Background characteristics of study participants
Overall, 271 respondents participated in the study. Their mean age was 57 (SD = 0.76) years which ranged from 22 to 86 years. Most of the respondents were females 211 (77.9%), 145 (53.5%) were currently married and 103 (38.0%) identified themselves as Catholics. As shown in Table 1, about 43% (117) were unemployed, 127 (46.9%) attained at least secondary level education and close to three-quarters (75.7%) were urban dwellers. Eighty-three (30.6%) of the respondents had been diagnosed with hypertension for more than 10 years while only 48 (17.7%) had the disease for less than two years.
Social demographic characteristics of participants with uncontrolled versus controlled BP
The mean systolic and diastolic BP readings were 146.0mmHg (95% CI: 142.0, 149.0) and 66.4mmHg (95% CI: 99.8, 135.2) respectively. The overall proportion of uncontrolled BP was 44.7% (95% CI: 38.7, 50.6%). There was no statistically significant difference between uncontrolled and controlled BP in terms of sex, age, marital status, religion, rural residence, level of education, employment status and duration with hypertension as shown in Table 1.
However, participants whose blood pressure were not controlled were more likely to reside in rural dwellings and have no formal education.
Table 1. Social demographic characteristics of participants with uncontrolled BP versus controlled BP
Back ground factors
|
Frequency (%)
N=271
|
Blood pressure control
|
Odds ratio (CI)
|
p-value
|
|
|
Uncontrolled BP
n (%)
|
Controlled BP
n (%)
|
|
|
Sex
Male
Female
|
60 (22.1)
211 (77.9)
|
35 (23.3)
115 (76.7)
|
25 (20.7)
96 (79.3)
|
reference
0.86 (0.48-1.52)
|
0.598
|
Age
≤34years
35-44 years
45-54 years
55-64 years
65 and above
|
10 (3.7)
38 (14.0)
55 (20.3)
100 (36.9)
68 (25.1)
|
5 (3.3)
18 (12.0)
30 (20.0)
55 (36.7)
42 (28.0)
|
5 (4.1)
20 (16.5)
25 (20.7)
45 (37.2)
26 (21.5)
|
reference
0.90 (0.22-3.62)
1.20 (0.31-4.62)
1.22 (0.33-4.49)
1.62 (0.43-6.12)
|
0.882
0.791
0.762
0.481
|
Marital Status
Single
Married
Divorced/Separated
Widowed
|
11 (4.1)
145 (53.5)
70 (25.8)
45 (16.6)
|
6 (4.0)
81 (54.0)
40 (26.7)
23 (15.3)
|
5 (4.1)
64 (52.9)
30 (24.8)
22 (18.2)
|
reference
1.05 (0.31-3.61)
1.11 (0.31-3.99)
0.87 (0.23-3.27)
|
0.932
0.872
0.838
|
Residence
Urban
Rural
|
205 (75.6)
66 (24.4)
|
118 (78.7)
32 (21.3)
|
87 (71.9)
34 (28.1)
|
reference
0.69 (0.40-1.21)
|
0.198*
|
Religion
Catholic
Anglican
Muslims
Pentecostal
Others
|
103 (38.0)
83 (30.6)
52 (19.2)
24 (8.9)
9 (3.3
|
53 (35.3)
42 (28.0)
29 (19.3)
18 (12.0)
8 (5.33)
|
50 (41.3)
41 (33.9)
23 (19.0)
6 (5.0)
1 (0.8)
|
0.13 (0.02-1.10)
0.13 (0.02-1.07)
0.16 (0.02-1.35)
0.38 (0.04-3.65)
reference
|
0.054*
|
Employment Status
Employment
Unemployed
|
154 (56.8)
117 (43.2)
|
82 (54.67)
68 (45.33)
|
72 (59.50)
49 (40.50)
|
reference
1.22 (0.75-1.98)
|
0.424
|
Level of Education
No formal
Primary level
Secondary level
Tertiary
|
75 (27.7)
69 (25.5)
54 (19.9)
73 (26.9)
|
50 (33.3)
34 (22.7)
31 (20.7)
35 (23.3)
|
25 (20.7)
35 (28.9)
23 (19.0)
38 (31.4)
|
reference
0.49 (0.25-0.95)
0.67 (0.33-1.39)
0.46 (0.24-0.89)
|
0.085*
|
Duration with hypertension
< 2years
2- < 5 years
5-10 years
More than 10years
|
48 (17.7)
68 (25.1)
72 (26.6)
83 (30.6)
|
26 (17.4)
38 (25.5)
40 (26.9)
45 (30.2)
|
22 (18.2)
30 (24.0)
32 (26.4)
38 (31.4)
|
reference
1.11 (0.53-2.34)
1.06 (0.51-2.20)
1.00 (0.49-2.04)
|
0.989
|
Dietary and lifestyle habits of respondents
Table 2 shows the dietary habits of respondents. Out of 271 participants, 243 (89.7%) did not add raw salt to their cooked food, 117 (43.2%) and 118 (43.5%) were eating fruits and vegetables on most days of the week respectively. One hundred thirteen (41.9%) of the respondents did not take dairy products at all, only 15 (5.5%) and 14 (5.2%) had not consumed nuts and grains respectively.
