1. van Elmpt W, Ollers M, Dingemans A-MC, et al (2012) Response Assessment Using 18F-FDG PET Early in the Course of Radiotherapy Correlates with Survival in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Nucl Med 53:1514–1520. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.102566
2. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Sch�tt P, et al (2004) FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1375-y
3. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al (2008) Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology. J Nucl Med 49:480–508. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.047787
4. Weber WA, Schwaiger M, Avril N (2000) Quantitative assessment of tumor metabolism using FDG-PET imaging. Nucl Med Biol 27:683–7
5. Bailly C, Bodet-Milin C, Bourgeois M, et al (2019) Exploring Tumor Heterogeneity Using PET Imaging: The Big Picture. Cancers (Basel) 11:1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091282
6. Kramer GM, Frings V, Hoetjes N, et al (2016) Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med 57:1343–1349. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170225
7. Pfaehler E, Mesotten L, Kramer G, et al (2021) Repeatability of two semi-automatic artificial intelligence approaches for tumor segmentation in PET. EJNMMI Res 11:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00744-9
8. T. Berghmans, M. Dusart J sculier et al. (2008) Primary Tumor Standardized Uptake Value ( SUV max ) Measured on Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( FDG-PET ) is of Prognostic Value for Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer ( NSCLC ). J Thorac Oncol 3:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e6d6b
9. Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, et al (2017) Characterization of PET / CT images using texture analysis : the past , the present … any future ? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3427-0
10. Biehl KJ, Kong F-M, Dehdashti F, et al (2006) 18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate? J Nucl Med 47:1808–1812. https://doi.org/47/11/1808 [pii]
11. Pfaehler E, van Sluis J, Merema BBJ, et al (2020) Experimental Multicenter and Multivendor Evaluation of the Performance of PET Radiomic Features Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Phantom Inserts. J Nucl Med 61:469–476. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229724
12. Kuhnert G, Boellaard R, Sterzer S, et al (2016) Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3165-8
13. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA (2004) Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med 45:1519–27
14. Kaalep A, Sera T, Rijnsdorp S, et al (2018) Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3977-4
15. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, et al (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:328–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
16. Kaalep A, Burggraaff CN, Pieplenbosch S, et al (2019) Quantitative implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET-CT performance standards. EJNMMI Phys 6:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-019-0257-8
17. Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, et al (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4
18. Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, et al (2017) EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3740-2
19. Verwer EE, Golla SS V., Kaalep A, et al (2021) Harmonisation of PET/CT contrast recovery performance for brain studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:2856–2870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05201-w