1.
Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni
G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU et al: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after
robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012, 62(3):431-452.
2.
Khoury W, Jakowlev K, Fein A, Orenstein H, Nakache R, Weinbroum AA: Renal apoptosis following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in a rat model. J Urol 2008, 180(4):1554-1558.
3.
Wiesenthal JD, Fazio LM, Perks AE, Blew BD, Mazer D, Hare G, Honey RJ, Pace KT: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal tissue oxygenation and blood flow in a rat model. Urology 2011, 77(6):1508 e1509-1515.
4.
Bergman S, Nutting A, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Andrew CG, Demyttenaere S, Woo D,
Carli F, Jutras L, Buthieu J et al: Elucidating the relationship between cardiac preload and renal perfusion under pneumoperitoneum. Surgical endoscopy 2006, 20(5):794-800.
5.
Demyttenaere SV, Taqi A, Polyhronopoulos GN, Bergman S, Stanbridge DD, Unikowsky B,
Carli F, Fried GM, Feldman LS: Targeting individual hemodynamics to maintain renal perfusion during pneumoperitoneum
in a porcine model. Surgery 2007, 142(3):350-356.
6.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in
mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37(9):2642-2647.
7.
Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, Costecalde M, Fleyfel M, Onimus J, Lebuffe G, Chambon
JP, Vallet B: Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation
during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103(5):678-684.
8.
Cinnella G, Grasso S, Spadaro S, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Salatto P, De Capraris A,
Nappi L, Greco P, Dambrosio M: Effects of recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory
mechanics and transpulmonary pressure during laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology 2013, 118(1):114-122.
9.
Bliacheriene F, Machado SB, Fonseca EB, Otsuke D, Auler JO, Jr., Michard F: Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51(9):1268-1272.
10.
Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, Hanss R, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein
B: Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted
by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009, 37(2):650-658.
11.
Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP: Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal
pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 2011, 15(1):R33.
12.
Hoiseth LO, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkeboen KA: Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic
surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012, 56(6):777-786.
13.
Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H: Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts
fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2014, 112(4):660-664.
14.
Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret
E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY et al: A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(5):428-437.
15.
Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic
O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Gunay E et al: Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications
in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis
of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med 2016, 4(4):272-280.
16.
Park SJ, Kim BG, Oh AH, Han SH, Han HS, Ryu JH: Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications
in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Surgical endoscopy 2016, 30(10):4598-4606.
17.
Kim HK, Pinsky MR: Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration, and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure
and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008, 36(10):2858-2862.
18.
Diaz F, Erranz B, Donoso A, Salomon T, Cruces P: Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation
during experimental intra-abdominal hypertension. BMC Anesthesiol 2015, 15:127.
19.
Min JJ, Gil NS, Lee JH, Ryu DK, Kim CS, Lee SM: Predictor of fluid responsiveness in the 'grey zone': augmented pulse pressure variation
through a temporary increase in tidal volume. Br J Anaesth 2017, 119(1):50-56.
20.
Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL: The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal
Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med 2017, 45(3):415-421.
21.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative
S: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)
statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007, 370(9596):1453-1457.
22.
Linares-Perdomo O, East TD, Brower R, Morris AH: Standardizing Predicted Body Weight Equations for Mechanical Ventilation Tidal Volume
Settings. Chest 2015, 148(1):73-78.
23.
Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P: Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial
surgery. Br J Anaesth 2008, 100(2):245-250.
24.
Zhang J, Critchley LA, Huang L: Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison
with Doppler ultrasound. Br J Anaesth 2015, 115(3):392-402.
25.
Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, Diouf M, Badoux L, Bernard E, Lorne E, Dupont
H: Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict
fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110(1):28-33.
26.
Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A, Fleischmann E, Hetz
H: Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis
to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103(3):346-351.
27.
Gouvea G, Diaz R, Auler L, Toledo R, Martinho JM: Evaluation of the pulse pressure variation index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness
during orthotopic liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103(2):238-243.
28.
Wilkman E, Kuitunen A, Pettila V, Varpula M: Fluid responsiveness predicted by elevation of PEEP in patients with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014, 58(1):27-35.
29.
Yang SY, Shim JK, Song Y, Seo SJ, Kwak YL: Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid
responsiveness in patients in the prone position. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110(5):713-720.
30.
Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A: What is a fluid challenge? Current opinion in critical care 2011, 17(3):290-295.
31.
Hong DM, Lee JM, Seo JH, Min JJ, Jeon Y, Bahk JH: Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing
patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing. Anaesthesia 2014, 69(7):717-722.
32.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86(2):420-428.
33.
Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, Pottecher J, Lakhal K,
Benzekri-Lefevre D, Molinari N et al: Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness
in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 2014, 18(6):587.
34.
Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L: Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000, 44(7):834-841.
35.
Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T, Matsuura T, Mori T, Nishikawa K: Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac
system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth 2013, 111(2):170-177.
36.
Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, Kemming GI, Kronas N, Goetz AE, Reuter DA: Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of
cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98(5):591-597.
37.
Caillard A, Gayat E, Tantot A, Dubreuil G, M'Bakulu E, Madadaki C, Bart F, Bresson
D, Froelich S, Mebazaa A et al: Comparison of cardiac output measured by oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography or pulse
pressure contour wave analysis. Br J Anaesth 2015, 114(6):893-900.
38.
Henny CP, Hofland J: Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surgical endoscopy 2005, 19(9):1163-1171.
39.
Jardin F, Genevray B, Brun-Ney D, Bourdarias JP: Influence of lung and chest wall compliances on transmission of airway pressure to
the pleural space in critically ill patients. Chest 1985, 88(5):653-658.
40.
Lai HY, Yang CC, Huang FY, Lee Y, Kuo YL, Kuo TB: Respiratory-related arterial pressure variability as an indicator of graded blood
loss: involvement of the autonomic nervous system. Clin Sci (Lond) 2003, 105(4):491-497.
41.
Lai HY, Yang CC, Cheng CF, Huang FY, Lee Y, Shyr MH, Kuo TB: Effect of esmolol on positive-pressure ventilation-induced variations of arterial
pressure in anaesthetized humans. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004, 107(3):303-308.
42.
Robotham JL, Wise RA, Bromberger-Barnea B: Effects of changes in abdominal pressure on left ventricular performance and regional
blood flow. Crit Care Med 1985, 13(10):803-809.
43.
Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA: Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 2009, 109(2):340-353.
44.
Dark PM, Singer M: The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output
in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30(11):2060-2066.