One hundred one (37.3%) of the respondents consumed fish at least once every week and only 4 (1.5%) consumed it every day. Fifty-three (19.6%) reported not to eat meat while about half of the respondents ate meat at least once every week (51.0%). One hundred fifty-three (56.0%) take sugar every day and 96 (35.4%) use vegetable oil while 101 (37.8%) use animal oil every day.
Only two participants (0.7%) were current smokers, and 45 (16.6%) reported that they drink alcohol on a daily basis. Over half of the patients (56.1%) were classified as having moderate levels of physical activity.
Dietary and lifestyle habits of participants with uncontrolled BP versus controlled BP
There was a higher proportion of participants who consumed raw salt in the uncontrolled BP group (16.0%) compared to only 4% in the controlled BP group. The odds of having uncontrolled BP was 5.57 among participants who consumed raw salt compared to those who did not (p=0.002). Similarly, there was a higher proportion of participants who did not consume fruits (64.7%) and vegetables (63.3%) every day in the un controlled group compared to the controlled BP group (43.0% and 46.3%) respectively. Inadequate consumption of fruits and vegetables had twice the odds of uncontrolled BP compared to adequate consumption (p=0.000 and p=0.005) respectively. Also, participants who consumed fish less than two servings a week were more likely to have uncontrolled BP (p=0.014). Participants who consumed red meat in a week were more likely to have uncontrolled BP as compared to those who did not, though the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.137).
Among the lifestyle habits of participants, smoking and inadequate physical activity were associated with uncontrolled BP while alcohol consumption had no association with BP control status. The categories “formerly smoked” and “current smoker” were merged due to low frequencies (n=14 and n=2, respectively) and this category was found to be associated with uncontrolled BP (p=0.044). There were higher percentages of no physical activity in the uncontrolled BP group (6.0%) compared to the controlled BP group (48.8%). Inadequate physical activity had 1.7 odds of uncontrolled BP compared to adequate physical activity and the difference between these groups was statistically significant (p=0.030). See Table 2.
Table 2: Dietary and lifestyle habits of participants with uncontrolled BP versus controlled BP
Diet and lifestyle
|
n (%)
|
Blood pressure control
|
Odds ratio (CI)
|
p-value
|
|
|
Uncontrolled BP n (%)
|
Controlled BP n (%)
|
|
|
Raw salt
|
|
|
|
|
|
No intake
|
243 (89.7)
|
126 (84.0)
|
117 (96.7)
|
reference
|
|
Raw salt Intake
|
28 (10.3)
|
24 (16.0)
|
4 (3.3)
|
5.57 (1.88-16.54)
|
0.002*
|
Fruits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyday
|
122 (45.0)
|
53 (35.3)
|
69 (57.0)
|
reference
|
|
<7days/week
|
149 (55.0)
|
97 (64.7)
|
52 (43.0)
|
2.43 (1.49-3.97)
|
0.000*
|
Vegetables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every day
|
120 (44.3)
|
55 (36.7)
|
65 (53.7)
|
reference
|
|
<7days/week
|
151 (55.7)
|
95 (63.3)
|
56 (46.3)
|
2.00 (1.23-3.27)
|
0.005*
|
Dairy products
|
|
|
|
|
|
≤1 cup of milk/day
|
232 (85.6)
|
126 (84.0)
|
106 (87.6)
|
reference
|
|
> 1 cup of milk/day
|
39 (14.4)
|
24 (16.0)
|
15 (12.4)
|
1.35 (0.67-2.7)
|
0.402
|
