A total of 86 participants met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the intervention and control groups (43 children in each group) and 80 children completed the study. Three participants from each group left the study during the follow-up period with these reasons: lack of motivation (n=4), taking medication (n=1), and migration (n=1). Therefore, 80 participants (40 in each group) were included in the statistical analyses. The study flow process is detailed in Figure 1.
With respect to the baseline characteristics, there were no significant differences in age, anthropometric measurements, sex, and parental education and occupation between the two groups (Table 2).
The baseline and after follow-up dietary macro and micro-nutrients, as well as their change values, are provided in Table 3. There was no difference in the two groups regarding the nutrients intake, at baseline. The mean changes in dietary total fat, fiber, pyridoxine, vitamin C, vitamin A, vitamin K, and potassium intakes were significantly increased in the DASH diet group (P < 0.05). Also, in the control group the energy, total fat, total carbohydrates, sugar, vitamin A, vitamin K, potassium and calcium intakes were significantly increased (P < 0.05). After the follow-up period, children in the DASH diet consumed higher amounts of protein, dietary fiber, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, pyridoxine, folate, vitamin C, vitamin K, potassium, calcium, and magnesium when compared to controls (P < 0.05). It should be noted that only the mean changes in dietary fiber and vitamin C intakes were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05).
The baseline and after intervention ADHD symptoms’ scores, assessed using ACS, SNAP-IV, and SDQ questionnaires are summarized in Table 4. There was no difference between the two groups at baseline (P > 0.05). After adjustment for age, sex, energy intake, and baseline values, both DASH and control diets led to significant improvements in scores based on all three questionnaires (P time < 0.05, Table 4). Whereas the group effect was significant for parent-reported ACS score (Pgroup = 0.05). However, no significant group effect was indicted in any subscales of the SNAP-IV questionnaire (Pgroup > 0.05). Significant group effects were also observed in some SDQ subscales including parent and child-reported scores of emotional symptoms and peer relationship problems, also the group effect for parent-reported scores of prosocial behavior was significant (Pgroup <0.05). A significant group*time effect was indicated in teacher-reported ACS score, teacher-reported HD and parent-reported combined score based on SNAP-IV questionnaire, and teacher and child-reported scores of hyperactivity, parent and teacher-reported scores of emotional symptoms, teacher reported scores of peer relationship problems and prosocial behavior, and also teacher, parent and child-reported total score according to reports based on SDQ scale (P group*time <0.05).
According to Table 5, after adjustment for possible confounders, the mean changes in ACS score were significantly higher in the DASH group when compared to the control group either for parents or teachers (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups based on SNAP-IV questionnaire. However, the reduction in mean hyperactivity score and the total SDQ score was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group, according to reports provided by parents, teachers, and children (P < 0.05). Furthermore, teachers reported more improvements in emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior in children assigned to DASH diet compared to those received the control diet (P<0.05).
The age, sex, energy intake, and baseline values-adjusted mean for ACS, combined subscale of SNAP-IV, and hyperactivity component of SDQ scores at baseline, months 1, 2 and 3 of follow-up are depicted in Supplemental Figures 1-3. The parents and teachers-reported ACS scores were significantly lower in the children assigned to the DASH diet at the second and the third months of the follow-up (Supplemental figure 1, P < 0.05). The total SNAP-IV score was significantly different only in scores provided by parents in the third month of follow-up (Supplemental figure 2, P<0.05). According to the parents, the SDQ hyperactivity score was significantly lower in the DASH group compared to the control group at the second and the third months of follow-up (Supplemental figure 3A, P < 0.05). The teachers and children-reported scores were significantly different in the third month of follow-up (Supplemental figures 3B and C, P < 0.05).