1. Wu, A. R., Wang, J., Streets, A. M. & Huang, Y. Single-cell transcriptional analysis. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 10, 439–462 (2017).
2. Gawad, C., Koh, W. & Quake, S. R. Single-cell genome sequencing: Current state of the science. Nature Reviews Genetics 17, 175–188 (2016).
3. Nam, A. S., Chaligne, R. & Landau, D. A. Integrating genetic and non-genetic determinants of cancer evolution by single-cell multi-omics. Nature Reviews Genetics 22, 3–18 (2021).
4. Birnbaum, K. D. Power in numbers: Single-cell RNA-seq strategies to dissect complex tissues. Annual Review of Genetics 52, 203–221 (2018).
5. Villani, A. C. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 356, (2017).
6. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371–375 (2014).
7. Venteicher, A. S. et al. Decoupling genetics, lineages, and microenvironment in IDH-mutant gliomas by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 355, (2017).
8. Shami, A. N. et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Human, Macaque, and Mouse Testes Uncovers Conserved and Divergent Features of Mammalian Spermatogenesis. Developmental Cell 54, (2020).
9. McGranahan, N. & Swanton, C. Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future. Cell vol. 168 613–628 (2017).
10. Prager, B. C., Xie, Q., Bao, S. & Rich, J. N. Cancer Stem Cells: The Architects of the Tumor Ecosystem. Cell Stem Cell vol. 24 41–53 (2019).
11. Kreso, A. & Dick, J. E. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell vol. 14 275–291 (2014).
12. Shaffer, S. M. et al. Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance. Nature 546, 431–435 (2017).
13. Neftel, C. et al. An Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma. Cell 178, 835-849.e21 (2019).
14. Wang, L. et al. The phenotypes of proliferating glioblastoma cells reside on a single axis of variation. Cancer Discovery 9, 1708–1719 (2019).
15. Weng, Q. et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics Uncovers Glial Progenitor Diversity and Cell Fate Determinants during Development and Gliomagenesis. Cell Stem Cell 24, 707-723.e8 (2019).
16. Müller, S. et al. Single-cell profiling of human gliomas reveals macrophage ontogeny as a basis for regional differences in macrophage activation in the tumor microenvironment. Genome Biology 18, (2017).
17. Pombo Antunes, A. R. et al. Single-cell profiling of myeloid cells in glioblastoma across species and disease stage reveals macrophage competition and specialization. Nature Neuroscience 24, 595–610 (2021).
18. Hara, T. et al. Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 39, 779-792.e11 (2021).
19. Zhang, L. et al. Single-Cell Analyses Inform Mechanisms of Myeloid-Targeted Therapies in Colon Cancer. Cell 181, 442-459.e29 (2020).
20. Cheng, S. et al. A pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells. Cell 184, 792-809.e23 (2021).
21. Minussi, D. C. et al. Breast tumours maintain a reservoir of subclonal diversity during expansion. Nature 592, 302–308 (2021).
22. Gao, R. et al. Punctuated copy number evolution and clonal stasis in triple-negative breast cancer. Nature Genetics 48, 1119–1130 (2016).
23. Macaulay, I. C. et al. G&T-seq: Parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nature Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).
24. Dey, S. S., Kester, L., Spanjaard, B., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell. Nature Biotechnology 33, 285–289 (2015).
25. Hou, Y. et al. Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell Research 26, 304–319 (2016).
26. Bian, S. et al. Single-cell multiomics sequencing and analyses of human colorectal cancer. https://www.science.org.
27. Zachariadis, V., Cheng, H., Andrews, N. & Enge, M. A Highly Scalable Method for Joint Whole-Genome Sequencing and Gene-Expression Profiling of Single Cells. Molecular Cell 80, 541-553.e5 (2020).
28. Guo, F. et al. Single-cell multi-omics sequencing of mouse early embryos and embryonic stem cells. Cell Research 2017 27:8 27, 967–988 (2017).
