This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research Article
Ayman Mohamed Alashkar
College of medicine, University of Bisha, KSA- Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-8731
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: Students’ approaches to learning are central to the process of learning. There is strong debate about the efficiency of traditional learning program (TLP) and the integrated learning program (ILP) in medical schools. TLP is easy for the students being passive learners and for the tutors playing the role of sage on the stage. ILP is mainly student centered in which the students are active learners with mentoring of their tutors. It is important to know the perspectives of medical school students about both programs as they used to apply TLP in the 1st year and starting ILP from the 2nd year.
Methodology: This study adopted quantitative research methodology. We addressed the 2nd and 3rd year medical students. Online survey using the Google forms was applied for data collection.
Results: agreement of the integrated program (80.8%) exceeded the traditional (48.5%) especially in improving the communication skills, dealing with new technologies, reinforcement of competencies in the research field, and to less extent for its suitability to be applied in medical schools nowadays, development of desired doctor skills to deal with patients and for provision of good approach for medical practice, and lastly for its suitability to identify and deal with the community needs. There was no statistical significance between both programs regarding support of professionalism values. The disagreement of ILP (19.2%) was much lower than TLP (51.5%).
Conclusion: Integrated learning program becomes an innovative tool for learning in medical schools with very good compliance among the medical students.
Keywords
Traditional, integrated, learning program
Figure 1
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 08 Jun, 2020
Community comments: 8
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research Article
Ayman Mohamed Alashkar
College of medicine, University of Bisha, KSA- Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-8731
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 08 Jun, 2020
Community comments: 8
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Educational Philosophy and Theory
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: Students’ approaches to learning are central to the process of learning. There is strong debate about the efficiency of traditional learning program (TLP) and the integrated learning program (ILP) in medical schools. TLP is easy for the students being passive learners and for the tutors playing the role of sage on the stage. ILP is mainly student centered in which the students are active learners with mentoring of their tutors. It is important to know the perspectives of medical school students about both programs as they used to apply TLP in the 1st year and starting ILP from the 2nd year.
Methodology: This study adopted quantitative research methodology. We addressed the 2nd and 3rd year medical students. Online survey using the Google forms was applied for data collection.
Results: agreement of the integrated program (80.8%) exceeded the traditional (48.5%) especially in improving the communication skills, dealing with new technologies, reinforcement of competencies in the research field, and to less extent for its suitability to be applied in medical schools nowadays, development of desired doctor skills to deal with patients and for provision of good approach for medical practice, and lastly for its suitability to identify and deal with the community needs. There was no statistical significance between both programs regarding support of professionalism values. The disagreement of ILP (19.2%) was much lower than TLP (51.5%).
Conclusion: Integrated learning program becomes an innovative tool for learning in medical schools with very good compliance among the medical students.
Figure 1
Loading...