Ankle Joint Pressure Change in Varus Malalignment of Tibia

doi:10.21203/rs.2.18985/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Ankle Joint Pressure Change in Varus Malalignment of Tibia

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18985/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 04 Mar, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Varus malalignment of tibia could alter ankle biomechanics, might lead to degenerative changes of the ankle joint. However, previous studies failed to report the detailed changes of ankle biomechanics in varus malalignment of tibia. The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate ankle joint pressure change in response to the gradual progression of varus malalignment of tibia.

Methods 8 fresh-frozen human cadaver legs were tested in this study. Varus malalignment of tibia and a total of 600N compressive force was simulated using a custom made fixture. Intra-articular sensors(TeckScan)were inserted in the ankle joint to collected ankle joint pressure data. The testing sequence was 0°, 2°,4°,6°,8°,10°,12°,14°,16°,18°,20° of tibial varus.

Results As the tibial varus progressed, the center of force(COF) shifted laterally both for medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint. For medial aspect of ankle joint, the lateral shift reached its maximum at 6º[2.76(1.46)mm, p=0.001] and 8º[2.76(1.62)mm, p=0.002], while for lateral aspect of ankle joint, the lateral shift reached its maximum at 12º[2.11(1.19)mm, p=0.002], thereafter, the COF shifted medially as the tibial varus progressed. The lateral joint pressure ratio was 0.481(0.125) at 0º and 0.548(0.108) at 10º and 0.517(0.101) at 20º. Significant differences were found between 0º and 10º(p=0.002), 10º and 20º (p=0.002)of tibial varus.

Conclusions For mild tibial varus deformities, there was a lateral shift of COF and lateral stress concentration within the ankle joint, while as the deformity progressed, COF shifted medially and lateral stress concentration decreased. Keywords: ankle biomechanics, tibial varus, joint pressure measurement

Orthopedics

ankle biomechanics

tibial varus

joint pressure measurement

The alignment of the lower extremity is critical for orthopaedic surgeons, both for preoperative and postoperative evaluation. It is believed that the varus or valgus deformity is highly associated with osteoarthritis, especially the knee joint.[1-4] Varus malalignment of tibia can be the result of malunion of tibia fractures or varus knee deformity. Varus knee is common in population, previous studies demonstrated that the knee joint loading and kinematics was altered in patients with early knee ostoearthritis.[5] Varus malalignment of tibia can alter normal biomechanics of the ankle joint, including stress concentration on the medial aspect of the ankle joint, prolonged stress would result in degenerative changes of cartilage within the ankle joint.[6]

However, compensatory function of the adjacent joints is common, Norton and colleague[5] studied the compensatory mechanism of hindfoot for advanced knee osteoarthritis, the found that as the mechanical axis angle became either more varus or valgus, the hindfoot would subsequently orient in more valgus or varus position in order to maintain a normal mechanical alignment of the lower extremity. Therefore, for patients with varus malalignment of tibia, would the subtalar joint compensate for the above deformity? and would this compensatory mechanism further affect the ankle joint biomechanics? Unfortunately, these biomechanical studies had failed to report the detailed ankle joint pressure change in response to a progression of varus malalignment of tibia.

The aim of this biomechanical study is to investigate the detailed ankle joint pressure change as the tibial varus progressed. We hypothesize that the pressure on lateral aspect of ankle joint will increase as the result of valgus inclination of the subtalar joint in response to the varus tibia malalignment. As the varus deformity progressed, the valgus inclination of the subtalar joint will reach its’ maximum and then fail, thereafter, the subtalar joint will convert into a varus inclination result in a sudden medial stress concentration.

A total of 8 fresh-frozen human cadaver legs were utilized for the biomechanical testing, the specimens were thawed to room temperature(24ºC). The mean age of the cadavers was 71.4(7.4) years old, 4 of the 8 were men, the other 4 were left. None of the cadaver specimen had malalignment of the tibia, hindfoot, nor preexisting subtalar joint osteoarthritis. All specimen had normal range of motion of both ankle and subtalar joint. The anterior soft tissue (including skin, subcutaneous tissue, anterior joint capsule, tendons and neurovascular bundles) of the ankle joint were dissected for the access to the ankle joint. Both the medial and lateral ankle ligaments were well preserved.

The tibia and fibular was cut at 20cm above the ankle joint. For each specimen, the proximal tibia and fibular was potted securely into a custom made shell, then mounted on a custom make fixture. The tibia and fibular were embedded and securely fixed into the shell using dental gymsum. Load was applied to the tibia via the custom made shell. Each specimen must be potted in neutral position, no plantarflexion or dorsiflexion of the ankle joint in sagittal plane, no varus or valgus malalignment of the hindfoot in coronal plane, no internal or external rotation of the foot in horizontal plane.

