1.Van Den Bent MJ, Bromberg JE, Buckner J. Low-grade and anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 134:361–380. http://doi.org10.1016/B978–0–12–802997–8.00022–0.
2.Bromberg JE, van den Bent MJ. Oligodendrogliomas: molecular biology and treatment. Oncologist. 2009; 14(2):155–163. http://doi.org10.1634/theoncologist.2008–0248.
3.Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV et al. A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(20):9852–9861. http://doi.org10.1158/0008–5472.CAN–06–1796.
4.Koeller KK, Rushing EJ. From the archives of the AFIP: Oligodendroglioma and its variants: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005; 25(6):1669–1688. http://doi.org10.1148/rg.256055137.
5.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta neuropathologica. 2007; 114(2):97–109. http://doi.org10.1007/s00401–007–0243–4.
6.Osborn AG: Osborn’s Brain: Imaging, Pathology, and Anatomy (1st edition). Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys, Inc.; 2012.
7.Al-Okaili RN, Krejza J, Wang S, Woo JH, Melhem ER. Advanced MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of intraaxial brain tumors in adults. Radiographics. 2006; 26 Suppl 1:S173–189. http://doi.org10.1148/rg.26si065513.
8.Law M, Yang S, Wang H et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(10):1989–1998. http://doi.org.
9.Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(2):214–221. http://doi.org.
10.Chawla S, Wang S, Wolf RL et al. Arterial spin-labeling and MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(9):1683–1689. http://doi.org10.3174/ajnr.A0673.
11.Lacerda S, Law M. Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009; 19(4):527–557. http://doi.org10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.007.
12.Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2016; 278(2):563–577. http://doi.org10.1148/radiol.2015151169.
13.Prasanna P, Patel J, Partovi S, Madabhushi A, Tiwari P. Radiomic features from the peritumoral brain parenchyma on treatment-naive multi-parametric MR imaging predict long versus short-term survival in glioblastoma multiforme: Preliminary findings. 2017; 27(10):4188–4197. http://doi.org10.1007/s00330–016–4637–3.
14.Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L et al. Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(18):2157–2164. http://doi.org10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9128.
15.Horvat N, Veeraraghavan H, Khan M et al. MR Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Radiomics Analysis to Assess Treatment Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy. 2018; 287(3):833–843. http://doi.org10.1148/radiol.2018172300.
16.Tian Q, Yan LF, Zhang X. Radiomics strategy for glioma grading using texture features from multiparametric MRI. 2018. http://doi.org10.1002/jmri.26010.
17.Kalinli A, Sarikoc F, Akgun H, Ozturk F. Performance comparison of machine learning methods for prognosis of hormone receptor status in breast cancer tissue samples. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013; 110(3):298–307. http://doi.org10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.12.005.
18.Parmar C, Grossmann P, Bussink J, Lambin P, Aerts HJ. Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers. Scientific reports. 2015; 5:13087. http://doi.org10.1038/srep13087.
19.Chae HD, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Kim KG, Goo JM. Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology. 2014; 273(1):285–293. http://doi.org10.1148/radiol.14132187.
20.Vamvakas A, Williams SC, Theodorou K et al. Imaging biomarker analysis of advanced multiparametric MRI for glioma grading. Phys Med. 2019; 60:188–198. http://doi.org10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.014.
21.Yushkevich PA, Yang G, Gerig G. ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016; 2016:3342–3345. http://doi.org10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591443.
22.Tagliamonte SA, Baayen RH. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation & Change. 2012; 24(2):135–178. http://doi.org.
23.Cui Z, Xia Z, Su M, Shu H, Gong G. Disrupted white matter connectivity underlying developmental dyslexia: A machine learning approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016; 37(4):1443–1458. http://doi.org10.1002/hbm.23112.
24.Suh HB, Choi YS, Bae S et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(9):3832–3839. http://doi.org10.1007/s00330–018–5368–4.
25.Takahashi S, Takahashi W, Tanaka S et al. Radiomics Analysis for Glioma Malignancy Evaluation Using Diffusion Kurtosis and Tensor Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. http://doi.org10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.011.
26.Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4006. http://doi.org10.1038/ncomms5006.
27.Rudie JD, Rauschecker AM, Bryan RN, Davatzikos C, Mohan S. Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology. Radiology. 2019; 290(3):607–618. http://doi.org10.1148/radiol.2018181928.
28.Sengupta A, Ramaniharan AK, Gupta RK, Agarwal S, Singh A. Glioma grading using a machine-learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T1 perfusion MRI and volumes of tumor components. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 50(4):1295–1306. http://doi.org10.1002/jmri.26704.
29.Williams LH, Drew T. Distraction in diagnostic radiology: How is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions? Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):12. http://doi.org10.1186/s41235–017–0050-y.
30.Waite S, Kolla S, Jeudy J et al. Tired in the Reading Room: The Influence of Fatigue in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14(2):191–197. http://doi.org10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.009.
31.Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201(3):611–617. http://doi.org10.2214/AJR.12.10375.
32.Thrall JH, Li X, Li Q et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15(3 Pt B):504–508. http://doi.org10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.026.