previous breastfeeding experience				<.001
No	621 (61.4)	369 (66.9)	252 (54.9)
Yes	390 (38.6)	183 (33.2)	207 (45.1)
Partner’s Infant feeding preference				.038
Breastfeeding	426 (42.1)	217 (39.3)	209 (45.5)
No preference	509 (50.4)	285 (51.6)	224 (48.8)
Infant Formula & mixed feeding	76 (7.5)	50 (9.1)	26 (5.7)
Parity				.008
Primiparous	568 (56.2)	331 (60.0)	237 (51.6)
Multiparous	443 (43.8)	221 (40.0)	222 (48.4)
Delivery type				.981
Spontaneous vaginal	799 (79.0)	434 (78.6)	365 (79.5)
Assisted vaginal	48 (4.8)	26 (4.7)	22 (4.8)
Planned caesarean	77 (7.6)	43 (7.8)	34 (7.4)
Emergency caesarean	87 (8.6)	49 (8.9)	38 (8.3)
Step 4: Breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour				.033
No	548 (54.2)	316 (57.3)	232 (50.5)
Yes	463 (45.8)	236 (42.8)	227 (49.5)
Step 6: Only breastmilk given				<.001
No	604 (59.7)	375 (67.9)	229 (49.9)
Yes	407 (40.3)	177 (32.1)	230 (50.1)
Step 7: Rooming-in				.893
No	315 (31.2)	171 (31.0)	144 (31.4)
Yes	696 (68.8)	381 (69.0)	315 (68.6)
Step 8: Breastfeeding on demand				.773
No	220 (21.8)	122 (22.1)	98 (21.4)
Yes	791 (78.2)	430 (77.9)	361 (78.7)
Step 9: No teat given				<.001
No	230 (22.8)	153 (27.7)	77 (16.8)
Yes	781 (77.3)	399 (72.3)	382 (83.2)
Step 10: Provide information on breastfeeding support				.007
No	162 (16.0)	104 (18.8)	58 (12.6)
Yes	849 (84.0)	448 (81.2)	401 (87.4)

Table 2. Odds of achieving planned duration of breastfeeding by exposure to Baby-friendly Hospital Practices
	Achieved planned breastfeeding duration
Characteristic	OR (95% CI)^†	Model 1 aOR (95% CI)^‡	Model 2 aOR (95% CI)^§
Step 4: Breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour
No	1	1	1
Yes	1.31 (1.02-1.68)	1.06 (0.80-1.39)	1.09 (0.80-1.49)
Step 6: Only breastmilk given
No	1	1	1
Yes	2.13 (1.65-2.75)	2.06 (1.49-2.84)	2.11 (1.48-3.01)
Step 7: Rooming-in
No	1	1	1
Yes	0.98 (0.75-1.28)	0.74 (0.48-1.14)	0.93 (0.53-1.65)
Step 8: Breastfeeding on demand
No	1	1	1
Yes	1.05 (0.77-1.41)	1.13 (0.70-1.82)	4.15 (1.09-15.89)
Step 9: No teat given
No	1	1	1
Yes	1.90 (1.40-2.59)	1.18 (0.81-1.72)	1.36 (0.79-2.32)
Step 10: Provide information on breastfeeding support
No	1	1	1
Yes	1.60 (1.13-2.27)	1.41 (0.98-2.02)	1.36 (0.92-2.00)
OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval ^†Unadjusted odds ratios ^‡Adjusted for other Baby-Friendly Hospital Practices ^§Further adjusted for maternal age, maternal education, family income, length of residence in Hong Kong, returning to work, intention to exclusively breastfeed, participant breastfed, previous breastfeeding experience, partner’s infant feeding preference, parity, delivery type and study site.

Table 3. Odds of achieving planned duration of breastfeeding by number of Baby-friendly Hospital Practices experienced, (n=1011)
No. of Practices Experienced	All Participants No. (%)	Participants who met Intentions	Unadjusted OR (CI)	Adjusted OR (CI)^†
1	31 (3.1)	8 (1.7)	1	1
2	185 (18.3)	75 (16.3)	1.96 (0.83-4.62)	1.93 (0.79-4.73)
3	204 (20.2)	80 (17.4)	1.85 (0.79-4.35)	2.24 (0.89-5.61)
4	178 (17.6)	81 (17.7)	2.40 (1.02-5.66)	3.35 (1.29-8.71)
5	213 (21.1)	96 (20.9)	2.36 (1.01-5.51)	4.28 (1.59-11.55)
6	200 (19.8)	119 (25.9)	4.22 (1.80-9.91)	8.45 (3.03-23.60)
OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval ^†Adjusted for maternal age, maternal education, family income, length of residence in Hong Kong, returning to work, intention to exclusively breastfeed, participant breastfed, previous breastfeeding experience, partner’s infant feeding preference, parity, delivery type and study site.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 01 May, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth →

Review #2 received at journal
09 Mar, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor revision
09 Mar, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
27 Feb, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
15 Feb, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
05 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
05 Feb, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
24 Jan, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Jan, 2020
Editor invited by journal
23 Jan, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Exposure to Baby-Friendly Hospital Practices and Mothers’ Achievement of their Planned Duration of Breastfeeding.

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

Significance Statement

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2