A custom designed fixture was utilized for the testing. Spirit levels were utilized to make sure both the working table and the top plate was horizontal throughout the entire testing process. The varus malalignment of tibia, including 0º,2º,4º,6º,8º,10º,12º,14º,16º,18º,20º, was simulated by the custom made apparatus. Each hole of the apparatus represented a specific varus angle. A bolt was used to fix the specimen at a desired varus angle.

The four threaded polyethylene pillar were utilized to connect the top plate and to apply compressive forces. Sensor cells were placed in each pillar, boxes with screens were connected to each sensor cell, the real-time force could be read and recorded on the screen. Springs were placed right above each force sensor, then followed by nuts, compressive forces can be generated by twisting the nut on the spring.

The sensor pads(Model 6900, TekScan, Inc., South Boston, MA), with each pad measuring 14*14mm, each pad had 121 senels(11*11 sensels), the column and row spacing was 1.3mm, resulting in a spatial resolution of 0.62 mm²per sensel. Two pads were put side by side within the ankle joint for the measurement of ankle joint pressure. The sensor pads were inserted into the ankle joint from anterior and secured by thumbtacks to the distal tibial metaphysis and the foot in order to avoid sensor motion during testing.[7, 8] The sensor pads were connected to the handle which could be further connected to a personal computer, data including pressure, force was collected using I-Scan software.(Figure 1)

The baseline ankle joint pressure distribution was collected for each specimen at 0º of tibial varus. The specimen was fixed at 0º of tibial varus by inserting a bolt, the foot was then placed onto the floor freely. A compressive force was generated through the 4 pillars by twisting the nuts. Make sure the top plate was horizontal throughout the testing. A 600N compressive force was applied to simulate the normal load across the ankle joint during ambulation. Both the medial and lateral ankle joint pressure data was collected. Then free the specimen by removing the bolt and then the top plate of the fixture was lifted upward, followed by 2º of tibial varus, then 4º,6º,8º,10º,12º,14º,16º,18º,20º. Both the medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint pressure data were collected for each alignment.

Statistical analysis

SPSS V.23 software (IBM Inc. , New York) was used for the data analysis. Matlab was used for the calculation of shift of center of force(COF), the peak pressure(P_max) and the mean pressure(P_mean). The lateral shift of COF relative to the ankle joint was defined as positive, the medial shift was defined as negative. S-W test was used for the test of normality. Paired student t test was utilized to determine the significant differences for lateral shift of COF, change of P_max and P_meanat different tibial varus deformities. The level of significance was set to a p value <0.05.

The COF shift

As the tibial varus progressed, the center of force shifted laterally both for medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint. The maximum lateral shift of medial COF was noticed at 6º[2.76(1.46)mm, p=0.001] and 8º[2.76(1.62)mm, p=0.002], while the maximum lateral shift of lateral COF was noticed at 12º[2.11(1.19)mm, p=0.002] when compared with 0º of tibial varus. Then the COF shifted medially as the tibial varus progressed.(Figure 2) The lateral shift of medial aspect COF was -1.46(1.08)mm at 20º of tibial varus, significant difference was found between 8º and 20º, p=0.001. The lateral shift of lateral aspect of COF was 0.65(0.69)mm at 20º of tibial varus, significant difference was found between 12º and 20º of tibial varus, p=0.026.(Figure 3)

The P_max

As the tibial varus progressed, it seemed that the P_max on both medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint decreased gradually, it was 5303.4(1105.1)kPa at 0º and 4432.1(948.6)kPa at 20º for medial aspect of the ankle joint, significant difference was found for the medial P_maxat 0º and 20º of tibial varus, p=0.045. However, it was 5135.5(1095.3)kPa at 0º and 4279.4(666.9)kPa at 20º for lateral aspect of the ankle joint, no significant difference was found for the lateral P_maxat 0º and 20º of tibial varus, p=0.116.