Nuts/ Seeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-5 serving/week
|
252 (93.0)
|
139 (92.7)
|
113 (93.4)
|
reference
|
|
<4serving/week
|
19 (7.0)
|
11 (7.3)
|
8 (6.6)
|
1.12 (0.43-2.87)
|
0.817
|
Grains
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-5servings/day
|
256 (94.5)
|
140 (93.3)
|
116 (95.9)
|
1.66 (0.55-4.99)
|
0.369
|
<4 serving/day
|
15 (5.6)
|
10 (6.7)
|
5 (4.1)
|
reference
|
|
Fish/poultry
|
|
|
|
|
|
≥2serving/week
|
110 (40.6)
|
51 (34.0)
|
59 (48.8)
|
reference
|
|
<2 serving/week
|
161 (59.4)
|
99 (66.0)
|
62 (51.2)
|
1.85 (1.13-3.02)
|
0.014*
|
Diet and lifestyle
|
n (%)
|
Blood pressure control
|
Odds ratio (CI)
|
p-value
|
|
|
Uncontrolled BP n (%)
|
Controlled BP
n (%)
|
|
Red meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not take red meat
|
88 (32.5)
|
43 (28.7)
|
45 (37.2)
|
reference
|
Consume red meat
|
183 (67.5)
|
107 (71.3)
|
76 (62.8)
|
1.47 (0.88-2.46)
|
0.137*
|
Vegetable oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily serving
|
102 (37.6)
|
53 (35.3)
|
49 (40.5)
|
reference
|
Once in a while
|
169 (62.4)
|
97 (64.7)
|
72 (59.5)
|
0.80 (0.49-1.32)
|
0.383
|
Animal oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not use
|
168 (62.0)
|
88 (58.7)
|
80 (66.1)
|
reference
|
Use animal oil
|
103 (38.0)
|
62 (41.3)
|
41 (33.9)
|
0.73 (0.44-1.20)
|
0.210
|
Smoking
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never smoked
|
255 (94.1)
|
137 (91.3)
|
118 (97.5)
|
reference
|
Ever smoked
|
16 (5.9)
|
13 (8.7)
|
3 (2.5)
|
3.73 (1.04-13.41)
|
0.044*
|
Alcohol intake
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- alcohol use
|
222 (81.9)
|
122 (81.3)
|
100 (82.6)
|
reference
|
Alcohol use
|
49 (18.1)
|
28 (18.7)
|
21 (17.4)
|
1.09 (0.59-2.04)
|
0.780
|
Physical activity
|
|
|
|
|
Ad. physical activity
|
119 (43.9)
|
57 (38.0)
|
62 (51.2)
|
Reference
|
No physical activity 152 (56.1)
|
93(62.0)
|
59(48.8)
|
1.71(1.06-2.88)
|
0.030*
|
Clinical characteristics of study participants
Eight (3.0%) of the respondents were underweight, 89 (32.8%) were of normal weight while the rest (64.2%) were either overweight or obese. Over half (62.4%) of the patients were classified as having good adherence to prescribed hypertensive medications.
Of all the respondents, 82 (30.3%), 98 (36.2%), 35 (12.9%) had heart problems, diabetes mellitus, and other diseases (like kidney diseases) respectively which may be related to high percentage of participants having hypertension for more than 10 years. Ninety-one (33.6%) of the respondents did not have any known comorbidity.
Clinical characteristics of participants with uncontrolled BP versus controlled BP
There was a higher proportion of overweight participants in the uncontrolled BP group (38.6%) compared to the controlled group (23.1%) while the proportion of participants with normal body mass index in the controlled group was much higher (38.8%) than in the uncontrolled group (28.0%). Overweight had twice the odds of uncontrolled BP compared to normal weight and the difference between these groups was statistically significant (p=0.007).
Study participants with good adherence were more likely to have controlled BP levels (74.4% of patients with controlled blood pressure had good adherence levels). The odds of having uncontrolled BP among poor adherent participants were 2.61 compared to those who were fully adherent (p<0.000).
