Andren H. Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology [Internet]. Ecological Society of America; 1992 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 1];73(3):794–804. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.2307/1940158
Batary P, Baladi A. Evidence of an Edge Effect on Avian Nest Success. Conserv. Biol. [Internet]. Blackwell Science Inc; 2004 Apr 1 [cited 2018 Jan 23];18(2):389–400. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00184.x
Bates JD, Davies KW. Effects of conifer treatments on soil nutrient availability and plant composition in sagebrush steppe. For. Ecol. Manage. 2017;400:631–44.
Bombaci S, Pejchar L. Consequences of pinyon and juniper woodland reduction for wildlife in North America. For. Ecol. Manage. 2016;365:34–50.
Brosh T, Adam S. Analysis of nesting nesting data at Ramat Hanadiv. Internal Report 2001-2010. 2012.
Browning DM, Archer SR, Asner GP, McClaran MP, Wessman CA. Woody plants in grasslands: Post-encroachment stand dynamics. Ecol. Appl. 2008;18(4):928–44.
Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR, Ratnaswamy MJ. Nest Predators and Fragmentation: a Review and Meta-Analysis. Conserv. Biol. [Internet]. Blackwell Science Inc; 2002 Apr 1 [cited 2018 Jan 24];16(2):306–18. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00308.x
Coates PS, Prochazka BG, Ricca MA, Gustafson K Ben, Ziegler P, Casazza ML. Pinyon and Juniper Encroachment into Sagebrush Ecosystems Impacts Distribution and Survival of Greater Sage-Grouse. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2017;70(1):25–38.
Davies KW, Bates JD. Restoring big sagebrush after controlling encroaching western juniper with fire: aspect and subspecies effects. Restor. Ecol. 2017;25(1):33–41.
DeGregorio B a, Weatherhead PJ, Sperry JH. Power lines, roads, and avian nest survival: effects on predator identity and predation intensity. Ecol. Evol. [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 2014 Nov 26];4(9):1589–600. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4063460&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
Dogra KS, Sood SK, Dobhal PK, Sharma S. Alien plant invasion and their impact on indigenous species diversity at global scale : A review. 2010;2(September):175–86.
Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. The Author(s); 2016 Aug;7:12485.
Elbroch M, Marks E (Eleanor M, Boretos CD. Bird tracks & sign : a guide to North American species. Stackpole Books; 2001.
Fuller RJ, Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Marchant JH, Wilson JD, Baillie SR, et al. Population Declines and Range Contractions among Lowland Farmland Birds in Britain. Conserv. Biol. [Internet]. Blackwell Science Inc; 1995 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 19];9(6):1425–41. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061425.x
Gates JE, Gysel LW. Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field-Forest Ecotones. Ecology [Internet]. Ecological Society of America; 1978 Aug [cited 2016 Oct 19];59(5):871–83. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.2307/1938540
Glasser TA, Hadar L. Grazing management aimed at producing landscape mosaics to restore and enhance biodiversity in Mediterranean ecosystems. Options Méditerranéennes. Ser. A Mediterr. Semin. 2014;(109):437–52.
Hadar L. The native flora in Ramat-Hanadiv. In: Perevolotsky A, editor. Manag. Conserv. Mediterr. Ecosyst. Ramat Hanadiv as a Parable. 1st ed. Ramat Hanadiv; 1989. p. 6–8.
Herranz J, Yanes M, Suárez F. Does photo-monitoring affect nest predation? J. F. Ornithol. [Internet]. Association of Field Ornithologists; 2002 Jan [cited 2015 Feb 10];73(1):97–101. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-73.1.97
Holmes RT, Schultz JC. Food availability for forest birds: effects of prey distribution and abundance on bird foraging. Can. J. Zool. [Internet]. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada ; 1988 Mar [cited 2018 Mar 17];66(3):720–8. Available from: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/10.1139/z88-107
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature. Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.; 2015 Aug;525:100.
Krannitz PG. Abundance and diversityof shrub-steppe birds in encroachment of ponderosa pine IN RELATION TO ENCROACHMENT OF PONDEROSA PINE. Wilson J. Ornithol. [Internet]. Wilson Ornithological Society; 2007 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Apr 14];119(4):655–64. Available from: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1676/06-129.1
Lahti DC. The “edge effect on nest predation” hypothesis after twenty years. Biol. Conserv. 2001;99(3):365–74.
