[1] Martinopoulos G, Tsilingiridis G, Kyriakis N. Identification of the environmental impact from the use of different materials in domestic solar hot water systems. Appl Energy 2013;102:545–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2012.08.035.
[2] Comodi G, Bevilacqua M, Caresana F, Pelagalli L, Venella P, Paciarotti C. LCA Analysis of Renewable Domestic Hot Water Systems with Unglazed and Glazed Solar Thermal Panels. Energy Procedia 2014;61:234–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2014.11.1096.
[3] Shah TR, Ali HM. Applications of hybrid nanofluids in solar energy, practical limitations and challenges: A critical review. Sol Energy 2019;183:173–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2019.03.012.
[4] Coimbra J, Almeida M. Challenges and benefits of building sustainable cooperative housing. Build Environ 2013;62:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2013.01.003.
[5] Eidan AA, AlSahlani A, Ahmed AQ, Al-fahham M, Jalil JM. Improving the performance of heat pipe-evacuated tube solar collector experimentally by using Al2O3 and CuO/acetone nanofluids. Sol Energy 2018;173:780–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2018.08.013.
[6] Chopra K, Pathak AK, Tyagi V V., Pandey AK, Anand S, Sari A. Thermal performance of phase change material integrated heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector system: An experimental assessment. Energy Convers Manag 2020;203:112205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2019.112205.
[7] Jowzi M, Veysi F, Sadeghi G. Experimental and numerical investigations on the thermal performance of a modified evacuated tube solar collector: Effect of the bypass tube. Sol Energy 2019;183:725–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2019.03.063.
[8] Yurddaş A. Optimization and thermal performance of evacuated tube solar collector with various nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020;152:119496. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2020.119496.
[9] Zhang X, You S, Xu W, Wang M, He T, Zheng X. Experimental investigation of the higher coefficient of thermal performance for water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters in China. Energy Convers Manag 2014;78:386–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2013.10.070.
[10] Naik BK, Bhowmik M, Muthukumar P. Experimental investigation and numerical modelling on the performance assessments of evacuated U – Tube solar collector systems. Renew Energy 2019;134:1344–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.09.066.
[11] Mercan M, Yurddaş A. Numerical analysis of evacuated tube solar collectors using nanofluids. Sol Energy 2019;191:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2019.08.074.
[12] Li Q, Gao W, Lin W, Liu T, Zhang Y, Ding X, et al. Experiment and simulation study on convective heat transfer of all-glass evacuated tube solar collector. Renew Energy 2020;152:1129–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2020.01.089.
[13] Alfaro-Ayala JA, López-Núñez OA, Gómez-Castro FI, Ramírez-Minguela JJ, Uribe-Ramírez AR, Belman-Flores JM, et al. Optimization of a solar collector with evacuated tubes using the simulated annealing and computational fluid dynamics. Energy Convers Manag 2018;166:343–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.039.
[14] Yao K, Li T, Tao H, Wei J, Feng K. Performance Evaluation of All-glass Evacuated Tube Solar Water Heater with Twist Tape Inserts Using CFD. Energy Procedia 2015;70:332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.131.
[15] Essa MA, Mostafa NH. Theoretical and experimental study for temperature distribution and flow profile in all water evacuated tube solar collector considering solar radiation boundary condition. Sol Energy 2017;142:267–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.035.
[16] Alfaro-ayala JA, Martínez-rodríguez G, Picón-núñez M, Uribe-ramírez AR, Gallegos-muñoz A. Numerical study of a low temperature water-in-glass evacuated tube solar collector. Energy Convers Manag 2015;94:472–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.091.
[17] Mazarrón FR, Porras-Prieto CJ, García JL, Benavente RM. Feasibility of active solar water heating systems with evacuated tube collector at different operational water temperatures. Energy Convers Manag 2016;113:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2016.01.046.
[18] Sharafeldin MA. Evacuated tube solar collector performance using CeO 2 / water nano fl uid 2018;185:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.054.
[19] Ozsoy A, Corumlu V. Thermal performance of a thermosyphon heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector using silver-water nanofluid for commercial applications. Renew Energy 2018;122:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.01.031.
[20] Gan YY, Ong HC, Ling TC, Zulkifli NWM, Wang CT, Yang YC. Thermal conductivity optimization and entropy generation analysis of titanium dioxide nanofluid in evacuated tube solar collector. Appl Therm Eng 2018;145:155–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2018.09.012.
[21] Dehaj MS, Mohiabadi MZ. Experimental investigation of heat pipe solar collector using MgO nanofluids. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2019;191:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2018.10.025.
[22] Yan S, Wang F, Shi ZG, Tian R. Heat transfer property of SiO2/water nanofluid flow inside solar collector vacuum tubes. Appl Therm Eng 2017;118:385–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.02.108.
[23] Sharafeldin MA, Gróf G, Abu-Nada E, Mahian O. Evacuated tube solar collector performance using copper nanofluid: Energy and environmental analysis. Appl Therm Eng 2019;162:114205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2019.114205.
[24] Bejan A. A Study of Entropy Generation in Fundamental Convective Heat Transfer. J Heat Transfer 1979;101:718–25. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3451063.
[25] Kaushik SC, Reddy VS, Tyagi SK. Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011;15:1857–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2010.12.007.
[26] López A, Ibáñez G, Pantoja J, Moreira J, Lastres O. Entropy generation analysis of MHD nanofluid flow in a porous vertical microchannel with nonlinear thermal radiation, slip flow and convective-radiative boundary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2017;107:982–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2016.10.126.
[27] Leong KY, Saidur R, Mahlia TMI, Yau YH. Entropy generation analysis of nanofluid flow in a circular tube subjected to constant wall temperature. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2012;39:1169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2012.06.009.
[28] Ramírez-Minguela JJ, Alfaro-Ayala JA, Rangel-Hernández VH, Uribe-Ramírez AR, Mendoza-Miranda JM, Pérez-García V, et al. Comparison of the thermo-hydraulic performance and the entropy generation rate for two types of low temperature solar collectors using CFD. Sol Energy 2018;166:123–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2018.03.050.
[29] Xu L, Wang Z, Yuan G, Li X, Ruan Y. A new dynamic test method for thermal performance of all-glass evacuated solar air collectors. Sol Energy 2012;86:1222–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2012.01.015.
[30] Sato AI, Scalon VL, Padilha A. Numerical analysis of a modified evacuated tubes solar collector. Renew Energy Power Qual J 2012;1:384–9. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj10.322.
[31] Jowzi M, Veysi F, Sadeghi G. Experimental and numerical investigations on the thermal performance of a modified evacuated tube solar collector: Effect of the bypass tube. Sol Energy 2019;183:725–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.063.
[32] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Papadopoulos A. Enhancing the performance of a linear Fresnel reflector using nanofluids and internal finned absorber. J Therm Anal Calorim 2019;135:237–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-6989-1.
[33] Bejan A, Kestin J. Entropy Generation Through Heat and Fluid Flow. J Appl Mech 1983;50:475–475. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3167072.