Slightly higher percentages of participants in the uncontrolled BP group had heart problems and diabetes (32.0%), (37.0%), compared to those in the controlled group (28.1%), (34.7%) respectively. However, the differences found between these groups were not statistically significant. Table 3
Table 3: Clinical characteristics by blood pressure control status
Factor
|
Frequency (%)
|
Blood pressure control
|
Odds ratio (CI)
|
p-value
|
|
|
Uncontrolled BP n (%)
|
Controlled BP
n (%)
|
|
|
BMI
Underweight
Normal weight
Over weight
Obese
|
8 (3.0)
89 (32.8)
86 (31.7)
88 (32.5)
|
2 (1.3)
42 (28.0)
58 (38.6)
48 (32.0)
|
6 (5.0)
47 (38.8)
28 (23.1)
40 (33.1)
|
0.37 (0.71-1.95)
reference
2.32 (1.25-4.28)
1.34 (0.74-2.42)
|
0.242
0.007*
0.328
|
Adherence to hypertensive drugs
Adherence
Non- adherence
|
169 (62.4)
102 (37.6)
|
79 (52.67)
71 (47.33)
|
90 (74.4)
31 (25.62)
|
reference
2.61 (1.55-4.38)
|
0.000*
|
Co-morbidities
Heart problems
Diabetes
Other diseases
No comorbidity
|
82 (30.3)
98 (36.2)
35 (12.9)
91 (33.6)
|
48 (32.00)
56 (37.3)
17 (11.3)
48 (32.0)
|
34 (28.1)
42 (34.7)
14 (11.6)
43 (35.5)
|
1.29 (0.66-2.52)
1.09 (0.48-2.03)
0.92 (0.41-2.47)
reference
|
0.465
0.666
0.840
|
Statistically significant variables at p<0.05
Factors associated with blood pressure control among hypertensive patients
Table 4 presents the adjusted estimates of the demographic, dietary, lifestyle and clinical characteristics of the respondents with their unadjusted estimates. Among the dietary factors, participants who consumed raw salt were 4.18 times more likely to have uncontrolled BP (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) =4.18, 95% CI: 1.32-13.24, p=0.015) as compared to those who did not. Similarly, participants who failed to consume fruits everyday were 2.18 more like to have un controlled BP compared to those who consumed fruits every day (AOR=2.18, 95% CI: 1.26-3.75, p=0.005). Among the clinical factors, participants who were overweight were 2.51 times more likely to have uncontrolled BP compared to their counterpart who were either underweight or had a normal body weight (AOR=2.52, 95% CI: 1.27-4.95, p=0.008). There was a positive association between being obese and having uncontrolled BP however this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.192). Similarly, participants who did not adhere to their anti-hypertensive medication were 1.82 times more likely to have uncontrolled BP compared to those who adhered to their medication (AOR=1.82, 95% CI: 1.03-3.21, p=0.039). Although religion, place of residence, level of education, eating vegetables less than 7 days/week, consumption of fish less than two serving a week, consumption of red meat every week, smoking and inadequate physical activity was strongly associated with blood pressure control in unadjusted analysis, the effects were moderated into non-significance in adjusted analysis.
Table 4: Factors associated with blood pressure control among hypertensive patients
Factors
|
Un adjusted OR (95%CI)
|
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
|
p value
|
Residence
Urban
Rural
|
reference
0.69 (0.40-1.21)
|
|
|
Religion
Catholic
Anglican
Muslim
Pentecostal
Others
|
0.13 (0.02-1.10)
0.13 (0.02-1.07)
0.16 (0.02-1.35)
0.38 (0.04-3.65)
reference
|
0.13 (0.01-1.13)
0.13 (0.01-1.20)
0.12 (0.01-1.15)
0.33 (0.03-0.48)
|
0.064
0.072
0.067
0.354
|
Raw salt
No intake
Intake of raw salt
|
reference
5.57 (1.88-16.54)
|
4.18 (1.32-13.24)
|
0.015*
|
Fruit intake
Everyday
<7days/week
|
reference
2.43 (1.49-3.97)
|
2.18 (1.26-3.75)
|
0.005*
|
Smoking
Never smoked
Ever smoked
|
reference
3.73 (1.04-13.41)
|
3.73 (0.95-14.67)
|
0.059
|
BMI
Underweight
Normal weight
Over weight
Obese
|
0.37 (0.07-1.95)
reference
2.32 (1.25-4.28)
1.34 (0.74-2.42)
|
0.47 (0.07-3.05)
2.51 (1.27-4.95)
1.54 (0.80-2.95)
|
0.431
0.008*
0.192
|
Adherence to drugs
Adherence
Non-adherence
|
reference
2.61 (1.55-4.38)
|
1.82 (1.03-3.21)
|
0.039*
|