LaManna JA, Hemenway AB, Boccadori V, Martin TE. Bird species turnover is related to changing predation risk along a vegetation gradient. Ecology [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Mar 7];96(6):1670–80. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1890/14-1333.1
Lavi A, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J, Noy-Meir I. Invasion of Pinus halepensis from plantations into adjacent natural habitats. Appl. Veg. Sci. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2016 Oct 19];8(1):85. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1658/1402-2001(2005)008[0085:IOPHFP]2.0.CO;2
Livingston AC, Varner JM, Jules ES, Kane JM, Arguello LA. Prescribed fire and conifer removal promote positive understorey vegetation responses in oak woodlands. J. Appl. Ecol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2016 Oct;53(5):1604–12.
Martin TE. Habitat and Area Effects on Forest Bird Assemblages: Is Nest Predation an Influence? Ecology [Internet]. 1988 Feb 11 [cited 2014 Nov 24];69(1):74. Available from: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.2307/1943162
Masoero G, Maurino L, Rolando A, Chamberlain D. The effect of treeline proximity on predation pressure: an experiment with artificial nests along elevational gradients in the European Alps. Bird Study [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2016 Aug 5 [cited 2016 Aug 9];1–11. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2016.1214106
McCollin D. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography (Cop.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 1998 Jun;21(3):247–60.
Murcia C. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. [Internet]. Elsevier Current Trends; 1995 Feb 1 [cited 2018 Jan 24];10(2):58–62. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534700889776#
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2015 Apr;520(7545):45–50.
Osem Y, Lavi A, Rosenfeld A. Colonization of Pinus halepensis in Mediterranean habitats: Consequences of afforestation, grazing and fire. Biol. Invasions. 2011;13:485–98.
Piper SD, Catterall CP. Effects of edge type and nest height on predation of artificial nests within subtropical Australian eucalypt forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004;203(1):361–72.
R Core team. Computing, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical [Internet]. Vienna, Austria, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
Rabinowitch A. Arboreal plant communities of the Mediterranean ecosystems in Israel. Rotem. 1985;18:5–12.
Richardson D, Rundel P, Price R, Liston A, Strauss S, Millar C, et al. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus [Internet]. David M. Richardson, editor. Cambridge university press; 2000 [cited 2017 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.cambridge.org/il/academic/subjects/life-sciences/ecology-and-conservation/ecology-and-biogeography-pinus?format=PB&isbn=9780521789103
Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. [Internet]. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004 Sep 6 [cited 2016 Oct 4];10(5–6):321–31. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00096.x
Ricklefs RE. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. to Zool. 1969;9(9):1–48.
Schaefer T. Video monitoring of shrub-nests reveals nest predators: Capsule Jays Garrulus glandarius are the most common predators, but carnivorous mammals and some other species also predate nests. Bird Study [Internet]. 2004 Jul [cited 2014 Nov 24];51(2):170–7. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00063650409461349
Schirmel J, Bundschuh M, Entling MH, Kowarik I, Buchholz S. Impacts of invasive plants on resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding types: a global assessment. Glob. Chang. Biol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2016 Feb;22(2):594–603.
Schmidt KA. Foraging Theory as a Conceptual Framework for Studying Nest Predation. Oikos [Internet]. 1999 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 27];85(1):151. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3546801?origin=crossref
Shaw P, Nicholson I. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology - [Internet]. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://books.google.co.il/books?hl=iw&lr=&id=Vj7A9jJrZP0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=coiling+basket+technology+israel&ots=zt30nezDIy&sig=xoky6Asr8j6dLUquACHD3EyxtLk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=coiling&f=false
Shirihai H, Gargallo G, Helbig AJ, Harris A, Kirwan GM, Svensson L. Sylvia warblers. Princeton University Press; 2001.
Shochat E, Abramsky Z, Pinshow B. Breeding bird species diversity in the Negev: effects of scrub fragmentation by planted forests. J. Appl. Ecol. [Internet]. 2002 Apr 20 [cited 2016 May 15];38(5):1135–47. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00667.x
Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright S, Warton D, Wang MY, Rcpp I, et al. Package ‘mvabund.’ Cran R. 2018;
Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI. mvabund– an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol. Evol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012;3(3):471–4.
Wegge P, Ingul H, Pollen VO, Halvorsrud E, Sivkov A V., Hjeljord O. Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests. Ornis Fenn. 2012;89(3):145–56.
Whelan CJ. Foliage structure influance foraging of insectivorous forest birds: an experimental study. Ecology [Internet]. Ecological Society of America; 2001 Jan 1 [cited 2018 Mar 17];82(1):219–31. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0219:FSIFOI]2.0.CO;2/full
Yom-Tov Y. The Effect of Food and Predation on Breeding Density and Success, Clutch Size and Laying Date of the Crow (Corvus corone l.). J. Anim. Ecol. [Internet]. 1974;43(2):479–98. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3378%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org