29. Oguchi, Y., Ozaki, Y., Abdelmoez, M. N. & Shintaku, H. NanoSINC-seq dissects the isoform diversity in subcellular compartments of single cells. Science Advances 7, (2021).
30. Abdelmoez, M. N. et al. SINC-seq: Correlation of transient gene expressions between nucleus and cytoplasm reflects single-cell physiology. Genome Biology 19, (2018).
31. Kivioja, T. et al. Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nature Methods 9, 72–74 (2012).
32. Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
33. Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
34. Reznikoff, W. S. Transposon Tn5. Annual Review of Genetics vol. 42 269–286 (2008).
35. Picelli, S. et al. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Research 24, 2033–2040 (2014).
36. Hennig, B. P. et al. Large-scale low-cost NGS library preparation using a robust Tn5 purification and tagmentation protocol. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 8, 79–89 (2018).
37. Sheng, K., Cao, W., Niu, Y., Deng, Q. & Zong, C. Effective detection of variation in single-cell transcriptomes using MATQ-seq. Nature Methods 14, 267–270 (2017).
38. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nature Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
39. Sheng, K., Cao, W., Niu, Y., Deng, Q. & Zong, C. Effective detection of variation in single-cell transcriptomes using MATQ-seq. Nature Methods 14, 267–270 (2017).
40. Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nature methods 10, 1096–8 (2013).
41. Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nature protocols 9, 171–81 (2014).
42. Fan, X. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of linear and circular RNAs in mouse preimplantation embryos. Genome Biology 16, (2015).
43. Garvin, T. et al. Interactive analysis and assessment of single-cell copy-number variations. Nature Methods vol. 12 1058–1060 (2015).
44. Sun, J. C. & Lanier, L. L. NK cell development, homeostasis and function: Parallels with CD8 + T cells. Nature Reviews Immunology vol. 11 645–657 (2011).
45. Farber, D. L., Yudanin, N. A. & Restifo, N. P. Human memory T cells: Generation, compartmentalization and homeostasis. Nature Reviews Immunology vol. 14 24–35 (2014).
46. Pizzolato, G. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing unveils the shared and the distinct cytotoxic hallmarks of human TCRVδ1 and TCRVδ2 γδ T lymphocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 11906–11915 (2019).
47. Uhlen, M. et al. A genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of protein-coding genes in human blood cells. Science 366, (2019).
48. Lin, W. et al. Establishment and characterization of new tumor xenografts and cancer cell lines from EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nature Communications 9, (2018).
49. Ben-David, U. et al. Genetic and transcriptional evolution alters cancer cell line drug response. Nature 560, 325–330 (2018).
50. Ceccarelli, M. et al. Molecular Profiling Reveals Biologically Discrete Subsets and Pathways of Progression in Diffuse Glioma. Cell 164, 550–563 (2016).
51. Hu, H. et al. Mutational Landscape of Secondary Glioblastoma Guides MET-Targeted Trial in Brain Tumor. Cell 175, 1665-1678.e18 (2018).
52. Habib, N. et al. Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq. Nature Methods 14, 955–958 (2017).
53. Mu, Q. et al. MYC amplification at diagnosis drives therapy-induced hypermutation of recurrent glioma. ResearchSquare (2021).
54. Sanchez-Vega, F. et al. Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell 173, 321-337.e10 (2018).
55. Wang, J. et al. Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy. Nature Genetics 48, 768–776 (2016).
56. Louis, D. N. et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro-Oncology 23, (2021).
57. Johnson, B. E. et al. Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science 343, (2014).
58. Barthel, F. P. et al. Longitudinal molecular trajectories of diffuse glioma in adults. Nature 576, (2019).
59. Venkataramani, V., Tanev, D. I., Kuner, T., Wick, W. & Winkler, F. Synaptic input to brain tumors: clinical implications. Neuro-oncology 23, 23–33 (2021).