The P_mean

The P_meanfor medial aspect of the ankle joint was 2266.4(672.7)kPa at 0º, 1891.2(563.9)kPa at 10º and 1618.7(421.5)kPa at 20º. When compared with baseline mean pressure at 0º, significant differences were found for both 10º and 20º. The P_meanfor medial aspect of the ankle joint decreased as the tibial varus progressed.(Figure 4) For lateral aspect of the ankle joint, the P_mean was 2103.8(625.1)kPa at 0º, 2295.3(589.7)kPa at 8º and 1748.9(467.2)kPa at 20º of tibial varus. Significant differences were found between the P_meanat 0º and 8º(p=0.047), the P_meanat 8º and 20º(p=0.002). The P_meanfor the lateral aspect of the ankle joint increased at 8º and then decreased at 20º of tibial varus.(Figure 5)

The lateral joint pressure ratio

In order to investigate the joint pressure change on the medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint, we introduce the lateral joint pressure ratio, it was a ratio of the lateral mean pressure divided by the whole joint mean pressure. The lateral joint pressure ratio was 0.481(0.125) at 0º, 0.548(0.108) at 10º and 0.517(0.101) at 20º. Significant differences were found between 0º and 10º(p=0.002), 10º and 20º (p=0.002) of tibial varus. The lateral joint pressure ratio increased at 10º of tibial varus and then converted to decrease as the tibial varus progressed.(Figure 6)

It has been widely recognized that varus ankle deformity is associated with varus type ankle osteoarthritis.[9-11] We assume that the prolonged exposure to eccentric loading on the medial side of the joint creates stress concentration on medial articular surface of the ankle joint and the continuous eccentric loading may result in degenerative changes of the cartilage and developing osteoarthritis.

However, according to our biomechanical study, we failed to find any medial stress concentration as tibial varus progressed to 20º. The P_max on both medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint decreased as the tibial varus progressed. And the P_meanfor medial aspect of the ankle joint also decreased as the tibial varus progressed, from 2266.4(672.7)kPa at 0º and 1618.7(421.5)kPa at 20º of tibial varus. Oneda and colleagues[5] reported a similar result, they performed a biomechanical investigation using a rigid-body spring model and concluded that varus deformity of the distal joint surface of tibia by itself does not result in medial stress concentration in the ankle. So, why the opposite is observed?

Hayashi and colleagues[5] retrospectively reviewed 133 ankles in 80 patients(OA group) and 62 ankles in 50 subjects(control group). The weightbearing X-rays were investigated, and they concluded that the valgus inclination of the subtalar joint progressed until the intermediate stage and converted to varus position at the later stage. Wang and colleagues[5] retrospectively investigated the X-rays of 233 ankles in 226 patients and 60 ankles from 60 subjects. They concluded that the subtalar joint often compensated for the malaligned ankle in static weightbearing, however, the compensatory mechanism often relied on the health condition of the subtalar joint, the healthier the subtalar joint, the more it could compensate for the malaligned ankle joint. Krahenbuhl and colleague[5] retrospectively investigated subtalar joint alignment of 88 patients and 27 healthy volunteers in different stages of ankle OA using weightbearing CT scans. A more valgus subtalar joint alignment was found in patients with varus ankle OA, compensation did not correlate with the stage of ankle OA.

These studies also demonstrated that the subtalar joint does compensate for the varus ankle deformity. However, they failed to explain how this compensatory mechanism happened and whether this compensation would alter the joint pressure distribution within the ankle joint? The aim of this biomechanical study was to investigate the detailed ankle joint pressure for varus tibia malalignment at a series of different deformities angles.

We found a lateral shift of COF and lateral stress concentration for mild varus deformities. As the tibial varus progressed from 0º to 20º, the COF of both medial and lateral aspect of the ankle joint shifted laterally till around 10º of tibial varus, and then shifted medially as the tibial varus progressed. The mean pressure of the lateral aspect of the ankle joint increased till about 10º of tibial varus, and then decreased as the tibial varus progressed. This could be caused by a valgus inclination of subtalar joint. The subtalar joint played a significant role in maintaining the talus in its normal relationship to the tibia, it acted as a torque transmitter and compensates for tibial varus deformities.[12-14] As calcaneus was in contact with the ground, the subtalar joint would compensate for the varus tilted ankle joint in order to maintain a normal hindfoot alignment. This valgus inclination of calcaneus might result in stress concentration on the lateral aspect of ankle joint and also lateral shift of center of force. Subtalar joint restriction could result in a decrease in lateral tibiotalar contact caused by the inhibition of calcaneal eversion.[5] So our biomechanical study favors previous studies, the subtalar joint might be compensating for the deformities above ankle joint, however, we failed to find a sudden medial stress concentration as the subtalar joint compensation fails. According to Hayashi and colleagues[5], they found that the valgus inclination of subtalar joint will convert into varus inclination as the varus ankle deformity increase, because of the failure of subtalar joint compensation. In this study, the maximum tibial varus deformity was 20º, further studies should be added to explore whether the medial stress concentration will occur as the the deformity angle is greater than 20º.

