To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of the vitamin D deficiency in Ukraine to date and the first study of this condition in the Transcarpathian region. Previously, the only countrywide study of vitamin D levels in Ukraine conducted and published in 2010 by Povoroznyuk et al.[9] reported that 81.8% of the Ukrainian population was deficient with levels of 25 (OH)D below 20 ng/ml, while 37.3% had levels below 10 ng/ml. In addition, Povoroznyuk et al.[9] reported that the average level of 25(OH)D in Ukraine was13.87 ng/ml, and the lowest level of 12.61 ng/ml was in western Ukraine, which geographically includes Transcarpathia as the westernmost region of the country. Unfortunately, the times of the year when the blood samples were drawn have not been reported for this study[9].
Overall, our data significantly differs from the results obtained by the other study discussed here; our results suggest the lesser prevalence of vitamin D deficiency than was thought previously. In contrast to the earlier study[9],our results indicate that only 51.74% of the studied population have a deficiency of vitamin D (below 20 ng /ml) in the winter months, and only 12.91% of individuals have levels below 12 ng/ml in Transcarpathia. Moreover, in our sample the mean 25(OH)D concentrations during the winter months was at 20.84 ng/ml, while the annual average was at22.67 ng/ml, almost twice the level previously reported[9].
There may be several reasons for the stark discrepancies in results between the two studies. First, Povoroznyuk et al. [9] reported using the electrochemoluminescent method, polyclonal Vitamin D assay (Roche Diagnostics®, Germany) on Elecsys 2010 analyzer. There were reports in 2011that Roche Diagnostics® withdrew several lots of this particular assay from use referring to the deterioration of the results conformity to the reference method (liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry; LCMSMS), the same studies reported those polyclonal assays tend to lower the actual serum 25(OH)D levels[10]. In contrast, in the current study the samples were tested using the Elecsys assay with a newer generation kit one a different analyzer (Cobas® e411, Roche Diagnostics®, Germany). Second, the season of sample collection can significantly contribute to the difference in our results. The exact difference between seasons cannot be established, because the earlier study did not specify the timing of samples collection[9]. It is unlikely that the climate could account for a large difference, as Transcarpathia has similar average solar activity compared to other regions of Ukraine. The total annual amount of sun exposure in Transcarpathia low lands is around 2,000 hours, while in mountainous areas it is approximately 1,700 hours, which is very similar to the total sun exposure in Ukraine overall (1,700 to 2,400 hours annually) [11].
Given the close geographic proximity of Transcarpathia to other European countries it seems reasonable to compare our findings to those from neighboring countries. The similar values reported for these countries give additional credence to our results. For instance, a recent study in Poland that involved5,775 adults with a mean age of 54.0 ± 15.9 years reported the mean level of 25(OH)D at 18.0 ± 9.6 ng/ml[12]. This study also indicates that 65.8% of the population had a level of 25(OH)D below 20 ng/ml, which is closer to our results (51.74%) than to the earlier study of the Ukrainian population overall (81.8%). In addition, while our results showed lower levels in females in all age groups of adults in almost all months of the year, the study conducted in Poland showed lower levels of vitamin D in men compared to women. Although the authors believe the geographic location plays a minor role in vitamin D status in Poland, this may in fact account for the relatively higher prevalence of the deficiency in Poland (14.06% higher compared to Transcarpathia) because the territory of Poland is located more to the north (52.13° N,21.02° E ) compared to Transcarpathia (48.41°N, 23.29°E). It should be noted that yet a different method of measurement of 25(OH)D was used in this Polish study(Liaison XL system (DiaSorin; CLIA method). The collection of material in this study was conducted from February 14 to March, and from April 28 to May 2, which is considered to be a “low” solar activity season. In the neighboring Slovakia, a study of healthy women aged 25–40 years showed an average level of25(OH)D at32.6 ng/ml[13],which is 10.3 ng/ml above 22.3 ng/ml 25(OH)D of during the year reported for women in Transcarpathia (mean age 39.87 ± 13.22 years). Unfortunately, this study did not account for the season. Similarly, the prevalence of severe vitamin D deficiency in Transcarpathia (12.91% below 12 ng/ml in the winter months) is lower than in Germany [14] and Great Britain[15], but higher than that reported in Spain[16], Italy[17], and France, where a study of 2,007 individuals, in the age ranges 30–54 reported only 5,2%prevalence of vitamin D deficiency below 10 ng/ml [18]. The average level of vitamin 25(OH)D in adult population of Transcarpathia (20.84 ng/ml in the winter months) is the closest to the levels reported in Austria (20.88 ng/ml, adults, age range 21–76 years) and Belgium (19.28 ng/ml, adults, age range 21–69)[19, 20].
The above comparison supports the notion that Ukrainian population has similar levels of vitamin D deficiency compared to its geographical neighbors, and that Transcarpathia may be part of the presumable north-south trend in serum vitamin D, where southern European countries have lower levels than northern European countries, though this trend does not follow the exact pattern (Fig. 2)[7, 12, 14–25].
Limitations
While our study had several limitations that prevented the direct comparisons to others (the method of measurement we used in our study is not the gold standard method for this type of tests, though it shows the correlation with tandem mass-spectrometry of r = 0,89 according to the manufacturer), and can be considered a rough population-based study on vitamin D status in the region, it highlights an important geographical trend that should be further explored and could be useful to aid the development of health care strategies in the region. Unfortunately, while we collected the seasonality data, we did not obtain data on the exact place of residence, and the origin of the people who were included in the study, as well as the information on supplements consumption was self-reported D, all these could be useful covariates in the future investigations.