60. Jung, E. et al. Emerging intersections between neuroscience and glioma biology. Nature Neuroscience vol. 22 1951–1960 (2019).
61. Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 573, 539–545 (2019).
62. Venkataramani, V. et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 573, 532–538 (2019).
63. Osswald, M. et al. Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network. Nature 528, 93–98 (2015).
64. Henley, J. M. & Wilkinson, K. A. Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience vol. 17 337–350 (2016).
65. Diering, G. H. & Huganir, R. L. The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity. Neuron vol. 100 314–329 (2018).
66. Tirosh, I. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. Nature 539, 309–313 (2016).
67. Neftel, C. et al. An Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma. Cell 178, 835-849.e21 (2019).
68. Henley, J. M. & Wilkinson, K. A. Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2016 17:6 17, 337–350 (2016).
69. Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. Nature 523, 486–490 (2015).
70. Cao, J. et al. SINGLE-CELL GENOMICS Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells. Science vol. 361 (2018).
71. Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. Nature Biotechnology 37, 916–924 (2019).
72. Stoeckius, M. et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nature Methods 14, 865–868 (2017).
73. Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nature Methods 14, 959–962 (2017).
74. Matson, K. J. E. et al. Isolation of adult spinal cord nuclei for massively parallel single-nucleus RNA sequencing. Journal of Visualized Experiments 2018, (2018).
75. Gu, W. et al. Depletion of Abundant Sequences by Hybridization (DASH): Using Cas9 to remove unwanted high-abundance species in sequencing libraries and molecular counting applications. Genome Biology 17, (2016).
76. Loi, D. S. C., Yu, L. & Wu, A. R. Effective ribosomal RNA depletion for single-cell total RNA-seq by scDASH. PeerJ 9, e10717 (2021).
77. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. in Bioinformatics vol. 34 (2018).
78. Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y. & Hu, F. SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11, (2016).
79. Li, H. seqtk Toolkit for processing sequences in FASTA/Q formats. GitHub 767, (2012).
80. Bushnell, B., Rood, J. & Singer, E. BBTools Software Package. PLOS ONE vol. 12 e0185056 https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (2017).
81. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, (2009).
82. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, (2009).
83. Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: Modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Research 27, (2017).
84. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: A flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, (2010).
85. Zaccaria, S. & Raphael, B. J. Characterizing allele- and haplotype-specific copy numbers in single cells with CHISEL. Nature Biotechnology 39, 207–214 (2021).
86. Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nature Genetics 48, (2016).
87. Navin, N. et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472, 90–95 (2011).
88. Nilsen, G. et al. Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation. BMC Genomics 13, (2012).
89. Talevich, E., Shain, A. H., Botton, T. & Bastian, B. C. CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. PLoS Computational Biology 12, (2016).
90. Oesper, L., Mahmoody, A. & Raphael, B. J. THetA: Inferring intra-tumor heterogeneity from high-throughput DNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 14, (2013).
91. Oesper, L., Satas, G. & Raphael, B. J. Quantifying tumor heterogeneity in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 30, (2014).
92. Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. Ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, (2019).
93. Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) vol. 2452 (2002).
94. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, (2013).
95. Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nature Biotechnology 34, (2016).
96. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nature Methods 14, (2017).
97. Melsted, P. et al. Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nature Biotechnology 39, (2021).
98. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nature Biotechnology 36, (2018).
99. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell 177, 1888-1902.e21 (2019).
100. Finak, G. et al. MAST: A flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 16, (2015).
101. Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nature Communications 2021 12:1 12, 1–20 (2021).
102. Gómez-Rubio, V. ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) . Journal of Statistical Software 77, (2017).
103. Kassambara, A. ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.4.0 (2020).
104. Yu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y. & Lam, T. T. Y. ggtree: an r package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, (2017).
105. Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, (2016).
106. Inkscape.org. Draw Freely | Inkscape. inkscape.org (2020).