Varus malalignment of tibia after tibia fracture malunion often involved with a varus tilted ankle joint, the ankle joint is normally congruent, in these cases the subtalar joint might compensate for the varus ankle deformity. However, Xie and colleague[5] found that in woman as the knee mechanical axis became more varus, the distal tibial plafond became more valgus, but this correlation was not found in male patients. This study failed to tell the reason why difference was found between female and male, the subtalar joint was also not investigated in this study. Probably, as the varus knee OA is a chronic pathology, the valgus inclination of distal tibial plafond could be the compensatory mechanism in response to varus knee mechanical axis.

There are some limitations for this study. First, this is a preliminary study which only included the joint pressure data, the compensatory mechanism should be supported by adding the radiological data of the ankle and subtalar joint(including CT data and weightbearing X-rays), these will make our findings more convincible. Further studies are needed to fully understand the compensatory mechanism of subtalar joint for varus tibia malalignment. Second limitation is that this is a static simulated weightbearing biomechanical study, the ankle and subtalar joint biomechanics might act differently in vivo, we also neglected the tendon forces around the ankle joint in this study.

We found a lateral shift of COF and lateral stress concentration for mild tibial varus and medial shift of center of force for greater deformities, these might be the valgus inclination of subtalar joint in compensation for the varus tibial malalignment. However, further biomechanical studies are needed to fully understand the subtalar joint compensatory mechanism for varus tibial malalignment.

List of abbreviations

COF, Center of force ; OA, Osteoarthritis ;

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University

School of Medicine. Written consent to donate their body was obtained from the individuals and their body was indeed donated only for research or scientific purposes.

Consent for publication

Written consent to publish the related images or clinical details of specimens was provided by donors included in the study.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting our findings was contained within the manuscript. And all data in this study was freely available to any researcher for noncommercial purposes.

Competing Interests

The authors have no conflict of interest

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant Number 201540102). The authors disclosed receipt of financial support from this research grant for the research and publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

YZ drafted the manuscript and performed the statistical analysis, XL helped to draft the manuscript and carried out the data collections, XX designed the study and helped to draft the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None

Rossi, R., D.E. Bonasia, and A. Amendola: The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2011. 19(10): p. 590-9.
Amis, A.A.: Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013. 21(1): p. 197-205.
McNamara, I., et al.: High tibial osteotomy: evolution of research and clinical applications--a Canadian experience. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013. 21(1): p. 23-31.
Herman, B.V. and J.R. Giffin: High tibial osteotomy in the ACL-deficient knee with medial compartment osteoarthritis. J Orthop Traumatol, 2016. 17(3): p. 277-85.
!!! INVALID CITATION !!! .
Krause, F., et al.: Ankle joint pressure in pes cavovarus. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007. 89(12): p. 1660-5.
Krause, F.G., et al.: Ankle joint pressure changes in a pes cavovarus model after lateralizing calcaneal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int, 2010. 31(9): p. 741-6.
Schmid, T., et al.: Ankle joint pressure changes in a pes cavovarus model: supramalleolar valgus osteotomy versus lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int, 2013. 34(9): p. 1190-7.
Takakura, Y., et al.: Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1995. 77(1): p. 50-4.
Stamatis, E.D., P.S. Cooper, and M.S. Myerson: Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int, 2003. 24(10): p. 754-64.
Hintermann, B., M. Knupp, and A. Barg: Supramalleolar Osteotomies for the Treatment of Ankle Arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2016. 24(7): p. 424-32.
Ting, A.J., et al.: The role of subtalar motion and ankle contact pressure changes from angular deformities of the tibia. Foot Ankle, 1987. 7(5): p. 290-9.
Mullaji, A. and G.M. Shetty: Persistent hindfoot valgus causes lateral deviation of weightbearing axis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011. 469(4): p. 1154-60.
Norton, A.A., et al.: Correlation of knee and hindfoot deformities in advanced knee OA: compensatory hindfoot alignment and where it occurs. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015. 473(1): p. 166-74.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 04 Mar, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders →

Editorial decision: Major revision
26 Jan, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
24 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
13 Jan, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
03 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
02 Jan, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
30 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
03 Dec, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
02 Dec, 2019
Editor invited by journal
02 Dec, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Ankle Joint Pressure Change in Varus Malalignment of Tibia

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

background

methods

results

Discussion

Conclusions

declarations

references

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1